chore(workers): declare iii.worker.yaml dependency graph for the 1.0.0 set - #288
Conversation
…0 set Add evidence-based `dependencies:` blocks to the workers in the harness dependency tree and align the harness's own ranges to the coordinated 1.0.0 release. Inter-worker edges use ^1.0.0 (resolve once the whole set ships at 1.0.0); system workers use ^0.19.0. - harness: iii-directory/session-manager/context-manager/llm-router/approval-gate -> ^1.0.0 - iii-directory, session-manager: configuration - context-manager: configuration, llm-router - llm-router: iii-state, configuration - provider-anthropic, provider-openai: iii-state, llm-router - approval-gate: iii-state, configuration, iii-directory, session-manager Cycle-forming edges omitted by design: approval-gate->harness (soft callback) and llm-router->providers (providers self-register). Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013LM3EaciHB9zGF8zRvjzxD
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 39 minutes and 38 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughMultiple worker YAML manifests ( ChangesWorker manifest dependency declarations and harness version bumps
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
skill-check — worker0 verified, 22 skipped (no docs/).
Four for four. Nicely done. |
Deleted obsolete `config.yaml` and `iii-permissions.yaml` files from the llm-router, as they are no longer needed for the current architecture and configuration management. This cleanup helps streamline the codebase and reduce confusion regarding configuration sources.
…andlers The publish step's `collect_worker_interface.py --assert-typed-schemas` (added in #274) rejects functions whose request/response serialize as untyped AnyValue. `directory::on-config-change` and the internal `directory::__on_worker_added` were registered with `serde_json::Value`, producing empty schemas and failing publish. Give each a typed request/response struct deriving `schemars::JsonSchema` (matching the worker's existing `ListPromptsInput {}` convention), so the collected interface carries real schemas. No behavioural change — both handlers still ignore/forward the same fields. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013LM3EaciHB9zGF8zRvjzxD
What
Adds
dependencies:blocks to the seven workers in the harness dependency tree and updates the harness's own dependency ranges, forming the explicit worker dependency graph for the coordinated 1.0.0 release.Dependency graph
System workers (
iii-state,iii-queue,configuration) pinned to^0.19.0; inter-worker edges to^1.0.0.Notes
router::chat/router::models::get,state::*,configuration::*,session::get/session::deleted,engine::functions/workers::list. Test-fixture references (shell::exec,web::fetch) and gated-function data (shell::run) were excluded.router::provider::register).^1.0.0inter-worker ranges become resolvable once the whole set is published at 1.0.0 — merging this commits the workers to the coordinated 1.0.0 release.iii-directory/session-manager/llm-router→context-manager/ providers /approval-gate→harness.https://claude.ai/code/session_013LM3EaciHB9zGF8zRvjzxD
Summary by CodeRabbit