Use new enums in vizio tests

[davet2001]

Breaking change

Proposed change

Type of change

• Dependency upgrade
• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New integration (thank you!)
• New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
• Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
• Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

• This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
• This PR is related to issue: Depends on Use enums in vizio #61996
• Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

• The code change is tested and works locally.
• Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
• There is no commented out code in this PR.
• I have followed the development checklist
• The code has been formatted using Black (black --fast homeassistant tests)
• Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

• Documentation added/updated for www.home-assistant.io

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

• The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
  Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
• New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
  Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
• For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.
• Untested files have been added to .coveragerc.

The integration reached or maintains the following Integration Quality Scale:

• No score or internal
• 🥈 Silver
• 🥇 Gold
• 🏆 Platinum

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

• I have reviewed two other open pull requests in this repository.

[probot-home-assistant]

Hey there @raman325, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (vizio) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!
_{^{(message by CodeOwnersMention)}}

[epenet]

Please revert the changes to conftest, and mark this PR as draft until the corresponding core PR is merged. There are still some pending questions on the core PR. See #61996

[davet2001]

@epenet Thanks for the review and the comments. Now sorted. I'll leave as draft unless you think it's ready to go ahead.

[davet2001]

The core PR #61996 has been merged now so this should be ok to proceed.

[epenet]

CI is failing at the moment

[davet2001]

CI is failing at the moment

Yes, I noticed after it was too late to sort it out. Will have another look tonight... looks like I need to rebase.

[davet2001]

@epenet should be ok now

[epenet]

LGTM