Lift protobuf restriction #683
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. |
|
It seems like the tests just hanged for 6 hours, then were cancelled via timeout. There was no additional logging that I could see. Maybe a transient issue? Maybe trying again would help? |
NathanHB
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2025
hynky1999
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2025
* lift protobuf restriction * fix typos * remove incorrect comment --------- Co-authored-by: Nathan Habib <[email protected]>
NathanHB
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 19, 2025
* lift protobuf restriction * fix typos * remove incorrect comment --------- Co-authored-by: Nathan Habib <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Is it still necessary to use a 3 year-old version of protobuf? I've been trying to integrate with a larger code base, and having trouble with conflicting dependencies. Lifting the restriction fixes that for me.