Repository navigation
Refactor provider implementations into separate modules - #88
Conversation
…ign contract testing Track A — Testgen discovery fix: - Replace func_count with callable_count in dag_test_discovery.rs, broadening the filter from FuncDef-only to all 4 callable item types (FnDef, FuncDef, PatternDef, PipelineDef), mirroring module_has_callable_items() canonical predicate. 59 modules now discovered (up from ~29), 9,710 test fns generated. - Delete 493 lines of redundant hand-written tests (sdlc_handlers, sdlc_worker, sdlc_integration, sdlc_scenario) that compensated for invisible modules. - Audit confirms all other FuncDef-specific filters are correct for their use. Track B — Contract testing design: - Add docs/design/contract-testing.md: problem statement, ContractObligation IR, parameterized test generation, provider compliance wiring. - Add CT-1 through CT-4 task entries in tasks.md. Track C — Provider completion: - Add transport blocks to gcs_claim_store.dag and gcs_outcome_ledger.dag. - Create 4 new provider files: file_signal_store.dag, pubsub_signal_store.dag, gcs_artifact_store.dag, inline_artifact_store.dag (with test blocks). - Update profile bindings in sdlc.dag for local + cloud_run profiles. - Extract inline service definitions from local.dag and cloud_run.dag to dedicated provider files. - Delete dead code stubs from pipelines/sdlc.dag. - Fix project -> project_id variable naming in deploy.dag. Snapshot updates: - Update obligation golden fixtures (w_auth, w_contract_aws, w_contract_azure) to reflect service definitions moving from profile files to provider files. - Update corpus inventory and module graph snapshots for 4 new provider files. https://claude.ai/code/session_01PmLvshGhZGoEvfDdiLawFj
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 05b91c6a67
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| conflict: Bool | ||
| lease_generation: Int | ||
| } | ||
| transport rest { method: PUT, path: "/upload/storage/v1/b/\{bucket\}/o?uploadType=media&name=claims/\{issue_id\}/\{stage\}.json" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bind cloud bucket config for ClaimStore transport
This new REST template introduces a required bucket input (.../b/{bucket}/...), but the active cloud_run profile still binds ClaimStore without any config values (dsl/profiles/sdlc.dag), so no value is wired into the prepare node for this placeholder. In GenericRestPrepareOp, missing non-default inputs trigger the has_missing_required fast-path and the request is marked Skipped, which means acquire/heartbeat/release can silently avoid calling GCS in cloud-run executions.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| updated: Bool | ||
| previous: StageOutcome? | ||
| } | ||
| transport rest { method: PUT, path: "/upload/storage/v1/b/\{bucket\}/o?uploadType=media&name=outcomes/\{run_key\}/\{stage\}.json" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bind cloud bucket config for OutcomeLedger transport
Like ClaimStore, this new REST path now depends on bucket (.../b/{bucket}/...), but cloud_run still binds OutcomeLedger without providing config in dsl/profiles/sdlc.dag. Because the operation inputs do not define bucket, the prepare step sees a missing required field and returns Skipped (via GenericRestPrepareOp), so upsert/get/list_by_issue can be skipped instead of hitting the ledger backend under the cloud-run profile.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Resolved 4 conflicts: - s2_credential_chain_gcp.json: take our readonly_targets:3 + main's total_obligations:82 - daglang-lower/src/lib.rs: take main's `mod tests;` (RT32 extraction), update readonly assertion in tests.rs - resolve_service.rs: take main's `requires_auth = true` pattern (postmortem hardening) - tasks.md: take main's structure, add RT49-RT57 (contract testing & derivation queue) Snapshot fixes: workflows.makegen 2→5, add std.virtual_io:1 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…eletion Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…rker brief Pre-staged execution brief per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker brief path (no canvas — design-lock at docs/design-lens-application- surface.md specifies fixture shape verbatim at line 292). 7 same-slice acceptance gates: fixture program (O(n²) body + Enforce O(log n) budget) + TestClaim assertion + diagnostic structural validation + no regression on T-LBP cementing + bootstrap regen + clippy + §1.8 #92 advancement. Hard prerequisites STOP-and-PING: T-LAS Slice A landed (gates #88-#91) AND T-LBP complexity-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE (gate #79). Worker does not author against partial substrate. Sibling demos #1953 (CRDT cost) + #1954 (memory-peak cost) share the same hard-prerequisite + TestClaim shape pattern — could dispatch as 3 sequential PRs or single multi-demo PR (worker's call at dispatch). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…briefs (#2117) * docs(briefs): Substrate bridge SourceSpan.file participation retirement worker brief Authored for gunbc#1958 Substrate-owned bridge slice. Targets audit-row #2 (kernel Bool patch BOOL_TYPES_FILE) + row #6 (pipeline authority PIPELINE_AUTHORITY_FILE) per r3-program-plan.md §5 line 353 scope-narrowing. Sibling #1959 closed as already-retired by PR #1272. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 Variant-aware projection carrier canvas (#1947) Surfaces 3 carrier-shape options (α RestResponseProjection variant-tag / β Declaration variant_projection_metadata / γ free-standing CoproductProjection) for Director ratification before worker brief authoring. Mgr-tier recommendation = γ (DeclarationRef-keyed, avoids tag-string-as-identity bridge). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — same-slice prerequisite + section anchor Director calibration (gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-...): 1. Promote ratchet-test cross-Mgr handoff from conditional Acceptance #4 to upfront same-slice BLOCKING prerequisite gate (per feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline). 2. Replace `r3-program-plan.md:353` line-cite with `§5 Y4 scope-clarification` section anchor (per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers). Code-line anchors in bootstrap.rs left as-is (anchor sites worker navigates to). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — umbrella stays Open per P2 ledger discipline Address BLOCKING inline review at line 46: bridge_source_span_file_participation_retired is an Open umbrella whose green predicate is "no production code path consults SourceSpan.file" per r3-structure.md:115. Partial retirement was explicitly rejected 2026-04-29 (Director acceptance #1130 / dispatch #1139). Changes: - Add Ledger-discipline preamble: umbrella row stays Open; receipt updates audit-packet enumeration, NOT bridge_ledger.dag. - Acceptance #3 reframed: do NOT mutate bridge_ledger.dag; mark rows #2 + #6 retired in the audit packet only. - Authority anchor updated: status=Open (not Proposed); add r3-structure.md:115 + bridge_ledger.dag:125-129 line refs. - Cross-Mgr section reframed: umbrella ratchet cannot flip on this PR alone; Verification's ledger-zero audit progress field is post-merge tracking, not a same-slice pre-merge blocker. Reconciles with BLOCKING finding (Director calibration #1 assumed umbrella ratchet could flip on partial retirement, which r3-structure.md:115 forbids). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 CoproductProjection worker brief — γ ratified (#1947) Director ratification of option γ at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394369848. Free-standing CoproductProjection carrier in src/v3/std/, DeclarationRef-keyed, typed WireTagValue leaf, 4 same-slice acceptance gates. Surfaces 3 substrate observations for STOP-and-PING (DeclarationRef String alias; FieldRef does-not-exist-at-HEAD; tag_field String asymmetry) — worker must escalate, not silently work around. PB Mgr cross-Mgr ping at carrier landing (heads-up, not blocker). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — resolve Acceptance #4 / Cross-Mgr contradiction openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at PR #2079 #issuecomment-... flagged Acceptance #4 ("ratchet test passes ... confirmed-present at HEAD before merge") contradicting the reframed Cross-Mgr section ("No same-slice ratchet-test gate applies; post-merge tracking only"). Both said different things about whether the umbrella ratchet is a pre-merge blocker. Resolution: Acceptance #4 reframed to explicitly state "No umbrella-ratchet pre-merge gate" — worker does NOT wait for Verification ratchet authoring; acceptance for this slice is the audit-packet receipt update in #3. Cross-Mgr handoff also updated to remove "ratchet authoring" from Verification's same-slice duties. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): S5 brief — absorb Director pre-ratifications for 3 STOP-and-PING items Director pre-ratified dispositions at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394416049: 1. DeclarationRef alias: accept (b) + debt note (re-escalate only on same-slice break) 2. FieldRef: grep-decide between InputFieldRef-as-specialization vs rename 3. tag_field String asymmetry: typed introduction + debt note for migration Worker proceeds without re-pinging unless evidence forces escalation. STOP-criteria section narrowed accordingly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification Gate A receipt — Option A (Dag-as-carrier) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394427814 + proposal merge at PR #2096 (commit fec8692): src/v3/std/substrate.dag::Dag IS the reflected program; no new substrate carrier required. ReflectedProgram<T> rejected. Gate A patches: 1. r3-program-plan.md §10.3: new Q-Reification row marked RATIFIED with PR #2096 merge link + Gate A receipt scope (this PR + #1960 closed-as-non-addition). 2. r3-v-pattern-a-tc1-v1-worker.md: 3 sites — status header (Q-Reification CLEARED, Branch B η non-vacuity remains), worker-pin gate, E6-G1.a/E3 producer dependency. Replaces ReflectedProgram<T> with consumer-wiring nuance: lens fold consumes Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator. 3. r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md: 2 sites — same nuance: deferred work is consumer-wiring, NOT a separate carrier. 4. r3-pr-e8-w1-producer-contract-test-plan-worker.md: 1 site — fold-over-Dag reframe. Receipt of pass-by-construction: this PR adds NO new .dag declaration to src/v3/std/. The ratification is structurally a non-addition (Option A correctness proof per same-slice dissolution discipline). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — delete superseded canvas + name dissolution trigger for tag_field asymmetry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings (P2 single-authority + P5 dissolution trigger). Fixes: 1. Delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-s5-variant-aware-projection-carrier-canvas.md (superseded by the γ-ratified worker brief in same PR; would otherwise leave two current-looking S5 status authorities post-merge — one saying ratification pending, one saying γ ratified). 2. Substrate observation #3 (tag_field String/FieldRef asymmetry) now carries a binding named dissolution trigger: when FieldRef exists as top-level carrier AND InputFieldRef is classified, migrate InternallyTaggedObject.tag_field via follow-on Substrate hygiene PR. Worker MUST add debt-paydown row to authoritative debt ledger before merging carrier-introduction PR. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification row — fix invariant cite (C-1 → P2) cursor review at gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-... flagged C-1 as mis-keyed: INVARIANTS.md C-1 is "missing args fail closed; no LitNull sentinels" (P3 fail-closed family), not parallel-representation/duplicate-authority. The correct cite for rejecting a parallel ReflectedProgram<T> alongside Dag is P2 single authority (INVARIANTS.md line 148: cost of change is proportional to how many files encode the same fact). Cite updated to "INVARIANTS.md P2 single authority" with inline gloss. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — name dissolution trigger for DeclarationRef alias debt openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: substrate observation #1 had desired endpoint ("future structural promotion of DeclarationRef") but no checkable dissolution trigger — same P5 gap that #3 (tag_field asymmetry) had been fixed for in commit 2601d7d. Trigger now binding: promote DeclarationRef when EITHER (a) audit-row #14 (declaration_name_preference_rank / declaration_by_name rank-table) closes — dsl/std ↔ src/v3/std module convergence makes name-keyed identity unambiguous and structural module identity available, OR (b) any DeclarationRef-typed consumer surfaces a string-identity bridge per feedback_opaque_strings_attract_heuristics (heuristic patching, naming- convention dispatch, suffix/prefix matching). Worker MUST add debt-paydown row before merging carrier-introduction PR (same pattern as the tag_field debt requirement). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: complete Q-Reification stale-cite sweep — e6-g1a brief :169 + Q-PAFS row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md:169 still said TC1/V1 "waits for Q-Reification and the carrier landing", contradicting the same brief's lines 15-19 + 148-153 saying Dag IS the carrier and no separate carrier lands. Fixed: 1. e6-g1a brief line 167-170 paragraph: clarified V1 waits for consumer-wiring work (lens fold consuming Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator), NOT for a carrier-introduction. 2. r3-program-plan.md:954 Q-PAFS row text was the same shape: "Resume after Q-Reification + ReflectedProgram<T>" — contradicted my new Q-Reification row in the same diff. Updated: Q-Reification STOP CLEARED 2026-05-07 (Option A); remaining hold = Branch B η non-vacuity only. Out-of-scope-for-this-PR: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-feasibility-probe.md contains 4 stale cites but is not modified in this PR; stale-on-main can be swept in a follow-up if needed (single source of truth is the e6-g1a-static-lens worker brief, not the feasibility probe per Q-PAFS Path A acceptance). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix InputFieldRef mis-read; reframe observations #2 + #3 codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079 line 22: my brief mis-read services.dag:28-36. The text actually says "No separate InputFieldRef carrier is introduced here, since ParamToken.name already carries the same shape and adding a wrapper would duplicate without strengthening the structural invariant" — i.e., InputFieldRef does NOT exist; the comment REJECTS the wrapper. Fixes: 1. Substrate observation #2 reframed: no FieldRef-shaped carrier exists at HEAD; services.dag:28-36 precedent argues against wrapper unless it strengthens structural invariant. New (a)/(b) STOP-and-PING: (a) follow services.dag precedent — wire_tag_field: String + key invariant on wire_tag_values + fixture-load fail-closed check; (b) introduce typed FieldRef — must justify per "duplicate without strengthening" test. 2. Carrier shape (line 19): wire_tag_field: FieldRef → {String|FieldRef} pending observation #2 resolution. 3. Substrate observation #3 reframed: InternallyTaggedObject asymmetry is conditional on path (b); under path (a) no asymmetry exists. Trigger correspondingly conditional. Removed stale "InputFieldRef classified" trigger clause. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — consolidate split per-variant maps into single keyed entry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: CoproductProjection shape split per-variant data across two parallel maps (variant_field_projections + wire_tag_values), admitting illegal states where keysets drift (P2 boundary discipline / illegal-states-unrepresentable). Fix: introduce CoproductVariantProjection { field_projection, wire_tag_value } as the per-variant keyed value; CoproductProjection.variant_projections becomes Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection>. Single keyed authority per variant. Director's binding constraint #2 enumerated the two fields separately but said "refine in implementation as ergonomics demand" — consolidation preserves the substantive constraints (typed WireTagValue leaf, structural per-variant projection) while enforcing keyset alignment by carrier shape. Empty-payload variants encoded via FieldProjection::Empty constructor (or analog), not via map-absence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix stale split-map vocab in path (a) + scope STOP-and-PING umbrella openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings. 1. Path (a) at line 43 still referenced "Map<VariantId, WireTagValue> key invariant on wire_tag_values" — that's the superseded split-map vocab; the consolidated shape is Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection> on variant_projections. Path (a) now references the consolidated map; per-variant WireTagValue lives inside CoproductVariantProjection. 2. Pre-ratification umbrella at line 36 said "all 3 dispositions pre-ratified, proceed without re-pinging" — but observation #2 was re-opened after the codex InputFieldRef finding and explicitly says STOP-and-PING. Contradictory. Umbrella now scoped: observations #1 + #3 are pre-ratified; #2 is re-opened STOP-and-PING — worker MUST escalate before choosing path (a) vs (b). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof canvas — 4-residual coproduct-dissolution audit Director ratified split disposition at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394696074: descent_execution_proof STANDS ALONE (consumer-side termination-contract substrate function with fail-closed residual enumeration; folding into T-E-P-Producer-Broadening explicitly rejected — different concern axis). Canvas surfaces 3 carrier-shape options for the residual enumeration per Director's coproduct-dissolution audit suggestion: α: 4-variant coproduct verbatim from §10.3 row 966 (Missing | Unknown | Incomplete | NonStrict) β: 3-axis dimensional product (presence × completeness × strictness) γ (recommended): reuse DescentEvidence at termination.dag:14-17 for "absent/unknown" via EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) payload-variant + separate EvidenceIncomplete — ratchets variant count 4 → 2 via dimensional folding while honoring services.dag "no parallel wrapper" precedent. Mgr recommendation γ; β rejected unless 3 axes provably compose orthogonally. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan brief Row #6 — derive from bootstrap_authority map, no new enum variant codex BLOCKING (post-merge of #2079, on commit 85ceb85 — same brief is now on main): my Row #6 disposition told the worker to introduce a new BootstrapAuthority::Pipeline variant ("extend the enum if needed"). That violates P2 single-authority — src/v3/std/bootstrap_authority.dag:90 already has "src/v3/compiler/pipeline.dag": CompilerAuthority, classifying pipeline.dag under the existing CompilerAuthority variant. The :14-17 comment is explicit: "the path itself is the BootstrapAuthoritySet map key; variants carry no duplicate path payload" — single authority, not extension-by-variant. Fix: Row #6 now instructs worker to derive the typed key from the existing bootstrap_authority-map witness (BootstrapAuthorityKey threading the existing CompilerAuthority classifier), refining the constructor surface if needed — NOT introducing a new enum variant. STOP-and-PING criteria updated to forbid new-variant resolution under any path. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof worker brief — γ ratified (2-variant residual) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395060514: - DescentResidual = EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) | EvidenceIncomplete (4 → 2 dissolution: Missing+Unknown fold via DescentUnknown injection; NonStrict folds via NonIncreasing wrap; Incomplete retained — different concern axis from evidence-lattice) - DescentEvidence 3-variant lattice at termination.dag:14-17 confirmed as authoritative composition target - Type signature from §10.3 row 966 confirmed verbatim-binding Director-asked canvas-shape verification absorbed: worker STOPs if EvidenceIncomplete decomposes into payload-variants (timeout / depth-bound / evaluator-error-during-proof-construction); proceeds as 2-variant otherwise. 7 same-slice acceptance gates incl Evaluator E2 #1971 consumer wiring in same PR + §10.3 row 966 row-text refresh to cite γ-disposition. Worker pin: quick-koi-190 (pre-authorized per §10.3 row 966). Auto-spawn HOLD per L-sized threshold; surgical-recreate path ratified case-by-case if critical path blocked. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — narrow EvidenceUnknown payload via NonStrictEvidence subset; delete superseded canvas openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2105: 2 findings. 1. BLOCKING (LAYER MODEL / illegal states unrepresentable): worker brief shape `EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence)` admitted EvidenceUnknown(Strict) even though the canvas itself acknowledged Strict-isn't-a-residual as illegal. P2 requires API-level enforcement, not prose convention. Fix: introduce typed subset `NonStrictEvidence = NonIncreasing | DescentUnknown`; residual now `EvidenceUnknown(NonStrictEvidence)` — illegal-states-unrepresentable by construction. NonStrictEvidence lands in same file as DescentResidual; composes with existing 3-variant DescentEvidence via inhabitation, not re-definition. 2. NON-BLOCKING (live-state drift): canvas + worker brief both visible with "ratification needed" vs "ratified" status — same P2 single-authority shape as the S5 canvas/worker-brief co-existence at #2079. Fix: delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-descent-execution-proof-canvas.md (worker brief frontmatter already names it as superseded; with canvas gone the live authority is unambiguous). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — section-anchor cite for §10.3 row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2105 line 47: my brief cited "§10.3 row 966" but the actual line is now 986 (after my Q-Reification row insert in PR #2079 shifted §10.3 by 20 lines). Reviewer's "no such section" claim is wrong on substance (file + section + row all exist) but the line drift IS real. Fix per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers (Director calibration in gunbc#2079): replaced all "§10.3 row 966" with "§10.3 Q-EVAL-Descent- Termination-Contract row" — name-anchor instead of line-anchor, drift-immune. 5 occurrences cleaned (closure predicate, acceptance gate #3, gate #5, STOP criterion, worker pin justification). Stylistic "row row-text" repetition collapsed to "row text". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition canvas — Lens<SymbolicCost> composition shape (#1957) Pre-staged per Director endorsement of T-CostLens-Composition canvas-shape authoring. Surfaces 3 composition options for the Lens<SymbolicCost> instance: α: two separate lenses, externally joined — REJECTED (violates §1.8 gate #39 no_coercion_cost_dimension by construction) β: single Lens<SymbolicCost> with composed witness in read — strong but requires Lens<C> carrier-shape refactor (target-context threading) γ (recommended): Lens<SymbolicCost> reads structural cost via algebra-fold + target-realization composed via existing Lookup<SymbolicCost> substrate at lookup.dag:48-60 — preserves generic Lens<C> carrier; satisfies all 4 §1.8 gates (#37-40) by construction; aligns with feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first Adjacent substrate verified at HEAD: lens.dag:70-77 (Lens<C>), algebra.dag:12+ (SymbolicCost 7-variant + Semiring), lookup.dag:48-60 (Lookup<SymbolicCost> + MissingCost lens-boundary). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-Workflow-As-Data canvas — audit-receipt-honoring scope-narrowing Pre-staged per Director endorsement. Q-Workflow-As-Data-Carriers (§10.3 row 983) named 5 carriers; grep-verified at HEAD that 4 of 5 ALREADY EXIST in dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (218 lines). Only WorkflowSecret<Name> is wholly net-new substrate. Surfaces 3 options: α: maximalist 5-carrier introduction in dsl/std/workflow.dag — REJECTED (admits parallel-representation debt vs audit-receipt #1771 reuse-first directive) β (recommended): minimalist — only WorkflowSecret<Name> + Cron<Schedule> refinement net-new; lens consumes extdeps.github.actions directly. Honors feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first. γ: like β + WorkflowObservationAnchor for typed lens-consumption-shape; natural ratchet from β if evidence accumulates. Sequencing: dispatch-ready post-T-LBP COMPLETE per §S4 design-schedule:95; brief authoring lands in advance per pre-staging discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition worker brief — γ ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775: - γ option ratified (Lens<SymbolicCost> + Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition) - Lens<C> generic at lens.dag:70-77 confirmed authoritative (no refactor in scope) - symbolic_cost_dimension: AnalysisDimension<SymbolicCost> defers to separate Dimensions sub-lane Critical reframing absorbed: src/v3/lenses/cost.dag ALREADY EXISTS (status: STRUCTURALLY TERMINAL; BEHAVIORALLY PROXY). T-CostLens-Composition is behavioral-completion + target-realization-wiring, NOT P1 carrier introduction. Worker reads existing lens; advances PROXY → BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE via Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition. 8 same-slice acceptance gates incl §1.8 #37-40 + #70 demonstration + lens status header refresh + §10.3 row text refresh. Out-of-scope (deferred per Director): symbolic_cost_dimension; Lens<C> generic refactor (STOP-and-PING if implementation reveals need). Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (same precedent as S5 + descent_execution_proof canvas deletions). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Delete superseded T-CostLens canvas (worker brief is single live authority) * docs(briefs): T-WAD Slice 1 worker brief — β ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395945465: 4 asks confirmed: 1. β ratified (minimalist reuse-first) 2. #1771 audit-receipt binding precedent confirmed 3. WorkflowSecret<Name> folds into dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (provider- specific scope; NOT new dsl/std/ file unless cross-provider evidence) 4. §1.8 gates #54 + #55 split into separate slices (slice 2 = timing-and-pattern; slice 3 = ci_workflow_modeled_as_dag) Slice 1 net-new substrate (only): - WorkflowSecret<Name> + SecretScope carriers - CronExpression + CronField (typed refinement of existing WorkflowTrigger::Schedule { cron: String } at actions.dag:43) Other 4 carriers from §10.3 row 983 reused as-is from extdeps.github.actions per audit-receipt #1771 directive. 6 same-slice acceptance gates incl no-parallel-representation grep + gate #53/#62/#63 advancement + bootstrap regen + clippy. Cross-provider STOP-and-PING per Director ask #3 caveat: worker greps adjacent provider work for WorkflowSecret-shape evidence; surfaces if found before finalizing fold-into-extdeps. Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (S5 + descent_execution_proof + T-CostLens precedent). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demo (#1952) complexity-contract compile-error worker brief Pre-staged execution brief per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker brief path (no canvas — design-lock at docs/design-lens-application- surface.md specifies fixture shape verbatim at line 292). 7 same-slice acceptance gates: fixture program (O(n²) body + Enforce O(log n) budget) + TestClaim assertion + diagnostic structural validation + no regression on T-LBP cementing + bootstrap regen + clippy + §1.8 #92 advancement. Hard prerequisites STOP-and-PING: T-LAS Slice A landed (gates #88-#91) AND T-LBP complexity-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE (gate #79). Worker does not author against partial substrate. Sibling demos #1953 (CRDT cost) + #1954 (memory-peak cost) share the same hard-prerequisite + TestClaim shape pattern — could dispatch as 3 sequential PRs or single multi-demo PR (worker's call at dispatch). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demos #1953 + #1954 — cost-basis sibling worker brief Pre-staged sibling brief covering both cost-basis demos (CRDT cost basis + memory-peak cost basis) per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker-brief path. Single brief for two demos because they share: - Hard-prerequisite pattern (T-LAS Slice A + T-LBP cost-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE) - TestClaim + Diagnostic structural validation shape - apply_lens(cost, ...) Enforce mode Sibling of #1952 brief (complexity-contract compile-error). Worker's call at dispatch on multi-demo PR vs sequential PRs (Mgr ratification needed if going multi-demo). #1953 (CRDT) substrate per design §4.2 + cost-basis-declaration audit at docs/audit/t-user-authored-cost-basis-discipline-worked-examples.md. #1954 (memory-peak) substrate per design §4.3; STOP-and-PING if Dimension<SymbolicCost> substrate (deferred to Dimensions sub-lane per Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775) not yet landed. 6 same-slice acceptance gates per demo + same STOP-and-PING discipline as #1952. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
… gates #88-#91) Slice A receipt for T-Lens-Application-Surface: lands the parametric substrate carriers from `docs/design-lens-application-surface.md` §2. Refresh the parse-corpus manifest for the new file and advance gates #88-#91 to CONSUMER_LANDED in `docs/r3-program-plan.md` §1.8. Per-lens `EnforceableLens` / `LensEnforcement` data instances + fold-pass execution land in Slice B (#1952 / #1953 / #1954) — they consume this landing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…reate) (#2158) * docs(briefs): Substrate bridge SourceSpan.file participation retirement worker brief Authored for gunbc#1958 Substrate-owned bridge slice. Targets audit-row #2 (kernel Bool patch BOOL_TYPES_FILE) + row #6 (pipeline authority PIPELINE_AUTHORITY_FILE) per r3-program-plan.md §5 line 353 scope-narrowing. Sibling #1959 closed as already-retired by PR #1272. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 Variant-aware projection carrier canvas (#1947) Surfaces 3 carrier-shape options (α RestResponseProjection variant-tag / β Declaration variant_projection_metadata / γ free-standing CoproductProjection) for Director ratification before worker brief authoring. Mgr-tier recommendation = γ (DeclarationRef-keyed, avoids tag-string-as-identity bridge). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — same-slice prerequisite + section anchor Director calibration (gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-...): 1. Promote ratchet-test cross-Mgr handoff from conditional Acceptance #4 to upfront same-slice BLOCKING prerequisite gate (per feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline). 2. Replace `r3-program-plan.md:353` line-cite with `§5 Y4 scope-clarification` section anchor (per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers). Code-line anchors in bootstrap.rs left as-is (anchor sites worker navigates to). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — umbrella stays Open per P2 ledger discipline Address BLOCKING inline review at line 46: bridge_source_span_file_participation_retired is an Open umbrella whose green predicate is "no production code path consults SourceSpan.file" per r3-structure.md:115. Partial retirement was explicitly rejected 2026-04-29 (Director acceptance #1130 / dispatch #1139). Changes: - Add Ledger-discipline preamble: umbrella row stays Open; receipt updates audit-packet enumeration, NOT bridge_ledger.dag. - Acceptance #3 reframed: do NOT mutate bridge_ledger.dag; mark rows #2 + #6 retired in the audit packet only. - Authority anchor updated: status=Open (not Proposed); add r3-structure.md:115 + bridge_ledger.dag:125-129 line refs. - Cross-Mgr section reframed: umbrella ratchet cannot flip on this PR alone; Verification's ledger-zero audit progress field is post-merge tracking, not a same-slice pre-merge blocker. Reconciles with BLOCKING finding (Director calibration #1 assumed umbrella ratchet could flip on partial retirement, which r3-structure.md:115 forbids). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 CoproductProjection worker brief — γ ratified (#1947) Director ratification of option γ at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394369848. Free-standing CoproductProjection carrier in src/v3/std/, DeclarationRef-keyed, typed WireTagValue leaf, 4 same-slice acceptance gates. Surfaces 3 substrate observations for STOP-and-PING (DeclarationRef String alias; FieldRef does-not-exist-at-HEAD; tag_field String asymmetry) — worker must escalate, not silently work around. PB Mgr cross-Mgr ping at carrier landing (heads-up, not blocker). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — resolve Acceptance #4 / Cross-Mgr contradiction openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at PR #2079 #issuecomment-... flagged Acceptance #4 ("ratchet test passes ... confirmed-present at HEAD before merge") contradicting the reframed Cross-Mgr section ("No same-slice ratchet-test gate applies; post-merge tracking only"). Both said different things about whether the umbrella ratchet is a pre-merge blocker. Resolution: Acceptance #4 reframed to explicitly state "No umbrella-ratchet pre-merge gate" — worker does NOT wait for Verification ratchet authoring; acceptance for this slice is the audit-packet receipt update in #3. Cross-Mgr handoff also updated to remove "ratchet authoring" from Verification's same-slice duties. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): S5 brief — absorb Director pre-ratifications for 3 STOP-and-PING items Director pre-ratified dispositions at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394416049: 1. DeclarationRef alias: accept (b) + debt note (re-escalate only on same-slice break) 2. FieldRef: grep-decide between InputFieldRef-as-specialization vs rename 3. tag_field String asymmetry: typed introduction + debt note for migration Worker proceeds without re-pinging unless evidence forces escalation. STOP-criteria section narrowed accordingly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification Gate A receipt — Option A (Dag-as-carrier) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394427814 + proposal merge at PR #2096 (commit fec8692): src/v3/std/substrate.dag::Dag IS the reflected program; no new substrate carrier required. ReflectedProgram<T> rejected. Gate A patches: 1. r3-program-plan.md §10.3: new Q-Reification row marked RATIFIED with PR #2096 merge link + Gate A receipt scope (this PR + #1960 closed-as-non-addition). 2. r3-v-pattern-a-tc1-v1-worker.md: 3 sites — status header (Q-Reification CLEARED, Branch B η non-vacuity remains), worker-pin gate, E6-G1.a/E3 producer dependency. Replaces ReflectedProgram<T> with consumer-wiring nuance: lens fold consumes Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator. 3. r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md: 2 sites — same nuance: deferred work is consumer-wiring, NOT a separate carrier. 4. r3-pr-e8-w1-producer-contract-test-plan-worker.md: 1 site — fold-over-Dag reframe. Receipt of pass-by-construction: this PR adds NO new .dag declaration to src/v3/std/. The ratification is structurally a non-addition (Option A correctness proof per same-slice dissolution discipline). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — delete superseded canvas + name dissolution trigger for tag_field asymmetry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings (P2 single-authority + P5 dissolution trigger). Fixes: 1. Delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-s5-variant-aware-projection-carrier-canvas.md (superseded by the γ-ratified worker brief in same PR; would otherwise leave two current-looking S5 status authorities post-merge — one saying ratification pending, one saying γ ratified). 2. Substrate observation #3 (tag_field String/FieldRef asymmetry) now carries a binding named dissolution trigger: when FieldRef exists as top-level carrier AND InputFieldRef is classified, migrate InternallyTaggedObject.tag_field via follow-on Substrate hygiene PR. Worker MUST add debt-paydown row to authoritative debt ledger before merging carrier-introduction PR. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification row — fix invariant cite (C-1 → P2) cursor review at gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-... flagged C-1 as mis-keyed: INVARIANTS.md C-1 is "missing args fail closed; no LitNull sentinels" (P3 fail-closed family), not parallel-representation/duplicate-authority. The correct cite for rejecting a parallel ReflectedProgram<T> alongside Dag is P2 single authority (INVARIANTS.md line 148: cost of change is proportional to how many files encode the same fact). Cite updated to "INVARIANTS.md P2 single authority" with inline gloss. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — name dissolution trigger for DeclarationRef alias debt openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: substrate observation #1 had desired endpoint ("future structural promotion of DeclarationRef") but no checkable dissolution trigger — same P5 gap that #3 (tag_field asymmetry) had been fixed for in commit 2601d7d. Trigger now binding: promote DeclarationRef when EITHER (a) audit-row #14 (declaration_name_preference_rank / declaration_by_name rank-table) closes — dsl/std ↔ src/v3/std module convergence makes name-keyed identity unambiguous and structural module identity available, OR (b) any DeclarationRef-typed consumer surfaces a string-identity bridge per feedback_opaque_strings_attract_heuristics (heuristic patching, naming- convention dispatch, suffix/prefix matching). Worker MUST add debt-paydown row before merging carrier-introduction PR (same pattern as the tag_field debt requirement). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: complete Q-Reification stale-cite sweep — e6-g1a brief :169 + Q-PAFS row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md:169 still said TC1/V1 "waits for Q-Reification and the carrier landing", contradicting the same brief's lines 15-19 + 148-153 saying Dag IS the carrier and no separate carrier lands. Fixed: 1. e6-g1a brief line 167-170 paragraph: clarified V1 waits for consumer-wiring work (lens fold consuming Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator), NOT for a carrier-introduction. 2. r3-program-plan.md:954 Q-PAFS row text was the same shape: "Resume after Q-Reification + ReflectedProgram<T>" — contradicted my new Q-Reification row in the same diff. Updated: Q-Reification STOP CLEARED 2026-05-07 (Option A); remaining hold = Branch B η non-vacuity only. Out-of-scope-for-this-PR: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-feasibility-probe.md contains 4 stale cites but is not modified in this PR; stale-on-main can be swept in a follow-up if needed (single source of truth is the e6-g1a-static-lens worker brief, not the feasibility probe per Q-PAFS Path A acceptance). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix InputFieldRef mis-read; reframe observations #2 + #3 codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079 line 22: my brief mis-read services.dag:28-36. The text actually says "No separate InputFieldRef carrier is introduced here, since ParamToken.name already carries the same shape and adding a wrapper would duplicate without strengthening the structural invariant" — i.e., InputFieldRef does NOT exist; the comment REJECTS the wrapper. Fixes: 1. Substrate observation #2 reframed: no FieldRef-shaped carrier exists at HEAD; services.dag:28-36 precedent argues against wrapper unless it strengthens structural invariant. New (a)/(b) STOP-and-PING: (a) follow services.dag precedent — wire_tag_field: String + key invariant on wire_tag_values + fixture-load fail-closed check; (b) introduce typed FieldRef — must justify per "duplicate without strengthening" test. 2. Carrier shape (line 19): wire_tag_field: FieldRef → {String|FieldRef} pending observation #2 resolution. 3. Substrate observation #3 reframed: InternallyTaggedObject asymmetry is conditional on path (b); under path (a) no asymmetry exists. Trigger correspondingly conditional. Removed stale "InputFieldRef classified" trigger clause. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — consolidate split per-variant maps into single keyed entry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: CoproductProjection shape split per-variant data across two parallel maps (variant_field_projections + wire_tag_values), admitting illegal states where keysets drift (P2 boundary discipline / illegal-states-unrepresentable). Fix: introduce CoproductVariantProjection { field_projection, wire_tag_value } as the per-variant keyed value; CoproductProjection.variant_projections becomes Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection>. Single keyed authority per variant. Director's binding constraint #2 enumerated the two fields separately but said "refine in implementation as ergonomics demand" — consolidation preserves the substantive constraints (typed WireTagValue leaf, structural per-variant projection) while enforcing keyset alignment by carrier shape. Empty-payload variants encoded via FieldProjection::Empty constructor (or analog), not via map-absence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix stale split-map vocab in path (a) + scope STOP-and-PING umbrella openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings. 1. Path (a) at line 43 still referenced "Map<VariantId, WireTagValue> key invariant on wire_tag_values" — that's the superseded split-map vocab; the consolidated shape is Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection> on variant_projections. Path (a) now references the consolidated map; per-variant WireTagValue lives inside CoproductVariantProjection. 