Use SsdpServiceInfo for SOURCE_SSDP tests (part 4)

[epenet]

Proposed change

Use SsdpServiceInfo for SOURCE_SSDP tests (part 4) as preliminary work for #59931.

They are split out from part 1/2/3 because the __iter__ method needs to be implemented in SsdpServiceInfo (at least temporarily)

Requires parts 2 and 3 to be merged: #60322, #60334
Also needs #60340

Type of change

• Dependency upgrade
• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New integration (thank you!)
• New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
• Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
• Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

• This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
• This PR is related to issue:
• Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

• The code change is tested and works locally.
• Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
• There is no commented out code in this PR.
• I have followed the development checklist
• The code has been formatted using Black (black --fast homeassistant tests)
• Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

• Documentation added/updated for www.home-assistant.io

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

• The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
  Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
• New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
  Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
• For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.
• Untested files have been added to .coveragerc.

The integration reached or maintains the following Integration Quality Scale:

• No score or internal
• 🥈 Silver
• 🥇 Gold
• 🏆 Platinum

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

• I have reviewed two other open pull requests in this repository.

[probot-home-assistant]

Hey there @StevenLooman, @ehendrix23, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (upnp) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!
_{^{(message by CodeOwnersMention)}}

[probot-home-assistant]

Hey there @heythisisnate, @kit-klein, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (konnected) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!
_{^{(message by CodeOwnersMention)}}

[probot-home-assistant]

Hey there @balloob, @frenck, @marcelveldt, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (hue) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!
_{^{(message by CodeOwnersMention)}}

[probot-home-assistant]

Hey there @leofig-rj, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (wilight) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!
_{^{(message by CodeOwnersMention)}}

[probot-home-assistant]

Hey there @ol-iver, @starkillerOG, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (denonavr) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!
_{^{(message by CodeOwnersMention)}}

[epenet]

This also needs #60340 to be merged beforehand.

[bdraco]

Needs a rebase

[epenet]

This should be the last batch for the preliminary work of #59931

[bdraco]

Looks like it needs a tweak
Warning: homeassistant/components/ssdp/__init__.py:168:1: D205 1 blank line required between summary line and description

[epenet]

This is required for in calls like in konnected:

core/homeassistant/components/konnected/config_flow.py

Lines 253 to 256 in fb909ec

	if not any(
	name in discovery_info[ATTR_UPNP_MODEL_NAME]
	for name in KONN_PANEL_MODEL_NAMES
	):

As in https://github.com/home-assistant/core/pull/60334/files#r756924593, this might need to be added to zeroconf/dhcp/usb/mqtt

[bdraco]

We probably should since its a temp measure and the goal is to avoid a breaking change