-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
draft for alternative namespace resolution standard proposal #10
draft for alternative namespace resolution standard proposal #10
Conversation
63ee0d6
to
16a453f
Compare
16a453f
to
eab70cc
Compare
Please, use the number |
HIP-xxxx.md
Outdated
{ | ||
"records": [{ | ||
"type": "NS", | ||
"ns": "0x36fc69f0983E536D1787cC83f481581f22CCA2A1._eth." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is probably going to change as we work on the actual implementation. Let's hold off on merging this HIP until something works ;-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this didn't end up changing with our implementation, so I assume we can merge this now
Is there some standard registry we can use for these network codes so they can be easily looked up / derived programmatically? I remember seeing some list from trezor or something that gets used a lot but can't find it now. E.g. someone might put Not exactly the same but similar to this https://github.com/multiformats/multiaddr |
I think keeping a list in this HIP would be appropriate. I feel like we should be sure to make this standard flexible enough to support more than just delegation to other L1 blockchains, for example being able to delegate to a nameserver that is discoverable via tor. It appears as though this should be possible with the current scheme, but I don't know all of the details in practice. Any other thoughts on what this standard could be used for? |
I see it being expanded to virtual off-network TLDs like |
No description provided.