2. Pre-ratification umbrella at line 36 said "all 3 dispositions pre-ratified, proceed without re-pinging" — but observation #2 was re-opened after the codex InputFieldRef finding and explicitly says STOP-and-PING. Contradictory. Umbrella now scoped: observations #1 + #3 are pre-ratified; #2 is re-opened STOP-and-PING — worker MUST escalate before choosing path (a) vs (b). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof canvas — 4-residual coproduct-dissolution audit Director ratified split disposition at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394696074: descent_execution_proof STANDS ALONE (consumer-side termination-contract substrate function with fail-closed residual enumeration; folding into T-E-P-Producer-Broadening explicitly rejected — different concern axis). Canvas surfaces 3 carrier-shape options for the residual enumeration per Director's coproduct-dissolution audit suggestion: α: 4-variant coproduct verbatim from §10.3 row 966 (Missing | Unknown | Incomplete | NonStrict) β: 3-axis dimensional product (presence × completeness × strictness) γ (recommended): reuse DescentEvidence at termination.dag:14-17 for "absent/unknown" via EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) payload-variant + separate EvidenceIncomplete — ratchets variant count 4 → 2 via dimensional folding while honoring services.dag "no parallel wrapper" precedent. Mgr recommendation γ; β rejected unless 3 axes provably compose orthogonally. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan brief Row #6 — derive from bootstrap_authority map, no new enum variant codex BLOCKING (post-merge of #2079, on commit 85ceb85 — same brief is now on main): my Row #6 disposition told the worker to introduce a new BootstrapAuthority::Pipeline variant ("extend the enum if needed"). That violates P2 single-authority — src/v3/std/bootstrap_authority.dag:90 already has "src/v3/compiler/pipeline.dag": CompilerAuthority, classifying pipeline.dag under the existing CompilerAuthority variant. The :14-17 comment is explicit: "the path itself is the BootstrapAuthoritySet map key; variants carry no duplicate path payload" — single authority, not extension-by-variant. Fix: Row #6 now instructs worker to derive the typed key from the existing bootstrap_authority-map witness (BootstrapAuthorityKey threading the existing CompilerAuthority classifier), refining the constructor surface if needed — NOT introducing a new enum variant. STOP-and-PING criteria updated to forbid new-variant resolution under any path. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof worker brief — γ ratified (2-variant residual) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395060514: - DescentResidual = EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) | EvidenceIncomplete (4 → 2 dissolution: Missing+Unknown fold via DescentUnknown injection; NonStrict folds via NonIncreasing wrap; Incomplete retained — different concern axis from evidence-lattice) - DescentEvidence 3-variant lattice at termination.dag:14-17 confirmed as authoritative composition target - Type signature from §10.3 row 966 confirmed verbatim-binding Director-asked canvas-shape verification absorbed: worker STOPs if EvidenceIncomplete decomposes into payload-variants (timeout / depth-bound / evaluator-error-during-proof-construction); proceeds as 2-variant otherwise. 7 same-slice acceptance gates incl Evaluator E2 #1971 consumer wiring in same PR + §10.3 row 966 row-text refresh to cite γ-disposition. Worker pin: quick-koi-190 (pre-authorized per §10.3 row 966). Auto-spawn HOLD per L-sized threshold; surgical-recreate path ratified case-by-case if critical path blocked. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — narrow EvidenceUnknown payload via NonStrictEvidence subset; delete superseded canvas openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2105: 2 findings. 1. BLOCKING (LAYER MODEL / illegal states unrepresentable): worker brief shape `EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence)` admitted EvidenceUnknown(Strict) even though the canvas itself acknowledged Strict-isn't-a-residual as illegal. P2 requires API-level enforcement, not prose convention. Fix: introduce typed subset `NonStrictEvidence = NonIncreasing | DescentUnknown`; residual now `EvidenceUnknown(NonStrictEvidence)` — illegal-states-unrepresentable by construction. NonStrictEvidence lands in same file as DescentResidual; composes with existing 3-variant DescentEvidence via inhabitation, not re-definition. 2. NON-BLOCKING (live-state drift): canvas + worker brief both visible with "ratification needed" vs "ratified" status — same P2 single-authority shape as the S5 canvas/worker-brief co-existence at #2079. Fix: delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-descent-execution-proof-canvas.md (worker brief frontmatter already names it as superseded; with canvas gone the live authority is unambiguous). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — section-anchor cite for §10.3 row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2105 line 47: my brief cited "§10.3 row 966" but the actual line is now 986 (after my Q-Reification row insert in PR #2079 shifted §10.3 by 20 lines). Reviewer's "no such section" claim is wrong on substance (file + section + row all exist) but the line drift IS real. Fix per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers (Director calibration in gunbc#2079): replaced all "§10.3 row 966" with "§10.3 Q-EVAL-Descent- Termination-Contract row" — name-anchor instead of line-anchor, drift-immune. 5 occurrences cleaned (closure predicate, acceptance gate #3, gate #5, STOP criterion, worker pin justification). Stylistic "row row-text" repetition collapsed to "row text". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition canvas — Lens<SymbolicCost> composition shape (#1957) Pre-staged per Director endorsement of T-CostLens-Composition canvas-shape authoring. Surfaces 3 composition options for the Lens<SymbolicCost> instance: α: two separate lenses, externally joined — REJECTED (violates §1.8 gate #39 no_coercion_cost_dimension by construction) β: single Lens<SymbolicCost> with composed witness in read — strong but requires Lens<C> carrier-shape refactor (target-context threading) γ (recommended): Lens<SymbolicCost> reads structural cost via algebra-fold + target-realization composed via existing Lookup<SymbolicCost> substrate at lookup.dag:48-60 — preserves generic Lens<C> carrier; satisfies all 4 §1.8 gates (#37-40) by construction; aligns with feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first Adjacent substrate verified at HEAD: lens.dag:70-77 (Lens<C>), algebra.dag:12+ (SymbolicCost 7-variant + Semiring), lookup.dag:48-60 (Lookup<SymbolicCost> + MissingCost lens-boundary). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-Workflow-As-Data canvas — audit-receipt-honoring scope-narrowing Pre-staged per Director endorsement. Q-Workflow-As-Data-Carriers (§10.3 row 983) named 5 carriers; grep-verified at HEAD that 4 of 5 ALREADY EXIST in dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (218 lines). Only WorkflowSecret<Name> is wholly net-new substrate. Surfaces 3 options: α: maximalist 5-carrier introduction in dsl/std/workflow.dag — REJECTED (admits parallel-representation debt vs audit-receipt #1771 reuse-first directive) β (recommended): minimalist — only WorkflowSecret<Name> + Cron<Schedule> refinement net-new; lens consumes extdeps.github.actions directly. Honors feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first. γ: like β + WorkflowObservationAnchor for typed lens-consumption-shape; natural ratchet from β if evidence accumulates. Sequencing: dispatch-ready post-T-LBP COMPLETE per §S4 design-schedule:95; brief authoring lands in advance per pre-staging discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition worker brief — γ ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775: - γ option ratified (Lens<SymbolicCost> + Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition) - Lens<C> generic at lens.dag:70-77 confirmed authoritative (no refactor in scope) - symbolic_cost_dimension: AnalysisDimension<SymbolicCost> defers to separate Dimensions sub-lane Critical reframing absorbed: src/v3/lenses/cost.dag ALREADY EXISTS (status: STRUCTURALLY TERMINAL; BEHAVIORALLY PROXY). T-CostLens-Composition is behavioral-completion + target-realization-wiring, NOT P1 carrier introduction. Worker reads existing lens; advances PROXY → BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE via Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition. 8 same-slice acceptance gates incl §1.8 #37-40 + #70 demonstration + lens status header refresh + §10.3 row text refresh. Out-of-scope (deferred per Director): symbolic_cost_dimension; Lens<C> generic refactor (STOP-and-PING if implementation reveals need). Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (same precedent as S5 + descent_execution_proof canvas deletions). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Delete superseded T-CostLens canvas (worker brief is single live authority) * docs(briefs): T-WAD Slice 1 worker brief — β ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395945465: 4 asks confirmed: 1. β ratified (minimalist reuse-first) 2. #1771 audit-receipt binding precedent confirmed 3. WorkflowSecret<Name> folds into dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (provider- specific scope; NOT new dsl/std/ file unless cross-provider evidence) 4. §1.8 gates #54 + #55 split into separate slices (slice 2 = timing-and-pattern; slice 3 = ci_workflow_modeled_as_dag) Slice 1 net-new substrate (only): - WorkflowSecret<Name> + SecretScope carriers - CronExpression + CronField (typed refinement of existing WorkflowTrigger::Schedule { cron: String } at actions.dag:43) Other 4 carriers from §10.3 row 983 reused as-is from extdeps.github.actions per audit-receipt #1771 directive. 6 same-slice acceptance gates incl no-parallel-representation grep + gate #53/#62/#63 advancement + bootstrap regen + clippy. Cross-provider STOP-and-PING per Director ask #3 caveat: worker greps adjacent provider work for WorkflowSecret-shape evidence; surfaces if found before finalizing fold-into-extdeps. Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (S5 + descent_execution_proof + T-CostLens precedent). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demo (#1952) complexity-contract compile-error worker brief Pre-staged execution brief per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker brief path (no canvas — design-lock at docs/design-lens-application- surface.md specifies fixture shape verbatim at line 292). 7 same-slice acceptance gates: fixture program (O(n²) body + Enforce O(log n) budget) + TestClaim assertion + diagnostic structural validation + no regression on T-LBP cementing + bootstrap regen + clippy + §1.8 #92 advancement. Hard prerequisites STOP-and-PING: T-LAS Slice A landed (gates #88-#91) AND T-LBP complexity-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE (gate #79). Worker does not author against partial substrate. Sibling demos #1953 (CRDT cost) + #1954 (memory-peak cost) share the same hard-prerequisite + TestClaim shape pattern — could dispatch as 3 sequential PRs or single multi-demo PR (worker's call at dispatch). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demos #1953 + #1954 — cost-basis sibling worker brief Pre-staged sibling brief covering both cost-basis demos (CRDT cost basis + memory-peak cost basis) per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker-brief path. Single brief for two demos because they share: - Hard-prerequisite pattern (T-LAS Slice A + T-LBP cost-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE) - TestClaim + Diagnostic structural validation shape - apply_lens(cost, ...) Enforce mode Sibling of #1952 brief (complexity-contract compile-error). Worker's call at dispatch on multi-demo PR vs sequential PRs (Mgr ratification needed if going multi-demo). #1953 (CRDT) substrate per design §4.2 + cost-basis-declaration audit at docs/audit/t-user-authored-cost-basis-discipline-worked-examples.md. #1954 (memory-peak) substrate per design §4.3; STOP-and-PING if Dimension<SymbolicCost> substrate (deferred to Dimensions sub-lane per Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775) not yet landed. 6 same-slice acceptance gates per demo + same STOP-and-PING discipline as #1952. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens — update Sub-issue from #1957 to #2141 (post-surgical-recreate) PM executed Director's surgical-recreate ratification (gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4397693699) at 17:54:43Z: closed #1957, created fresh #2141 to trigger pollAutoSpawn fresh-creation path. Worker fierce-ram-21 (#2153) spawned on #2141. 1-line brief update per Director's queued-action commitment: brief now references #2141 + cites surgical-recreate authority. #1957 closed-as-superseded. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* WIP: Substrate T-LAS Slice A: 88-91 carrier + routing landings * WIP: Substrate T-LAS Slice A: 88-91 carrier + routing landings * feat(v3.std): land lens_application substrate carriers (T-LAS Slice A gates #88-#91) Slice A receipt for T-Lens-Application-Surface: lands the parametric substrate carriers from `docs/design-lens-application-surface.md` §2. Refresh the parse-corpus manifest for the new file and advance gates #88-#91 to CONSUMER_LANDED in `docs/r3-program-plan.md` §1.8. Per-lens `EnforceableLens` / `LensEnforcement` data instances + fold-pass execution land in Slice B (#1952 / #1953 / #1954) — they consume this landing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: Substrate T-LAS Slice A: 88-91 carrier + routing landings * WIP: Substrate T-LAS Slice A: 88-91 carrier + routing landings * WIP: Substrate T-LAS Slice A: 88-91 carrier + routing landings * docs(v3.std): clarify EnforceableLens parser-uniqueness invariant is tracked-not-yet-enforced Per codex BLOCKING on PR #2145 (sha a74a2b6): the EnforceableLens substrate carrier comment claimed a live mechanical guarantee ("PARSER-LEVEL UNIQUENESS INVARIANT: the parser enforces ...") that this PR does not implement. Reframe to name the design intent + status: the carrier shape is landed, the parser check is tracked debt deferred to a follow-up slice, and duplicate declarations are convention-only at this commit. Design-lock authority for the full invariant remains the design doc §2 paragraph. Refresh parse-corpus manifest hash for the comment change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(v3.std): pin EnforceableLens parser-uniqueness dissolution routing to #2162 Per codex BLOCKING on PR #2145 (sha b6e3839): the prior comment named the deferred parser pass as "Slice B (or a follow-up Substrate slice)" — too vague to satisfy INVARIANTS.md P5's specific-retirement-path discipline for tracked debt at substrate-authority level. Filed #2162 as the single retirement path for the tracked parser check + behavior-driven duplicate-declarations Diagnostic test. Reframed the comment to name #2162 as the dissolution routing. Refresh parse-corpus manifest hash for the comment change; regen bootstrap snapshots so the substrate file matches. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…nded + Q-Cost-Composition-Layering ε) (#2181) * docs(briefs): Substrate bridge SourceSpan.file participation retirement worker brief Authored for gunbc#1958 Substrate-owned bridge slice. Targets audit-row #2 (kernel Bool patch BOOL_TYPES_FILE) + row #6 (pipeline authority PIPELINE_AUTHORITY_FILE) per r3-program-plan.md §5 line 353 scope-narrowing. Sibling #1959 closed as already-retired by PR #1272. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 Variant-aware projection carrier canvas (#1947) Surfaces 3 carrier-shape options (α RestResponseProjection variant-tag / β Declaration variant_projection_metadata / γ free-standing CoproductProjection) for Director ratification before worker brief authoring. Mgr-tier recommendation = γ (DeclarationRef-keyed, avoids tag-string-as-identity bridge). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — same-slice prerequisite + section anchor Director calibration (gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-...): 1. Promote ratchet-test cross-Mgr handoff from conditional Acceptance #4 to upfront same-slice BLOCKING prerequisite gate (per feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline). 2. Replace `r3-program-plan.md:353` line-cite with `§5 Y4 scope-clarification` section anchor (per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers). Code-line anchors in bootstrap.rs left as-is (anchor sites worker navigates to). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — umbrella stays Open per P2 ledger discipline Address BLOCKING inline review at line 46: bridge_source_span_file_participation_retired is an Open umbrella whose green predicate is "no production code path consults SourceSpan.file" per r3-structure.md:115. Partial retirement was explicitly rejected 2026-04-29 (Director acceptance #1130 / dispatch #1139). Changes: - Add Ledger-discipline preamble: umbrella row stays Open; receipt updates audit-packet enumeration, NOT bridge_ledger.dag. - Acceptance #3 reframed: do NOT mutate bridge_ledger.dag; mark rows #2 + #6 retired in the audit packet only. - Authority anchor updated: status=Open (not Proposed); add r3-structure.md:115 + bridge_ledger.dag:125-129 line refs. - Cross-Mgr section reframed: umbrella ratchet cannot flip on this PR alone; Verification's ledger-zero audit progress field is post-merge tracking, not a same-slice pre-merge blocker. Reconciles with BLOCKING finding (Director calibration #1 assumed umbrella ratchet could flip on partial retirement, which r3-structure.md:115 forbids). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 CoproductProjection worker brief — γ ratified (#1947) Director ratification of option γ at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394369848. Free-standing CoproductProjection carrier in src/v3/std/, DeclarationRef-keyed, typed WireTagValue leaf, 4 same-slice acceptance gates. Surfaces 3 substrate observations for STOP-and-PING (DeclarationRef String alias; FieldRef does-not-exist-at-HEAD; tag_field String asymmetry) — worker must escalate, not silently work around. PB Mgr cross-Mgr ping at carrier landing (heads-up, not blocker). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — resolve Acceptance #4 / Cross-Mgr contradiction openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at PR #2079 #issuecomment-... flagged Acceptance #4 ("ratchet test passes ... confirmed-present at HEAD before merge") contradicting the reframed Cross-Mgr section ("No same-slice ratchet-test gate applies; post-merge tracking only"). Both said different things about whether the umbrella ratchet is a pre-merge blocker. Resolution: Acceptance #4 reframed to explicitly state "No umbrella-ratchet pre-merge gate" — worker does NOT wait for Verification ratchet authoring; acceptance for this slice is the audit-packet receipt update in #3. Cross-Mgr handoff also updated to remove "ratchet authoring" from Verification's same-slice duties. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): S5 brief — absorb Director pre-ratifications for 3 STOP-and-PING items Director pre-ratified dispositions at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394416049: 1. DeclarationRef alias: accept (b) + debt note (re-escalate only on same-slice break) 2. FieldRef: grep-decide between InputFieldRef-as-specialization vs rename 3. tag_field String asymmetry: typed introduction + debt note for migration Worker proceeds without re-pinging unless evidence forces escalation. STOP-criteria section narrowed accordingly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification Gate A receipt — Option A (Dag-as-carrier) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394427814 + proposal merge at PR #2096 (commit fec8692): src/v3/std/substrate.dag::Dag IS the reflected program; no new substrate carrier required. ReflectedProgram<T> rejected. Gate A patches: 1. r3-program-plan.md §10.3: new Q-Reification row marked RATIFIED with PR #2096 merge link + Gate A receipt scope (this PR + #1960 closed-as-non-addition). 2. r3-v-pattern-a-tc1-v1-worker.md: 3 sites — status header (Q-Reification CLEARED, Branch B η non-vacuity remains), worker-pin gate, E6-G1.a/E3 producer dependency. Replaces ReflectedProgram<T> with consumer-wiring nuance: lens fold consumes Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator. 3. r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md: 2 sites — same nuance: deferred work is consumer-wiring, NOT a separate carrier. 4. r3-pr-e8-w1-producer-contract-test-plan-worker.md: 1 site — fold-over-Dag reframe. Receipt of pass-by-construction: this PR adds NO new .dag declaration to src/v3/std/. The ratification is structurally a non-addition (Option A correctness proof per same-slice dissolution discipline). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — delete superseded canvas + name dissolution trigger for tag_field asymmetry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings (P2 single-authority + P5 dissolution trigger). Fixes: 1. Delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-s5-variant-aware-projection-carrier-canvas.md (superseded by the γ-ratified worker brief in same PR; would otherwise leave two current-looking S5 status authorities post-merge — one saying ratification pending, one saying γ ratified). 2. Substrate observation #3 (tag_field String/FieldRef asymmetry) now carries a binding named dissolution trigger: when FieldRef exists as top-level carrier AND InputFieldRef is classified, migrate InternallyTaggedObject.tag_field via follow-on Substrate hygiene PR. Worker MUST add debt-paydown row to authoritative debt ledger before merging carrier-introduction PR. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification row — fix invariant cite (C-1 → P2) cursor review at gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-... flagged C-1 as mis-keyed: INVARIANTS.md C-1 is "missing args fail closed; no LitNull sentinels" (P3 fail-closed family), not parallel-representation/duplicate-authority. The correct cite for rejecting a parallel ReflectedProgram<T> alongside Dag is P2 single authority (INVARIANTS.md line 148: cost of change is proportional to how many files encode the same fact). Cite updated to "INVARIANTS.md P2 single authority" with inline gloss. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — name dissolution trigger for DeclarationRef alias debt openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: substrate observation #1 had desired endpoint ("future structural promotion of DeclarationRef") but no checkable dissolution trigger — same P5 gap that #3 (tag_field asymmetry) had been fixed for in commit 2601d7d. Trigger now binding: promote DeclarationRef when EITHER (a) audit-row #14 (declaration_name_preference_rank / declaration_by_name rank-table) closes — dsl/std ↔ src/v3/std module convergence makes name-keyed identity unambiguous and structural module identity available, OR (b) any DeclarationRef-typed consumer surfaces a string-identity bridge per feedback_opaque_strings_attract_heuristics (heuristic patching, naming- convention dispatch, suffix/prefix matching). Worker MUST add debt-paydown row before merging carrier-introduction PR (same pattern as the tag_field debt requirement). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: complete Q-Reification stale-cite sweep — e6-g1a brief :169 + Q-PAFS row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md:169 still said TC1/V1 "waits for Q-Reification and the carrier landing", contradicting the same brief's lines 15-19 + 148-153 saying Dag IS the carrier and no separate carrier lands. Fixed: 1. e6-g1a brief line 167-170 paragraph: clarified V1 waits for consumer-wiring work (lens fold consuming Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator), NOT for a carrier-introduction. 2. r3-program-plan.md:954 Q-PAFS row text was the same shape: "Resume after Q-Reification + ReflectedProgram<T>" — contradicted my new Q-Reification row in the same diff. Updated: Q-Reification STOP CLEARED 2026-05-07 (Option A); remaining hold = Branch B η non-vacuity only. Out-of-scope-for-this-PR: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-feasibility-probe.md contains 4 stale cites but is not modified in this PR; stale-on-main can be swept in a follow-up if needed (single source of truth is the e6-g1a-static-lens worker brief, not the feasibility probe per Q-PAFS Path A acceptance). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix InputFieldRef mis-read; reframe observations #2 + #3 codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079 line 22: my brief mis-read services.dag:28-36. The text actually says "No separate InputFieldRef carrier is introduced here, since ParamToken.name already carries the same shape and adding a wrapper would duplicate without strengthening the structural invariant" — i.e., InputFieldRef does NOT exist; the comment REJECTS the wrapper. Fixes: 1. Substrate observation #2 reframed: no FieldRef-shaped carrier exists at HEAD; services.dag:28-36 precedent argues against wrapper unless it strengthens structural invariant. New (a)/(b) STOP-and-PING: (a) follow services.dag precedent — wire_tag_field: String + key invariant on wire_tag_values + fixture-load fail-closed check; (b) introduce typed FieldRef — must justify per "duplicate without strengthening" test. 2. Carrier shape (line 19): wire_tag_field: FieldRef → {String|FieldRef} pending observation #2 resolution. 3. Substrate observation #3 reframed: InternallyTaggedObject asymmetry is conditional on path (b); under path (a) no asymmetry exists. Trigger correspondingly conditional. Removed stale "InputFieldRef classified" trigger clause. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — consolidate split per-variant maps into single keyed entry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: CoproductProjection shape split per-variant data across two parallel maps (variant_field_projections + wire_tag_values), admitting illegal states where keysets drift (P2 boundary discipline / illegal-states-unrepresentable). Fix: introduce CoproductVariantProjection { field_projection, wire_tag_value } as the per-variant keyed value; CoproductProjection.variant_projections becomes Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection>. Single keyed authority per variant. Director's binding constraint #2 enumerated the two fields separately but said "refine in implementation as ergonomics demand" — consolidation preserves the substantive constraints (typed WireTagValue leaf, structural per-variant projection) while enforcing keyset alignment by carrier shape. Empty-payload variants encoded via FieldProjection::Empty constructor (or analog), not via map-absence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix stale split-map vocab in path (a) + scope STOP-and-PING umbrella openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings. 1. Path (a) at line 43 still referenced "Map<VariantId, WireTagValue> key invariant on wire_tag_values" — that's the superseded split-map vocab; the consolidated shape is Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection> on variant_projections. Path (a) now references the consolidated map; per-variant WireTagValue lives inside CoproductVariantProjection. 2. Pre-ratification umbrella at line 36 said "all 3 dispositions pre-ratified, proceed without re-pinging" — but observation #2 was re-opened after the codex InputFieldRef finding and explicitly says STOP-and-PING. Contradictory. Umbrella now scoped: observations #1 + #3 are pre-ratified; #2 is re-opened STOP-and-PING — worker MUST escalate before choosing path (a) vs (b). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof canvas — 4-residual coproduct-dissolution audit Director ratified split disposition at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394696074: descent_execution_proof STANDS ALONE (consumer-side termination-contract substrate function with fail-closed residual enumeration; folding into T-E-P-Producer-Broadening explicitly rejected — different concern axis). Canvas surfaces 3 carrier-shape options for the residual enumeration per Director's coproduct-dissolution audit suggestion: α: 4-variant coproduct verbatim from §10.3 row 966 (Missing | Unknown | Incomplete | NonStrict) β: 3-axis dimensional product (presence × completeness × strictness) γ (recommended): reuse DescentEvidence at termination.dag:14-17 for "absent/unknown" via EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) payload-variant + separate EvidenceIncomplete — ratchets variant count 4 → 2 via dimensional folding while honoring services.dag "no parallel wrapper" precedent. Mgr recommendation γ; β rejected unless 3 axes provably compose orthogonally. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan brief Row #6 — derive from bootstrap_authority map, no new enum variant codex BLOCKING (post-merge of #2079, on commit 85ceb85 — same brief is now on main): my Row #6 disposition told the worker to introduce a new BootstrapAuthority::Pipeline variant ("extend the enum if needed"). That violates P2 single-authority — src/v3/std/bootstrap_authority.dag:90 already has "src/v3/compiler/pipeline.dag": CompilerAuthority, classifying pipeline.dag under the existing CompilerAuthority variant. The :14-17 comment is explicit: "the path itself is the BootstrapAuthoritySet map key; variants carry no duplicate path payload" — single authority, not extension-by-variant. Fix: Row #6 now instructs worker to derive the typed key from the existing bootstrap_authority-map witness (BootstrapAuthorityKey threading the existing CompilerAuthority classifier), refining the constructor surface if needed — NOT introducing a new enum variant. STOP-and-PING criteria updated to forbid new-variant resolution under any path. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof worker brief — γ ratified (2-variant residual) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395060514: - DescentResidual = EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) | EvidenceIncomplete (4 → 2 dissolution: Missing+Unknown fold via DescentUnknown injection; NonStrict folds via NonIncreasing wrap; Incomplete retained — different concern axis from evidence-lattice) - DescentEvidence 3-variant lattice at termination.dag:14-17 confirmed as authoritative composition target - Type signature from §10.3 row 966 confirmed verbatim-binding Director-asked canvas-shape verification absorbed: worker STOPs if EvidenceIncomplete decomposes into payload-variants (timeout / depth-bound / evaluator-error-during-proof-construction); proceeds as 2-variant otherwise. 7 same-slice acceptance gates incl Evaluator E2 #1971 consumer wiring in same PR + §10.3 row 966 row-text refresh to cite γ-disposition. Worker pin: quick-koi-190 (pre-authorized per §10.3 row 966). Auto-spawn HOLD per L-sized threshold; surgical-recreate path ratified case-by-case if critical path blocked. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — narrow EvidenceUnknown payload via NonStrictEvidence subset; delete superseded canvas openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2105: 2 findings. 1. BLOCKING (LAYER MODEL / illegal states unrepresentable): worker brief shape `EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence)` admitted EvidenceUnknown(Strict) even though the canvas itself acknowledged Strict-isn't-a-residual as illegal. P2 requires API-level enforcement, not prose convention. Fix: introduce typed subset `NonStrictEvidence = NonIncreasing | DescentUnknown`; residual now `EvidenceUnknown(NonStrictEvidence)` — illegal-states-unrepresentable by construction. NonStrictEvidence lands in same file as DescentResidual; composes with existing 3-variant DescentEvidence via inhabitation, not re-definition. 2. NON-BLOCKING (live-state drift): canvas + worker brief both visible with "ratification needed" vs "ratified" status — same P2 single-authority shape as the S5 canvas/worker-brief co-existence at #2079. Fix: delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-descent-execution-proof-canvas.md (worker brief frontmatter already names it as superseded; with canvas gone the live authority is unambiguous). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — section-anchor cite for §10.3 row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2105 line 47: my brief cited "§10.3 row 966" but the actual line is now 986 (after my Q-Reification row insert in PR #2079 shifted §10.3 by 20 lines). Reviewer's "no such section" claim is wrong on substance (file + section + row all exist) but the line drift IS real. Fix per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers (Director calibration in gunbc#2079): replaced all "§10.3 row 966" with "§10.3 Q-EVAL-Descent- Termination-Contract row" — name-anchor instead of line-anchor, drift-immune. 5 occurrences cleaned (closure predicate, acceptance gate #3, gate #5, STOP criterion, worker pin justification). Stylistic "row row-text" repetition collapsed to "row text". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition canvas — Lens<SymbolicCost> composition shape (#1957) Pre-staged per Director endorsement of T-CostLens-Composition canvas-shape authoring. Surfaces 3 composition options for the Lens<SymbolicCost> instance: α: two separate lenses, externally joined — REJECTED (violates §1.8 gate #39 no_coercion_cost_dimension by construction) β: single Lens<SymbolicCost> with composed witness in read — strong but requires Lens<C> carrier-shape refactor (target-context threading) γ (recommended): Lens<SymbolicCost> reads structural cost via algebra-fold + target-realization composed via existing Lookup<SymbolicCost> substrate at lookup.dag:48-60 — preserves generic Lens<C> carrier; satisfies all 4 §1.8 gates (#37-40) by construction; aligns with feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first Adjacent substrate verified at HEAD: lens.dag:70-77 (Lens<C>), algebra.dag:12+ (SymbolicCost 7-variant + Semiring), lookup.dag:48-60 (Lookup<SymbolicCost> + MissingCost lens-boundary). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-Workflow-As-Data canvas — audit-receipt-honoring scope-narrowing Pre-staged per Director endorsement. Q-Workflow-As-Data-Carriers (§10.3 row 983) named 5 carriers; grep-verified at HEAD that 4 of 5 ALREADY EXIST in dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (218 lines). Only WorkflowSecret<Name> is wholly net-new substrate. Surfaces 3 options: α: maximalist 5-carrier introduction in dsl/std/workflow.dag — REJECTED (admits parallel-representation debt vs audit-receipt #1771 reuse-first directive) β (recommended): minimalist — only WorkflowSecret<Name> + Cron<Schedule> refinement net-new; lens consumes extdeps.github.actions directly. Honors feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first. γ: like β + WorkflowObservationAnchor for typed lens-consumption-shape; natural ratchet from β if evidence accumulates. Sequencing: dispatch-ready post-T-LBP COMPLETE per §S4 design-schedule:95; brief authoring lands in advance per pre-staging discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition worker brief — γ ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775: - γ option ratified (Lens<SymbolicCost> + Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition) - Lens<C> generic at lens.dag:70-77 confirmed authoritative (no refactor in scope) - symbolic_cost_dimension: AnalysisDimension<SymbolicCost> defers to separate Dimensions sub-lane Critical reframing absorbed: src/v3/lenses/cost.dag ALREADY EXISTS (status: STRUCTURALLY TERMINAL; BEHAVIORALLY PROXY). T-CostLens-Composition is behavioral-completion + target-realization-wiring, NOT P1 carrier introduction. Worker reads existing lens; advances PROXY → BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE via Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition. 8 same-slice acceptance gates incl §1.8 #37-40 + #70 demonstration + lens status header refresh + §10.3 row text refresh. Out-of-scope (deferred per Director): symbolic_cost_dimension; Lens<C> generic refactor (STOP-and-PING if implementation reveals need). Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (same precedent as S5 + descent_execution_proof canvas deletions). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Delete superseded T-CostLens canvas (worker brief is single live authority) * docs(briefs): T-WAD Slice 1 worker brief — β ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395945465: 4 asks confirmed: 1. β ratified (minimalist reuse-first) 2. #1771 audit-receipt binding precedent confirmed 3. WorkflowSecret<Name> folds into dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (provider- specific scope; NOT new dsl/std/ file unless cross-provider evidence) 4. §1.8 gates #54 + #55 split into separate slices (slice 2 = timing-and-pattern; slice 3 = ci_workflow_modeled_as_dag) Slice 1 net-new substrate (only): - WorkflowSecret<Name> + SecretScope carriers - CronExpression + CronField (typed refinement of existing WorkflowTrigger::Schedule { cron: String } at actions.dag:43) Other 4 carriers from §10.3 row 983 reused as-is from extdeps.github.actions per audit-receipt #1771 directive. 6 same-slice acceptance gates incl no-parallel-representation grep + gate #53/#62/#63 advancement + bootstrap regen + clippy. Cross-provider STOP-and-PING per Director ask #3 caveat: worker greps adjacent provider work for WorkflowSecret-shape evidence; surfaces if found before finalizing fold-into-extdeps. Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (S5 + descent_execution_proof + T-CostLens precedent). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demo (#1952) complexity-contract compile-error worker brief Pre-staged execution brief per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker brief path (no canvas — design-lock at docs/design-lens-application- surface.md specifies fixture shape verbatim at line 292). 7 same-slice acceptance gates: fixture program (O(n²) body + Enforce O(log n) budget) + TestClaim assertion + diagnostic structural validation + no regression on T-LBP cementing + bootstrap regen + clippy + §1.8 #92 advancement. Hard prerequisites STOP-and-PING: T-LAS Slice A landed (gates #88-#91) AND T-LBP complexity-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE (gate #79). Worker does not author against partial substrate. Sibling demos #1953 (CRDT cost) + #1954 (memory-peak cost) share the same hard-prerequisite + TestClaim shape pattern — could dispatch as 3 sequential PRs or single multi-demo PR (worker's call at dispatch). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demos #1953 + #1954 — cost-basis sibling worker brief Pre-staged sibling brief covering both cost-basis demos (CRDT cost basis + memory-peak cost basis) per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker-brief path. Single brief for two demos because they share: - Hard-prerequisite pattern (T-LAS Slice A + T-LBP cost-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE) - TestClaim + Diagnostic structural validation shape - apply_lens(cost, ...) Enforce mode Sibling of #1952 brief (complexity-contract compile-error). Worker's call at dispatch on multi-demo PR vs sequential PRs (Mgr ratification needed if going multi-demo). #1953 (CRDT) substrate per design §4.2 + cost-basis-declaration audit at docs/audit/t-user-authored-cost-basis-discipline-worked-examples.md. #1954 (memory-peak) substrate per design §4.3; STOP-and-PING if Dimension<SymbolicCost> substrate (deferred to Dimensions sub-lane per Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775) not yet landed. 6 same-slice acceptance gates per demo + same STOP-and-PING discipline as #1952. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens — update Sub-issue from #1957 to #2141 (post-surgical-recreate) PM executed Director's surgical-recreate ratification (gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4397693699) at 17:54:43Z: closed #1957, created fresh #2141 to trigger pollAutoSpawn fresh-creation path. Worker fierce-ram-21 (#2153) spawned on #2141. 1-line brief update per Director's queued-action commitment: brief now references #2141 + cites surgical-recreate authority. #1957 closed-as-superseded. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas (β-extended substrate-shape question) Director α-revised supersession at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4400920572 elevated β-extended path (introduce first-precedent .dag-side fold-over-realization-rows + name active-target authority shape) from slice-tier to canvas-tier. Authored per Q-PAFS template: - Substrate-state at HEAD grep-verified (Lens<C>.read no target-context; zero .dag-side fold-over-realizations precedent; 15+ lens instances using generic Lens<C>) - Binary question: should .dag-side lenses receive target-context for target-keyed reading? - Options matrix: (i) LanguageSpec param to fold; (ii) per-target lens instances [parallel-representation debt]; (iii) global accessor [REJECTED global-state anti-pattern] - Mgr provisional preference: (i) - Cross-cutting: cost.dag load-bearing; emission_provenance.dag secondary; other 13+ lenses target-agnostic Framework discipline anchors per Director corrections: - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline - feedback_parallel_representation_debt - feedback_abstraction_layering (sibling canvas) Sibling canvas (ε path): q-cost-composition-layering-canvas.md authoring follows. Both canvases together address deeper cross-cutting axis: does target-context belong .dag-side (β-extended) or emit-side (ε)? Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Cost-Composition-Layering canvas (ε substrate-shape question) Sibling canvas to q-lens-target-context-canvas.md. Director α-revised supersession at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4400920572 elevated ε path (Rust-side cost-composition wiring; preserves cost.dag PROXY) from slice-tier to canvas-tier. Authored per Q-PAFS template: - Factoring claim: cost = (target-agnostic-shape SymbolicCost algebra) × (target-specific-values per-primitive realization-cost data loaded Rust-side) - Test against feedback_abstraction_layering (Director-named anchor at gunbc#828 c#4400921658): pure objective concepts × language-agnostic LanguageSpec × emit-side composition. Compliance test for each layer. - Pro factoring (ε structurally honest): SymbolicCost algebra is target- agnostic at HEAD; Rust-side composition is natural home; #38/#39 substrate- already-aligned per Slice 1 finding. - Con factoring (ε is parallel-representation debt): N parallel Rust-side compositions if multiple lenses need target-context; lens-framework abstraction stops at substrate boundary; future lenses hit same dilemma. Mgr provisional reading: factoring honest for COST specifically; NOT generalizable. ε right framing IF cost is the singular need + factoring holds. If N>1 target-context-needing lenses surface, β-extended (option (i) from sibling canvas) becomes the right path. Director ratification ask: 3-way choice (ε) Cost-specific Rust-side composition; preserves cost.dag PROXY (β-extended option (i)) Lens<C> refactor for LanguageSpec parameter (both sequenced) ε now for cost; β-extended later if N>1 Framework discipline anchors: - feedback_abstraction_layering (Director-named for this canvas) - feedback_parallel_representation_debt - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline Canvas-pair complete; sibling canvas + this canvas address the deeper cross-cutting axis: target-context belongs .dag-side (β-extended) or emit-side (ε)? Director ratification across both informs T-CostLens follow-on slice + downstream lens architecture. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs: ε ratified canonical for cost; β-extended deferred to N=2 — gate updates Director ratification at #2181 #issuecomment-... : - (ε) RATIFIED standalone for cost composition (canonical-not-transitional) - (β-extended option (i)) DEFERRED to N=2 trigger event (second lens with target-context need beyond cost) - ("both sequenced") REJECTED as bridge-with-named-dissolution anti-pattern Same-slice acceptance gates landed: 1. Q-Cost-Composition-Layering canvas: status updated from "ratification needed" → "Director-RATIFIED 2026-05-07 (ε standalone; canonical-not- transitional); PROPOSAL maturation pending" 2. Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas: status updated from "ratification needed" → "DRAFT/DEFERRED 2026-05-07; reopens on N=2 trigger event" (second lens with substantive target-context need; emission_provenance most likely candidate per cross-cutting analysis §3) 3. r3-program-plan.md gate-table rows #37 + #40 + #70: ε path ratified; close via Rust-side composition reading abstract SymbolicCost × per- primitive realization-cost in T-CostLens follow-on slice 4. r3-program-plan.md §10.3 T-CostLens-Composition row: ε ratified for #37/#40/#70; β-extended deferred per N=2 trigger 5. v3-lens-capability-register.md cost.dag row: ε disposition cited; #2175 continues as cross-cutting umbrella tracker Closed-system disposition per Director: if N=2 condition never fires, β-extended never fires — structurally correct under closed-system design. Framework discipline anchors honored: - feedback_abstraction_layering: ε respects layering (objective concepts pure; target-specific values flow at emit time per Layer-3 honesty test) - feedback_parallel_representation_debt: bounded to N=1; reopens at N=2 - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline: ε ratified canonical, not transitional - feedback_construction_over_ratchets: substrate-shape question answered structurally - feedback_substrate_principle_audit: substrate-fact authored at canvas- tier; ratification follows P1 procedure Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): canvas inventory grounded in live src/v3/lenses/ registry codex BLOCKING at #2181 (sha 00551a8): Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas inventory was "copied from expected lens set instead of live src/v3/lenses/ registry"; emission_provenance trigger references not grounded in live file content. Same shape of error as 3 prior BLOCKING reversals (Q-Reification, S5 DeclarationRef, T-CostLens merge-content). Substrate-state-grep is being treated as retrospective-correction rather than prerequisite. Tightening: this is the 4th occurrence; should be hard-prerequisite-discipline going forward. Fixes: 1. Q-Lens-Target-Context inventory section: replaced approximate "15+ lens instances" framing with exact `ls`-grep registry (15 .dag files listed by name), notes infer_helpers + lower_helpers are helper modules authoring shared structural fns rather than top-level lens instances. 2. emission_provenance.dag analysis grounded in HEAD file status header: STATUS = STRUCTURALLY TERMINAL; LENS-INSTANCE FIXTURE-BOUND; BEHAVIORALLY DEFERRED. `read` body is fail-closed Empty stub. Lens does NOT currently read target-context inside fold; producer-side instrumentation records target-specific entries consumed via standard framework. Reframed as "ungrounded at HEAD" rather than "POSSIBLY target-context need" — re-evaluates at producer-wiring landing. 3. Net finding: N=1 confirmed at HEAD (cost.dag only); N=2 is empirically open pending lens-completion cycles, NOT pre-claimable. Plus non-blocking improvement: Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 9 stale `#issuecomment-...` placeholder replaced with concrete ratification comment id `#issuecomment-4401584012`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): fix Director-ratification-ask typo + #37 gate-id clarification footnote cursor APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS at #2181 (sha 4209eb7) flagged 2 NON-BLOCKING items + 1 exploratory: 1. (NON-BLOCKING) Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 69: `## Directorratification ask` → `## Director ratification ask` (whitespace typo) 2. (NON-BLOCKING) Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 9 placeholder `#issuecomment-...`: ALREADY ADDRESSED in commit `db88b1004` (replaced with `#issuecomment-4401584012`) 3. (Exploratory) Gate #37 id `cost_lens_reads_target_realization` framing implies .dag lens body performs realization read; per ε ratification it's Rust-side composition consumer. Added clarifying footnote noting gate-id retention + Rust-side closure path; rename candidate post-follow-on-slice landing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context — absorb PM canvas-review concerns 1-3 Director relayed PM canvas review at #2068 c#4401627536: Concern 1 (RESOLVED via grep-verify): empirical N=1 confirmation. PM ran `grep -lc 'TypeRealization|CallableRealization|MethodTemplateContract| target_realization|realization_cost|LanguageSpec' src/v3/lenses/*.dag`; only cost.dag has 3 hits, all 14 others have 0 refs (including emission_provenance.dag which I'd previously framed speculatively). Net-finding §3 updated with grep result inline + "N=1 empirically grounded" framing replacing speculative "secondary candidate" language. Empirical basis for DEFERRED β-extended disposition strengthened. Concern 2 (Option (ii) multiplier framing): per-target lens instances replicate the entire Lens<C> authoring surface — N×M × 4 (carrier + monoid sequential + branch + iterate) authoring overhead. Updated Con bullet to reflect the multiplier explicitly: 3 targets × 1 cost lens × 4 = 12 authored fns; grows to 36 if 3 lenses need target-context. Cites feedback_parallel_representation_debt as the P2 framing. Concern 3 (Option (i) threading cost quantification): replaced narrative "threading cost is real but manageable" with quantified breakdown — ~15 signature changes + 14 ignore-parameter patterns + 1 consumer + cementing- test revalidation. Helps future Director ratification at N=2 trigger event. All 3 amendments are docs-only refinements; ε ratification at gunbc#2181 c#4401584012 unchanged. Strengthens canvas as durable substrate-shape decision record. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): canvases — collapse stale ratification-ask sections post-ratification codex BLOCKING at #2181 (sha be9a9c9): both canvases had stale "Director ratification ask" sections after status headers were updated to RATIFIED/DEFERRED. Per INVARIANTS P1 "Documentation Describes Live State" — canvas internally presented both settled and unsettled authority. Fixes: 1. Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 69-76: "Director ratification ask" section collapsed to "Director ratification (RECEIVED 2026-05-07)" with ε ratified, β-extended deferred, "both sequenced" rejected. Three options recorded as historical with ratification cite. Eliminates the rejected "both, sequenced" line that conflicted with status-header "canonical-not- transitional" framing. 2. Q-Lens-Target-Context line 131-136: "Director ratification ask" section collapsed to "Director disposition (DEFERRED 2026-05-07; reopens on N=2 trigger event)". Original ratification asks recorded as FROZEN; revisit at N=2 trigger event with then-current substrate-state grep. Eliminates live-now-ratify framing that conflicted with status-header DEFERRED. Both canvases now single live authority — RATIFIED/DEFERRED dispositions, no internal ratification-ask drift. Future re-ratification (Q-Lens-Target- Context at N=2 trigger) refreshes options matrix at that point per substrate-state-honesty discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context — separate live N=1 from reopen-only future N=2 openai-pro APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS at #2181 (sha be9a9c9): canvas line 127 mixed live N=1 authority with speculative N=2 candidate in one current-state cost count. Per P1 Documentation Describes Live State + P2 single-authority metadata: the live count at HEAD is `cost × 3 targets = 3 per-target instances` (× 4 authoring-multiplier per Option (ii) Con = 12 fns). The `emission_provenance × 3` figure is a reopen-only future scenario that materializes only if emission_provenance becomes the second real target-context lens at producer- wiring landing time. Updated to separate the two clearly: live count + reopen-only future scenario marked separately. Aligns with the grep-verified N=1 finding established earlier in canvas §3. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ined as context) (#2193) * docs(briefs): Substrate bridge SourceSpan.file participation retirement worker brief Authored for gunbc#1958 Substrate-owned bridge slice. Targets audit-row #2 (kernel Bool patch BOOL_TYPES_FILE) + row #6 (pipeline authority PIPELINE_AUTHORITY_FILE) per r3-program-plan.md §5 line 353 scope-narrowing. Sibling #1959 closed as already-retired by PR #1272. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 Variant-aware projection carrier canvas (#1947) Surfaces 3 carrier-shape options (α RestResponseProjection variant-tag / β Declaration variant_projection_metadata / γ free-standing CoproductProjection) for Director ratification before worker brief authoring. Mgr-tier recommendation = γ (DeclarationRef-keyed, avoids tag-string-as-identity bridge). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — same-slice prerequisite + section anchor Director calibration (gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-...): 1. Promote ratchet-test cross-Mgr handoff from conditional Acceptance #4 to upfront same-slice BLOCKING prerequisite gate (per feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline). 2. Replace `r3-program-plan.md:353` line-cite with `§5 Y4 scope-clarification` section anchor (per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers). Code-line anchors in bootstrap.rs left as-is (anchor sites worker navigates to). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — umbrella stays Open per P2 ledger discipline Address BLOCKING inline review at line 46: bridge_source_span_file_participation_retired is an Open umbrella whose green predicate is "no production code path consults SourceSpan.file" per r3-structure.md:115. Partial retirement was explicitly rejected 2026-04-29 (Director acceptance #1130 / dispatch #1139). Changes: - Add Ledger-discipline preamble: umbrella row stays Open; receipt updates audit-packet enumeration, NOT bridge_ledger.dag. - Acceptance #3 reframed: do NOT mutate bridge_ledger.dag; mark rows #2 + #6 retired in the audit packet only. - Authority anchor updated: status=Open (not Proposed); add r3-structure.md:115 + bridge_ledger.dag:125-129 line refs. - Cross-Mgr section reframed: umbrella ratchet cannot flip on this PR alone; Verification's ledger-zero audit progress field is post-merge tracking, not a same-slice pre-merge blocker. Reconciles with BLOCKING finding (Director calibration #1 assumed umbrella ratchet could flip on partial retirement, which r3-structure.md:115 forbids). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 CoproductProjection worker brief — γ ratified (#1947) Director ratification of option γ at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394369848. Free-standing CoproductProjection carrier in src/v3/std/, DeclarationRef-keyed, typed WireTagValue leaf, 4 same-slice acceptance gates. Surfaces 3 substrate observations for STOP-and-PING (DeclarationRef String alias; FieldRef does-not-exist-at-HEAD; tag_field String asymmetry) — worker must escalate, not silently work around. PB Mgr cross-Mgr ping at carrier landing (heads-up, not blocker). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — resolve Acceptance #4 / Cross-Mgr contradiction openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at PR #2079 #issuecomment-... flagged Acceptance #4 ("ratchet test passes ... confirmed-present at HEAD before merge") contradicting the reframed Cross-Mgr section ("No same-slice ratchet-test gate applies; post-merge tracking only"). Both said different things about whether the umbrella ratchet is a pre-merge blocker. Resolution: Acceptance #4 reframed to explicitly state "No umbrella-ratchet pre-merge gate" — worker does NOT wait for Verification ratchet authoring; acceptance for this slice is the audit-packet receipt update in #3. Cross-Mgr handoff also updated to remove "ratchet authoring" from Verification's same-slice duties. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): S5 brief — absorb Director pre-ratifications for 3 STOP-and-PING items Director pre-ratified dispositions at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394416049: 1. DeclarationRef alias: accept (b) + debt note (re-escalate only on same-slice break) 2. FieldRef: grep-decide between InputFieldRef-as-specialization vs rename 3. tag_field String asymmetry: typed introduction + debt note for migration Worker proceeds without re-pinging unless evidence forces escalation. STOP-criteria section narrowed accordingly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification Gate A receipt — Option A (Dag-as-carrier) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394427814 + proposal merge at PR #2096 (commit fec8692): src/v3/std/substrate.dag::Dag IS the reflected program; no new substrate carrier required. ReflectedProgram<T> rejected. Gate A patches: 1. r3-program-plan.md §10.3: new Q-Reification row marked RATIFIED with PR #2096 merge link + Gate A receipt scope (this PR + #1960 closed-as-non-addition). 2. r3-v-pattern-a-tc1-v1-worker.md: 3 sites — status header (Q-Reification CLEARED, Branch B η non-vacuity remains), worker-pin gate, E6-G1.a/E3 producer dependency. Replaces ReflectedProgram<T> with consumer-wiring nuance: lens fold consumes Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator. 3. r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md: 2 sites — same nuance: deferred work is consumer-wiring, NOT a separate carrier. 4. r3-pr-e8-w1-producer-contract-test-plan-worker.md: 1 site — fold-over-Dag reframe. Receipt of pass-by-construction: this PR adds NO new .dag declaration to src/v3/std/. The ratification is structurally a non-addition (Option A correctness proof per same-slice dissolution discipline). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — delete superseded canvas + name dissolution trigger for tag_field asymmetry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings (P2 single-authority + P5 dissolution trigger). Fixes: 1. Delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-s5-variant-aware-projection-carrier-canvas.md (superseded by the γ-ratified worker brief in same PR; would otherwise leave two current-looking S5 status authorities post-merge — one saying ratification pending, one saying γ ratified). 2. Substrate observation #3 (tag_field String/FieldRef asymmetry) now carries a binding named dissolution trigger: when FieldRef exists as top-level carrier AND InputFieldRef is classified, migrate InternallyTaggedObject.tag_field via follow-on Substrate hygiene PR. Worker MUST add debt-paydown row to authoritative debt ledger before merging carrier-introduction PR. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification row — fix invariant cite (C-1 → P2) cursor review at gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-... flagged C-1 as mis-keyed: INVARIANTS.md C-1 is "missing args fail closed; no LitNull sentinels" (P3 fail-closed family), not parallel-representation/duplicate-authority. The correct cite for rejecting a parallel ReflectedProgram<T> alongside Dag is P2 single authority (INVARIANTS.md line 148: cost of change is proportional to how many files encode the same fact). Cite updated to "INVARIANTS.md P2 single authority" with inline gloss. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — name dissolution trigger for DeclarationRef alias debt openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: substrate observation #1 had desired endpoint ("future structural promotion of DeclarationRef") but no checkable dissolution trigger — same P5 gap that #3 (tag_field asymmetry) had been fixed for in commit 2601d7d. Trigger now binding: promote DeclarationRef when EITHER (a) audit-row #14 (declaration_name_preference_rank / declaration_by_name rank-table) closes — dsl/std ↔ src/v3/std module convergence makes name-keyed identity unambiguous and structural module identity available, OR (b) any DeclarationRef-typed consumer surfaces a string-identity bridge per feedback_opaque_strings_attract_heuristics (heuristic patching, naming- convention dispatch, suffix/prefix matching). Worker MUST add debt-paydown row before merging carrier-introduction PR (same pattern as the tag_field debt requirement). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: complete Q-Reification stale-cite sweep — e6-g1a brief :169 + Q-PAFS row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md:169 still said TC1/V1 "waits for Q-Reification and the carrier landing", contradicting the same brief's lines 15-19 + 148-153 saying Dag IS the carrier and no separate carrier lands. Fixed: 1. e6-g1a brief line 167-170 paragraph: clarified V1 waits for consumer-wiring work (lens fold consuming Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator), NOT for a carrier-introduction. 2. r3-program-plan.md:954 Q-PAFS row text was the same shape: "Resume after Q-Reification + ReflectedProgram<T>" — contradicted my new Q-Reification row in the same diff. Updated: Q-Reification STOP CLEARED 2026-05-07 (Option A); remaining hold = Branch B η non-vacuity only. Out-of-scope-for-this-PR: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-feasibility-probe.md contains 4 stale cites but is not modified in this PR; stale-on-main can be swept in a follow-up if needed (single source of truth is the e6-g1a-static-lens worker brief, not the feasibility probe per Q-PAFS Path A acceptance). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix InputFieldRef mis-read; reframe observations #2 + #3 codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079 line 22: my brief mis-read services.dag:28-36. The text actually says "No separate InputFieldRef carrier is introduced here, since ParamToken.name already carries the same shape and adding a wrapper would duplicate without strengthening the structural invariant" — i.e., InputFieldRef does NOT exist; the comment REJECTS the wrapper. Fixes: 1. Substrate observation #2 reframed: no FieldRef-shaped carrier exists at HEAD; services.dag:28-36 precedent argues against wrapper unless it strengthens structural invariant. New (a)/(b) STOP-and-PING: (a) follow services.dag precedent — wire_tag_field: String + key invariant on wire_tag_values + fixture-load fail-closed check; (b) introduce typed FieldRef — must justify per "duplicate without strengthening" test. 2. Carrier shape (line 19): wire_tag_field: FieldRef → {String|FieldRef} pending observation #2 resolution. 3. Substrate observation #3 reframed: InternallyTaggedObject asymmetry is conditional on path (b); under path (a) no asymmetry exists. Trigger correspondingly conditional. Removed stale "InputFieldRef classified" trigger clause. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — consolidate split per-variant maps into single keyed entry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: CoproductProjection shape split per-variant data across two parallel maps (variant_field_projections + wire_tag_values), admitting illegal states where keysets drift (P2 boundary discipline / illegal-states-unrepresentable). Fix: introduce CoproductVariantProjection { field_projection, wire_tag_value } as the per-variant keyed value; CoproductProjection.variant_projections becomes Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection>. Single keyed authority per variant. Director's binding constraint #2 enumerated the two fields separately but said "refine in implementation as ergonomics demand" — consolidation preserves the substantive constraints (typed WireTagValue leaf, structural per-variant projection) while enforcing keyset alignment by carrier shape. Empty-payload variants encoded via FieldProjection::Empty constructor (or analog), not via map-absence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix stale split-map vocab in path (a) + scope STOP-and-PING umbrella openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings. 1. Path (a) at line 43 still referenced "Map<VariantId, WireTagValue> key invariant on wire_tag_values" — that's the superseded split-map vocab; the consolidated shape is Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection> on variant_projections. Path (a) now references the consolidated map; per-variant WireTagValue lives inside CoproductVariantProjection. 2. Pre-ratification umbrella at line 36 said "all 3 dispositions pre-ratified, proceed without re-pinging" — but observation #2 was re-opened after the codex InputFieldRef finding and explicitly says STOP-and-PING. Contradictory. Umbrella now scoped: observations #1 + #3 are pre-ratified; #2 is re-opened STOP-and-PING — worker MUST escalate before choosing path (a) vs (b). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof canvas — 4-residual coproduct-dissolution audit Director ratified split disposition at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394696074: descent_execution_proof STANDS ALONE (consumer-side termination-contract substrate function with fail-closed residual enumeration; folding into T-E-P-Producer-Broadening explicitly rejected — different concern axis). Canvas surfaces 3 carrier-shape options for the residual enumeration per Director's coproduct-dissolution audit suggestion: α: 4-variant coproduct verbatim from §10.3 row 966 (Missing | Unknown | Incomplete | NonStrict) β: 3-axis dimensional product (presence × completeness × strictness) γ (recommended): reuse DescentEvidence at termination.dag:14-17 for "absent/unknown" via EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) payload-variant + separate EvidenceIncomplete — ratchets variant count 4 → 2 via dimensional folding while honoring services.dag "no parallel wrapper" precedent. Mgr recommendation γ; β rejected unless 3 axes provably compose orthogonally. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan brief Row #6 — derive from bootstrap_authority map, no new enum variant codex BLOCKING (post-merge of #2079, on commit 85ceb85 — same brief is now on main): my Row #6 disposition told the worker to introduce a new BootstrapAuthority::Pipeline variant ("extend the enum if needed"). That violates P2 single-authority — src/v3/std/bootstrap_authority.dag:90 already has "src/v3/compiler/pipeline.dag": CompilerAuthority, classifying pipeline.dag under the existing CompilerAuthority variant. The :14-17 comment is explicit: "the path itself is the BootstrapAuthoritySet map key; variants carry no duplicate path payload" — single authority, not extension-by-variant. Fix: Row #6 now instructs worker to derive the typed key from the existing bootstrap_authority-map witness (BootstrapAuthorityKey threading the existing CompilerAuthority classifier), refining the constructor surface if needed — NOT introducing a new enum variant. STOP-and-PING criteria updated to forbid new-variant resolution under any path. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof worker brief — γ ratified (2-variant residual) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395060514: - DescentResidual = EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) | EvidenceIncomplete (4 → 2 dissolution: Missing+Unknown fold via DescentUnknown injection; NonStrict folds via NonIncreasing wrap; Incomplete retained — different concern axis from evidence-lattice) - DescentEvidence 3-variant lattice at termination.dag:14-17 confirmed as authoritative composition target - Type signature from §10.3 row 966 confirmed verbatim-binding Director-asked canvas-shape verification absorbed: worker STOPs if EvidenceIncomplete decomposes into payload-variants (timeout / depth-bound / evaluator-error-during-proof-construction); proceeds as 2-variant otherwise. 7 same-slice acceptance gates incl Evaluator E2 #1971 consumer wiring in same PR + §10.3 row 966 row-text refresh to cite γ-disposition. Worker pin: quick-koi-190 (pre-authorized per §10.3 row 966). Auto-spawn HOLD per L-sized threshold; surgical-recreate path ratified case-by-case if critical path blocked. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — narrow EvidenceUnknown payload via NonStrictEvidence subset; delete superseded canvas openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2105: 2 findings. 1. BLOCKING (LAYER MODEL / illegal states unrepresentable): worker brief shape `EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence)` admitted EvidenceUnknown(Strict) even though the canvas itself acknowledged Strict-isn't-a-residual as illegal. P2 requires API-level enforcement, not prose convention. Fix: introduce typed subset `NonStrictEvidence = NonIncreasing | DescentUnknown`; residual now `EvidenceUnknown(NonStrictEvidence)` — illegal-states-unrepresentable by construction. NonStrictEvidence lands in same file as DescentResidual; composes with existing 3-variant DescentEvidence via inhabitation, not re-definition. 2. NON-BLOCKING (live-state drift): canvas + worker brief both visible with "ratification needed" vs "ratified" status — same P2 single-authority shape as the S5 canvas/worker-brief co-existence at #2079. Fix: delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-descent-execution-proof-canvas.md (worker brief frontmatter already names it as superseded; with canvas gone the live authority is unambiguous). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — section-anchor cite for §10.3 row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2105 line 47: my brief cited "§10.3 row 966" but the actual line is now 986 (after my Q-Reification row insert in PR #2079 shifted §10.3 by 20 lines). Reviewer's "no such section" claim is wrong on substance (file + section + row all exist) but the line drift IS real. Fix per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers (Director calibration in gunbc#2079): replaced all "§10.3 row 966" with "§10.3 Q-EVAL-Descent- Termination-Contract row" — name-anchor instead of line-anchor, drift-immune. 5 occurrences cleaned (closure predicate, acceptance gate #3, gate #5, STOP criterion, worker pin justification). Stylistic "row row-text" repetition collapsed to "row text". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition canvas — Lens<SymbolicCost> composition shape (#1957) Pre-staged per Director endorsement of T-CostLens-Composition canvas-shape authoring. Surfaces 3 composition options for the Lens<SymbolicCost> instance: α: two separate lenses, externally joined — REJECTED (violates §1.8 gate #39 no_coercion_cost_dimension by construction) β: single Lens<SymbolicCost> with composed witness in read — strong but requires Lens<C> carrier-shape refactor (target-context threading) γ (recommended): Lens<SymbolicCost> reads structural cost via algebra-fold + target-realization composed via existing Lookup<SymbolicCost> substrate at lookup.dag:48-60 — preserves generic Lens<C> carrier; satisfies all 4 §1.8 gates (#37-40) by construction; aligns with feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first Adjacent substrate verified at HEAD: lens.dag:70-77 (Lens<C>), algebra.dag:12+ (SymbolicCost 7-variant + Semiring), lookup.dag:48-60 (Lookup<SymbolicCost> + MissingCost lens-boundary). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-Workflow-As-Data canvas — audit-receipt-honoring scope-narrowing Pre-staged per Director endorsement. Q-Workflow-As-Data-Carriers (§10.3 row 983) named 5 carriers; grep-verified at HEAD that 4 of 5 ALREADY EXIST in dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (218 lines). Only WorkflowSecret<Name> is wholly net-new substrate. Surfaces 3 options: α: maximalist 5-carrier introduction in dsl/std/workflow.dag — REJECTED (admits parallel-representation debt vs audit-receipt #1771 reuse-first directive) β (recommended): minimalist — only WorkflowSecret<Name> + Cron<Schedule> refinement net-new; lens consumes extdeps.github.actions directly. Honors feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first. γ: like β + WorkflowObservationAnchor for typed lens-consumption-shape; natural ratchet from β if evidence accumulates. Sequencing: dispatch-ready post-T-LBP COMPLETE per §S4 design-schedule:95; brief authoring lands in advance per pre-staging discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition worker brief — γ ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775: - γ option ratified (Lens<SymbolicCost> + Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition) - Lens<C> generic at lens.dag:70-77 confirmed authoritative (no refactor in scope) - symbolic_cost_dimension: AnalysisDimension<SymbolicCost> defers to separate Dimensions sub-lane Critical reframing absorbed: src/v3/lenses/cost.dag ALREADY EXISTS (status: STRUCTURALLY TERMINAL; BEHAVIORALLY PROXY). T-CostLens-Composition is behavioral-completion + target-realization-wiring, NOT P1 carrier introduction. Worker reads existing lens; advances PROXY → BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE via Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition. 8 same-slice acceptance gates incl §1.8 #37-40 + #70 demonstration + lens status header refresh + §10.3 row text refresh. Out-of-scope (deferred per Director): symbolic_cost_dimension; Lens<C> generic refactor (STOP-and-PING if implementation reveals need). Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (same precedent as S5 + descent_execution_proof canvas deletions). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Delete superseded T-CostLens canvas (worker brief is single live authority) * docs(briefs): T-WAD Slice 1 worker brief — β ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395945465: 4 asks confirmed: 1. β ratified (minimalist reuse-first) 2. #1771 audit-receipt binding precedent confirmed 3. WorkflowSecret<Name> folds into dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (provider- specific scope; NOT new dsl/std/ file unless cross-provider evidence) 4. §1.8 gates #54 + #55 split into separate slices (slice 2 = timing-and-pattern; slice 3 = ci_workflow_modeled_as_dag) Slice 1 net-new substrate (only): - WorkflowSecret<Name> + SecretScope carriers - CronExpression + CronField (typed refinement of existing WorkflowTrigger::Schedule { cron: String } at actions.dag:43) Other 4 carriers from §10.3 row 983 reused as-is from extdeps.github.actions per audit-receipt #1771 directive. 6 same-slice acceptance gates incl no-parallel-representation grep + gate #53/#62/#63 advancement + bootstrap regen + clippy. Cross-provider STOP-and-PING per Director ask #3 caveat: worker greps adjacent provider work for WorkflowSecret-shape evidence; surfaces if found before finalizing fold-into-extdeps. Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (S5 + descent_execution_proof + T-CostLens precedent). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demo (#1952) complexity-contract compile-error worker brief Pre-staged execution brief per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker brief path (no canvas — design-lock at docs/design-lens-application- surface.md specifies fixture shape verbatim at line 292). 7 same-slice acceptance gates: fixture program (O(n²) body + Enforce O(log n) budget) + TestClaim assertion + diagnostic structural validation + no regression on T-LBP cementing + bootstrap regen + clippy + §1.8 #92 advancement. Hard prerequisites STOP-and-PING: T-LAS Slice A landed (gates #88-#91) AND T-LBP complexity-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE (gate #79). Worker does not author against partial substrate. Sibling demos #1953 (CRDT cost) + #1954 (memory-peak cost) share the same hard-prerequisite + TestClaim shape pattern — could dispatch as 3 sequential PRs or single multi-demo PR (worker's call at dispatch). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demos #1953 + #1954 — cost-basis sibling worker brief Pre-staged sibling brief covering both cost-basis demos (CRDT cost basis + memory-peak cost basis) per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker-brief path. Single brief for two demos because they share: - Hard-prerequisite pattern (T-LAS Slice A + T-LBP cost-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE) - TestClaim + Diagnostic structural validation shape - apply_lens(cost, ...) Enforce mode Sibling of #1952 brief (complexity-contract compile-error). Worker's call at dispatch on multi-demo PR vs sequential PRs (Mgr ratification needed if going multi-demo). #1953 (CRDT) substrate per design §4.2 + cost-basis-declaration audit at docs/audit/t-user-authored-cost-basis-discipline-worked-examples.md. #1954 (memory-peak) substrate per design §4.3; STOP-and-PING if Dimension<SymbolicCost> substrate (deferred to Dimensions sub-lane per Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775) not yet landed. 6 same-slice acceptance gates per demo + same STOP-and-PING discipline as #1952. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens — update Sub-issue from #1957 to #2141 (post-surgical-recreate) PM executed Director's surgical-recreate ratification (gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4397693699) at 17:54:43Z: closed #1957, created fresh #2141 to trigger pollAutoSpawn fresh-creation path. Worker fierce-ram-21 (#2153) spawned on #2141. 1-line brief update per Director's queued-action commitment: brief now references #2141 + cites surgical-recreate authority. #1957 closed-as-superseded. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas (β-extended substrate-shape question) Director α-revised supersession at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4400920572 elevated β-extended path (introduce first-precedent .dag-side fold-over-realization-rows + name active-target authority shape) from slice-tier to canvas-tier. Authored per Q-PAFS template: - Substrate-state at HEAD grep-verified (Lens<C>.read no target-context; zero .dag-side fold-over-realizations precedent; 15+ lens instances using generic Lens<C>) - Binary question: should .dag-side lenses receive target-context for target-keyed reading? - Options matrix: (i) LanguageSpec param to fold; (ii) per-target lens instances [parallel-representation debt]; (iii) global accessor [REJECTED global-state anti-pattern] - Mgr provisional preference: (i) - Cross-cutting: cost.dag load-bearing; emission_provenance.dag secondary; other 13+ lenses target-agnostic Framework discipline anchors per Director corrections: - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline - feedback_parallel_representation_debt - feedback_abstraction_layering (sibling canvas) Sibling canvas (ε path): q-cost-composition-layering-canvas.md authoring follows. Both canvases together address deeper cross-cutting axis: does target-context belong .dag-side (β-extended) or emit-side (ε)? Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Cost-Composition-Layering canvas (ε substrate-shape question) Sibling canvas to q-lens-target-context-canvas.md. Director α-revised supersession at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4400920572 elevated ε path (Rust-side cost-composition wiring; preserves cost.dag PROXY) from slice-tier to canvas-tier. Authored per Q-PAFS template: - Factoring claim: cost = (target-agnostic-shape SymbolicCost algebra) × (target-specific-values per-primitive realization-cost data loaded Rust-side) - Test against feedback_abstraction_layering (Director-named anchor at gunbc#828 c#4400921658): pure objective concepts × language-agnostic LanguageSpec × emit-side composition. Compliance test for each layer. - Pro factoring (ε structurally honest): SymbolicCost algebra is target- agnostic at HEAD; Rust-side composition is natural home; #38/#39 substrate- already-aligned per Slice 1 finding. - Con factoring (ε is parallel-representation debt): N parallel Rust-side compositions if multiple lenses need target-context; lens-framework abstraction stops at substrate boundary; future lenses hit same dilemma. Mgr provisional reading: factoring honest for COST specifically; NOT generalizable. ε right framing IF cost is the singular need + factoring holds. If N>1 target-context-needing lenses surface, β-extended (option (i) from sibling canvas) becomes the right path. Director ratification ask: 3-way choice (ε) Cost-specific Rust-side composition; preserves cost.dag PROXY (β-extended option (i)) Lens<C> refactor for LanguageSpec parameter (both sequenced) ε now for cost; β-extended later if N>1 Framework discipline anchors: - feedback_abstraction_layering (Director-named for this canvas) - feedback_parallel_representation_debt - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline Canvas-pair complete; sibling canvas + this canvas address the deeper cross-cutting axis: target-context belongs .dag-side (β-extended) or emit-side (ε)? Director ratification across both informs T-CostLens follow-on slice + downstream lens architecture. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs: ε ratified canonical for cost; β-extended deferred to N=2 — gate updates Director ratification at #2181 #issuecomment-... : - (ε) RATIFIED standalone for cost composition (canonical-not-transitional) - (β-extended option (i)) DEFERRED to N=2 trigger event (second lens with target-context need beyond cost) - ("both sequenced") REJECTED as bridge-with-named-dissolution anti-pattern Same-slice acceptance gates landed: 1. Q-Cost-Composition-Layering canvas: status updated from "ratification needed" → "Director-RATIFIED 2026-05-07 (ε standalone; canonical-not- transitional); PROPOSAL maturation pending" 2. Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas: status updated from "ratification needed" → "DRAFT/DEFERRED 2026-05-07; reopens on N=2 trigger event" (second lens with substantive target-context need; emission_provenance most likely candidate per cross-cutting analysis §3) 3. r3-program-plan.md gate-table rows #37 + #40 + #70: ε path ratified; close via Rust-side composition reading abstract SymbolicCost × per- primitive realization-cost in T-CostLens follow-on slice 4. r3-program-plan.md §10.3 T-CostLens-Composition row: ε ratified for #37/#40/#70; β-extended deferred per N=2 trigger 5. v3-lens-capability-register.md cost.dag row: ε disposition cited; #2175 continues as cross-cutting umbrella tracker Closed-system disposition per Director: if N=2 condition never fires, β-extended never fires — structurally correct under closed-system design. Framework discipline anchors honored: - feedback_abstraction_layering: ε respects layering (objective concepts pure; target-specific values flow at emit time per Layer-3 honesty test) - feedback_parallel_representation_debt: bounded to N=1; reopens at N=2 - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline: ε ratified canonical, not transitional - feedback_construction_over_ratchets: substrate-shape question answered structurally - feedback_substrate_principle_audit: substrate-fact authored at canvas- tier; ratification follows P1 procedure Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): canvas inventory grounded in live src/v3/lenses/ registry codex BLOCKING at #2181 (sha 00551a8): Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas inventory was "copied from expected lens set instead of live src/v3/lenses/ registry"; emission_provenance trigger references not grounded in live file content. Same shape of error as 3 prior BLOCKING reversals (Q-Reification, S5 DeclarationRef, T-CostLens merge-content). Substrate-state-grep is being treated as retrospective-correction rather than prerequisite. Tightening: this is the 4th occurrence; should be hard-prerequisite-discipline going forward. Fixes: 1. Q-Lens-Target-Context inventory section: replaced approximate "15+ lens instances" framing with exact `ls`-grep registry (15 .dag files listed by name), notes infer_helpers + lower_helpers are helper modules authoring shared structural fns rather than top-level lens instances. 