feat: Add __str__ to Application

[CaedenPH]

About

This pull request is about (X), which does (Y).

Checklist

• I've ran pre-commit to format and lint the change(s) made.
• I've checked to make sure the change(s) work on 3.8.6 and higher.
• This fixes/solves an Issue (If existent):.
  • resolves #
• I've made this pull request for/as: (check all that apply)
  • Documentation
  • Breaking change
  • New feature/enhancement
  • Bugfix

[mAxYoLo01]

Please make sure to track the unstable branch, currently it is the stable one.

[EepyElvyra]

This pull request is about (X), which does (Y).

Also please explain why you want this change since I don't know anything about the intentions of this PR/why the change should be implemented/...

Also, as already mentioned, please target the unstable branch for your pr

[CaedenPH]

This pull request is about (X), which does (Y).

Also please explain why you want this change since I don't know anything about the intentions of this PR/why the change should be implemented/...

Also, as already mentioned, please target the unstable branch for your pr

When printing client.me, a user is left with an unfriendly Application instance, this would mean that it prints the username.

[Catalyst4222]

A better way to give more information about it would be to add a __repr__ to the class, or to the user field. Using __str__ to give information when printing data usually isn't the best way to do it

[Catalyst4222]

A better way to give more information about it would be to add a __repr__ to the class, or to the user field. Using __str__ to give information when printing data usually isn't the best way to do it

attr_utils.field has a repr param, if you set that to True it'll show up when you print it out. When I add id and name to the repr, it prints (in my case) as Application(id=Snowflake(835925027337273354), name='CataBot 2.0'), which is more descriptive without tricking the user into thinking it's a string

[EepyElvyra]

Put repr=True into @define() above the application class as suggested.

Failure to do this within 3 days will resolve the PR being closed (due to inactivity)

[EepyElvyra]

Closing in favour of #1026