2. emission_provenance.dag analysis grounded in HEAD file status header: STATUS = STRUCTURALLY TERMINAL; LENS-INSTANCE FIXTURE-BOUND; BEHAVIORALLY DEFERRED. `read` body is fail-closed Empty stub. Lens does NOT currently read target-context inside fold; producer-side instrumentation records target-specific entries consumed via standard framework. Reframed as "ungrounded at HEAD" rather than "POSSIBLY target-context need" — re-evaluates at producer-wiring landing. 3. Net finding: N=1 confirmed at HEAD (cost.dag only); N=2 is empirically open pending lens-completion cycles, NOT pre-claimable. Plus non-blocking improvement: Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 9 stale `#issuecomment-...` placeholder replaced with concrete ratification comment id `#issuecomment-4401584012`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): fix Director-ratification-ask typo + #37 gate-id clarification footnote cursor APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS at #2181 (sha 4209eb7) flagged 2 NON-BLOCKING items + 1 exploratory: 1. (NON-BLOCKING) Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 69: `## Directorratification ask` → `## Director ratification ask` (whitespace typo) 2. (NON-BLOCKING) Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 9 placeholder `#issuecomment-...`: ALREADY ADDRESSED in commit `db88b1004` (replaced with `#issuecomment-4401584012`) 3. (Exploratory) Gate #37 id `cost_lens_reads_target_realization` framing implies .dag lens body performs realization read; per ε ratification it's Rust-side composition consumer. Added clarifying footnote noting gate-id retention + Rust-side closure path; rename candidate post-follow-on-slice landing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context — absorb PM canvas-review concerns 1-3 Director relayed PM canvas review at #2068 c#4401627536: Concern 1 (RESOLVED via grep-verify): empirical N=1 confirmation. PM ran `grep -lc 'TypeRealization|CallableRealization|MethodTemplateContract| target_realization|realization_cost|LanguageSpec' src/v3/lenses/*.dag`; only cost.dag has 3 hits, all 14 others have 0 refs (including emission_provenance.dag which I'd previously framed speculatively). Net-finding §3 updated with grep result inline + "N=1 empirically grounded" framing replacing speculative "secondary candidate" language. Empirical basis for DEFERRED β-extended disposition strengthened. Concern 2 (Option (ii) multiplier framing): per-target lens instances replicate the entire Lens<C> authoring surface — N×M × 4 (carrier + monoid sequential + branch + iterate) authoring overhead. Updated Con bullet to reflect the multiplier explicitly: 3 targets × 1 cost lens × 4 = 12 authored fns; grows to 36 if 3 lenses need target-context. Cites feedback_parallel_representation_debt as the P2 framing. Concern 3 (Option (i) threading cost quantification): replaced narrative "threading cost is real but manageable" with quantified breakdown — ~15 signature changes + 14 ignore-parameter patterns + 1 consumer + cementing- test revalidation. Helps future Director ratification at N=2 trigger event. All 3 amendments are docs-only refinements; ε ratification at gunbc#2181 c#4401584012 unchanged. Strengthens canvas as durable substrate-shape decision record. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): canvases — collapse stale ratification-ask sections post-ratification codex BLOCKING at #2181 (sha be9a9c9): both canvases had stale "Director ratification ask" sections after status headers were updated to RATIFIED/DEFERRED. Per INVARIANTS P1 "Documentation Describes Live State" — canvas internally presented both settled and unsettled authority. Fixes: 1. Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 69-76: "Director ratification ask" section collapsed to "Director ratification (RECEIVED 2026-05-07)" with ε ratified, β-extended deferred, "both sequenced" rejected. Three options recorded as historical with ratification cite. Eliminates the rejected "both, sequenced" line that conflicted with status-header "canonical-not- transitional" framing. 2. Q-Lens-Target-Context line 131-136: "Director ratification ask" section collapsed to "Director disposition (DEFERRED 2026-05-07; reopens on N=2 trigger event)". Original ratification asks recorded as FROZEN; revisit at N=2 trigger event with then-current substrate-state grep. Eliminates live-now-ratify framing that conflicted with status-header DEFERRED. Both canvases now single live authority — RATIFIED/DEFERRED dispositions, no internal ratification-ask drift. Future re-ratification (Q-Lens-Target- Context at N=2 trigger) refreshes options matrix at that point per substrate-state-honesty discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context — separate live N=1 from reopen-only future N=2 openai-pro APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS at #2181 (sha be9a9c9): canvas line 127 mixed live N=1 authority with speculative N=2 candidate in one current-state cost count. Per P1 Documentation Describes Live State + P2 single-authority metadata: the live count at HEAD is `cost × 3 targets = 3 per-target instances` (× 4 authoring-multiplier per Option (ii) Con = 12 fns). The `emission_provenance × 3` figure is a reopen-only future scenario that materializes only if emission_provenance becomes the second real target-context lens at producer- wiring landing time. Updated to separate the two clearly: live count + reopen-only future scenario marked separately. Aligns with the grep-verified N=1 finding established earlier in canvas §3. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): T-CostLens worker brief — ε supersession header (γ retained as context) PR #2181 merged at eff426d ratifies ε path canonical-not-transitional for cost composition. Brief was authored under γ scope (.dag-side Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition). Add binding ε supersession header at top; retain γ section as historical context per single-authority discipline. cost.dag stays PROXY under ε; composition is Rust-side (abstract SymbolicCost shape × per-primitive realization values). Authority: Director ratification at #2181 #issuecomment-4401584012. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…precedent does NOT apply) (#2197) * docs(briefs): Substrate bridge SourceSpan.file participation retirement worker brief Authored for gunbc#1958 Substrate-owned bridge slice. Targets audit-row #2 (kernel Bool patch BOOL_TYPES_FILE) + row #6 (pipeline authority PIPELINE_AUTHORITY_FILE) per r3-program-plan.md §5 line 353 scope-narrowing. Sibling #1959 closed as already-retired by PR #1272. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 Variant-aware projection carrier canvas (#1947) Surfaces 3 carrier-shape options (α RestResponseProjection variant-tag / β Declaration variant_projection_metadata / γ free-standing CoproductProjection) for Director ratification before worker brief authoring. Mgr-tier recommendation = γ (DeclarationRef-keyed, avoids tag-string-as-identity bridge). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — same-slice prerequisite + section anchor Director calibration (gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-...): 1. Promote ratchet-test cross-Mgr handoff from conditional Acceptance #4 to upfront same-slice BLOCKING prerequisite gate (per feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline). 2. Replace `r3-program-plan.md:353` line-cite with `§5 Y4 scope-clarification` section anchor (per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers). Code-line anchors in bootstrap.rs left as-is (anchor sites worker navigates to). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — umbrella stays Open per P2 ledger discipline Address BLOCKING inline review at line 46: bridge_source_span_file_participation_retired is an Open umbrella whose green predicate is "no production code path consults SourceSpan.file" per r3-structure.md:115. Partial retirement was explicitly rejected 2026-04-29 (Director acceptance #1130 / dispatch #1139). Changes: - Add Ledger-discipline preamble: umbrella row stays Open; receipt updates audit-packet enumeration, NOT bridge_ledger.dag. - Acceptance #3 reframed: do NOT mutate bridge_ledger.dag; mark rows #2 + #6 retired in the audit packet only. - Authority anchor updated: status=Open (not Proposed); add r3-structure.md:115 + bridge_ledger.dag:125-129 line refs. - Cross-Mgr section reframed: umbrella ratchet cannot flip on this PR alone; Verification's ledger-zero audit progress field is post-merge tracking, not a same-slice pre-merge blocker. Reconciles with BLOCKING finding (Director calibration #1 assumed umbrella ratchet could flip on partial retirement, which r3-structure.md:115 forbids). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 CoproductProjection worker brief — γ ratified (#1947) Director ratification of option γ at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394369848. Free-standing CoproductProjection carrier in src/v3/std/, DeclarationRef-keyed, typed WireTagValue leaf, 4 same-slice acceptance gates. Surfaces 3 substrate observations for STOP-and-PING (DeclarationRef String alias; FieldRef does-not-exist-at-HEAD; tag_field String asymmetry) — worker must escalate, not silently work around. PB Mgr cross-Mgr ping at carrier landing (heads-up, not blocker). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — resolve Acceptance #4 / Cross-Mgr contradiction openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at PR #2079 #issuecomment-... flagged Acceptance #4 ("ratchet test passes ... confirmed-present at HEAD before merge") contradicting the reframed Cross-Mgr section ("No same-slice ratchet-test gate applies; post-merge tracking only"). Both said different things about whether the umbrella ratchet is a pre-merge blocker. Resolution: Acceptance #4 reframed to explicitly state "No umbrella-ratchet pre-merge gate" — worker does NOT wait for Verification ratchet authoring; acceptance for this slice is the audit-packet receipt update in #3. Cross-Mgr handoff also updated to remove "ratchet authoring" from Verification's same-slice duties. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): S5 brief — absorb Director pre-ratifications for 3 STOP-and-PING items Director pre-ratified dispositions at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394416049: 1. DeclarationRef alias: accept (b) + debt note (re-escalate only on same-slice break) 2. FieldRef: grep-decide between InputFieldRef-as-specialization vs rename 3. tag_field String asymmetry: typed introduction + debt note for migration Worker proceeds without re-pinging unless evidence forces escalation. STOP-criteria section narrowed accordingly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification Gate A receipt — Option A (Dag-as-carrier) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394427814 + proposal merge at PR #2096 (commit fec8692): src/v3/std/substrate.dag::Dag IS the reflected program; no new substrate carrier required. ReflectedProgram<T> rejected. Gate A patches: 1. r3-program-plan.md §10.3: new Q-Reification row marked RATIFIED with PR #2096 merge link + Gate A receipt scope (this PR + #1960 closed-as-non-addition). 2. r3-v-pattern-a-tc1-v1-worker.md: 3 sites — status header (Q-Reification CLEARED, Branch B η non-vacuity remains), worker-pin gate, E6-G1.a/E3 producer dependency. Replaces ReflectedProgram<T> with consumer-wiring nuance: lens fold consumes Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator. 3. r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md: 2 sites — same nuance: deferred work is consumer-wiring, NOT a separate carrier. 4. r3-pr-e8-w1-producer-contract-test-plan-worker.md: 1 site — fold-over-Dag reframe. Receipt of pass-by-construction: this PR adds NO new .dag declaration to src/v3/std/. The ratification is structurally a non-addition (Option A correctness proof per same-slice dissolution discipline). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — delete superseded canvas + name dissolution trigger for tag_field asymmetry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings (P2 single-authority + P5 dissolution trigger). Fixes: 1. Delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-s5-variant-aware-projection-carrier-canvas.md (superseded by the γ-ratified worker brief in same PR; would otherwise leave two current-looking S5 status authorities post-merge — one saying ratification pending, one saying γ ratified). 2. Substrate observation #3 (tag_field String/FieldRef asymmetry) now carries a binding named dissolution trigger: when FieldRef exists as top-level carrier AND InputFieldRef is classified, migrate InternallyTaggedObject.tag_field via follow-on Substrate hygiene PR. Worker MUST add debt-paydown row to authoritative debt ledger before merging carrier-introduction PR. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification row — fix invariant cite (C-1 → P2) cursor review at gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-... flagged C-1 as mis-keyed: INVARIANTS.md C-1 is "missing args fail closed; no LitNull sentinels" (P3 fail-closed family), not parallel-representation/duplicate-authority. The correct cite for rejecting a parallel ReflectedProgram<T> alongside Dag is P2 single authority (INVARIANTS.md line 148: cost of change is proportional to how many files encode the same fact). Cite updated to "INVARIANTS.md P2 single authority" with inline gloss. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — name dissolution trigger for DeclarationRef alias debt openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: substrate observation #1 had desired endpoint ("future structural promotion of DeclarationRef") but no checkable dissolution trigger — same P5 gap that #3 (tag_field asymmetry) had been fixed for in commit 2601d7d. Trigger now binding: promote DeclarationRef when EITHER (a) audit-row #14 (declaration_name_preference_rank / declaration_by_name rank-table) closes — dsl/std ↔ src/v3/std module convergence makes name-keyed identity unambiguous and structural module identity available, OR (b) any DeclarationRef-typed consumer surfaces a string-identity bridge per feedback_opaque_strings_attract_heuristics (heuristic patching, naming- convention dispatch, suffix/prefix matching). Worker MUST add debt-paydown row before merging carrier-introduction PR (same pattern as the tag_field debt requirement). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: complete Q-Reification stale-cite sweep — e6-g1a brief :169 + Q-PAFS row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md:169 still said TC1/V1 "waits for Q-Reification and the carrier landing", contradicting the same brief's lines 15-19 + 148-153 saying Dag IS the carrier and no separate carrier lands. Fixed: 1. e6-g1a brief line 167-170 paragraph: clarified V1 waits for consumer-wiring work (lens fold consuming Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator), NOT for a carrier-introduction. 2. r3-program-plan.md:954 Q-PAFS row text was the same shape: "Resume after Q-Reification + ReflectedProgram<T>" — contradicted my new Q-Reification row in the same diff. Updated: Q-Reification STOP CLEARED 2026-05-07 (Option A); remaining hold = Branch B η non-vacuity only. Out-of-scope-for-this-PR: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-feasibility-probe.md contains 4 stale cites but is not modified in this PR; stale-on-main can be swept in a follow-up if needed (single source of truth is the e6-g1a-static-lens worker brief, not the feasibility probe per Q-PAFS Path A acceptance). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix InputFieldRef mis-read; reframe observations #2 + #3 codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079 line 22: my brief mis-read services.dag:28-36. The text actually says "No separate InputFieldRef carrier is introduced here, since ParamToken.name already carries the same shape and adding a wrapper would duplicate without strengthening the structural invariant" — i.e., InputFieldRef does NOT exist; the comment REJECTS the wrapper. Fixes: 1. Substrate observation #2 reframed: no FieldRef-shaped carrier exists at HEAD; services.dag:28-36 precedent argues against wrapper unless it strengthens structural invariant. New (a)/(b) STOP-and-PING: (a) follow services.dag precedent — wire_tag_field: String + key invariant on wire_tag_values + fixture-load fail-closed check; (b) introduce typed FieldRef — must justify per "duplicate without strengthening" test. 2. Carrier shape (line 19): wire_tag_field: FieldRef → {String|FieldRef} pending observation #2 resolution. 3. Substrate observation #3 reframed: InternallyTaggedObject asymmetry is conditional on path (b); under path (a) no asymmetry exists. Trigger correspondingly conditional. Removed stale "InputFieldRef classified" trigger clause. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — consolidate split per-variant maps into single keyed entry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: CoproductProjection shape split per-variant data across two parallel maps (variant_field_projections + wire_tag_values), admitting illegal states where keysets drift (P2 boundary discipline / illegal-states-unrepresentable). Fix: introduce CoproductVariantProjection { field_projection, wire_tag_value } as the per-variant keyed value; CoproductProjection.variant_projections becomes Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection>. Single keyed authority per variant. Director's binding constraint #2 enumerated the two fields separately but said "refine in implementation as ergonomics demand" — consolidation preserves the substantive constraints (typed WireTagValue leaf, structural per-variant projection) while enforcing keyset alignment by carrier shape. Empty-payload variants encoded via FieldProjection::Empty constructor (or analog), not via map-absence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix stale split-map vocab in path (a) + scope STOP-and-PING umbrella openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings. 1. Path (a) at line 43 still referenced "Map<VariantId, WireTagValue> key invariant on wire_tag_values" — that's the superseded split-map vocab; the consolidated shape is Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection> on variant_projections. Path (a) now references the consolidated map; per-variant WireTagValue lives inside CoproductVariantProjection. 2. Pre-ratification umbrella at line 36 said "all 3 dispositions pre-ratified, proceed without re-pinging" — but observation #2 was re-opened after the codex InputFieldRef finding and explicitly says STOP-and-PING. Contradictory. Umbrella now scoped: observations #1 + #3 are pre-ratified; #2 is re-opened STOP-and-PING — worker MUST escalate before choosing path (a) vs (b). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof canvas — 4-residual coproduct-dissolution audit Director ratified split disposition at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394696074: descent_execution_proof STANDS ALONE (consumer-side termination-contract substrate function with fail-closed residual enumeration; folding into T-E-P-Producer-Broadening explicitly rejected — different concern axis). Canvas surfaces 3 carrier-shape options for the residual enumeration per Director's coproduct-dissolution audit suggestion: α: 4-variant coproduct verbatim from §10.3 row 966 (Missing | Unknown | Incomplete | NonStrict) β: 3-axis dimensional product (presence × completeness × strictness) γ (recommended): reuse DescentEvidence at termination.dag:14-17 for "absent/unknown" via EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) payload-variant + separate EvidenceIncomplete — ratchets variant count 4 → 2 via dimensional folding while honoring services.dag "no parallel wrapper" precedent. Mgr recommendation γ; β rejected unless 3 axes provably compose orthogonally. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan brief Row #6 — derive from bootstrap_authority map, no new enum variant codex BLOCKING (post-merge of #2079, on commit 85ceb85 — same brief is now on main): my Row #6 disposition told the worker to introduce a new BootstrapAuthority::Pipeline variant ("extend the enum if needed"). That violates P2 single-authority — src/v3/std/bootstrap_authority.dag:90 already has "src/v3/compiler/pipeline.dag": CompilerAuthority, classifying pipeline.dag under the existing CompilerAuthority variant. The :14-17 comment is explicit: "the path itself is the BootstrapAuthoritySet map key; variants carry no duplicate path payload" — single authority, not extension-by-variant. Fix: Row #6 now instructs worker to derive the typed key from the existing bootstrap_authority-map witness (BootstrapAuthorityKey threading the existing CompilerAuthority classifier), refining the constructor surface if needed — NOT introducing a new enum variant. STOP-and-PING criteria updated to forbid new-variant resolution under any path. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof worker brief — γ ratified (2-variant residual) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395060514: - DescentResidual = EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) | EvidenceIncomplete (4 → 2 dissolution: Missing+Unknown fold via DescentUnknown injection; NonStrict folds via NonIncreasing wrap; Incomplete retained — different concern axis from evidence-lattice) - DescentEvidence 3-variant lattice at termination.dag:14-17 confirmed as authoritative composition target - Type signature from §10.3 row 966 confirmed verbatim-binding Director-asked canvas-shape verification absorbed: worker STOPs if EvidenceIncomplete decomposes into payload-variants (timeout / depth-bound / evaluator-error-during-proof-construction); proceeds as 2-variant otherwise. 7 same-slice acceptance gates incl Evaluator E2 #1971 consumer wiring in same PR + §10.3 row 966 row-text refresh to cite γ-disposition. Worker pin: quick-koi-190 (pre-authorized per §10.3 row 966). Auto-spawn HOLD per L-sized threshold; surgical-recreate path ratified case-by-case if critical path blocked. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — narrow EvidenceUnknown payload via NonStrictEvidence subset; delete superseded canvas openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2105: 2 findings. 1. BLOCKING (LAYER MODEL / illegal states unrepresentable): worker brief shape `EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence)` admitted EvidenceUnknown(Strict) even though the canvas itself acknowledged Strict-isn't-a-residual as illegal. P2 requires API-level enforcement, not prose convention. Fix: introduce typed subset `NonStrictEvidence = NonIncreasing | DescentUnknown`; residual now `EvidenceUnknown(NonStrictEvidence)` — illegal-states-unrepresentable by construction. NonStrictEvidence lands in same file as DescentResidual; composes with existing 3-variant DescentEvidence via inhabitation, not re-definition. 2. NON-BLOCKING (live-state drift): canvas + worker brief both visible with "ratification needed" vs "ratified" status — same P2 single-authority shape as the S5 canvas/worker-brief co-existence at #2079. Fix: delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-descent-execution-proof-canvas.md (worker brief frontmatter already names it as superseded; with canvas gone the live authority is unambiguous). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — section-anchor cite for §10.3 row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2105 line 47: my brief cited "§10.3 row 966" but the actual line is now 986 (after my Q-Reification row insert in PR #2079 shifted §10.3 by 20 lines). Reviewer's "no such section" claim is wrong on substance (file + section + row all exist) but the line drift IS real. Fix per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers (Director calibration in gunbc#2079): replaced all "§10.3 row 966" with "§10.3 Q-EVAL-Descent- Termination-Contract row" — name-anchor instead of line-anchor, drift-immune. 5 occurrences cleaned (closure predicate, acceptance gate #3, gate #5, STOP criterion, worker pin justification). Stylistic "row row-text" repetition collapsed to "row text". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition canvas — Lens<SymbolicCost> composition shape (#1957) Pre-staged per Director endorsement of T-CostLens-Composition canvas-shape authoring. Surfaces 3 composition options for the Lens<SymbolicCost> instance: α: two separate lenses, externally joined — REJECTED (violates §1.8 gate #39 no_coercion_cost_dimension by construction) β: single Lens<SymbolicCost> with composed witness in read — strong but requires Lens<C> carrier-shape refactor (target-context threading) γ (recommended): Lens<SymbolicCost> reads structural cost via algebra-fold + target-realization composed via existing Lookup<SymbolicCost> substrate at lookup.dag:48-60 — preserves generic Lens<C> carrier; satisfies all 4 §1.8 gates (#37-40) by construction; aligns with feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first Adjacent substrate verified at HEAD: lens.dag:70-77 (Lens<C>), algebra.dag:12+ (SymbolicCost 7-variant + Semiring), lookup.dag:48-60 (Lookup<SymbolicCost> + MissingCost lens-boundary). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-Workflow-As-Data canvas — audit-receipt-honoring scope-narrowing Pre-staged per Director endorsement. Q-Workflow-As-Data-Carriers (§10.3 row 983) named 5 carriers; grep-verified at HEAD that 4 of 5 ALREADY EXIST in dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (218 lines). Only WorkflowSecret<Name> is wholly net-new substrate. Surfaces 3 options: α: maximalist 5-carrier introduction in dsl/std/workflow.dag — REJECTED (admits parallel-representation debt vs audit-receipt #1771 reuse-first directive) β (recommended): minimalist — only WorkflowSecret<Name> + Cron<Schedule> refinement net-new; lens consumes extdeps.github.actions directly. Honors feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first. γ: like β + WorkflowObservationAnchor for typed lens-consumption-shape; natural ratchet from β if evidence accumulates. Sequencing: dispatch-ready post-T-LBP COMPLETE per §S4 design-schedule:95; brief authoring lands in advance per pre-staging discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition worker brief — γ ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775: - γ option ratified (Lens<SymbolicCost> + Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition) - Lens<C> generic at lens.dag:70-77 confirmed authoritative (no refactor in scope) - symbolic_cost_dimension: AnalysisDimension<SymbolicCost> defers to separate Dimensions sub-lane Critical reframing absorbed: src/v3/lenses/cost.dag ALREADY EXISTS (status: STRUCTURALLY TERMINAL; BEHAVIORALLY PROXY). T-CostLens-Composition is behavioral-completion + target-realization-wiring, NOT P1 carrier introduction. Worker reads existing lens; advances PROXY → BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE via Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition. 8 same-slice acceptance gates incl §1.8 #37-40 + #70 demonstration + lens status header refresh + §10.3 row text refresh. Out-of-scope (deferred per Director): symbolic_cost_dimension; Lens<C> generic refactor (STOP-and-PING if implementation reveals need). Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (same precedent as S5 + descent_execution_proof canvas deletions). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Delete superseded T-CostLens canvas (worker brief is single live authority) * docs(briefs): T-WAD Slice 1 worker brief — β ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395945465: 4 asks confirmed: 1. β ratified (minimalist reuse-first) 2. #1771 audit-receipt binding precedent confirmed 3. WorkflowSecret<Name> folds into dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (provider- specific scope; NOT new dsl/std/ file unless cross-provider evidence) 4. §1.8 gates #54 + #55 split into separate slices (slice 2 = timing-and-pattern; slice 3 = ci_workflow_modeled_as_dag) Slice 1 net-new substrate (only): - WorkflowSecret<Name> + SecretScope carriers - CronExpression + CronField (typed refinement of existing WorkflowTrigger::Schedule { cron: String } at actions.dag:43) Other 4 carriers from §10.3 row 983 reused as-is from extdeps.github.actions per audit-receipt #1771 directive. 6 same-slice acceptance gates incl no-parallel-representation grep + gate #53/#62/#63 advancement + bootstrap regen + clippy. Cross-provider STOP-and-PING per Director ask #3 caveat: worker greps adjacent provider work for WorkflowSecret-shape evidence; surfaces if found before finalizing fold-into-extdeps. Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (S5 + descent_execution_proof + T-CostLens precedent). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demo (#1952) complexity-contract compile-error worker brief Pre-staged execution brief per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker brief path (no canvas — design-lock at docs/design-lens-application- surface.md specifies fixture shape verbatim at line 292). 7 same-slice acceptance gates: fixture program (O(n²) body + Enforce O(log n) budget) + TestClaim assertion + diagnostic structural validation + no regression on T-LBP cementing + bootstrap regen + clippy + §1.8 #92 advancement. Hard prerequisites STOP-and-PING: T-LAS Slice A landed (gates #88-#91) AND T-LBP complexity-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE (gate #79). Worker does not author against partial substrate. Sibling demos #1953 (CRDT cost) + #1954 (memory-peak cost) share the same hard-prerequisite + TestClaim shape pattern — could dispatch as 3 sequential PRs or single multi-demo PR (worker's call at dispatch). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demos #1953 + #1954 — cost-basis sibling worker brief Pre-staged sibling brief covering both cost-basis demos (CRDT cost basis + memory-peak cost basis) per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker-brief path. Single brief for two demos because they share: - Hard-prerequisite pattern (T-LAS Slice A + T-LBP cost-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE) - TestClaim + Diagnostic structural validation shape - apply_lens(cost, ...) Enforce mode Sibling of #1952 brief (complexity-contract compile-error). Worker's call at dispatch on multi-demo PR vs sequential PRs (Mgr ratification needed if going multi-demo). #1953 (CRDT) substrate per design §4.2 + cost-basis-declaration audit at docs/audit/t-user-authored-cost-basis-discipline-worked-examples.md. #1954 (memory-peak) substrate per design §4.3; STOP-and-PING if Dimension<SymbolicCost> substrate (deferred to Dimensions sub-lane per Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775) not yet landed. 6 same-slice acceptance gates per demo + same STOP-and-PING discipline as #1952. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens — update Sub-issue from #1957 to #2141 (post-surgical-recreate) PM executed Director's surgical-recreate ratification (gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4397693699) at 17:54:43Z: closed #1957, created fresh #2141 to trigger pollAutoSpawn fresh-creation path. Worker fierce-ram-21 (#2153) spawned on #2141. 1-line brief update per Director's queued-action commitment: brief now references #2141 + cites surgical-recreate authority. #1957 closed-as-superseded. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas (β-extended substrate-shape question) Director α-revised supersession at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4400920572 elevated β-extended path (introduce first-precedent .dag-side fold-over-realization-rows + name active-target authority shape) from slice-tier to canvas-tier. Authored per Q-PAFS template: - Substrate-state at HEAD grep-verified (Lens<C>.read no target-context; zero .dag-side fold-over-realizations precedent; 15+ lens instances using generic Lens<C>) - Binary question: should .dag-side lenses receive target-context for target-keyed reading? - Options matrix: (i) LanguageSpec param to fold; (ii) per-target lens instances [parallel-representation debt]; (iii) global accessor [REJECTED global-state anti-pattern] - Mgr provisional preference: (i) - Cross-cutting: cost.dag load-bearing; emission_provenance.dag secondary; other 13+ lenses target-agnostic Framework discipline anchors per Director corrections: - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline - feedback_parallel_representation_debt - feedback_abstraction_layering (sibling canvas) Sibling canvas (ε path): q-cost-composition-layering-canvas.md authoring follows. Both canvases together address deeper cross-cutting axis: does target-context belong .dag-side (β-extended) or emit-side (ε)? Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Cost-Composition-Layering canvas (ε substrate-shape question) Sibling canvas to q-lens-target-context-canvas.md. Director α-revised supersession at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4400920572 elevated ε path (Rust-side cost-composition wiring; preserves cost.dag PROXY) from slice-tier to canvas-tier. Authored per Q-PAFS template: - Factoring claim: cost = (target-agnostic-shape SymbolicCost algebra) × (target-specific-values per-primitive realization-cost data loaded Rust-side) - Test against feedback_abstraction_layering (Director-named anchor at gunbc#828 c#4400921658): pure objective concepts × language-agnostic LanguageSpec × emit-side composition. Compliance test for each layer. - Pro factoring (ε structurally honest): SymbolicCost algebra is target- agnostic at HEAD; Rust-side composition is natural home; #38/#39 substrate- already-aligned per Slice 1 finding. - Con factoring (ε is parallel-representation debt): N parallel Rust-side compositions if multiple lenses need target-context; lens-framework abstraction stops at substrate boundary; future lenses hit same dilemma. Mgr provisional reading: factoring honest for COST specifically; NOT generalizable. ε right framing IF cost is the singular need + factoring holds. If N>1 target-context-needing lenses surface, β-extended (option (i) from sibling canvas) becomes the right path. Director ratification ask: 3-way choice (ε) Cost-specific Rust-side composition; preserves cost.dag PROXY (β-extended option (i)) Lens<C> refactor for LanguageSpec parameter (both sequenced) ε now for cost; β-extended later if N>1 Framework discipline anchors: - feedback_abstraction_layering (Director-named for this canvas) - feedback_parallel_representation_debt - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline Canvas-pair complete; sibling canvas + this canvas address the deeper cross-cutting axis: target-context belongs .dag-side (β-extended) or emit-side (ε)? Director ratification across both informs T-CostLens follow-on slice + downstream lens architecture. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs: ε ratified canonical for cost; β-extended deferred to N=2 — gate updates Director ratification at #2181 #issuecomment-... : - (ε) RATIFIED standalone for cost composition (canonical-not-transitional) - (β-extended option (i)) DEFERRED to N=2 trigger event (second lens with target-context need beyond cost) - ("both sequenced") REJECTED as bridge-with-named-dissolution anti-pattern Same-slice acceptance gates landed: 1. Q-Cost-Composition-Layering canvas: status updated from "ratification needed" → "Director-RATIFIED 2026-05-07 (ε standalone; canonical-not- transitional); PROPOSAL maturation pending" 2. Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas: status updated from "ratification needed" → "DRAFT/DEFERRED 2026-05-07; reopens on N=2 trigger event" (second lens with substantive target-context need; emission_provenance most likely candidate per cross-cutting analysis §3) 3. r3-program-plan.md gate-table rows #37 + #40 + #70: ε path ratified; close via Rust-side composition reading abstract SymbolicCost × per- primitive realization-cost in T-CostLens follow-on slice 4. r3-program-plan.md §10.3 T-CostLens-Composition row: ε ratified for #37/#40/#70; β-extended deferred per N=2 trigger 5. v3-lens-capability-register.md cost.dag row: ε disposition cited; #2175 continues as cross-cutting umbrella tracker Closed-system disposition per Director: if N=2 condition never fires, β-extended never fires — structurally correct under closed-system design. Framework discipline anchors honored: - feedback_abstraction_layering: ε respects layering (objective concepts pure; target-specific values flow at emit time per Layer-3 honesty test) - feedback_parallel_representation_debt: bounded to N=1; reopens at N=2 - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline: ε ratified canonical, not transitional - feedback_construction_over_ratchets: substrate-shape question answered structurally - feedback_substrate_principle_audit: substrate-fact authored at canvas- tier; ratification follows P1 procedure Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): canvas inventory grounded in live src/v3/lenses/ registry codex BLOCKING at #2181 (sha 00551a8): Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas inventory was "copied from expected lens set instead of live src/v3/lenses/ registry"; emission_provenance trigger references not grounded in live file content. Same shape of error as 3 prior BLOCKING reversals (Q-Reification, S5 DeclarationRef, T-CostLens merge-content). Substrate-state-grep is being treated as retrospective-correction rather than prerequisite. Tightening: this is the 4th occurrence; should be hard-prerequisite-discipline going forward. Fixes: 1. Q-Lens-Target-Context inventory section: replaced approximate "15+ lens instances" framing with exact `ls`-grep registry (15 .dag files listed by name), notes infer_helpers + lower_helpers are helper modules authoring shared structural fns rather than top-level lens instances. 2. emission_provenance.dag analysis grounded in HEAD file status header: STATUS = STRUCTURALLY TERMINAL; LENS-INSTANCE FIXTURE-BOUND; BEHAVIORALLY DEFERRED. `read` body is fail-closed Empty stub. Lens does NOT currently read target-context inside fold; producer-side instrumentation records target-specific entries consumed via standard framework. Reframed as "ungrounded at HEAD" rather than "POSSIBLY target-context need" — re-evaluates at producer-wiring landing. 3. Net finding: N=1 confirmed at HEAD (cost.dag only); N=2 is empirically open pending lens-completion cycles, NOT pre-claimable. Plus non-blocking improvement: Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 9 stale `#issuecomment-...` placeholder replaced with concrete ratification comment id `#issuecomment-4401584012`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): fix Director-ratification-ask typo + #37 gate-id clarification footnote cursor APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS at #2181 (sha 4209eb7) flagged 2 NON-BLOCKING items + 1 exploratory: 1. (NON-BLOCKING) Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 69: `## Directorratification ask` → `## Director ratification ask` (whitespace typo) 2. (NON-BLOCKING) Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 9 placeholder `#issuecomment-...`: ALREADY ADDRESSED in commit `db88b1004` (replaced with `#issuecomment-4401584012`) 3. (Exploratory) Gate #37 id `cost_lens_reads_target_realization` framing implies .dag lens body performs realization read; per ε ratification it's Rust-side composition consumer. Added clarifying footnote noting gate-id retention + Rust-side closure path; rename candidate post-follow-on-slice landing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context — absorb PM canvas-review concerns 1-3 Director relayed PM canvas review at #2068 c#4401627536: Concern 1 (RESOLVED via grep-verify): empirical N=1 confirmation. PM ran `grep -lc 'TypeRealization|CallableRealization|MethodTemplateContract| target_realization|realization_cost|LanguageSpec' src/v3/lenses/*.dag`; only cost.dag has 3 hits, all 14 others have 0 refs (including emission_provenance.dag which I'd previously framed speculatively). Net-finding §3 updated with grep result inline + "N=1 empirically grounded" framing replacing speculative "secondary candidate" language. Empirical basis for DEFERRED β-extended disposition strengthened. Concern 2 (Option (ii) multiplier framing): per-target lens instances replicate the entire Lens<C> authoring surface — N×M × 4 (carrier + monoid sequential + branch + iterate) authoring overhead. Updated Con bullet to reflect the multiplier explicitly: 3 targets × 1 cost lens × 4 = 12 authored fns; grows to 36 if 3 lenses need target-context. Cites feedback_parallel_representation_debt as the P2 framing. Concern 3 (Option (i) threading cost quantification): replaced narrative "threading cost is real but manageable" with quantified breakdown — ~15 signature changes + 14 ignore-parameter patterns + 1 consumer + cementing- test revalidation. Helps future Director ratification at N=2 trigger event. All 3 amendments are docs-only refinements; ε ratification at gunbc#2181 c#4401584012 unchanged. Strengthens canvas as durable substrate-shape decision record. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): canvases — collapse stale ratification-ask sections post-ratification codex BLOCKING at #2181 (sha be9a9c9): both canvases had stale "Director ratification ask" sections after status headers were updated to RATIFIED/DEFERRED. Per INVARIANTS P1 "Documentation Describes Live State" — canvas internally presented both settled and unsettled authority. Fixes: 1. Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 69-76: "Director ratification ask" section collapsed to "Director ratification (RECEIVED 2026-05-07)" with ε ratified, β-extended deferred, "both sequenced" rejected. Three options recorded as historical with ratification cite. Eliminates the rejected "both, sequenced" line that conflicted with status-header "canonical-not- transitional" framing. 2. Q-Lens-Target-Context line 131-136: "Director ratification ask" section collapsed to "Director disposition (DEFERRED 2026-05-07; reopens on N=2 trigger event)". Original ratification asks recorded as FROZEN; revisit at N=2 trigger event with then-current substrate-state grep. Eliminates live-now-ratify framing that conflicted with status-header DEFERRED. Both canvases now single live authority — RATIFIED/DEFERRED dispositions, no internal ratification-ask drift. Future re-ratification (Q-Lens-Target- Context at N=2 trigger) refreshes options matrix at that point per substrate-state-honesty discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context — separate live N=1 from reopen-only future N=2 openai-pro APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS at #2181 (sha be9a9c9): canvas line 127 mixed live N=1 authority with speculative N=2 candidate in one current-state cost count. Per P1 Documentation Describes Live State + P2 single-authority metadata: the live count at HEAD is `cost × 3 targets = 3 per-target instances` (× 4 authoring-multiplier per Option (ii) Con = 12 fns). The `emission_provenance × 3` figure is a reopen-only future scenario that materializes only if emission_provenance becomes the second real target-context lens at producer- wiring landing time. Updated to separate the two clearly: live count + reopen-only future scenario marked separately. Aligns with the grep-verified N=1 finding established earlier in canvas §3. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): T-CostLens worker brief — ε supersession header (γ retained as context) PR #2181 merged at eff426d ratifies ε path canonical-not-transitional for cost composition. Brief was authored under γ scope (.dag-side Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition). Add binding ε supersession header at top; retain γ section as historical context per single-authority discipline. cost.dag stays PROXY under ε; composition is Rust-side (abstract SymbolicCost shape × per-primitive realization values). Authority: Director ratification at #2181 #issuecomment-4401584012. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Complexity-Composition-Layering canvas — DRAFT (factoring tested, ε precedent does NOT apply) Director authorized canvas authoring at #828 c#4402669133 as parallel structure to Q-Cost-Composition-Layering (ε RATIFIED). Substrate- grep on src/v3/lenses/complexity.dag at HEAD shows the factoring claim DIFFERS from cost-lens: - Cost-lens needed (target-agnostic shape × target-specific values) factoring → Rust-side composition (ε) - Complexity-lens has NO target-specific axis; output is structural property of DAG topology + algebra-instance composition; substrate- native fully-on-.dag-side completion Mgr provisional reading: ε precedent does NOT apply; complexity-lens BEHAVIORAL COMPLETION is direct slice-tier substrate authoring (carrier introduction follows SymbolicCost precedent + T-E-P P1 carrier consumption). Director ratification ask: Q1 (factoring finding correct), Q2 (slice-tier directly bypassing canvas), Q3 (fresh worker pin). Cross-Mgr: Verification Mgr (#2075) pinged on v2-oracle snapshot capture status (cross-cutting prerequisite for #1950/#1951 cementing dispatch). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs(briefs): Substrate bridge SourceSpan.file participation retirement worker brief Authored for gunbc#1958 Substrate-owned bridge slice. Targets audit-row #2 (kernel Bool patch BOOL_TYPES_FILE) + row #6 (pipeline authority PIPELINE_AUTHORITY_FILE) per r3-program-plan.md §5 line 353 scope-narrowing. Sibling #1959 closed as already-retired by PR #1272. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 Variant-aware projection carrier canvas (#1947) Surfaces 3 carrier-shape options (α RestResponseProjection variant-tag / β Declaration variant_projection_metadata / γ free-standing CoproductProjection) for Director ratification before worker brief authoring. Mgr-tier recommendation = γ (DeclarationRef-keyed, avoids tag-string-as-identity bridge). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — same-slice prerequisite + section anchor Director calibration (gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-...): 1. Promote ratchet-test cross-Mgr handoff from conditional Acceptance #4 to upfront same-slice BLOCKING prerequisite gate (per feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline). 2. Replace `r3-program-plan.md:353` line-cite with `§5 Y4 scope-clarification` section anchor (per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers). Code-line anchors in bootstrap.rs left as-is (anchor sites worker navigates to). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — umbrella stays Open per P2 ledger discipline Address BLOCKING inline review at line 46: bridge_source_span_file_participation_retired is an Open umbrella whose green predicate is "no production code path consults SourceSpan.file" per r3-structure.md:115. Partial retirement was explicitly rejected 2026-04-29 (Director acceptance #1130 / dispatch #1139). Changes: - Add Ledger-discipline preamble: umbrella row stays Open; receipt updates audit-packet enumeration, NOT bridge_ledger.dag. - Acceptance #3 reframed: do NOT mutate bridge_ledger.dag; mark rows #2 + #6 retired in the audit packet only. - Authority anchor updated: status=Open (not Proposed); add r3-structure.md:115 + bridge_ledger.dag:125-129 line refs. - Cross-Mgr section reframed: umbrella ratchet cannot flip on this PR alone; Verification's ledger-zero audit progress field is post-merge tracking, not a same-slice pre-merge blocker. Reconciles with BLOCKING finding (Director calibration #1 assumed umbrella ratchet could flip on partial retirement, which r3-structure.md:115 forbids). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 CoproductProjection worker brief — γ ratified (#1947) Director ratification of option γ at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394369848. Free-standing CoproductProjection carrier in src/v3/std/, DeclarationRef-keyed, typed WireTagValue leaf, 4 same-slice acceptance gates. Surfaces 3 substrate observations for STOP-and-PING (DeclarationRef String alias; FieldRef does-not-exist-at-HEAD; tag_field String asymmetry) — worker must escalate, not silently work around. PB Mgr cross-Mgr ping at carrier landing (heads-up, not blocker). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — resolve Acceptance #4 / Cross-Mgr contradiction openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at PR #2079 #issuecomment-... flagged Acceptance #4 ("ratchet test passes ... confirmed-present at HEAD before merge") contradicting the reframed Cross-Mgr section ("No same-slice ratchet-test gate applies; post-merge tracking only"). Both said different things about whether the umbrella ratchet is a pre-merge blocker. Resolution: Acceptance #4 reframed to explicitly state "No umbrella-ratchet pre-merge gate" — worker does NOT wait for Verification ratchet authoring; acceptance for this slice is the audit-packet receipt update in #3. Cross-Mgr handoff also updated to remove "ratchet authoring" from Verification's same-slice duties. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): S5 brief — absorb Director pre-ratifications for 3 STOP-and-PING items Director pre-ratified dispositions at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394416049: 1. DeclarationRef alias: accept (b) + debt note (re-escalate only on same-slice break) 2. FieldRef: grep-decide between InputFieldRef-as-specialization vs rename 3. tag_field String asymmetry: typed introduction + debt note for migration Worker proceeds without re-pinging unless evidence forces escalation. STOP-criteria section narrowed accordingly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification Gate A receipt — Option A (Dag-as-carrier) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394427814 + proposal merge at PR #2096 (commit fec8692): src/v3/std/substrate.dag::Dag IS the reflected program; no new substrate carrier required. ReflectedProgram<T> rejected. Gate A patches: 1. r3-program-plan.md §10.3: new Q-Reification row marked RATIFIED with PR #2096 merge link + Gate A receipt scope (this PR + #1960 closed-as-non-addition). 2. r3-v-pattern-a-tc1-v1-worker.md: 3 sites — status header (Q-Reification CLEARED, Branch B η non-vacuity remains), worker-pin gate, E6-G1.a/E3 producer dependency. Replaces ReflectedProgram<T> with consumer-wiring nuance: lens fold consumes Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator. 3. r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md: 2 sites — same nuance: deferred work is consumer-wiring, NOT a separate carrier. 4. r3-pr-e8-w1-producer-contract-test-plan-worker.md: 1 site — fold-over-Dag reframe. Receipt of pass-by-construction: this PR adds NO new .dag declaration to src/v3/std/. The ratification is structurally a non-addition (Option A correctness proof per same-slice dissolution discipline). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — delete superseded canvas + name dissolution trigger for tag_field asymmetry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings (P2 single-authority + P5 dissolution trigger). Fixes: 1. Delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-s5-variant-aware-projection-carrier-canvas.md (superseded by the γ-ratified worker brief in same PR; would otherwise leave two current-looking S5 status authorities post-merge — one saying ratification pending, one saying γ ratified). 2. Substrate observation #3 (tag_field String/FieldRef asymmetry) now carries a binding named dissolution trigger: when FieldRef exists as top-level carrier AND InputFieldRef is classified, migrate InternallyTaggedObject.tag_field via follow-on Substrate hygiene PR. Worker MUST add debt-paydown row to authoritative debt ledger before merging carrier-introduction PR. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification row — fix invariant cite (C-1 → P2) cursor review at gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-... flagged C-1 as mis-keyed: INVARIANTS.md C-1 is "missing args fail closed; no LitNull sentinels" (P3 fail-closed family), not parallel-representation/duplicate-authority. The correct cite for rejecting a parallel ReflectedProgram<T> alongside Dag is P2 single authority (INVARIANTS.md line 148: cost of change is proportional to how many files encode the same fact). Cite updated to "INVARIANTS.md P2 single authority" with inline gloss. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — name dissolution trigger for DeclarationRef alias debt openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: substrate observation #1 had desired endpoint ("future structural promotion of DeclarationRef") but no checkable dissolution trigger — same P5 gap that #3 (tag_field asymmetry) had been fixed for in commit 2601d7d. Trigger now binding: promote DeclarationRef when EITHER (a) audit-row #14 (declaration_name_preference_rank / declaration_by_name rank-table) closes — dsl/std ↔ src/v3/std module convergence makes name-keyed identity unambiguous and structural module identity available, OR (b) any DeclarationRef-typed consumer surfaces a string-identity bridge per feedback_opaque_strings_attract_heuristics (heuristic patching, naming- convention dispatch, suffix/prefix matching). Worker MUST add debt-paydown row before merging carrier-introduction PR (same pattern as the tag_field debt requirement). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: complete Q-Reification stale-cite sweep — e6-g1a brief :169 + Q-PAFS row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md:169 still said TC1/V1 "waits for Q-Reification and the carrier landing", contradicting the same brief's lines 15-19 + 148-153 saying Dag IS the carrier and no separate carrier lands. Fixed: 1. e6-g1a brief line 167-170 paragraph: clarified V1 waits for consumer-wiring work (lens fold consuming Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator), NOT for a carrier-introduction. 2. r3-program-plan.md:954 Q-PAFS row text was the same shape: "Resume after Q-Reification + ReflectedProgram<T>" — contradicted my new Q-Reification row in the same diff. Updated: Q-Reification STOP CLEARED 2026-05-07 (Option A); remaining hold = Branch B η non-vacuity only. Out-of-scope-for-this-PR: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-feasibility-probe.md contains 4 stale cites but is not modified in this PR; stale-on-main can be swept in a follow-up if needed (single source of truth is the e6-g1a-static-lens worker brief, not the feasibility probe per Q-PAFS Path A acceptance). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix InputFieldRef mis-read; reframe observations #2 + #3 codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079 line 22: my brief mis-read services.dag:28-36. The text actually says "No separate InputFieldRef carrier is introduced here, since ParamToken.name already carries the same shape and adding a wrapper would duplicate without strengthening the structural invariant" — i.e., InputFieldRef does NOT exist; the comment REJECTS the wrapper. Fixes: 1. Substrate observation #2 reframed: no FieldRef-shaped carrier exists at HEAD; services.dag:28-36 precedent argues against wrapper unless it strengthens structural invariant. New (a)/(b) STOP-and-PING: (a) follow services.dag precedent — wire_tag_field: String + key invariant on wire_tag_values + fixture-load fail-closed check; (b) introduce typed FieldRef — must justify per "duplicate without strengthening" test. 2. Carrier shape (line 19): wire_tag_field: FieldRef → {String|FieldRef} pending observation #2 resolution. 3. Substrate observation #3 reframed: InternallyTaggedObject asymmetry is conditional on path (b); under path (a) no asymmetry exists. Trigger correspondingly conditional. Removed stale "InputFieldRef classified" trigger clause. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — consolidate split per-variant maps into single keyed entry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: CoproductProjection shape split per-variant data across two parallel maps (variant_field_projections + wire_tag_values), admitting illegal states where keysets drift (P2 boundary discipline / illegal-states-unrepresentable). Fix: introduce CoproductVariantProjection { field_projection, wire_tag_value } as the per-variant keyed value; CoproductProjection.variant_projections becomes Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection>. Single keyed authority per variant. Director's binding constraint #2 enumerated the two fields separately but said "refine in implementation as ergonomics demand" — consolidation preserves the substantive constraints (typed WireTagValue leaf, structural per-variant projection) while enforcing keyset alignment by carrier shape. Empty-payload variants encoded via FieldProjection::Empty constructor (or analog), not via map-absence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix stale split-map vocab in path (a) + scope STOP-and-PING umbrella openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings. 1. Path (a) at line 43 still referenced "Map<VariantId, WireTagValue> key invariant on wire_tag_values" — that's the superseded split-map vocab; the consolidated shape is Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection> on variant_projections. Path (a) now references the consolidated map; per-variant WireTagValue lives inside CoproductVariantProjection. 2. Pre-ratification umbrella at line 36 said "all 3 dispositions pre-ratified, proceed without re-pinging" — but observation #2 was re-opened after the codex InputFieldRef finding and explicitly says STOP-and-PING. Contradictory. Umbrella now scoped: observations #1 + #3 are pre-ratified; #2 is re-opened STOP-and-PING — worker MUST escalate before choosing path (a) vs (b). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof canvas — 4-residual coproduct-dissolution audit Director ratified split disposition at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394696074: descent_execution_proof STANDS ALONE (consumer-side termination-contract substrate function with fail-closed residual enumeration; folding into T-E-P-Producer-Broadening explicitly rejected — different concern axis). Canvas surfaces 3 carrier-shape options for the residual enumeration per Director's coproduct-dissolution audit suggestion: α: 4-variant coproduct verbatim from §10.3 row 966 (Missing | Unknown | Incomplete | NonStrict) β: 3-axis dimensional product (presence × completeness × strictness) γ (recommended): reuse DescentEvidence at termination.dag:14-17 for "absent/unknown" via EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) payload-variant + separate EvidenceIncomplete — ratchets variant count 4 → 2 via dimensional folding while honoring services.dag "no parallel wrapper" precedent. Mgr recommendation γ; β rejected unless 3 axes provably compose orthogonally. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan brief Row #6 — derive from bootstrap_authority map, no new enum variant codex BLOCKING (post-merge of #2079, on commit 85ceb85 — same brief is now on main): my Row #6 disposition told the worker to introduce a new BootstrapAuthority::Pipeline variant ("extend the enum if needed"). That violates P2 single-authority — src/v3/std/bootstrap_authority.dag:90 already has "src/v3/compiler/pipeline.dag": CompilerAuthority, classifying pipeline.dag under the existing CompilerAuthority variant. The :14-17 comment is explicit: "the path itself is the BootstrapAuthoritySet map key; variants carry no duplicate path payload" — single authority, not extension-by-variant. Fix: Row #6 now instructs worker to derive the typed key from the existing bootstrap_authority-map witness (BootstrapAuthorityKey threading the existing CompilerAuthority classifier), refining the constructor surface if needed — NOT introducing a new enum variant. STOP-and-PING criteria updated to forbid new-variant resolution under any path. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof worker brief — γ ratified (2-variant residual) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395060514: - DescentResidual = EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) | EvidenceIncomplete (4 → 2 dissolution: Missing+Unknown fold via DescentUnknown injection; NonStrict folds via NonIncreasing wrap; Incomplete retained — different concern axis from evidence-lattice) - DescentEvidence 3-variant lattice at termination.dag:14-17 confirmed as authoritative composition target - Type signature from §10.3 row 966 confirmed verbatim-binding Director-asked canvas-shape verification absorbed: worker STOPs if EvidenceIncomplete decomposes into payload-variants (timeout / depth-bound / evaluator-error-during-proof-construction); proceeds as 2-variant otherwise. 7 same-slice acceptance gates incl Evaluator E2 #1971 consumer wiring in same PR + §10.3 row 966 row-text refresh to cite γ-disposition. Worker pin: quick-koi-190 (pre-authorized per §10.3 row 966). Auto-spawn HOLD per L-sized threshold; surgical-recreate path ratified case-by-case if critical path blocked. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — narrow EvidenceUnknown payload via NonStrictEvidence subset; delete superseded canvas openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2105: 2 findings. 1. BLOCKING (LAYER MODEL / illegal states unrepresentable): worker brief shape `EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence)` admitted EvidenceUnknown(Strict) even though the canvas itself acknowledged Strict-isn't-a-residual as illegal. P2 requires API-level enforcement, not prose convention. Fix: introduce typed subset `NonStrictEvidence = NonIncreasing | DescentUnknown`; residual now `EvidenceUnknown(NonStrictEvidence)` — illegal-states-unrepresentable by construction. NonStrictEvidence lands in same file as DescentResidual; composes with existing 3-variant DescentEvidence via inhabitation, not re-definition. 2. NON-BLOCKING (live-state drift): canvas + worker brief both visible with "ratification needed" vs "ratified" status — same P2 single-authority shape as the S5 canvas/worker-brief co-existence at #2079. Fix: delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-descent-execution-proof-canvas.md (worker brief frontmatter already names it as superseded; with canvas gone the live authority is unambiguous). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — section-anchor cite for §10.3 row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2105 line 47: my brief cited "§10.3 row 966" but the actual line is now 986 (after my Q-Reification row insert in PR #2079 shifted §10.3 by 20 lines). Reviewer's "no such section" claim is wrong on substance (file + section + row all exist) but the line drift IS real. Fix per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers (Director calibration in gunbc#2079): replaced all "§10.3 row 966" with "§10.3 Q-EVAL-Descent- Termination-Contract row" — name-anchor instead of line-anchor, drift-immune. 5 occurrences cleaned (closure predicate, acceptance gate #3, gate #5, STOP criterion, worker pin justification). Stylistic "row row-text" repetition collapsed to "row text". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition canvas — Lens<SymbolicCost> composition shape (#1957) Pre-staged per Director endorsement of T-CostLens-Composition canvas-shape authoring. Surfaces 3 composition options for the Lens<SymbolicCost> instance: α: two separate lenses, externally joined — REJECTED (violates §1.8 gate #39 no_coercion_cost_dimension by construction) β: single Lens<SymbolicCost> with composed witness in read — strong but requires Lens<C> carrier-shape refactor (target-context threading) γ (recommended): Lens<SymbolicCost> reads structural cost via algebra-fold + target-realization composed via existing Lookup<SymbolicCost> substrate at lookup.dag:48-60 — preserves generic Lens<C> carrier; satisfies all 4 §1.8 gates (#37-40) by construction; aligns with feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first Adjacent substrate verified at HEAD: lens.dag:70-77 (Lens<C>), algebra.dag:12+ (SymbolicCost 7-variant + Semiring), lookup.dag:48-60 (Lookup<SymbolicCost> + MissingCost lens-boundary). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-Workflow-As-Data canvas — audit-receipt-honoring scope-narrowing Pre-staged per Director endorsement. Q-Workflow-As-Data-Carriers (§10.3 row 983) named 5 carriers; grep-verified at HEAD that 4 of 5 ALREADY EXIST in dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (218 lines). Only WorkflowSecret<Name> is wholly net-new substrate. Surfaces 3 options: α: maximalist 5-carrier introduction in dsl/std/workflow.dag — REJECTED (admits parallel-representation debt vs audit-receipt #1771 reuse-first directive) β (recommended): minimalist — only WorkflowSecret<Name> + Cron<Schedule> refinement net-new; lens consumes extdeps.github.actions directly. Honors feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first. γ: like β + WorkflowObservationAnchor for typed lens-consumption-shape; natural ratchet from β if evidence accumulates. Sequencing: dispatch-ready post-T-LBP COMPLETE per §S4 design-schedule:95; brief authoring lands in advance per pre-staging discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition worker brief — γ ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775: - γ option ratified (Lens<SymbolicCost> + Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition) - Lens<C> generic at lens.dag:70-77 confirmed authoritative (no refactor in scope) - symbolic_cost_dimension: AnalysisDimension<SymbolicCost> defers to separate Dimensions sub-lane Critical reframing absorbed: src/v3/lenses/cost.dag ALREADY EXISTS (status: STRUCTURALLY TERMINAL; BEHAVIORALLY PROXY). T-CostLens-Composition is behavioral-completion + target-realization-wiring, NOT P1 carrier introduction. Worker reads existing lens; advances PROXY → BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE via Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition. 8 same-slice acceptance gates incl §1.8 #37-40 + #70 demonstration + lens status header refresh + §10.3 row text refresh. Out-of-scope (deferred per Director): symbolic_cost_dimension; Lens<C> generic refactor (STOP-and-PING if implementation reveals need). Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (same precedent as S5 + descent_execution_proof canvas deletions). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Delete superseded T-CostLens canvas (worker brief is single live authority) * docs(briefs): T-WAD Slice 1 worker brief — β ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395945465: 4 asks confirmed: 1. β ratified (minimalist reuse-first) 2. #1771 audit-receipt binding precedent confirmed 3. WorkflowSecret<Name> folds into dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (provider- specific scope; NOT new dsl/std/ file unless cross-provider evidence) 4. §1.8 gates #54 + #55 split into separate slices (slice 2 = timing-and-pattern; slice 3 = ci_workflow_modeled_as_dag) Slice 1 net-new substrate (only): - WorkflowSecret<Name> + SecretScope carriers - CronExpression + CronField (typed refinement of existing WorkflowTrigger::Schedule { cron: String } at actions.dag:43) Other 4 carriers from §10.3 row 983 reused as-is from extdeps.github.actions per audit-receipt #1771 directive. 6 same-slice acceptance gates incl no-parallel-representation grep + gate #53/#62/#63 advancement + bootstrap regen + clippy. Cross-provider STOP-and-PING per Director ask #3 caveat: worker greps adjacent provider work for WorkflowSecret-shape evidence; surfaces if found before finalizing fold-into-extdeps. Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (S5 + descent_execution_proof + T-CostLens precedent). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demo (#1952) complexity-contract compile-error worker brief Pre-staged execution brief per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker brief path (no canvas — design-lock at docs/design-lens-application- surface.md specifies fixture shape verbatim at line 292). 7 same-slice acceptance gates: fixture program (O(n²) body + Enforce O(log n) budget) + TestClaim assertion + diagnostic structural validation + no regression on T-LBP cementing + bootstrap regen + clippy + §1.8 #92 advancement. Hard prerequisites STOP-and-PING: T-LAS Slice A landed (gates #88-#91) AND T-LBP complexity-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE (gate #79). Worker does not author against partial substrate. Sibling demos #1953 (CRDT cost) + #1954 (memory-peak cost) share the same hard-prerequisite + TestClaim shape pattern — could dispatch as 3 sequential PRs or single multi-demo PR (worker's call at dispatch). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demos #1953 + #1954 — cost-basis sibling worker brief Pre-staged sibling brief covering both cost-basis demos (CRDT cost basis + memory-peak cost basis) per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker-brief path. Single brief for two demos because they share: - Hard-prerequisite pattern (T-LAS Slice A + T-LBP cost-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE) - TestClaim + Diagnostic structural validation shape - apply_lens(cost, ...) Enforce mode Sibling of #1952 brief (complexity-contract compile-error). Worker's call at dispatch on multi-demo PR vs sequential PRs (Mgr ratification needed if going multi-demo). #1953 (CRDT) substrate per design §4.2 + cost-basis-declaration audit at docs/audit/t-user-authored-cost-basis-discipline-worked-examples.md. #1954 (memory-peak) substrate per design §4.3; STOP-and-PING if Dimension<SymbolicCost> substrate (deferred to Dimensions sub-lane per Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775) not yet landed. 6 same-slice acceptance gates per demo + same STOP-and-PING discipline as #1952. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens — update Sub-issue from #1957 to #2141 (post-surgical-recreate) PM executed Director's surgical-recreate ratification (gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4397693699) at 17:54:43Z: closed #1957, created fresh #2141 to trigger pollAutoSpawn fresh-creation path. Worker fierce-ram-21 (#2153) spawned on #2141. 1-line brief update per Director's queued-action commitment: brief now references #2141 + cites surgical-recreate authority. #1957 closed-as-superseded. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas (β-extended substrate-shape question) Director α-revised supersession at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4400920572 elevated β-extended path (introduce first-precedent .dag-side fold-over-realization-rows + name active-target authority shape) from slice-tier to canvas-tier. Authored per Q-PAFS template: - Substrate-state at HEAD grep-verified (Lens<C>.read no target-context; zero .dag-side fold-over-realizations precedent; 15+ lens instances using generic Lens<C>) - Binary question: should .dag-side lenses receive target-context for target-keyed reading? - Options matrix: (i) LanguageSpec param to fold; (ii) per-target lens instances [parallel-representation debt]; (iii) global accessor [REJECTED global-state anti-pattern] - Mgr provisional preference: (i) - Cross-cutting: cost.dag load-bearing; emission_provenance.dag secondary; other 13+ lenses target-agnostic Framework discipline anchors per Director corrections: - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline - feedback_parallel_representation_debt - feedback_abstraction_layering (sibling canvas) Sibling canvas (ε path): q-cost-composition-layering-canvas.md authoring follows. Both canvases together address deeper cross-cutting axis: does target-context belong .dag-side (β-extended) or emit-side (ε)? Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Cost-Composition-Layering canvas (ε substrate-shape question) Sibling canvas to q-lens-target-context-canvas.md. Director α-revised supersession at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4400920572 elevated ε path (Rust-side cost-composition wiring; preserves cost.dag PROXY) from slice-tier to canvas-tier. Authored per Q-PAFS template: - Factoring claim: cost = (target-agnostic-shape SymbolicCost algebra) × (target-specific-values per-primitive realization-cost data loaded Rust-side) - Test against feedback_abstraction_layering (Director-named anchor at gunbc#828 c#4400921658): pure objective concepts × language-agnostic LanguageSpec × emit-side composition. Compliance test for each layer. - Pro factoring (ε structurally honest): SymbolicCost algebra is target- agnostic at HEAD; Rust-side composition is natural home; #38/#39 substrate- already-aligned per Slice 1 finding. - Con factoring (ε is parallel-representation debt): N parallel Rust-side compositions if multiple lenses need target-context; lens-framework abstraction stops at substrate boundary; future lenses hit same dilemma. Mgr provisional reading: factoring honest for COST specifically; NOT generalizable. ε right framing IF cost is the singular need + factoring holds. If N>1 target-context-needing lenses surface, β-extended (option (i) from sibling canvas) becomes the right path. Director ratification ask: 3-way choice (ε) Cost-specific Rust-side composition; preserves cost.dag PROXY (β-extended option (i)) Lens<C> refactor for LanguageSpec parameter (both sequenced) ε now for cost; β-extended later if N>1 Framework discipline anchors: - feedback_abstraction_layering (Director-named for this canvas) - feedback_parallel_representation_debt - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline Canvas-pair complete; sibling canvas + this canvas address the deeper cross-cutting axis: target-context belongs .dag-side (β-extended) or emit-side (ε)? Director ratification across both informs T-CostLens follow-on slice + downstream lens architecture. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs: ε ratified canonical for cost; β-extended deferred to N=2 — gate updates Director ratification at #2181 #issuecomment-... : - (ε) RATIFIED standalone for cost composition (canonical-not-transitional) - (β-extended option (i)) DEFERRED to N=2 trigger event (second lens with target-context need beyond cost) - ("both sequenced") REJECTED as bridge-with-named-dissolution anti-pattern Same-slice acceptance gates landed: 1. Q-Cost-Composition-Layering canvas: status updated from "ratification needed" → "Director-RATIFIED 2026-05-07 (ε standalone; canonical-not- transitional); PROPOSAL maturation pending" 2. Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas: status updated from "ratification needed" → "DRAFT/DEFERRED 2026-05-07; reopens on N=2 trigger event" (second lens with substantive target-context need; emission_provenance most likely candidate per cross-cutting analysis §3) 3. r3-program-plan.md gate-table rows #37 + #40 + #70: ε path ratified; close via Rust-side composition reading abstract SymbolicCost × per- primitive realization-cost in T-CostLens follow-on slice 4. r3-program-plan.md §10.3 T-CostLens-Composition row: ε ratified for #37/#40/#70; β-extended deferred per N=2 trigger 5. v3-lens-capability-register.md cost.dag row: ε disposition cited; #2175 continues as cross-cutting umbrella tracker Closed-system disposition per Director: if N=2 condition never fires, β-extended never fires — structurally correct under closed-system design. Framework discipline anchors honored: - feedback_abstraction_layering: ε respects layering (objective concepts pure; target-specific values flow at emit time per Layer-3 honesty test) - feedback_parallel_representation_debt: bounded to N=1; reopens at N=2 - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline: ε ratified canonical, not transitional - feedback_construction_over_ratchets: substrate-shape question answered structurally - feedback_substrate_principle_audit: substrate-fact authored at canvas- tier; ratification follows P1 procedure Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): canvas inventory grounded in live src/v3/lenses/ registry codex BLOCKING at #2181 (sha 00551a8): Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas inventory was "copied from expected lens set instead of live src/v3/lenses/ registry"; emission_provenance trigger references not grounded in live file content. Same shape of error as 3 prior BLOCKING reversals (Q-Reification, S5 DeclarationRef, T-CostLens merge-content). Substrate-state-grep is being treated as retrospective-correction rather than prerequisite. Tightening: this is the 4th occurrence; should be hard-prerequisite-discipline going forward. Fixes: 1. Q-Lens-Target-Context inventory section: replaced approximate "15+ lens instances" framing with exact `ls`-grep registry (15 .dag files listed by name), notes infer_helpers + lower_helpers are helper modules authoring shared structural fns rather than top-level lens instances. 2. emission_provenance.dag analysis grounded in HEAD file status header: STATUS = STRUCTURALLY TERMINAL; LENS-INSTANCE FIXTURE-BOUND; BEHAVIORALLY DEFERRED. `read` body is fail-closed Empty stub. Lens does NOT currently read target-context inside fold; producer-side instrumentation records target-specific entries consumed via standard framework. Reframed as "ungrounded at HEAD" rather than "POSSIBLY target-context need" — re-evaluates at producer-wiring landing. 3. Net finding: N=1 confirmed at HEAD (cost.dag only); N=2 is empirically open pending lens-completion cycles, NOT pre-claimable. Plus non-blocking improvement: Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 9 stale `#issuecomment-...` placeholder replaced with concrete ratification comment id `#issuecomment-4401584012`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): fix Director-ratification-ask typo + #37 gate-id clarification footnote cursor APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS at #2181 (sha 4209eb7) flagged 2 NON-BLOCKING items + 1 exploratory: 1. (NON-BLOCKING) Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 69: `## Directorratification ask` → `## Director ratification ask` (whitespace typo) 2. (NON-BLOCKING) Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 9 placeholder `#issuecomment-...`: ALREADY ADDRESSED in commit `db88b1004` (replaced with `#issuecomment-4401584012`) 3. (Exploratory) Gate #37 id `cost_lens_reads_target_realization` framing implies .dag lens body performs realization read; per ε ratification it's Rust-side composition consumer. Added clarifying footnote noting gate-id retention + Rust-side closure path; rename candidate post-follow-on-slice landing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context — absorb PM canvas-review concerns 1-3 Director relayed PM canvas review at #2068 c#4401627536: Concern 1 (RESOLVED via grep-verify): empirical N=1 confirmation. PM ran `grep -lc 'TypeRealization|CallableRealization|MethodTemplateContract| target_realization|realization_cost|LanguageSpec' src/v3/lenses/*.dag`; only cost.dag has 3 hits, all 14 others have 0 refs (including emission_provenance.dag which I'd previously framed speculatively). Net-finding §3 updated with grep result inline + "N=1 empirically grounded" framing replacing speculative "secondary candidate" language. Empirical basis for DEFERRED β-extended disposition strengthened. Concern 2 (Option (ii) multiplier framing): per-target lens instances replicate the entire Lens<C> authoring surface — N×M × 4 (carrier + monoid sequential + branch + iterate) authoring overhead. Updated Con bullet to reflect the multiplier explicitly: 3 targets × 1 cost lens × 4 = 12 authored fns; grows to 36 if 3 lenses need target-context. Cites feedback_parallel_representation_debt as the P2 framing. Concern 3 (Option (i) threading cost quantification): replaced narrative "threading cost is real but manageable" with quantified breakdown — ~15 signature changes + 14 ignore-parameter patterns + 1 consumer + cementing- test revalidation. Helps future Director ratification at N=2 trigger event. All 3 amendments are docs-only refinements; ε ratification at gunbc#2181 c#4401584012 unchanged. Strengthens canvas as durable substrate-shape decision record. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): canvases — collapse stale ratification-ask sections post-ratification codex BLOCKING at #2181 (sha be9a9c9): both canvases had stale "Director ratification ask" sections after status headers were updated to RATIFIED/DEFERRED. Per INVARIANTS P1 "Documentation Describes Live State" — canvas internally presented both settled and unsettled authority. Fixes: 1. Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 69-76: "Director ratification ask" section collapsed to "Director ratification (RECEIVED 2026-05-07)" with ε ratified, β-extended deferred, "both sequenced" rejected. Three options recorded as historical with ratification cite. Eliminates the rejected "both, sequenced" line that conflicted with status-header "canonical-not- transitional" framing. 2. Q-Lens-Target-Context line 131-136: "Director ratification ask" section collapsed to "Director disposition (DEFERRED 2026-05-07; reopens on N=2 trigger event)". Original ratification asks recorded as FROZEN; revisit at N=2 trigger event with then-current substrate-state grep. Eliminates live-now-ratify framing that conflicted with status-header DEFERRED. Both canvases now single live authority — RATIFIED/DEFERRED dispositions, no internal ratification-ask drift. Future re-ratification (Q-Lens-Target- Context at N=2 trigger) refreshes options matrix at that point per substrate-state-honesty discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context — separate live N=1 from reopen-only future N=2 openai-pro APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS at #2181 (sha be9a9c9): canvas line 127 mixed live N=1 authority with speculative N=2 candidate in one current-state cost count. Per P1 Documentation Describes Live State + P2 single-authority metadata: the live count at HEAD is `cost × 3 targets = 3 per-target instances` (× 4 authoring-multiplier per Option (ii) Con = 12 fns). The `emission_provenance × 3` figure is a reopen-only future scenario that materializes only if emission_provenance becomes the second real target-context lens at producer- wiring landing time. Updated to separate the two clearly: live count + reopen-only future scenario marked separately. Aligns with the grep-verified N=1 finding established earlier in canvas §3. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): T-CostLens worker brief — ε supersession header (γ retained as context) PR #2181 merged at eff426d ratifies ε path canonical-not-transitional for cost composition. Brief was authored under γ scope (.dag-side Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition). Add binding ε supersession header at top; retain γ section as historical context per single-authority discipline. cost.dag stays PROXY under ε; composition is Rust-side (abstract SymbolicCost shape × per-primitive realization values). Authority: Director ratification at #2181 #issuecomment-4401584012. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Complexity-Composition-Layering canvas — DRAFT (factoring tested, ε precedent does NOT apply) Director authorized canvas authoring at #828 c#4402669133 as parallel structure to Q-Cost-Composition-Layering (ε RATIFIED). Substrate- grep on src/v3/lenses/complexity.dag at HEAD shows the factoring claim DIFFERS from cost-lens: - Cost-lens needed (target-agnostic shape × target-specific values) factoring → Rust-side composition (ε) - Complexity-lens has NO target-specific axis; output is structural property of DAG topology + algebra-instance composition; substrate- native fully-on-.dag-side completion Mgr provisional reading: ε precedent does NOT apply; complexity-lens BEHAVIORAL COMPLETION is direct slice-tier substrate authoring (carrier introduction follows SymbolicCost precedent + T-E-P P1 carrier consumption). Director ratification ask: Q1 (factoring finding correct), Q2 (slice-tier directly bypassing canvas), Q3 (fresh worker pin). Cross-Mgr: Verification Mgr (#2075) pinged on v2-oracle snapshot capture status (cross-cutting prerequisite for #1950/#1951 cementing dispatch). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LBP complexity-lens substrate-completion worker brief (Q1/Q2/Q3 RATIFIED) Pre-authored brief for complexity-lens BEHAVIORAL COMPLETION substrate work per Director Q1/Q2/Q3 ratification at #828 c#4402714255. Three deliverables: carrier introduction (ComplexityCost / WorkSpan / AsymptoticClass following SymbolicCost precedent) + lens widening (complexity.dag PROXY → COMPLETE) + T-E-P P1 carrier consumption (DescentEvidence / CallPattern / SubValueRelation for asymptotic classification of recursive-call behavior). Indirect-variant dependency surfaced as worker-grep concern at slice- authoring time (T-E-P P1 Slice 5+ pending; eager-bat-178 stream). Cementing test (#1950) is separate downstream brief; v2-oracle snapshot ownership pending Q4 cross-Mgr ratification. Worker pin: fresh-pool pick at dispatch time (NOT eager-bat-178 per Director Q3 framing; NOT fierce-ram-21 busy with cost-lens ε). Same-window-dispatch discipline applies post-canvas-merge (PR #2197). Pre-authored vs pre-known discipline applied per feedback_pre_known_vs_pre_authored_briefs.md memorialized 2026-05-08. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): rewrite complexity-lens brief consuming live design authority (codex BLOCKING fix) Codex BLOCKING (3 findings) at #2199 sha 7a8bb6d: 1. Brief authored against missing canvas instead of reconciling with docs/design-complexity-lens-behavioral-completeness.md (which exists at HEAD with comprehensive substrate spec) 2. Producer coverage treated as optional corpus scope; should be hard T-E-P-Producer-Broadening prerequisite 3. Stale/non-in-repo planning authority cited; should be r3-structure.md row 146 (T-LBP slice 1) All three BLOCKING findings VALID — substrate-grep-before-authoring discipline failure on my part (feedback_substrate_grep_before_authoring already memorialized; violated own discipline). Rewrite delegates carrier shape, dimension wiring, and consumer rewrite to live design doc §§1.1-1.6 verbatim: - §1.1 SymbolicCost — already at algebra.dag; no change - §1.2 SizeVariable — display_name enrichment - §1.3 work_dimension + span_dimension — two AnalysisDimension instances - §1.4 AsymptoticClass + BoundedLattice instance - §1.5 Certainty (cost-aware composition; no lattice) - §1.6 cost_bound_to_symbolic projection - §1.7 ComplexitySummary record + lens widening T-E-P P1 hard prerequisite per design's authority discipline + r3- structure.md row 146; STOP-and-PING if T-E-P P1 not COMPLETE at slice authoring time. Authority cites updated to live r3-structure.md row 146. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…per Q6 RATIFIED) (#2209) * docs(briefs): Substrate bridge SourceSpan.file participation retirement worker brief Authored for gunbc#1958 Substrate-owned bridge slice. Targets audit-row #2 (kernel Bool patch BOOL_TYPES_FILE) + row #6 (pipeline authority PIPELINE_AUTHORITY_FILE) per r3-program-plan.md §5 line 353 scope-narrowing. Sibling #1959 closed as already-retired by PR #1272. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 Variant-aware projection carrier canvas (#1947) Surfaces 3 carrier-shape options (α RestResponseProjection variant-tag / β Declaration variant_projection_metadata / γ free-standing CoproductProjection) for Director ratification before worker brief authoring. Mgr-tier recommendation = γ (DeclarationRef-keyed, avoids tag-string-as-identity bridge). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — same-slice prerequisite + section anchor Director calibration (gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-...): 1. Promote ratchet-test cross-Mgr handoff from conditional Acceptance #4 to upfront same-slice BLOCKING prerequisite gate (per feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline). 2. Replace `r3-program-plan.md:353` line-cite with `§5 Y4 scope-clarification` section anchor (per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers). Code-line anchors in bootstrap.rs left as-is (anchor sites worker navigates to). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — umbrella stays Open per P2 ledger discipline Address BLOCKING inline review at line 46: bridge_source_span_file_participation_retired is an Open umbrella whose green predicate is "no production code path consults SourceSpan.file" per r3-structure.md:115. Partial retirement was explicitly rejected 2026-04-29 (Director acceptance #1130 / dispatch #1139). Changes: - Add Ledger-discipline preamble: umbrella row stays Open; receipt updates audit-packet enumeration, NOT bridge_ledger.dag. - Acceptance #3 reframed: do NOT mutate bridge_ledger.dag; mark rows #2 + #6 retired in the audit packet only. - Authority anchor updated: status=Open (not Proposed); add r3-structure.md:115 + bridge_ledger.dag:125-129 line refs. - Cross-Mgr section reframed: umbrella ratchet cannot flip on this PR alone; Verification's ledger-zero audit progress field is post-merge tracking, not a same-slice pre-merge blocker. Reconciles with BLOCKING finding (Director calibration #1 assumed umbrella ratchet could flip on partial retirement, which r3-structure.md:115 forbids). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 CoproductProjection worker brief — γ ratified (#1947) Director ratification of option γ at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394369848. Free-standing CoproductProjection carrier in src/v3/std/, DeclarationRef-keyed, typed WireTagValue leaf, 4 same-slice acceptance gates. Surfaces 3 substrate observations for STOP-and-PING (DeclarationRef String alias; FieldRef does-not-exist-at-HEAD; tag_field String asymmetry) — worker must escalate, not silently work around. PB Mgr cross-Mgr ping at carrier landing (heads-up, not blocker). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — resolve Acceptance #4 / Cross-Mgr contradiction openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at PR #2079 #issuecomment-... flagged Acceptance #4 ("ratchet test passes ... confirmed-present at HEAD before merge") contradicting the reframed Cross-Mgr section ("No same-slice ratchet-test gate applies; post-merge tracking only"). Both said different things about whether the umbrella ratchet is a pre-merge blocker. Resolution: Acceptance #4 reframed to explicitly state "No umbrella-ratchet pre-merge gate" — worker does NOT wait for Verification ratchet authoring; acceptance for this slice is the audit-packet receipt update in #3. Cross-Mgr handoff also updated to remove "ratchet authoring" from Verification's same-slice duties. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): S5 brief — absorb Director pre-ratifications for 3 STOP-and-PING items Director pre-ratified dispositions at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394416049: 1. DeclarationRef alias: accept (b) + debt note (re-escalate only on same-slice break) 2. FieldRef: grep-decide between InputFieldRef-as-specialization vs rename 3. tag_field String asymmetry: typed introduction + debt note for migration Worker proceeds without re-pinging unless evidence forces escalation. STOP-criteria section narrowed accordingly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification Gate A receipt — Option A (Dag-as-carrier) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394427814 + proposal merge at PR #2096 (commit fec8692): src/v3/std/substrate.dag::Dag IS the reflected program; no new substrate carrier required. ReflectedProgram<T> rejected. Gate A patches: 1. r3-program-plan.md §10.3: new Q-Reification row marked RATIFIED with PR #2096 merge link + Gate A receipt scope (this PR + #1960 closed-as-non-addition). 2. r3-v-pattern-a-tc1-v1-worker.md: 3 sites — status header (Q-Reification CLEARED, Branch B η non-vacuity remains), worker-pin gate, E6-G1.a/E3 producer dependency. Replaces ReflectedProgram<T> with consumer-wiring nuance: lens fold consumes Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator. 3. r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md: 2 sites — same nuance: deferred work is consumer-wiring, NOT a separate carrier. 4. r3-pr-e8-w1-producer-contract-test-plan-worker.md: 1 site — fold-over-Dag reframe. Receipt of pass-by-construction: this PR adds NO new .dag declaration to src/v3/std/. The ratification is structurally a non-addition (Option A correctness proof per same-slice dissolution discipline). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — delete superseded canvas + name dissolution trigger for tag_field asymmetry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings (P2 single-authority + P5 dissolution trigger). Fixes: 1. Delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-s5-variant-aware-projection-carrier-canvas.md (superseded by the γ-ratified worker brief in same PR; would otherwise leave two current-looking S5 status authorities post-merge — one saying ratification pending, one saying γ ratified). 2. Substrate observation #3 (tag_field String/FieldRef asymmetry) now carries a binding named dissolution trigger: when FieldRef exists as top-level carrier AND InputFieldRef is classified, migrate InternallyTaggedObject.tag_field via follow-on Substrate hygiene PR. Worker MUST add debt-paydown row to authoritative debt ledger before merging carrier-introduction PR. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification row — fix invariant cite (C-1 → P2) cursor review at gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-... flagged C-1 as mis-keyed: INVARIANTS.md C-1 is "missing args fail closed; no LitNull sentinels" (P3 fail-closed family), not parallel-representation/duplicate-authority. The correct cite for rejecting a parallel ReflectedProgram<T> alongside Dag is P2 single authority (INVARIANTS.md line 148: cost of change is proportional to how many files encode the same fact). Cite updated to "INVARIANTS.md P2 single authority" with inline gloss. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — name dissolution trigger for DeclarationRef alias debt openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: substrate observation #1 had desired endpoint ("future structural promotion of DeclarationRef") but no checkable dissolution trigger — same P5 gap that #3 (tag_field asymmetry) had been fixed for in commit 2601d7d. Trigger now binding: promote DeclarationRef when EITHER (a) audit-row #14 (declaration_name_preference_rank / declaration_by_name rank-table) closes — dsl/std ↔ src/v3/std module convergence makes name-keyed identity unambiguous and structural module identity available, OR (b) any DeclarationRef-typed consumer surfaces a string-identity bridge per feedback_opaque_strings_attract_heuristics (heuristic patching, naming- convention dispatch, suffix/prefix matching). Worker MUST add debt-paydown row before merging carrier-introduction PR (same pattern as the tag_field debt requirement). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: complete Q-Reification stale-cite sweep — e6-g1a brief :169 + Q-PAFS row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md:169 still said TC1/V1 "waits for Q-Reification and the carrier landing", contradicting the same brief's lines 15-19 + 148-153 saying Dag IS the carrier and no separate carrier lands. Fixed: 1. e6-g1a brief line 167-170 paragraph: clarified V1 waits for consumer-wiring work (lens fold consuming Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator), NOT for a carrier-introduction. 2. r3-program-plan.md:954 Q-PAFS row text was the same shape: "Resume after Q-Reification + ReflectedProgram<T>" — contradicted my new Q-Reification row in the same diff. Updated: Q-Reification STOP CLEARED 2026-05-07 (Option A); remaining hold = Branch B η non-vacuity only. Out-of-scope-for-this-PR: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-feasibility-probe.md contains 4 stale cites but is not modified in this PR; stale-on-main can be swept in a follow-up if needed (single source of truth is the e6-g1a-static-lens worker brief, not the feasibility probe per Q-PAFS Path A acceptance). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix InputFieldRef mis-read; reframe observations #2 + #3 codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079 line 22: my brief mis-read services.dag:28-36. The text actually says "No separate InputFieldRef carrier is introduced here, since ParamToken.name already carries the same shape and adding a wrapper would duplicate without strengthening the structural invariant" — i.e., InputFieldRef does NOT exist; the comment REJECTS the wrapper. Fixes: 1. Substrate observation #2 reframed: no FieldRef-shaped carrier exists at HEAD; services.dag:28-36 precedent argues against wrapper unless it strengthens structural invariant. New (a)/(b) STOP-and-PING: (a) follow services.dag precedent — wire_tag_field: String + key invariant on wire_tag_values + fixture-load fail-closed check; (b) introduce typed FieldRef — must justify per "duplicate without strengthening" test. 2. Carrier shape (line 19): wire_tag_field: FieldRef → {String|FieldRef} pending observation #2 resolution. 3. Substrate observation #3 reframed: InternallyTaggedObject asymmetry is conditional on path (b); under path (a) no asymmetry exists. Trigger correspondingly conditional. Removed stale "InputFieldRef classified" trigger clause. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — consolidate split per-variant maps into single keyed entry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: CoproductProjection shape split per-variant data across two parallel maps (variant_field_projections + wire_tag_values), admitting illegal states where keysets drift (P2 boundary discipline / illegal-states-unrepresentable). Fix: introduce CoproductVariantProjection { field_projection, wire_tag_value } as the per-variant keyed value; CoproductProjection.variant_projections becomes Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection>. Single keyed authority per variant. Director's binding constraint #2 enumerated the two fields separately but said "refine in implementation as ergonomics demand" — consolidation preserves the substantive constraints (typed WireTagValue leaf, structural per-variant projection) while enforcing keyset alignment by carrier shape. Empty-payload variants encoded via FieldProjection::Empty constructor (or analog), not via map-absence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix stale split-map vocab in path (a) + scope STOP-and-PING umbrella openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings. 1. Path (a) at line 43 still referenced "Map<VariantId, WireTagValue> key invariant on wire_tag_values" — that's the superseded split-map vocab; the consolidated shape is Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection> on variant_projections. Path (a) now references the consolidated map; per-variant WireTagValue lives inside CoproductVariantProjection. 2. Pre-ratification umbrella at line 36 said "all 3 dispositions pre-ratified, proceed without re-pinging" — but observation #2 was re-opened after the codex InputFieldRef finding and explicitly says STOP-and-PING. Contradictory. Umbrella now scoped: observations #1 + #3 are pre-ratified; #2 is re-opened STOP-and-PING — worker MUST escalate before choosing path (a) vs (b). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof canvas — 4-residual coproduct-dissolution audit Director ratified split disposition at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394696074: descent_execution_proof STANDS ALONE (consumer-side termination-contract substrate function with fail-closed residual enumeration; folding into T-E-P-Producer-Broadening explicitly rejected — different concern axis). Canvas surfaces 3 carrier-shape options for the residual enumeration per Director's coproduct-dissolution audit suggestion: α: 4-variant coproduct verbatim from §10.3 row 966 (Missing | Unknown | Incomplete | NonStrict) β: 3-axis dimensional product (presence × completeness × strictness) γ (recommended): reuse DescentEvidence at termination.dag:14-17 for "absent/unknown" via EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) payload-variant + separate EvidenceIncomplete — ratchets variant count 4 → 2 via dimensional folding while honoring services.dag "no parallel wrapper" precedent. Mgr recommendation γ; β rejected unless 3 axes provably compose orthogonally. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan brief Row #6 — derive from bootstrap_authority map, no new enum variant codex BLOCKING (post-merge of #2079, on commit 85ceb85 — same brief is now on main): my Row #6 disposition told the worker to introduce a new BootstrapAuthority::Pipeline variant ("extend the enum if needed"). That violates P2 single-authority — src/v3/std/bootstrap_authority.dag:90 already has "src/v3/compiler/pipeline.dag": CompilerAuthority, classifying pipeline.dag under the existing CompilerAuthority variant. The :14-17 comment is explicit: "the path itself is the BootstrapAuthoritySet map key; variants carry no duplicate path payload" — single authority, not extension-by-variant. Fix: Row #6 now instructs worker to derive the typed key from the existing bootstrap_authority-map witness (BootstrapAuthorityKey threading the existing CompilerAuthority classifier), refining the constructor surface if needed — NOT introducing a new enum variant. STOP-and-PING criteria updated to forbid new-variant resolution under any path. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof worker brief — γ ratified (2-variant residual) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395060514: - DescentResidual = EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) | EvidenceIncomplete (4 → 2 dissolution: Missing+Unknown fold via DescentUnknown injection; NonStrict folds via NonIncreasing wrap; Incomplete retained — different concern axis from evidence-lattice) - DescentEvidence 3-variant lattice at termination.dag:14-17 confirmed as authoritative composition target - Type signature from §10.3 row 966 confirmed verbatim-binding Director-asked canvas-shape verification absorbed: worker STOPs if EvidenceIncomplete decomposes into payload-variants (timeout / depth-bound / evaluator-error-during-proof-construction); proceeds as 2-variant otherwise. 7 same-slice acceptance gates incl Evaluator E2 #1971 consumer wiring in same PR + §10.3 row 966 row-text refresh to cite γ-disposition. Worker pin: quick-koi-190 (pre-authorized per §10.3 row 966). Auto-spawn HOLD per L-sized threshold; surgical-recreate path ratified case-by-case if critical path blocked. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — narrow EvidenceUnknown payload via NonStrictEvidence subset; delete superseded canvas openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2105: 2 findings. 1. BLOCKING (LAYER MODEL / illegal states unrepresentable): worker brief shape `EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence)` admitted EvidenceUnknown(Strict) even though the canvas itself acknowledged Strict-isn't-a-residual as illegal. P2 requires API-level enforcement, not prose convention. Fix: introduce typed subset `NonStrictEvidence = NonIncreasing | DescentUnknown`; residual now `EvidenceUnknown(NonStrictEvidence)` — illegal-states-unrepresentable by construction. NonStrictEvidence lands in same file as DescentResidual; composes with existing 3-variant DescentEvidence via inhabitation, not re-definition. 2. NON-BLOCKING (live-state drift): canvas + worker brief both visible with "ratification needed" vs "ratified" status — same P2 single-authority shape as the S5 canvas/worker-brief co-existence at #2079. Fix: delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-descent-execution-proof-canvas.md (worker brief frontmatter already names it as superseded; with canvas gone the live authority is unambiguous). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — section-anchor cite for §10.3 row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2105 line 47: my brief cited "§10.3 row 966" but the actual line is now 986 (after my Q-Reification row insert in PR #2079 shifted §10.3 by 20 lines). Reviewer's "no such section" claim is wrong on substance (file + section + row all exist) but the line drift IS real. Fix per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers (Director calibration in gunbc#2079): replaced all "§10.3 row 966" with "§10.3 Q-EVAL-Descent- Termination-Contract row" — name-anchor instead of line-anchor, drift-immune. 5 occurrences cleaned (closure predicate, acceptance gate #3, gate #5, STOP criterion, worker pin justification). Stylistic "row row-text" repetition collapsed to "row text". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition canvas — Lens<SymbolicCost> composition shape (#1957) Pre-staged per Director endorsement of T-CostLens-Composition canvas-shape authoring. Surfaces 3 composition options for the Lens<SymbolicCost> instance: α: two separate lenses, externally joined — REJECTED (violates §1.8 gate #39 no_coercion_cost_dimension by construction) β: single Lens<SymbolicCost> with composed witness in read — strong but requires Lens<C> carrier-shape refactor (target-context threading) γ (recommended): Lens<SymbolicCost> reads structural cost via algebra-fold + target-realization composed via existing Lookup<SymbolicCost> substrate at lookup.dag:48-60 — preserves generic Lens<C> carrier; satisfies all 4 §1.8 gates (#37-40) by construction; aligns with feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first Adjacent substrate verified at HEAD: lens.dag:70-77 (Lens<C>), algebra.dag:12+ (SymbolicCost 7-variant + Semiring), lookup.dag:48-60 (Lookup<SymbolicCost> + MissingCost lens-boundary). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-Workflow-As-Data canvas — audit-receipt-honoring scope-narrowing Pre-staged per Director endorsement. Q-Workflow-As-Data-Carriers (§10.3 row 983) named 5 carriers; grep-verified at HEAD that 4 of 5 ALREADY EXIST in dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (218 lines). Only WorkflowSecret<Name> is wholly net-new substrate. Surfaces 3 options: α: maximalist 5-carrier introduction in dsl/std/workflow.dag — REJECTED (admits parallel-representation debt vs audit-receipt #1771 reuse-first directive) β (recommended): minimalist — only WorkflowSecret<Name> + Cron<Schedule> refinement net-new; lens consumes extdeps.github.actions directly. Honors feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first. γ: like β + WorkflowObservationAnchor for typed lens-consumption-shape; natural ratchet from β if evidence accumulates. Sequencing: dispatch-ready post-T-LBP COMPLETE per §S4 design-schedule:95; brief authoring lands in advance per pre-staging discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition worker brief — γ ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775: - γ option ratified (Lens<SymbolicCost> + Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition) - Lens<C> generic at lens.dag:70-77 confirmed authoritative (no refactor in scope) - symbolic_cost_dimension: AnalysisDimension<SymbolicCost> defers to separate Dimensions sub-lane Critical reframing absorbed: src/v3/lenses/cost.dag ALREADY EXISTS (status: STRUCTURALLY TERMINAL; BEHAVIORALLY PROXY). T-CostLens-Composition is behavioral-completion + target-realization-wiring, NOT P1 carrier introduction. Worker reads existing lens; advances PROXY → BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE via Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition. 8 same-slice acceptance gates incl §1.8 #37-40 + #70 demonstration + lens status header refresh + §10.3 row text refresh. Out-of-scope (deferred per Director): symbolic_cost_dimension; Lens<C> generic refactor (STOP-and-PING if implementation reveals need). Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (same precedent as S5 + descent_execution_proof canvas deletions). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Delete superseded T-CostLens canvas (worker brief is single live authority) * docs(briefs): T-WAD Slice 1 worker brief — β ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395945465: 4 asks confirmed: 1. β ratified (minimalist reuse-first) 2. #1771 audit-receipt binding precedent confirmed 3. WorkflowSecret<Name> folds into dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (provider- specific scope; NOT new dsl/std/ file unless cross-provider evidence) 4. §1.8 gates #54 + #55 split into separate slices (slice 2 = timing-and-pattern; slice 3 = ci_workflow_modeled_as_dag) Slice 1 net-new substrate (only): - WorkflowSecret<Name> + SecretScope carriers - CronExpression + CronField (typed refinement of existing WorkflowTrigger::Schedule { cron: String } at actions.dag:43) Other 4 carriers from §10.3 row 983 reused as-is from extdeps.github.actions per audit-receipt #1771 directive. 6 same-slice acceptance gates incl no-parallel-representation grep + gate #53/#62/#63 advancement + bootstrap regen + clippy. Cross-provider STOP-and-PING per Director ask #3 caveat: worker greps adjacent provider work for WorkflowSecret-shape evidence; surfaces if found before finalizing fold-into-extdeps. Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (S5 + descent_execution_proof + T-CostLens precedent). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demo (#1952) complexity-contract compile-error worker brief Pre-staged execution brief per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker brief path (no canvas — design-lock at docs/design-lens-application- surface.md specifies fixture shape verbatim at line 292). 7 same-slice acceptance gates: fixture program (O(n²) body + Enforce O(log n) budget) + TestClaim assertion + diagnostic structural validation + no regression on T-LBP cementing + bootstrap regen + clippy + §1.8 #92 advancement. Hard prerequisites STOP-and-PING: T-LAS Slice A landed (gates #88-#91) AND T-LBP complexity-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE (gate #79). Worker does not author against partial substrate. Sibling demos #1953 (CRDT cost) + #1954 (memory-peak cost) share the same hard-prerequisite + TestClaim shape pattern — could dispatch as 3 sequential PRs or single multi-demo PR (worker's call at dispatch). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demos #1953 + #1954 — cost-basis sibling worker brief Pre-staged sibling brief covering both cost-basis demos (CRDT cost basis + memory-peak cost basis) per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker-brief path. Single brief for two demos because they share: - Hard-prerequisite pattern (T-LAS Slice A + T-LBP cost-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE) - TestClaim + Diagnostic structural validation shape - apply_lens(cost, ...) Enforce mode Sibling of #1952 brief (complexity-contract compile-error). Worker's call at dispatch on multi-demo PR vs sequential PRs (Mgr ratification needed if going multi-demo). #1953 (CRDT) substrate per design §4.2 + cost-basis-declaration audit at docs/audit/t-user-authored-cost-basis-discipline-worked-examples.md. #1954 (memory-peak) substrate per design §4.3; STOP-and-PING if Dimension<SymbolicCost> substrate (deferred to Dimensions sub-lane per Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775) not yet landed. 6 same-slice acceptance gates per demo + same STOP-and-PING discipline as #1952. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens — update Sub-issue from #1957 to #2141 (post-surgical-recreate) PM executed Director's surgical-recreate ratification (gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4397693699) at 17:54:43Z: closed #1957, created fresh #2141 to trigger pollAutoSpawn fresh-creation path. Worker fierce-ram-21 (#2153) spawned on #2141. 1-line brief update per Director's queued-action commitment: brief now references #2141 + cites surgical-recreate authority. #1957 closed-as-superseded. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas (β-extended substrate-shape question) Director α-revised supersession at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4400920572 elevated β-extended path (introduce first-precedent .dag-side fold-over-realization-rows + name active-target authority shape) from slice-tier to canvas-tier. Authored per Q-PAFS template: - Substrate-state at HEAD grep-verified (Lens<C>.read no target-context; zero .dag-side fold-over-realizations precedent; 15+ lens instances using generic Lens<C>) - Binary question: should .dag-side lenses receive target-context for target-keyed reading? - Options matrix: (i) LanguageSpec param to fold; (ii) per-target lens instances [parallel-representation debt]; (iii) global accessor [REJECTED global-state anti-pattern] - Mgr provisional preference: (i) - Cross-cutting: cost.dag load-bearing; emission_provenance.dag secondary; other 13+ lenses target-agnostic Framework discipline anchors per Director corrections: - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline - feedback_parallel_representation_debt - feedback_abstraction_layering (sibling canvas) Sibling canvas (ε path): q-cost-composition-layering-canvas.md authoring follows. Both canvases together address deeper cross-cutting axis: does target-context belong .dag-side (β-extended) or emit-side (ε)? Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Cost-Composition-Layering canvas (ε substrate-shape question) Sibling canvas to q-lens-target-context-canvas.md. Director α-revised supersession at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4400920572 elevated ε path (Rust-side cost-composition wiring; preserves cost.dag PROXY) from slice-tier to canvas-tier. Authored per Q-PAFS template: - Factoring claim: cost = (target-agnostic-shape SymbolicCost algebra) × (target-specific-values per-primitive realization-cost data loaded Rust-side) - Test against feedback_abstraction_layering (Director-named anchor at gunbc#828 c#4400921658): pure objective concepts × language-agnostic LanguageSpec × emit-side composition. Compliance test for each layer. - Pro factoring (ε structurally honest): SymbolicCost algebra is target- agnostic at HEAD; Rust-side composition is natural home; #38/#39 substrate- already-aligned per Slice 1 finding. - Con factoring (ε is parallel-representation debt): N parallel Rust-side compositions if multiple lenses need target-context; lens-framework abstraction stops at substrate boundary; future lenses hit same dilemma. Mgr provisional reading: factoring honest for COST specifically; NOT generalizable. ε right framing IF cost is the singular need + factoring holds. If N>1 target-context-needing lenses surface, β-extended (option (i) from sibling canvas) becomes the right path. Director ratification ask: 3-way choice (ε) Cost-specific Rust-side composition; preserves cost.dag PROXY (β-extended option (i)) Lens<C> refactor for LanguageSpec parameter (both sequenced) ε now for cost; β-extended later if N>1 Framework discipline anchors: - feedback_abstraction_layering (Director-named for this canvas) - feedback_parallel_representation_debt - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline Canvas-pair complete; sibling canvas + this canvas address the deeper cross-cutting axis: target-context belongs .dag-side (β-extended) or emit-side (ε)? Director ratification across both informs T-CostLens follow-on slice + downstream lens architecture. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs: ε ratified canonical for cost; β-extended deferred to N=2 — gate updates Director ratification at #2181 #issuecomment-... : - (ε) RATIFIED standalone for cost composition (canonical-not-transitional) - (β-extended option (i)) DEFERRED to N=2 trigger event (second lens with target-context need beyond cost) - ("both sequenced") REJECTED as bridge-with-named-dissolution anti-pattern Same-slice acceptance gates landed: 1. Q-Cost-Composition-Layering canvas: status updated from "ratification needed" → "Director-RATIFIED 2026-05-07 (ε standalone; canonical-not- transitional); PROPOSAL maturation pending" 2. Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas: status updated from "ratification needed" → "DRAFT/DEFERRED 2026-05-07; reopens on N=2 trigger event" (second lens with substantive target-context need; emission_provenance most likely candidate per cross-cutting analysis §3) 3. r3-program-plan.md gate-table rows #37 + #40 + #70: ε path ratified; close via Rust-side composition reading abstract SymbolicCost × per- primitive realization-cost in T-CostLens follow-on slice 4. r3-program-plan.md §10.3 T-CostLens-Composition row: ε ratified for #37/#40/#70; β-extended deferred per N=2 trigger 5. v3-lens-capability-register.md cost.dag row: ε disposition cited; #2175 continues as cross-cutting umbrella tracker Closed-system disposition per Director: if N=2 condition never fires, β-extended never fires — structurally correct under closed-system design. Framework discipline anchors honored: - feedback_abstraction_layering: ε respects layering (objective concepts pure; target-specific values flow at emit time per Layer-3 honesty test) - feedback_parallel_representation_debt: bounded to N=1; reopens at N=2 - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline: ε ratified canonical, not transitional - feedback_construction_over_ratchets: substrate-shape question answered structurally - feedback_substrate_principle_audit: substrate-fact authored at canvas- tier; ratification follows P1 procedure Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): canvas inventory grounded in live src/v3/lenses/ registry codex BLOCKING at #2181 (sha 00551a8): Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas inventory was "copied from expected lens set instead of live src/v3/lenses/ registry"; emission_provenance trigger references not grounded in live file content. Same shape of error as 3 prior BLOCKING reversals (Q-Reification, S5 DeclarationRef, T-CostLens merge-content). Substrate-state-grep is being treated as retrospective-correction rather than prerequisite. Tightening: this is the 4th occurrence; should be hard-prerequisite-discipline going forward. Fixes: 1. Q-Lens-Target-Context inventory section: replaced approximate "15+ lens instances" framing with exact `ls`-grep registry (15 .dag files listed by name), notes infer_helpers + lower_helpers are helper modules authoring shared structural fns rather than top-level lens instances. 2. emission_provenance.dag analysis grounded in HEAD file status header: STATUS = STRUCTURALLY TERMINAL; LENS-INSTANCE FIXTURE-BOUND; BEHAVIORALLY DEFERRED. `read` body is fail-closed Empty stub. Lens does NOT currently read target-context inside fold; producer-side instrumentation records target-specific entries consumed via standard framework. Reframed as "ungrounded at HEAD" rather than "POSSIBLY target-context need" — re-evaluates at producer-wiring landing. 3. Net finding: N=1 confirmed at HEAD (cost.dag only); N=2 is empirically open pending lens-completion cycles, NOT pre-claimable. Plus non-blocking improvement: Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 9 stale `#issuecomment-...` placeholder replaced with concrete ratification comment id `#issuecomment-4401584012`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): fix Director-ratification-ask typo + #37 gate-id clarification footnote cursor APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS at #2181 (sha 4209eb7) flagged 2 NON-BLOCKING items + 1 exploratory: 1. (NON-BLOCKING) Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 69: `## Directorratification ask` → `## Director ratification ask` (whitespace typo) 2. (NON-BLOCKING) Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 9 placeholder `#issuecomment-...`: ALREADY ADDRESSED in commit `db88b1004` (replaced with `#issuecomment-4401584012`) 3. (Exploratory) Gate #37 id `cost_lens_reads_target_realization` framing implies .dag lens body performs realization read; per ε ratification it's Rust-side composition consumer. Added clarifying footnote noting gate-id retention + Rust-side closure path; rename candidate post-follow-on-slice landing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context — absorb PM canvas-review concerns 1-3 Director relayed PM canvas review at #2068 c#4401627536: Concern 1 (RESOLVED via grep-verify): empirical N=1 confirmation. PM ran `grep -lc 'TypeRealization|CallableRealization|MethodTemplateContract| target_realization|realization_cost|LanguageSpec' src/v3/lenses/*.dag`; only cost.dag has 3 hits, all 14 others have 0 refs (including emission_provenance.dag which I'd previously framed speculatively). Net-finding §3 updated with grep result inline + "N=1 empirically grounded" framing replacing speculative "secondary candidate" language. Empirical basis for DEFERRED β-extended disposition strengthened. Concern 2 (Option (ii) multiplier framing): per-target lens instances replicate the entire Lens<C> authoring surface — N×M × 4 (carrier + monoid sequential + branch + iterate) authoring overhead. Updated Con bullet to reflect the multiplier explicitly: 3 targets × 1 cost lens × 4 = 12 authored fns; grows to 36 if 3 lenses need target-context. Cites feedback_parallel_representation_debt as the P2 framing. Concern 3 (Option (i) threading cost quantification): replaced narrative "threading cost is real but manageable" with quantified breakdown — ~15 signature changes + 14 ignore-parameter patterns + 1 consumer + cementing- test revalidation. Helps future Director ratification at N=2 trigger event. All 3 amendments are docs-only refinements; ε ratification at gunbc#2181 c#4401584012 unchanged. Strengthens canvas as durable substrate-shape decision record. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): canvases — collapse stale ratification-ask sections post-ratification codex BLOCKING at #2181 (sha be9a9c9): both canvases had stale "Director ratification ask" sections after status headers were updated to RATIFIED/DEFERRED. Per INVARIANTS P1 "Documentation Describes Live State" — canvas internally presented both settled and unsettled authority. Fixes: 1. Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 69-76: "Director ratification ask" section collapsed to "Director ratification (RECEIVED 2026-05-07)" with ε ratified, β-extended deferred, "both sequenced" rejected. Three options recorded as historical with ratification cite. Eliminates the rejected "both, sequenced" line that conflicted with status-header "canonical-not- transitional" framing. 2. Q-Lens-Target-Context line 131-136: "Director ratification ask" section collapsed to "Director disposition (DEFERRED 2026-05-07; reopens on N=2 trigger event)". Original ratification asks recorded as FROZEN; revisit at N=2 trigger event with then-current substrate-state grep. Eliminates live-now-ratify framing that conflicted with status-header DEFERRED. Both canvases now single live authority — RATIFIED/DEFERRED dispositions, no internal ratification-ask drift. Future re-ratification (Q-Lens-Target- Context at N=2 trigger) refreshes options matrix at that point per substrate-state-honesty discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context — separate live N=1 from reopen-only future N=2 openai-pro APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS at #2181 (sha be9a9c9): canvas line 127 mixed live N=1 authority with speculative N=2 candidate in one current-state cost count. Per P1 Documentation Describes Live State + P2 single-authority metadata: the live count at HEAD is `cost × 3 targets = 3 per-target instances` (× 4 authoring-multiplier per Option (ii) Con = 12 fns). The `emission_provenance × 3` figure is a reopen-only future scenario that materializes only if emission_provenance becomes the second real target-context lens at producer- wiring landing time. Updated to separate the two clearly: live count + reopen-only future scenario marked separately. Aligns with the grep-verified N=1 finding established earlier in canvas §3. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): T-CostLens worker brief — ε supersession header (γ retained as context) PR #2181 merged at eff426d ratifies ε path canonical-not-transitional for cost composition. Brief was authored under γ scope (.dag-side Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition). Add binding ε supersession header at top; retain γ section as historical context per single-authority discipline. cost.dag stays PROXY under ε; composition is Rust-side (abstract SymbolicCost shape × per-primitive realization values). Authority: Director ratification at #2181 #issuecomment-4401584012. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Complexity-Composition-Layering canvas — DRAFT (factoring tested, ε precedent does NOT apply) Director authorized canvas authoring at #828 c#4402669133 as parallel structure to Q-Cost-Composition-Layering (ε RATIFIED). Substrate- grep on src/v3/lenses/complexity.dag at HEAD shows the factoring claim DIFFERS from cost-lens: - Cost-lens needed (target-agnostic shape × target-specific values) factoring → Rust-side composition (ε) - Complexity-lens has NO target-specific axis; output is structural property of DAG topology + algebra-instance composition; substrate- native fully-on-.dag-side completion Mgr provisional reading: ε precedent does NOT apply; complexity-lens BEHAVIORAL COMPLETION is direct slice-tier substrate authoring (carrier introduction follows SymbolicCost precedent + T-E-P P1 carrier consumption). Director ratification ask: Q1 (factoring finding correct), Q2 (slice-tier directly bypassing canvas), Q3 (fresh worker pin). Cross-Mgr: Verification Mgr (#2075) pinged on v2-oracle snapshot capture status (cross-cutting prerequisite for #1950/#1951 cementing dispatch). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LBP complexity-lens substrate-completion worker brief (Q1/Q2/Q3 RATIFIED) Pre-authored brief for complexity-lens BEHAVIORAL COMPLETION substrate work per Director Q1/Q2/Q3 ratification at #828 c#4402714255. Three deliverables: carrier introduction (ComplexityCost / WorkSpan / AsymptoticClass following SymbolicCost precedent) + lens widening (complexity.dag PROXY → COMPLETE) + T-E-P P1 carrier consumption (DescentEvidence / CallPattern / SubValueRelation for asymptotic classification of recursive-call behavior). Indirect-variant dependency surfaced as worker-grep concern at slice- authoring time (T-E-P P1 Slice 5+ pending; eager-bat-178 stream). Cementing test (#1950) is separate downstream brief; v2-oracle snapshot ownership pending Q4 cross-Mgr ratification. Worker pin: fresh-pool pick at dispatch time (NOT eager-bat-178 per Director Q3 framing; NOT fierce-ram-21 busy with cost-lens ε). Same-window-dispatch discipline applies post-canvas-merge (PR #2197). Pre-authored vs pre-known discipline applied per feedback_pre_known_vs_pre_authored_briefs.md memorialized 2026-05-08. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): rewrite complexity-lens brief consuming live design authority (codex BLOCKING fix) Codex BLOCKING (3 findings) at #2199 sha 7a8bb6d: 1. Brief authored against missing canvas instead of reconciling with docs/design-complexity-lens-behavioral-completeness.md (which exists at HEAD with comprehensive substrate spec) 2. Producer coverage treated as optional corpus scope; should be hard T-E-P-Producer-Broadening prerequisite 3. Stale/non-in-repo planning authority cited; should be r3-structure.md row 146 (T-LBP slice 1) All three BLOCKING findings VALID — substrate-grep-before-authoring discipline failure on my part (feedback_substrate_grep_before_authoring already memorialized; violated own discipline). Rewrite delegates carrier shape, dimension wiring, and consumer rewrite to live design doc §§1.1-1.6 verbatim: - §1.1 SymbolicCost — already at algebra.dag; no change - §1.2 SizeVariable — display_name enrichment - §1.3 work_dimension + span_dimension — two AnalysisDimension instances - §1.4 AsymptoticClass + BoundedLattice instance - §1.5 Certainty (cost-aware composition; no lattice) - §1.6 cost_bound_to_symbolic projection - §1.7 ComplexitySummary record + lens widening T-E-P P1 hard prerequisite per design's authority discipline + r3- structure.md row 146; STOP-and-PING if T-E-P P1 not COMPLETE at slice authoring time. Authority cites updated to live r3-structure.md row 146. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-PerfWithinBaseline canvas — DRAFT (canvas-tier P1 procedure per Q6 RATIFIED) Director Q6 RATIFIED canvas-tier-required at #828 c#4403163639 for PerfWithinBaseline TestPredicate variant authoring. Three substantive substrate-shape questions resolved: Q1 baseline shape: (a) literal-Int rejected as strict-mirror-of-CostBounded defeats semantic load; (b) DeclarationRef-to-stored-data composes LensOutputEquals + data X: SymbolicCost precedent at HEAD; (c) runtime- fixture-injection over-authors. Mgr lean (b). Q2 ComparisonOp composition: (i) reuse existing ComparisonOp via test- runner-side resolution matches LensOutputEquals path; (ii) new relative- op-set introduces parallel-representation debt. Mgr lean (i). Q3 baseline-storage scope: (α) in-scope slice authors example data; (β) out-of-scope variant-only slice + PB consumer authors baseline data matches existing layering. Mgr lean (β). Combined Mgr lean: Q1(b) + Q2(i) + Q3(β) — variant authored as compositional extension; baseline-storage is PB consumer-tier work. Cross-Mgr: PB Mgr #2138 worker (crisp-swift-433) holds dispatch on #2204 land; T-Tier3-Dissolution #2085 R-4 prereq encoded. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…g-shape original) (#2210) * docs(briefs): Substrate bridge SourceSpan.file participation retirement worker brief Authored for gunbc#1958 Substrate-owned bridge slice. Targets audit-row #2 (kernel Bool patch BOOL_TYPES_FILE) + row #6 (pipeline authority PIPELINE_AUTHORITY_FILE) per r3-program-plan.md §5 line 353 scope-narrowing. Sibling #1959 closed as already-retired by PR #1272. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 Variant-aware projection carrier canvas (#1947) Surfaces 3 carrier-shape options (α RestResponseProjection variant-tag / β Declaration variant_projection_metadata / γ free-standing CoproductProjection) for Director ratification before worker brief authoring. Mgr-tier recommendation = γ (DeclarationRef-keyed, avoids tag-string-as-identity bridge). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — same-slice prerequisite + section anchor Director calibration (gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-...): 1. Promote ratchet-test cross-Mgr handoff from conditional Acceptance #4 to upfront same-slice BLOCKING prerequisite gate (per feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline). 2. Replace `r3-program-plan.md:353` line-cite with `§5 Y4 scope-clarification` section anchor (per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers). Code-line anchors in bootstrap.rs left as-is (anchor sites worker navigates to). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — umbrella stays Open per P2 ledger discipline Address BLOCKING inline review at line 46: bridge_source_span_file_participation_retired is an Open umbrella whose green predicate is "no production code path consults SourceSpan.file" per r3-structure.md:115. Partial retirement was explicitly rejected 2026-04-29 (Director acceptance #1130 / dispatch #1139). Changes: - Add Ledger-discipline preamble: umbrella row stays Open; receipt updates audit-packet enumeration, NOT bridge_ledger.dag. - Acceptance #3 reframed: do NOT mutate bridge_ledger.dag; mark rows #2 + #6 retired in the audit packet only. - Authority anchor updated: status=Open (not Proposed); add r3-structure.md:115 + bridge_ledger.dag:125-129 line refs. - Cross-Mgr section reframed: umbrella ratchet cannot flip on this PR alone; Verification's ledger-zero audit progress field is post-merge tracking, not a same-slice pre-merge blocker. Reconciles with BLOCKING finding (Director calibration #1 assumed umbrella ratchet could flip on partial retirement, which r3-structure.md:115 forbids). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 CoproductProjection worker brief — γ ratified (#1947) Director ratification of option γ at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394369848. Free-standing CoproductProjection carrier in src/v3/std/, DeclarationRef-keyed, typed WireTagValue leaf, 4 same-slice acceptance gates. Surfaces 3 substrate observations for STOP-and-PING (DeclarationRef String alias; FieldRef does-not-exist-at-HEAD; tag_field String asymmetry) — worker must escalate, not silently work around. PB Mgr cross-Mgr ping at carrier landing (heads-up, not blocker). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — resolve Acceptance #4 / Cross-Mgr contradiction openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at PR #2079 #issuecomment-... flagged Acceptance #4 ("ratchet test passes ... confirmed-present at HEAD before merge") contradicting the reframed Cross-Mgr section ("No same-slice ratchet-test gate applies; post-merge tracking only"). Both said different things about whether the umbrella ratchet is a pre-merge blocker. Resolution: Acceptance #4 reframed to explicitly state "No umbrella-ratchet pre-merge gate" — worker does NOT wait for Verification ratchet authoring; acceptance for this slice is the audit-packet receipt update in #3. Cross-Mgr handoff also updated to remove "ratchet authoring" from Verification's same-slice duties. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): S5 brief — absorb Director pre-ratifications for 3 STOP-and-PING items Director pre-ratified dispositions at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394416049: 1. DeclarationRef alias: accept (b) + debt note (re-escalate only on same-slice break) 2. FieldRef: grep-decide between InputFieldRef-as-specialization vs rename 3. tag_field String asymmetry: typed introduction + debt note for migration Worker proceeds without re-pinging unless evidence forces escalation. STOP-criteria section narrowed accordingly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification Gate A receipt — Option A (Dag-as-carrier) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394427814 + proposal merge at PR #2096 (commit fec8692): src/v3/std/substrate.dag::Dag IS the reflected program; no new substrate carrier required. ReflectedProgram<T> rejected. Gate A patches: 1. r3-program-plan.md §10.3: new Q-Reification row marked RATIFIED with PR #2096 merge link + Gate A receipt scope (this PR + #1960 closed-as-non-addition). 2. r3-v-pattern-a-tc1-v1-worker.md: 3 sites — status header (Q-Reification CLEARED, Branch B η non-vacuity remains), worker-pin gate, E6-G1.a/E3 producer dependency. Replaces ReflectedProgram<T> with consumer-wiring nuance: lens fold consumes Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator. 3. r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md: 2 sites — same nuance: deferred work is consumer-wiring, NOT a separate carrier. 4. r3-pr-e8-w1-producer-contract-test-plan-worker.md: 1 site — fold-over-Dag reframe. Receipt of pass-by-construction: this PR adds NO new .dag declaration to src/v3/std/. The ratification is structurally a non-addition (Option A correctness proof per same-slice dissolution discipline). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — delete superseded canvas + name dissolution trigger for tag_field asymmetry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings (P2 single-authority + P5 dissolution trigger). Fixes: 1. Delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-s5-variant-aware-projection-carrier-canvas.md (superseded by the γ-ratified worker brief in same PR; would otherwise leave two current-looking S5 status authorities post-merge — one saying ratification pending, one saying γ ratified). 2. Substrate observation #3 (tag_field String/FieldRef asymmetry) now carries a binding named dissolution trigger: when FieldRef exists as top-level carrier AND InputFieldRef is classified, migrate InternallyTaggedObject.tag_field via follow-on Substrate hygiene PR. Worker MUST add debt-paydown row to authoritative debt ledger before merging carrier-introduction PR. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification row — fix invariant cite (C-1 → P2) cursor review at gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-... flagged C-1 as mis-keyed: INVARIANTS.md C-1 is "missing args fail closed; no LitNull sentinels" (P3 fail-closed family), not parallel-representation/duplicate-authority. The correct cite for rejecting a parallel ReflectedProgram<T> alongside Dag is P2 single authority (INVARIANTS.md line 148: cost of change is proportional to how many files encode the same fact). Cite updated to "INVARIANTS.md P2 single authority" with inline gloss. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — name dissolution trigger for DeclarationRef alias debt openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: substrate observation #1 had desired endpoint ("future structural promotion of DeclarationRef") but no checkable dissolution trigger — same P5 gap that #3 (tag_field asymmetry) had been fixed for in commit 2601d7d. Trigger now binding: promote DeclarationRef when EITHER (a) audit-row #14 (declaration_name_preference_rank / declaration_by_name rank-table) closes — dsl/std ↔ src/v3/std module convergence makes name-keyed identity unambiguous and structural module identity available, OR (b) any DeclarationRef-typed consumer surfaces a string-identity bridge per feedback_opaque_strings_attract_heuristics (heuristic patching, naming- convention dispatch, suffix/prefix matching). Worker MUST add debt-paydown row before merging carrier-introduction PR (same pattern as the tag_field debt requirement). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: complete Q-Reification stale-cite sweep — e6-g1a brief :169 + Q-PAFS row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md:169 still said TC1/V1 "waits for Q-Reification and the carrier landing", contradicting the same brief's lines 15-19 + 148-153 saying Dag IS the carrier and no separate carrier lands. Fixed: 1. e6-g1a brief line 167-170 paragraph: clarified V1 waits for consumer-wiring work (lens fold consuming Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator), NOT for a carrier-introduction. 2. r3-program-plan.md:954 Q-PAFS row text was the same shape: "Resume after Q-Reification + ReflectedProgram<T>" — contradicted my new Q-Reification row in the same diff. Updated: Q-Reification STOP CLEARED 2026-05-07 (Option A); remaining hold = Branch B η non-vacuity only. Out-of-scope-for-this-PR: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-feasibility-probe.md contains 4 stale cites but is not modified in this PR; stale-on-main can be swept in a follow-up if needed (single source of truth is the e6-g1a-static-lens worker brief, not the feasibility probe per Q-PAFS Path A acceptance). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix InputFieldRef mis-read; reframe observations #2 + #3 codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079 line 22: my brief mis-read services.dag:28-36. The text actually says "No separate InputFieldRef carrier is introduced here, since ParamToken.name already carries the same shape and adding a wrapper would duplicate without strengthening the structural invariant" — i.e., InputFieldRef does NOT exist; the comment REJECTS the wrapper. Fixes: 1. Substrate observation #2 reframed: no FieldRef-shaped carrier exists at HEAD; services.dag:28-36 precedent argues against wrapper unless it strengthens structural invariant. New (a)/(b) STOP-and-PING: (a) follow services.dag precedent — wire_tag_field: String + key invariant on wire_tag_values + fixture-load fail-closed check; (b) introduce typed FieldRef — must justify per "duplicate without strengthening" test. 2. Carrier shape (line 19): wire_tag_field: FieldRef → {String|FieldRef} pending observation #2 resolution. 3. Substrate observation #3 reframed: InternallyTaggedObject asymmetry is conditional on path (b); under path (a) no asymmetry exists. Trigger correspondingly conditional. Removed stale "InputFieldRef classified" trigger clause. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — consolidate split per-variant maps into single keyed entry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: CoproductProjection shape split per-variant data across two parallel maps (variant_field_projections + wire_tag_values), admitting illegal states where keysets drift (P2 boundary discipline / illegal-states-unrepresentable). Fix: introduce CoproductVariantProjection { field_projection, wire_tag_value } as the per-variant keyed value; CoproductProjection.variant_projections becomes Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection>. Single keyed authority per variant. Director's binding constraint #2 enumerated the two fields separately but said "refine in implementation as ergonomics demand" — consolidation preserves the substantive constraints (typed WireTagValue leaf, structural per-variant projection) while enforcing keyset alignment by carrier shape. Empty-payload variants encoded via FieldProjection::Empty constructor (or analog), not via map-absence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix stale split-map vocab in path (a) + scope STOP-and-PING umbrella openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings. 1. Path (a) at line 43 still referenced "Map<VariantId, WireTagValue> key invariant on wire_tag_values" — that's the superseded split-map vocab; the consolidated shape is Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection> on variant_projections. Path (a) now references the consolidated map; per-variant WireTagValue lives inside CoproductVariantProjection. 2. Pre-ratification umbrella at line 36 said "all 3 dispositions pre-ratified, proceed without re-pinging" — but observation #2 was re-opened after the codex InputFieldRef finding and explicitly says STOP-and-PING. Contradictory. Umbrella now scoped: observations #1 + #3 are pre-ratified; #2 is re-opened STOP-and-PING — worker MUST escalate before choosing path (a) vs (b). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof canvas — 4-residual coproduct-dissolution audit Director ratified split disposition at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394696074: descent_execution_proof STANDS ALONE (consumer-side termination-contract substrate function with fail-closed residual enumeration; folding into T-E-P-Producer-Broadening explicitly rejected — different concern axis). Canvas surfaces 3 carrier-shape options for the residual enumeration per Director's coproduct-dissolution audit suggestion: α: 4-variant coproduct verbatim from §10.3 row 966 (Missing | Unknown | Incomplete | NonStrict) β: 3-axis dimensional product (presence × completeness × strictness) γ (recommended): reuse DescentEvidence at termination.dag:14-17 for "absent/unknown" via EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) payload-variant + separate EvidenceIncomplete — ratchets variant count 4 → 2 via dimensional folding while honoring services.dag "no parallel wrapper" precedent. Mgr recommendation γ; β rejected unless 3 axes provably compose orthogonally. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan brief Row #6 — derive from bootstrap_authority map, no new enum variant codex BLOCKING (post-merge of #2079, on commit 85ceb85 — same brief is now on main): my Row #6 disposition told the worker to introduce a new BootstrapAuthority::Pipeline variant ("extend the enum if needed"). That violates P2 single-authority — src/v3/std/bootstrap_authority.dag:90 already has "src/v3/compiler/pipeline.dag": CompilerAuthority, classifying pipeline.dag under the existing CompilerAuthority variant. The :14-17 comment is explicit: "the path itself is the BootstrapAuthoritySet map key; variants carry no duplicate path payload" — single authority, not extension-by-variant. Fix: Row #6 now instructs worker to derive the typed key from the existing bootstrap_authority-map witness (BootstrapAuthorityKey threading the existing CompilerAuthority classifier), refining the constructor surface if needed — NOT introducing a new enum variant. STOP-and-PING criteria updated to forbid new-variant resolution under any path. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof worker brief — γ ratified (2-variant residual) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395060514: - DescentResidual = EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) | EvidenceIncomplete (4 → 2 dissolution: Missing+Unknown fold via DescentUnknown injection; NonStrict folds via NonIncreasing wrap; Incomplete retained — different concern axis from evidence-lattice) - DescentEvidence 3-variant lattice at termination.dag:14-17 confirmed as authoritative composition target - Type signature from §10.3 row 966 confirmed verbatim-binding Director-asked canvas-shape verification absorbed: worker STOPs if EvidenceIncomplete decomposes into payload-variants (timeout / depth-bound / evaluator-error-during-proof-construction); proceeds as 2-variant otherwise. 7 same-slice acceptance gates incl Evaluator E2 #1971 consumer wiring in same PR + §10.3 row 966 row-text refresh to cite γ-disposition. Worker pin: quick-koi-190 (pre-authorized per §10.3 row 966). Auto-spawn HOLD per L-sized threshold; surgical-recreate path ratified case-by-case if critical path blocked. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — narrow EvidenceUnknown payload via NonStrictEvidence subset; delete superseded canvas openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2105: 2 findings. 1. BLOCKING (LAYER MODEL / illegal states unrepresentable): worker brief shape `EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence)` admitted EvidenceUnknown(Strict) even though the canvas itself acknowledged Strict-isn't-a-residual as illegal. P2 requires API-level enforcement, not prose convention. Fix: introduce typed subset `NonStrictEvidence = NonIncreasing | DescentUnknown`; residual now `EvidenceUnknown(NonStrictEvidence)` — illegal-states-unrepresentable by construction. NonStrictEvidence lands in same file as DescentResidual; composes with existing 3-variant DescentEvidence via inhabitation, not re-definition. 2. NON-BLOCKING (live-state drift): canvas + worker brief both visible with "ratification needed" vs "ratified" status — same P2 single-authority shape as the S5 canvas/worker-brief co-existence at #2079. Fix: delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-descent-execution-proof-canvas.md (worker brief frontmatter already names it as superseded; with canvas gone the live authority is unambiguous). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — section-anchor cite for §10.3 row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2105 line 47: my brief cited "§10.3 row 966" but the actual line is now 986 (after my Q-Reification row insert in PR #2079 shifted §10.3 by 20 lines). Reviewer's "no such section" claim is wrong on substance (file + section + row all exist) but the line drift IS real. Fix per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers (Director calibration in gunbc#2079): replaced all "§10.3 row 966" with "§10.3 Q-EVAL-Descent- Termination-Contract row" — name-anchor instead of line-anchor, drift-immune. 5 occurrences cleaned (closure predicate, acceptance gate #3, gate #5, STOP criterion, worker pin justification). Stylistic "row row-text" repetition collapsed to "row text". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition canvas — Lens<SymbolicCost> composition shape (#1957) Pre-staged per Director endorsement of T-CostLens-Composition canvas-shape authoring. Surfaces 3 composition options for the Lens<SymbolicCost> instance: α: two separate lenses, externally joined — REJECTED (violates §1.8 gate #39 no_coercion_cost_dimension by construction) β: single Lens<SymbolicCost> with composed witness in read — strong but requires Lens<C> carrier-shape refactor (target-context threading) γ (recommended): Lens<SymbolicCost> reads structural cost via algebra-fold + target-realization composed via existing Lookup<SymbolicCost> substrate at lookup.dag:48-60 — preserves generic Lens<C> carrier; satisfies all 4 §1.8 gates (#37-40) by construction; aligns with feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first Adjacent substrate verified at HEAD: lens.dag:70-77 (Lens<C>), algebra.dag:12+ (SymbolicCost 7-variant + Semiring), lookup.dag:48-60 (Lookup<SymbolicCost> + MissingCost lens-boundary). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-Workflow-As-Data canvas — audit-receipt-honoring scope-narrowing Pre-staged per Director endorsement. Q-Workflow-As-Data-Carriers (§10.3 row 983) named 5 carriers; grep-verified at HEAD that 4 of 5 ALREADY EXIST in dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (218 lines). Only WorkflowSecret<Name> is wholly net-new substrate. Surfaces 3 options: α: maximalist 5-carrier introduction in dsl/std/workflow.dag — REJECTED (admits parallel-representation debt vs audit-receipt #1771 reuse-first directive) β (recommended): minimalist — only WorkflowSecret<Name> + Cron<Schedule> refinement net-new; lens consumes extdeps.github.actions directly. Honors feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first. γ: like β + WorkflowObservationAnchor for typed lens-consumption-shape; natural ratchet from β if evidence accumulates. Sequencing: dispatch-ready post-T-LBP COMPLETE per §S4 design-schedule:95; brief authoring lands in advance per pre-staging discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition worker brief — γ ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775: - γ option ratified (Lens<SymbolicCost> + Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition) - Lens<C> generic at lens.dag:70-77 confirmed authoritative (no refactor in scope) - symbolic_cost_dimension: AnalysisDimension<SymbolicCost> defers to separate Dimensions sub-lane Critical reframing absorbed: src/v3/lenses/cost.dag ALREADY EXISTS (status: STRUCTURALLY TERMINAL; BEHAVIORALLY PROXY). T-CostLens-Composition is behavioral-completion + target-realization-wiring, NOT P1 carrier introduction. Worker reads existing lens; advances PROXY → BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE via Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition. 8 same-slice acceptance gates incl §1.8 #37-40 + #70 demonstration + lens status header refresh + §10.3 row text refresh. Out-of-scope (deferred per Director): symbolic_cost_dimension; Lens<C> generic refactor (STOP-and-PING if implementation reveals need). Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (same precedent as S5 + descent_execution_proof canvas deletions). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Delete superseded T-CostLens canvas (worker brief is single live authority) * docs(briefs): T-WAD Slice 1 worker brief — β ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395945465: 4 asks confirmed: 1. β ratified (minimalist reuse-first) 2. #1771 audit-receipt binding precedent confirmed 3. WorkflowSecret<Name> folds into dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (provider- specific scope; NOT new dsl/std/ file unless cross-provider evidence) 4. §1.8 gates #54 + #55 split into separate slices (slice 2 = timing-and-pattern; slice 3 = ci_workflow_modeled_as_dag) Slice 1 net-new substrate (only): - WorkflowSecret<Name> + SecretScope carriers - CronExpression + CronField (typed refinement of existing WorkflowTrigger::Schedule { cron: String } at actions.dag:43) Other 4 carriers from §10.3 row 983 reused as-is from extdeps.github.actions per audit-receipt #1771 directive. 6 same-slice acceptance gates incl no-parallel-representation grep + gate #53/#62/#63 advancement + bootstrap regen + clippy. Cross-provider STOP-and-PING per Director ask #3 caveat: worker greps adjacent provider work for WorkflowSecret-shape evidence; surfaces if found before finalizing fold-into-extdeps. Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (S5 + descent_execution_proof + T-CostLens precedent). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demo (#1952) complexity-contract compile-error worker brief Pre-staged execution brief per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker brief path (no canvas — design-lock at docs/design-lens-application- surface.md specifies fixture shape verbatim at line 292). 7 same-slice acceptance gates: fixture program (O(n²) body + Enforce O(log n) budget) + TestClaim assertion + diagnostic structural validation + no regression on T-LBP cementing + bootstrap regen + clippy + §1.8 #92 advancement. Hard prerequisites STOP-and-PING: T-LAS Slice A landed (gates #88-#91) AND T-LBP complexity-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE (gate #79). Worker does not author against partial substrate. Sibling demos #1953 (CRDT cost) + #1954 (memory-peak cost) share the same hard-prerequisite + TestClaim shape pattern — could dispatch as 3 sequential PRs or single multi-demo PR (worker's call at dispatch). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demos #1953 + #1954 — cost-basis sibling worker brief Pre-staged sibling brief covering both cost-basis demos (CRDT cost basis + memory-peak cost basis) per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker-brief path. Single brief for two demos because they share: - Hard-prerequisite pattern (T-LAS Slice A + T-LBP cost-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE) - TestClaim + Diagnostic structural validation shape - apply_lens(cost, ...) Enforce mode Sibling of #1952 brief (complexity-contract compile-error). Worker's call at dispatch on multi-demo PR vs sequential PRs (Mgr ratification needed if going multi-demo). #1953 (CRDT) substrate per design §4.2 + cost-basis-declaration audit at docs/audit/t-user-authored-cost-basis-discipline-worked-examples.md. #1954 (memory-peak) substrate per design §4.3; STOP-and-PING if Dimension<SymbolicCost> substrate (deferred to Dimensions sub-lane per Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775) not yet landed. 6 same-slice acceptance gates per demo + same STOP-and-PING discipline as #1952. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens — update Sub-issue from #1957 to #2141 (post-surgical-recreate) PM executed Director's surgical-recreate ratification (gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4397693699) at 17:54:43Z: closed #1957, created fresh #2141 to trigger pollAutoSpawn fresh-creation path. Worker fierce-ram-21 (#2153) spawned on #2141. 1-line brief update per Director's queued-action commitment: brief now references #2141 + cites surgical-recreate authority. #1957 closed-as-superseded. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas (β-extended substrate-shape question) Director α-revised supersession at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4400920572 elevated β-extended path (introduce first-precedent .dag-side fold-over-realization-rows + name active-target authority shape) from slice-tier to canvas-tier. Authored per Q-PAFS template: - Substrate-state at HEAD grep-verified (Lens<C>.read no target-context; zero .dag-side fold-over-realizations precedent; 15+ lens instances using generic Lens<C>) - Binary question: should .dag-side lenses receive target-context for target-keyed reading? - Options matrix: (i) LanguageSpec param to fold; (ii) per-target lens instances [parallel-representation debt]; (iii) global accessor [REJECTED global-state anti-pattern] - Mgr provisional preference: (i) - Cross-cutting: cost.dag load-bearing; emission_provenance.dag secondary; other 13+ lenses target-agnostic Framework discipline anchors per Director corrections: - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline - feedback_parallel_representation_debt - feedback_abstraction_layering (sibling canvas) Sibling canvas (ε path): q-cost-composition-layering-canvas.md authoring follows. Both canvases together address deeper cross-cutting axis: does target-context belong .dag-side (β-extended) or emit-side (ε)? Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Cost-Composition-Layering canvas (ε substrate-shape question) Sibling canvas to q-lens-target-context-canvas.md. Director α-revised supersession at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4400920572 elevated ε path (Rust-side cost-composition wiring; preserves cost.dag PROXY) from slice-tier to canvas-tier. Authored per Q-PAFS template: - Factoring claim: cost = (target-agnostic-shape SymbolicCost algebra) × (target-specific-values per-primitive realization-cost data loaded Rust-side) - Test against feedback_abstraction_layering (Director-named anchor at gunbc#828 c#4400921658): pure objective concepts × language-agnostic LanguageSpec × emit-side composition. Compliance test for each layer. - Pro factoring (ε structurally honest): SymbolicCost algebra is target- agnostic at HEAD; Rust-side composition is natural home; #38/#39 substrate- already-aligned per Slice 1 finding. - Con factoring (ε is parallel-representation debt): N parallel Rust-side compositions if multiple lenses need target-context; lens-framework abstraction stops at substrate boundary; future lenses hit same dilemma. Mgr provisional reading: factoring honest for COST specifically; NOT generalizable. ε right framing IF cost is the singular need + factoring holds. If N>1 target-context-needing lenses surface, β-extended (option (i) from sibling canvas) becomes the right path. Director ratification ask: 3-way choice (ε) Cost-specific Rust-side composition; preserves cost.dag PROXY (β-extended option (i)) Lens<C> refactor for LanguageSpec parameter (both sequenced) ε now for cost; β-extended later if N>1 Framework discipline anchors: - feedback_abstraction_layering (Director-named for this canvas) - feedback_parallel_representation_debt - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline Canvas-pair complete; sibling canvas + this canvas address the deeper cross-cutting axis: target-context belongs .dag-side (β-extended) or emit-side (ε)? Director ratification across both informs T-CostLens follow-on slice + downstream lens architecture. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs: ε ratified canonical for cost; β-extended deferred to N=2 — gate updates Director ratification at #2181 #issuecomment-... : - (ε) RATIFIED standalone for cost composition (canonical-not-transitional) - (β-extended option (i)) DEFERRED to N=2 trigger event (second lens with target-context need beyond cost) - ("both sequenced") REJECTED as bridge-with-named-dissolution anti-pattern Same-slice acceptance gates landed: 1. Q-Cost-Composition-Layering canvas: status updated from "ratification needed" → "Director-RATIFIED 2026-05-07 (ε standalone; canonical-not- transitional); PROPOSAL maturation pending" 2. Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas: status updated from "ratification needed" → "DRAFT/DEFERRED 2026-05-07; reopens on N=2 trigger event" (second lens with substantive target-context need; emission_provenance most likely candidate per cross-cutting analysis §3) 3. r3-program-plan.md gate-table rows #37 + #40 + #70: ε path ratified; close via Rust-side composition reading abstract SymbolicCost × per- primitive realization-cost in T-CostLens follow-on slice 4. r3-program-plan.md §10.3 T-CostLens-Composition row: ε ratified for #37/#40/#70; β-extended deferred per N=2 trigger 5. v3-lens-capability-register.md cost.dag row: ε disposition cited; #2175 continues as cross-cutting umbrella tracker Closed-system disposition per Director: if N=2 condition never fires, β-extended never fires — structurally correct under closed-system design. Framework discipline anchors honored: - feedback_abstraction_layering: ε respects layering (objective concepts pure; target-specific values flow at emit time per Layer-3 honesty test) - feedback_parallel_representation_debt: bounded to N=1; reopens at N=2 - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline: ε ratified canonical, not transitional - feedback_construction_over_ratchets: substrate-shape question answered structurally - feedback_substrate_principle_audit: substrate-fact authored at canvas- tier; ratification follows P1 procedure Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): canvas inventory grounded in live src/v3/lenses/ registry codex BLOCKING at #2181 (sha 00551a8): Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas inventory was "copied from expected lens set instead of live src/v3/lenses/ registry"; emission_provenance trigger references not grounded in live file content. Same shape of error as 3 prior BLOCKING reversals (Q-Reification, S5 DeclarationRef, T-CostLens merge-content). Substrate-state-grep is being treated as retrospective-correction rather than prerequisite. Tightening: this is the 4th occurrence; should be hard-prerequisite-discipline going forward. Fixes: 1. Q-Lens-Target-Context inventory section: replaced approximate "15+ lens instances" framing with exact `ls`-grep registry (15 .dag files listed by name), notes infer_helpers + lower_helpers are helper modules authoring shared structural fns rather than top-level lens instances. 2. emission_provenance.dag analysis grounded in HEAD file status header: STATUS = STRUCTURALLY TERMINAL; LENS-INSTANCE FIXTURE-BOUND; BEHAVIORALLY DEFERRED. `read` body is fail-closed Empty stub. Lens does NOT currently read target-context inside fold; producer-side instrumentation records target-specific entries consumed via standard framework. Reframed as "ungrounded at HEAD" rather than "POSSIBLY target-context need" — re-evaluates at producer-wiring landing. 3. Net finding: N=1 confirmed at HEAD (cost.dag only); N=2 is empirically open pending lens-completion cycles, NOT pre-claimable. Plus non-blocking improvement: Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 9 stale `#issuecomment-...` placeholder replaced with concrete ratification comment id `#issuecomment-4401584012`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): fix Director-ratification-ask typo + #37 gate-id clarification footnote cursor APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS at #2181 (sha 4209eb7) flagged 2 NON-BLOCKING items + 1 exploratory: 1. (NON-BLOCKING) Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 69: `## Directorratification ask` → `## Director ratification ask` (whitespace typo) 2. (NON-BLOCKING) Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 9 placeholder `#issuecomment-...`: ALREADY ADDRESSED in commit `db88b1004` (replaced with `#issuecomment-4401584012`) 3. (Exploratory) Gate #37 id `cost_lens_reads_target_realization` framing implies .dag lens body performs realization read; per ε ratification it's Rust-side composition consumer. Added clarifying footnote noting gate-id retention + Rust-side closure path; rename candidate post-follow-on-slice landing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context — absorb PM canvas-review concerns 1-3 Director relayed PM canvas review at #2068 c#4401627536: Concern 1 (RESOLVED via grep-verify): empirical N=1 confirmation. PM ran `grep -lc 'TypeRealization|CallableRealization|MethodTemplateContract| target_realization|realization_cost|LanguageSpec' src/v3/lenses/*.dag`; only cost.dag has 3 hits, all 14 others have 0 refs (including emission_provenance.dag which I'd previously framed speculatively). Net-finding §3 updated with grep result inline + "N=1 empirically grounded" framing replacing speculative "secondary candidate" language. Empirical basis for DEFERRED β-extended disposition strengthened. Concern 2 (Option (ii) multiplier framing): per-target lens instances replicate the entire Lens<C> authoring surface — N×M × 4 (carrier + monoid sequential + branch + iterate) authoring overhead. Updated Con bullet to reflect the multiplier explicitly: 3 targets × 1 cost lens × 4 = 12 authored fns; grows to 36 if 3 lenses need target-context. Cites feedback_parallel_representation_debt as the P2 framing. Concern 3 (Option (i) threading cost quantification): replaced narrative "threading cost is real but manageable" with quantified breakdown — ~15 signature changes + 14 ignore-parameter patterns + 1 consumer + cementing- test revalidation. Helps future Director ratification at N=2 trigger event. All 3 amendments are docs-only refinements; ε ratification at gunbc#2181 c#4401584012 unchanged. Strengthens canvas as durable substrate-shape decision record. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): canvases — collapse stale ratification-ask sections post-ratification codex BLOCKING at #2181 (sha be9a9c9): both canvases had stale "Director ratification ask" sections after status headers were updated to RATIFIED/DEFERRED. Per INVARIANTS P1 "Documentation Describes Live State" — canvas internally presented both settled and unsettled authority. Fixes: 1. Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 69-76: "Director ratification ask" section collapsed to "Director ratification (RECEIVED 2026-05-07)" with ε ratified, β-extended deferred, "both sequenced" rejected. Three options recorded as historical with ratification cite. Eliminates the rejected "both, sequenced" line that conflicted with status-header "canonical-not- transitional" framing. 2. Q-Lens-Target-Context line 131-136: "Director ratification ask" section collapsed to "Director disposition (DEFERRED 2026-05-07; reopens on N=2 trigger event)". Original ratification asks recorded as FROZEN; revisit at N=2 trigger event with then-current substrate-state grep. Eliminates live-now-ratify framing that conflicted with status-header DEFERRED. Both canvases now single live authority — RATIFIED/DEFERRED dispositions, no internal ratification-ask drift. Future re-ratification (Q-Lens-Target- Context at N=2 trigger) refreshes options matrix at that point per substrate-state-honesty discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context — separate live N=1 from reopen-only future N=2 openai-pro APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS at #2181 (sha be9a9c9): canvas line 127 mixed live N=1 authority with speculative N=2 candidate in one current-state cost count. Per P1 Documentation Describes Live State + P2 single-authority metadata: the live count at HEAD is `cost × 3 targets = 3 per-target instances` (× 4 authoring-multiplier per Option (ii) Con = 12 fns). The `emission_provenance × 3` figure is a reopen-only future scenario that materializes only if emission_provenance becomes the second real target-context lens at producer- wiring landing time. Updated to separate the two clearly: live count + reopen-only future scenario marked separately. Aligns with the grep-verified N=1 finding established earlier in canvas §3. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): T-CostLens worker brief — ε supersession header (γ retained as context) PR #2181 merged at eff426d ratifies ε path canonical-not-transitional for cost composition. Brief was authored under γ scope (.dag-side Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition). Add binding ε supersession header at top; retain γ section as historical context per single-authority discipline. cost.dag stays PROXY under ε; composition is Rust-side (abstract SymbolicCost shape × per-primitive realization values). Authority: Director ratification at #2181 #issuecomment-4401584012. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Complexity-Composition-Layering canvas — DRAFT (factoring tested, ε precedent does NOT apply) Director authorized canvas authoring at #828 c#4402669133 as parallel structure to Q-Cost-Composition-Layering (ε RATIFIED). Substrate- grep on src/v3/lenses/complexity.dag at HEAD shows the factoring claim DIFFERS from cost-lens: - Cost-lens needed (target-agnostic shape × target-specific values) factoring → Rust-side composition (ε) - Complexity-lens has NO target-specific axis; output is structural property of DAG topology + algebra-instance composition; substrate- native fully-on-.dag-side completion Mgr provisional reading: ε precedent does NOT apply; complexity-lens BEHAVIORAL COMPLETION is direct slice-tier substrate authoring (carrier introduction follows SymbolicCost precedent + T-E-P P1 carrier consumption). Director ratification ask: Q1 (factoring finding correct), Q2 (slice-tier directly bypassing canvas), Q3 (fresh worker pin). Cross-Mgr: Verification Mgr (#2075) pinged on v2-oracle snapshot capture status (cross-cutting prerequisite for #1950/#1951 cementing dispatch). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LBP complexity-lens substrate-completion worker brief (Q1/Q2/Q3 RATIFIED) Pre-authored brief for complexity-lens BEHAVIORAL COMPLETION substrate work per Director Q1/Q2/Q3 ratification at #828 c#4402714255. Three deliverables: carrier introduction (ComplexityCost / WorkSpan / AsymptoticClass following SymbolicCost precedent) + lens widening (complexity.dag PROXY → COMPLETE) + T-E-P P1 carrier consumption (DescentEvidence / CallPattern / SubValueRelation for asymptotic classification of recursive-call behavior). Indirect-variant dependency surfaced as worker-grep concern at slice- authoring time (T-E-P P1 Slice 5+ pending; eager-bat-178 stream). Cementing test (#1950) is separate downstream brief; v2-oracle snapshot ownership pending Q4 cross-Mgr ratification. Worker pin: fresh-pool pick at dispatch time (NOT eager-bat-178 per Director Q3 framing; NOT fierce-ram-21 busy with cost-lens ε). Same-window-dispatch discipline applies post-canvas-merge (PR #2197). Pre-authored vs pre-known discipline applied per feedback_pre_known_vs_pre_authored_briefs.md memorialized 2026-05-08. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): rewrite complexity-lens brief consuming live design authority (codex BLOCKING fix) Codex BLOCKING (3 findings) at #2199 sha 7a8bb6d: 1. Brief authored against missing canvas instead of reconciling with docs/design-complexity-lens-behavioral-completeness.md (which exists at HEAD with comprehensive substrate spec) 2. Producer coverage treated as optional corpus scope; should be hard T-E-P-Producer-Broadening prerequisite 3. Stale/non-in-repo planning authority cited; should be r3-structure.md row 146 (T-LBP slice 1) All three BLOCKING findings VALID — substrate-grep-before-authoring discipline failure on my part (feedback_substrate_grep_before_authoring already memorialized; violated own discipline). Rewrite delegates carrier shape, dimension wiring, and consumer rewrite to live design doc §§1.1-1.6 verbatim: - §1.1 SymbolicCost — already at algebra.dag; no change - §1.2 SizeVariable — display_name enrichment - §1.3 work_dimension + span_dimension — two AnalysisDimension instances - §1.4 AsymptoticClass + BoundedLattice instance - §1.5 Certainty (cost-aware composition; no lattice) - §1.6 cost_bound_to_symbolic projection - §1.7 ComplexitySummary record + lens widening T-E-P P1 hard prerequisite per design's authority discipline + r3- structure.md row 146; STOP-and-PING if T-E-P P1 not COMPLETE at slice authoring time. Authority cites updated to live r3-structure.md row 146. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-PerfWithinBaseline canvas — DRAFT (canvas-tier P1 procedure per Q6 RATIFIED) Director Q6 RATIFIED canvas-tier-required at #828 c#4403163639 for PerfWithinBaseline TestPredicate variant authoring. Three substantive substrate-shape questions resolved: Q1 baseline shape: (a) literal-Int rejected as strict-mirror-of-CostBounded defeats semantic load; (b) DeclarationRef-to-stored-data composes LensOutputEquals + data X: SymbolicCost precedent at HEAD; (c) runtime- fixture-injection over-authors. Mgr lean (b). Q2 ComparisonOp composition: (i) reuse existing ComparisonOp via test- runner-side resolution matches LensOutputEquals path; (ii) new relative- op-set introduces parallel-representation debt. Mgr lean (i). Q3 baseline-storage scope: (α) in-scope slice authors example data; (β) out-of-scope variant-only slice + PB consumer authors baseline data matches existing layering. Mgr lean (β). Combined Mgr lean: Q1(b) + Q2(i) + Q3(β) — variant authored as compositional extension; baseline-storage is PB consumer-tier work. Cross-Mgr: PB Mgr #2138 worker (crisp-swift-433) holds dispatch on #2204 land; T-Tier3-Dissolution #2085 R-4 prereq encoded. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-PerfWithinBaseline canvas REVISED (supersedes wrong-shape original) Director disposition at #828 c#4403265220 authorized supersession after BLOCKING at PR #2209 c#4403246233 verified VALID: original canvas conflated symbolic SymbolicCost (cost-lens substrate) with wall-clock measured median/p99 baseline (T-Tier3 perf gate substrate per docs/r3-structure.md:225 + :461 Director-locked 2026-04-28). Revised canvas frames as two-path ratification: - P1 author full perf-budget substrate in-R3 (multi-slice; pattern-5 genuinely-novel substrate-fact-introduction) - P2 explicitly post-R3 per Director-locked recommendation (zero in-R3 effort; structural close per r3-structure.md:461 'R3 deliverable is structural close; perf is downstream') Mgr lean: P2 — Director-locked recommendation explicit; trigger- condition ('someone authors perf-budget claim with concrete numbers and tooling') not met; R3 horizon constraint argues against multi- slice perf-budget substrate adding to 5-orthogonal-dependency picture. Original canvas at q-perf-within-baseline-canvas.md retained with SUPERSEDED-BY header per durable-decision-record discipline. 5th discipline-failure of 2026-05-08 cycle: substrate-grep verified substrate-precedent but missed consumer-side requirement at canonical authority doc; Director self-flagged symmetric two-axis verification gap; canvas-finding-taxonomy needs precondition 'consumer-side requirement grep-verified at canonical authority doc'. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-PerfWithinBaseline canvas-revised — correct trigger-condition framing per Director c#4403297623 Director caught second-axis grep failure on revised canvas: my P2 reasoning #1 ("path-trigger condition for P1 is not met") was structurally wrong. Existing tooling at HEAD substantially meets the Director-locked 2026-04-28 trigger-condition ("someone authors the perf-budget claim with concrete numbers and tooling"): - docs/briefs/r3-pb-tier3-perf-budget-worker.md - docs/audit/c1-tier3-perf-budget-readiness-matrix.md - src/v3/compiler/benches/tier3_mirror_perf.rs - docs/audit/c1-tier3-baseline-capture-procedure.md - docs/audit/c1-r3-canonical-bench-host-decision-matrix.md Plus thresholds (≤2× median, ≤5× p99) + capture discipline (N=3 min, N=5 preferred) + canonical bench host option matrix. P1 is bridging existing tooling to substrate (compositional-extension), NOT multi-slice greenfield genuinely-novel pattern-5 as originally framed. Smaller scope than canvas-finding-taxonomy pattern 5 implies. Path-call genuinely depends on PB Mgr's R-3 (canonical CI bench host) + R-7 (tier3_baseline.json baseline-capture path) decisions per their audit response at c#4403059897. Path-call DEFERRED to cross-Mgr coordination outcome with PB Mgr (#2074); Substrate Mgr surfaces with corrected framing this turn. Sixth discipline-failure of cycle (mine, second-axis grep gap on existing-tooling state); same-class as Director's first-axis grep gap on consumer-side requirement at the prior turn. Memorialized as two-axis verification discipline anchor. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs(briefs): Substrate bridge SourceSpan.file participation retirement worker brief Authored for gunbc#1958 Substrate-owned bridge slice. Targets audit-row #2 (kernel Bool patch BOOL_TYPES_FILE) + row #6 (pipeline authority PIPELINE_AUTHORITY_FILE) per r3-program-plan.md §5 line 353 scope-narrowing. Sibling #1959 closed as already-retired by PR #1272. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 Variant-aware projection carrier canvas (#1947) Surfaces 3 carrier-shape options (α RestResponseProjection variant-tag / β Declaration variant_projection_metadata / γ free-standing CoproductProjection) for Director ratification before worker brief authoring. Mgr-tier recommendation = γ (DeclarationRef-keyed, avoids tag-string-as-identity bridge). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — same-slice prerequisite + section anchor Director calibration (gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-...): 1. Promote ratchet-test cross-Mgr handoff from conditional Acceptance #4 to upfront same-slice BLOCKING prerequisite gate (per feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline). 2. Replace `r3-program-plan.md:353` line-cite with `§5 Y4 scope-clarification` section anchor (per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers). Code-line anchors in bootstrap.rs left as-is (anchor sites worker navigates to). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — umbrella stays Open per P2 ledger discipline Address BLOCKING inline review at line 46: bridge_source_span_file_participation_retired is an Open umbrella whose green predicate is "no production code path consults SourceSpan.file" per r3-structure.md:115. Partial retirement was explicitly rejected 2026-04-29 (Director acceptance #1130 / dispatch #1139). Changes: - Add Ledger-discipline preamble: umbrella row stays Open; receipt updates audit-packet enumeration, NOT bridge_ledger.dag. - Acceptance #3 reframed: do NOT mutate bridge_ledger.dag; mark rows #2 + #6 retired in the audit packet only. - Authority anchor updated: status=Open (not Proposed); add r3-structure.md:115 + bridge_ledger.dag:125-129 line refs. - Cross-Mgr section reframed: umbrella ratchet cannot flip on this PR alone; Verification's ledger-zero audit progress field is post-merge tracking, not a same-slice pre-merge blocker. Reconciles with BLOCKING finding (Director calibration #1 assumed umbrella ratchet could flip on partial retirement, which r3-structure.md:115 forbids). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 CoproductProjection worker brief — γ ratified (#1947) Director ratification of option γ at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394369848. Free-standing CoproductProjection carrier in src/v3/std/, DeclarationRef-keyed, typed WireTagValue leaf, 4 same-slice acceptance gates. Surfaces 3 substrate observations for STOP-and-PING (DeclarationRef String alias; FieldRef does-not-exist-at-HEAD; tag_field String asymmetry) — worker must escalate, not silently work around. PB Mgr cross-Mgr ping at carrier landing (heads-up, not blocker). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — resolve Acceptance #4 / Cross-Mgr contradiction openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at PR #2079 #issuecomment-... flagged Acceptance #4 ("ratchet test passes ... confirmed-present at HEAD before merge") contradicting the reframed Cross-Mgr section ("No same-slice ratchet-test gate applies; post-merge tracking only"). Both said different things about whether the umbrella ratchet is a pre-merge blocker. Resolution: Acceptance #4 reframed to explicitly state "No umbrella-ratchet pre-merge gate" — worker does NOT wait for Verification ratchet authoring; acceptance for this slice is the audit-packet receipt update in #3. Cross-Mgr handoff also updated to remove "ratchet authoring" from Verification's same-slice duties. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): S5 brief — absorb Director pre-ratifications for 3 STOP-and-PING items Director pre-ratified dispositions at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394416049: 1. DeclarationRef alias: accept (b) + debt note (re-escalate only on same-slice break) 2. FieldRef: grep-decide between InputFieldRef-as-specialization vs rename 3. tag_field String asymmetry: typed introduction + debt note for migration Worker proceeds without re-pinging unless evidence forces escalation. STOP-criteria section narrowed accordingly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification Gate A receipt — Option A (Dag-as-carrier) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394427814 + proposal merge at PR #2096 (commit fec8692): src/v3/std/substrate.dag::Dag IS the reflected program; no new substrate carrier required. ReflectedProgram<T> rejected. Gate A patches: 1. r3-program-plan.md §10.3: new Q-Reification row marked RATIFIED with PR #2096 merge link + Gate A receipt scope (this PR + #1960 closed-as-non-addition). 2. r3-v-pattern-a-tc1-v1-worker.md: 3 sites — status header (Q-Reification CLEARED, Branch B η non-vacuity remains), worker-pin gate, E6-G1.a/E3 producer dependency. Replaces ReflectedProgram<T> with consumer-wiring nuance: lens fold consumes Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator. 3. r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md: 2 sites — same nuance: deferred work is consumer-wiring, NOT a separate carrier. 4. r3-pr-e8-w1-producer-contract-test-plan-worker.md: 1 site — fold-over-Dag reframe. Receipt of pass-by-construction: this PR adds NO new .dag declaration to src/v3/std/. The ratification is structurally a non-addition (Option A correctness proof per same-slice dissolution discipline). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — delete superseded canvas + name dissolution trigger for tag_field asymmetry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings (P2 single-authority + P5 dissolution trigger). Fixes: 1. Delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-s5-variant-aware-projection-carrier-canvas.md (superseded by the γ-ratified worker brief in same PR; would otherwise leave two current-looking S5 status authorities post-merge — one saying ratification pending, one saying γ ratified). 2. Substrate observation #3 (tag_field String/FieldRef asymmetry) now carries a binding named dissolution trigger: when FieldRef exists as top-level carrier AND InputFieldRef is classified, migrate InternallyTaggedObject.tag_field via follow-on Substrate hygiene PR. Worker MUST add debt-paydown row to authoritative debt ledger before merging carrier-introduction PR. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification row — fix invariant cite (C-1 → P2) cursor review at gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-... flagged C-1 as mis-keyed: INVARIANTS.md C-1 is "missing args fail closed; no LitNull sentinels" (P3 fail-closed family), not parallel-representation/duplicate-authority. The correct cite for rejecting a parallel ReflectedProgram<T> alongside Dag is P2 single authority (INVARIANTS.md line 148: cost of change is proportional to how many files encode the same fact). Cite updated to "INVARIANTS.md P2 single authority" with inline gloss. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — name dissolution trigger for DeclarationRef alias debt openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: substrate observation #1 had desired endpoint ("future structural promotion of DeclarationRef") but no checkable dissolution trigger — same P5 gap that #3 (tag_field asymmetry) had been fixed for in commit 2601d7d. Trigger now binding: promote DeclarationRef when EITHER (a) audit-row #14 (declaration_name_preference_rank / declaration_by_name rank-table) closes — dsl/std ↔ src/v3/std module convergence makes name-keyed identity unambiguous and structural module identity available, OR (b) any DeclarationRef-typed consumer surfaces a string-identity bridge per feedback_opaque_strings_attract_heuristics (heuristic patching, naming- convention dispatch, suffix/prefix matching). Worker MUST add debt-paydown row before merging carrier-introduction PR (same pattern as the tag_field debt requirement). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: complete Q-Reification stale-cite sweep — e6-g1a brief :169 + Q-PAFS row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md:169 still said TC1/V1 "waits for Q-Reification and the carrier landing", contradicting the same brief's lines 15-19 + 148-153 saying Dag IS the carrier and no separate carrier lands. Fixed: 1. e6-g1a brief line 167-170 paragraph: clarified V1 waits for consumer-wiring work (lens fold consuming Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator), NOT for a carrier-introduction. 2. r3-program-plan.md:954 Q-PAFS row text was the same shape: "Resume after Q-Reification + ReflectedProgram<T>" — contradicted my new Q-Reification row in the same diff. Updated: Q-Reification STOP CLEARED 2026-05-07 (Option A); remaining hold = Branch B η non-vacuity only. Out-of-scope-for-this-PR: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-feasibility-probe.md contains 4 stale cites but is not modified in this PR; stale-on-main can be swept in a follow-up if needed (single source of truth is the e6-g1a-static-lens worker brief, not the feasibility probe per Q-PAFS Path A acceptance). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix InputFieldRef mis-read; reframe observations #2 + #3 codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079 line 22: my brief mis-read services.dag:28-36. The text actually says "No separate InputFieldRef carrier is introduced here, since ParamToken.name already carries the same shape and adding a wrapper would duplicate without strengthening the structural invariant" — i.e., InputFieldRef does NOT exist; the comment REJECTS the wrapper. Fixes: 1. Substrate observation #2 reframed: no FieldRef-shaped carrier exists at HEAD; services.dag:28-36 precedent argues against wrapper unless it strengthens structural invariant. New (a)/(b) STOP-and-PING: (a) follow services.dag precedent — wire_tag_field: String + key invariant on wire_tag_values + fixture-load fail-closed check; (b) introduce typed FieldRef — must justify per "duplicate without strengthening" test. 2. Carrier shape (line 19): wire_tag_field: FieldRef → {String|FieldRef} pending observation #2 resolution. 3. Substrate observation #3 reframed: InternallyTaggedObject asymmetry is conditional on path (b); under path (a) no asymmetry exists. Trigger correspondingly conditional. Removed stale "InputFieldRef classified" trigger clause. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — consolidate split per-variant maps into single keyed entry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: CoproductProjection shape split per-variant data across two parallel maps (variant_field_projections + wire_tag_values), admitting illegal states where keysets drift (P2 boundary discipline / illegal-states-unrepresentable). Fix: introduce CoproductVariantProjection { field_projection, wire_tag_value } as the per-variant keyed value; CoproductProjection.variant_projections becomes Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection>. Single keyed authority per variant. Director's binding constraint #2 enumerated the two fields separately but said "refine in implementation as ergonomics demand" — consolidation preserves the substantive constraints (typed WireTagValue leaf, structural per-variant projection) while enforcing keyset alignment by carrier shape. Empty-payload variants encoded via FieldProjection::Empty constructor (or analog), not via map-absence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix stale split-map vocab in path (a) + scope STOP-and-PING umbrella openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings. 1. Path (a) at line 43 still referenced "Map<VariantId, WireTagValue> key invariant on wire_tag_values" — that's the superseded split-map vocab; the consolidated shape is Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection> on variant_projections. Path (a) now references the consolidated map; per-variant WireTagValue lives inside CoproductVariantProjection. 2. Pre-ratification umbrella at line 36 said "all 3 dispositions pre-ratified, proceed without re-pinging" — but observation #2 was re-opened after the codex InputFieldRef finding and explicitly says STOP-and-PING. Contradictory. Umbrella now scoped: observations #1 + #3 are pre-ratified; #2 is re-opened STOP-and-PING — worker MUST escalate before choosing path (a) vs (b). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof canvas — 4-residual coproduct-dissolution audit Director ratified split disposition at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394696074: descent_execution_proof STANDS ALONE (consumer-side termination-contract substrate function with fail-closed residual enumeration; folding into T-E-P-Producer-Broadening explicitly rejected — different concern axis). Canvas surfaces 3 carrier-shape options for the residual enumeration per Director's coproduct-dissolution audit suggestion: α: 4-variant coproduct verbatim from §10.3 row 966 (Missing | Unknown | Incomplete | NonStrict) β: 3-axis dimensional product (presence × completeness × strictness) γ (recommended): reuse DescentEvidence at termination.dag:14-17 for "absent/unknown" via EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) payload-variant + separate EvidenceIncomplete — ratchets variant count 4 → 2 via dimensional folding while honoring services.dag "no parallel wrapper" precedent. Mgr recommendation γ; β rejected unless 3 axes provably compose orthogonally. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan brief Row #6 — derive from bootstrap_authority map, no new enum variant codex BLOCKING (post-merge of #2079, on commit 85ceb85 — same brief is now on main): my Row #6 disposition told the worker to introduce a new BootstrapAuthority::Pipeline variant ("extend the enum if needed"). That violates P2 single-authority — src/v3/std/bootstrap_authority.dag:90 already has "src/v3/compiler/pipeline.dag": CompilerAuthority, classifying pipeline.dag under the existing CompilerAuthority variant. The :14-17 comment is explicit: "the path itself is the BootstrapAuthoritySet map key; variants carry no duplicate path payload" — single authority, not extension-by-variant. Fix: Row #6 now instructs worker to derive the typed key from the existing bootstrap_authority-map witness (BootstrapAuthorityKey threading the existing CompilerAuthority classifier), refining the constructor surface if needed — NOT introducing a new enum variant. STOP-and-PING criteria updated to forbid new-variant resolution under any path. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof worker brief — γ ratified (2-variant residual) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395060514: - DescentResidual = EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) | EvidenceIncomplete (4 → 2 dissolution: Missing+Unknown fold via DescentUnknown injection; NonStrict folds via NonIncreasing wrap; Incomplete retained — different concern axis from evidence-lattice) - DescentEvidence 3-variant lattice at termination.dag:14-17 confirmed as authoritative composition target - Type signature from §10.3 row 966 confirmed verbatim-binding Director-asked canvas-shape verification absorbed: worker STOPs if EvidenceIncomplete decomposes into payload-variants (timeout / depth-bound / evaluator-error-during-proof-construction); proceeds as 2-variant otherwise. 7 same-slice acceptance gates incl Evaluator E2 #1971 consumer wiring in same PR + §10.3 row 966 row-text refresh to cite γ-disposition. Worker pin: quick-koi-190 (pre-authorized per §10.3 row 966). Auto-spawn HOLD per L-sized threshold; surgical-recreate path ratified case-by-case if critical path blocked. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — narrow EvidenceUnknown payload via NonStrictEvidence subset; delete superseded canvas openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2105: 2 findings. 1. BLOCKING (LAYER MODEL / illegal states unrepresentable): worker brief shape `EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence)` admitted EvidenceUnknown(Strict) even though the canvas itself acknowledged Strict-isn't-a-residual as illegal. P2 requires API-level enforcement, not prose convention. Fix: introduce typed subset `NonStrictEvidence = NonIncreasing | DescentUnknown`; residual now `EvidenceUnknown(NonStrictEvidence)` — illegal-states-unrepresentable by construction. NonStrictEvidence lands in same file as DescentResidual; composes with existing 3-variant DescentEvidence via inhabitation, not re-definition. 2. NON-BLOCKING (live-state drift): canvas + worker brief both visible with "ratification needed" vs "ratified" status — same P2 single-authority shape as the S5 canvas/worker-brief co-existence at #2079. Fix: delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-descent-execution-proof-canvas.md (worker brief frontmatter already names it as superseded; with canvas gone the live authority is unambiguous). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — section-anchor cite for §10.3 row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2105 line 47: my brief cited "§10.3 row 966" but the actual line is now 986 (after my Q-Reification row insert in PR #2079 shifted §10.3 by 20 lines). Reviewer's "no such section" claim is wrong on substance (file + section + row all exist) but the line drift IS real. Fix per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers (Director calibration in gunbc#2079): replaced all "§10.3 row 966" with "§10.3 Q-EVAL-Descent- Termination-Contract row" — name-anchor instead of line-anchor, drift-immune. 5 occurrences cleaned (closure predicate, acceptance gate #3, gate #5, STOP criterion, worker pin justification). Stylistic "row row-text" repetition collapsed to "row text". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition canvas — Lens<SymbolicCost> composition shape (#1957) Pre-staged per Director endorsement of T-CostLens-Composition canvas-shape authoring. Surfaces 3 composition options for the Lens<SymbolicCost> instance: α: two separate lenses, externally joined — REJECTED (violates §1.8 gate #39 no_coercion_cost_dimension by construction) β: single Lens<SymbolicCost> with composed witness in read — strong but requires Lens<C> carrier-shape refactor (target-context threading) γ (recommended): Lens<SymbolicCost> reads structural cost via algebra-fold + target-realization composed via existing Lookup<SymbolicCost> substrate at lookup.dag:48-60 — preserves generic Lens<C> carrier; satisfies all 4 §1.8 gates (#37-40) by construction; aligns with feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first Adjacent substrate verified at HEAD: lens.dag:70-77 (Lens<C>), algebra.dag:12+ (SymbolicCost 7-variant + Semiring), lookup.dag:48-60 (Lookup<SymbolicCost> + MissingCost lens-boundary). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-Workflow-As-Data canvas — audit-receipt-honoring scope-narrowing Pre-staged per Director endorsement. Q-Workflow-As-Data-Carriers (§10.3 row 983) named 5 carriers; grep-verified at HEAD that 4 of 5 ALREADY EXIST in dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (218 lines). Only WorkflowSecret<Name> is wholly net-new substrate. Surfaces 3 options: α: maximalist 5-carrier introduction in dsl/std/workflow.dag — REJECTED (admits parallel-representation debt vs audit-receipt #1771 reuse-first directive) β (recommended): minimalist — only WorkflowSecret<Name> + Cron<Schedule> refinement net-new; lens consumes extdeps.github.actions directly. Honors feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first. γ: like β + WorkflowObservationAnchor for typed lens-consumption-shape; natural ratchet from β if evidence accumulates. Sequencing: dispatch-ready post-T-LBP COMPLETE per §S4 design-schedule:95; brief authoring lands in advance per pre-staging discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition worker brief — γ ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775: - γ option ratified (Lens<SymbolicCost> + Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition) - Lens<C> generic at lens.dag:70-77 confirmed authoritative (no refactor in scope) - symbolic_cost_dimension: AnalysisDimension<SymbolicCost> defers to separate Dimensions sub-lane Critical reframing absorbed: src/v3/lenses/cost.dag ALREADY EXISTS (status: STRUCTURALLY TERMINAL; BEHAVIORALLY PROXY). T-CostLens-Composition is behavioral-completion + target-realization-wiring, NOT P1 carrier introduction. Worker reads existing lens; advances PROXY → BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE via Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition. 8 same-slice acceptance gates incl §1.8 #37-40 + #70 demonstration + lens status header refresh + §10.3 row text refresh. Out-of-scope (deferred per Director): symbolic_cost_dimension; Lens<C> generic refactor (STOP-and-PING if implementation reveals need). Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (same precedent as S5 + descent_execution_proof canvas deletions). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Delete superseded T-CostLens canvas (worker brief is single live authority) * docs(briefs): T-WAD Slice 1 worker brief — β ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395945465: 4 asks confirmed: 1. β ratified (minimalist reuse-first) 2. #1771 audit-receipt binding precedent confirmed 3. WorkflowSecret<Name> folds into dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (provider- specific scope; NOT new dsl/std/ file unless cross-provider evidence) 4. §1.8 gates #54 + #55 split into separate slices (slice 2 = timing-and-pattern; slice 3 = ci_workflow_modeled_as_dag) Slice 1 net-new substrate (only): - WorkflowSecret<Name> + SecretScope carriers - CronExpression + CronField (typed refinement of existing WorkflowTrigger::Schedule { cron: String } at actions.dag:43) Other 4 carriers from §10.3 row 983 reused as-is from extdeps.github.actions per audit-receipt #1771 directive. 6 same-slice acceptance gates incl no-parallel-representation grep + gate #53/#62/#63 advancement + bootstrap regen + clippy. Cross-provider STOP-and-PING per Director ask #3 caveat: worker greps adjacent provider work for WorkflowSecret-shape evidence; surfaces if found before finalizing fold-into-extdeps. Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (S5 + descent_execution_proof + T-CostLens precedent). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demo (#1952) complexity-contract compile-error worker brief Pre-staged execution brief per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker brief path (no canvas — design-lock at docs/design-lens-application- surface.md specifies fixture shape verbatim at line 292). 7 same-slice acceptance gates: fixture program (O(n²) body + Enforce O(log n) budget) + TestClaim assertion + diagnostic structural validation + no regression on T-LBP cementing + bootstrap regen + clippy + §1.8 #92 advancement. Hard prerequisites STOP-and-PING: T-LAS Slice A landed (gates #88-#91) AND T-LBP complexity-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE (gate #79). Worker does not author against partial substrate. Sibling demos #1953 (CRDT cost) + #1954 (memory-peak cost) share the same hard-prerequisite + TestClaim shape pattern — could dispatch as 3 sequential PRs or single multi-demo PR (worker's call at dispatch). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demos #1953 + #1954 — cost-basis sibling worker brief Pre-staged sibling brief covering both cost-basis demos (CRDT cost basis + memory-peak cost basis) per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker-brief path. Single brief for two demos because they share: - Hard-prerequisite pattern (T-LAS Slice A + T-LBP cost-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE) - TestClaim + Diagnostic structural validation shape - apply_lens(cost, ...) Enforce mode Sibling of #1952 brief (complexity-contract compile-error). Worker's call at dispatch on multi-demo PR vs sequential PRs (Mgr ratification needed if going multi-demo). #1953 (CRDT) substrate per design §4.2 + cost-basis-declaration audit at docs/audit/t-user-authored-cost-basis-discipline-worked-examples.md. #1954 (memory-peak) substrate per design §4.3; STOP-and-PING if Dimension<SymbolicCost> substrate (deferred to Dimensions sub-lane per Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775) not yet landed. 6 same-slice acceptance gates per demo + same STOP-and-PING discipline as #1952. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens — update Sub-issue from #1957 to #2141 (post-surgical-recreate) PM executed Director's surgical-recreate ratification (gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4397693699) at 17:54:43Z: closed #1957, created fresh #2141 to trigger pollAutoSpawn fresh-creation path. Worker fierce-ram-21 (#2153) spawned on #2141. 1-line brief update per Director's queued-action commitment: brief now references #2141 + cites surgical-recreate authority. #1957 closed-as-superseded. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas (β-extended substrate-shape question) Director α-revised supersession at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4400920572 elevated β-extended path (introduce first-precedent .dag-side fold-over-realization-rows + name active-target authority shape) from slice-tier to canvas-tier. Authored per Q-PAFS template: - Substrate-state at HEAD grep-verified (Lens<C>.read no target-context; zero .dag-side fold-over-realizations precedent; 15+ lens instances using generic Lens<C>) - Binary question: should .dag-side lenses receive target-context for target-keyed reading? - Options matrix: (i) LanguageSpec param to fold; (ii) per-target lens instances [parallel-representation debt]; (iii) global accessor [REJECTED global-state anti-pattern] - Mgr provisional preference: (i) - Cross-cutting: cost.dag load-bearing; emission_provenance.dag secondary; other 13+ lenses target-agnostic Framework discipline anchors per Director corrections: - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline - feedback_parallel_representation_debt - feedback_abstraction_layering (sibling canvas) Sibling canvas (ε path): q-cost-composition-layering-canvas.md authoring follows. Both canvases together address deeper cross-cutting axis: does target-context belong .dag-side (β-extended) or emit-side (ε)? Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Cost-Composition-Layering canvas (ε substrate-shape question) Sibling canvas to q-lens-target-context-canvas.md. Director α-revised supersession at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4400920572 elevated ε path (Rust-side cost-composition wiring; preserves cost.dag PROXY) from slice-tier to canvas-tier. Authored per Q-PAFS template: - Factoring claim: cost = (target-agnostic-shape SymbolicCost algebra) × (target-specific-values per-primitive realization-cost data loaded Rust-side) - Test against feedback_abstraction_layering (Director-named anchor at gunbc#828 c#4400921658): pure objective concepts × language-agnostic LanguageSpec × emit-side composition. Compliance test for each layer. - Pro factoring (ε structurally honest): SymbolicCost algebra is target- agnostic at HEAD; Rust-side composition is natural home; #38/#39 substrate- already-aligned per Slice 1 finding. - Con factoring (ε is parallel-representation debt): N parallel Rust-side compositions if multiple lenses need target-context; lens-framework abstraction stops at substrate boundary; future lenses hit same dilemma. Mgr provisional reading: factoring honest for COST specifically; NOT generalizable. ε right framing IF cost is the singular need + factoring holds. If N>1 target-context-needing lenses surface, β-extended (option (i) from sibling canvas) becomes the right path. Director ratification ask: 3-way choice (ε) Cost-specific Rust-side composition; preserves cost.dag PROXY (β-extended option (i)) Lens<C> refactor for LanguageSpec parameter (both sequenced) ε now for cost; β-extended later if N>1 Framework discipline anchors: - feedback_abstraction_layering (Director-named for this canvas) - feedback_parallel_representation_debt - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline Canvas-pair complete; sibling canvas + this canvas address the deeper cross-cutting axis: target-context belongs .dag-side (β-extended) or emit-side (ε)? Director ratification across both informs T-CostLens follow-on slice + downstream lens architecture. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs: ε ratified canonical for cost; β-extended deferred to N=2 — gate updates Director ratification at #2181 #issuecomment-... : - (ε) RATIFIED standalone for cost composition (canonical-not-transitional) - (β-extended option (i)) DEFERRED to N=2 trigger event (second lens with target-context need beyond cost) - ("both sequenced") REJECTED as bridge-with-named-dissolution anti-pattern Same-slice acceptance gates landed: 1. Q-Cost-Composition-Layering canvas: status updated from "ratification needed" → "Director-RATIFIED 2026-05-07 (ε standalone; canonical-not- transitional); PROPOSAL maturation pending" 2. Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas: status updated from "ratification needed" → "DRAFT/DEFERRED 2026-05-07; reopens on N=2 trigger event" (second lens with substantive target-context need; emission_provenance most likely candidate per cross-cutting analysis §3) 3. r3-program-plan.md gate-table rows #37 + #40 + #70: ε path ratified; close via Rust-side composition reading abstract SymbolicCost × per- primitive realization-cost in T-CostLens follow-on slice 4. r3-program-plan.md §10.3 T-CostLens-Composition row: ε ratified for #37/#40/#70; β-extended deferred per N=2 trigger 5. v3-lens-capability-register.md cost.dag row: ε disposition cited; #2175 continues as cross-cutting umbrella tracker Closed-system disposition per Director: if N=2 condition never fires, β-extended never fires — structurally correct under closed-system design. Framework discipline anchors honored: - feedback_abstraction_layering: ε respects layering (objective concepts pure; target-specific values flow at emit time per Layer-3 honesty test) - feedback_parallel_representation_debt: bounded to N=1; reopens at N=2 - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline: ε ratified canonical, not transitional - feedback_construction_over_ratchets: substrate-shape question answered structurally - feedback_substrate_principle_audit: substrate-fact authored at canvas- tier; ratification follows P1 procedure Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): canvas inventory grounded in live src/v3/lenses/ registry codex BLOCKING at #2181 (sha 00551a8): Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas inventory was "copied from expected lens set instead of live src/v3/lenses/ registry"; emission_provenance trigger references not grounded in live file content. Same shape of error as 3 prior BLOCKING reversals (Q-Reification, S5 DeclarationRef, T-CostLens merge-content). Substrate-state-grep is being treated as retrospective-correction rather than prerequisite. Tightening: this is the 4th occurrence; should be hard-prerequisite-discipline going forward. Fixes: 1. Q-Lens-Target-Context inventory section: replaced approximate "15+ lens instances" framing with exact `ls`-grep registry (15 .dag files listed by name), notes infer_helpers + lower_helpers are helper modules authoring shared structural fns rather than top-level lens instances. 2. emission_provenance.dag analysis grounded in HEAD file status header: STATUS = STRUCTURALLY TERMINAL; LENS-INSTANCE FIXTURE-BOUND; BEHAVIORALLY DEFERRED. `read` body is fail-closed Empty stub. Lens does NOT currently read target-context inside fold; producer-side instrumentation records target-specific entries consumed via standard framework. Reframed as "ungrounded at HEAD" rather than "POSSIBLY target-context need" — re-evaluates at producer-wiring landing. 3. Net finding: N=1 confirmed at HEAD (cost.dag only); N=2 is empirically open pending lens-completion cycles, NOT pre-claimable. Plus non-blocking improvement: Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 9 stale `#issuecomment-...` placeholder replaced with concrete ratification comment id `#issuecomment-4401584012`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): fix Director-ratification-ask typo + #37 gate-id clarification footnote cursor APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS at #2181 (sha 4209eb7) flagged 2 NON-BLOCKING items + 1 exploratory: 1. (NON-BLOCKING) Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 69: `## Directorratification ask` → `## Director ratification ask` (whitespace typo) 2. (NON-BLOCKING) Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 9 placeholder `#issuecomment-...`: ALREADY ADDRESSED in commit `db88b1004` (replaced with `#issuecomment-4401584012`) 3. (Exploratory) Gate #37 id `cost_lens_reads_target_realization` framing implies .dag lens body performs realization read; per ε ratification it's Rust-side composition consumer. Added clarifying footnote noting gate-id retention + Rust-side closure path; rename candidate post-follow-on-slice landing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context — absorb PM canvas-review concerns 1-3 Director relayed PM canvas review at #2068 c#4401627536: Concern 1 (RESOLVED via grep-verify): empirical N=1 confirmation. PM ran `grep -lc 'TypeRealization|CallableRealization|MethodTemplateContract| target_realization|realization_cost|LanguageSpec' src/v3/lenses/*.dag`; only cost.dag has 3 hits, all 14 others have 0 refs (including emission_provenance.dag which I'd previously framed speculatively). Net-finding §3 updated with grep result inline + "N=1 empirically grounded" framing replacing speculative "secondary candidate" language. Empirical basis for DEFERRED β-extended disposition strengthened. Concern 2 (Option (ii) multiplier framing): per-target lens instances replicate the entire Lens<C> authoring surface — N×M × 4 (carrier + monoid sequential + branch + iterate) authoring overhead. Updated Con bullet to reflect the multiplier explicitly: 3 targets × 1 cost lens × 4 = 12 authored fns; grows to 36 if 3 lenses need target-context. Cites feedback_parallel_representation_debt as the P2 framing. Concern 3 (Option (i) threading cost quantification): replaced narrative "threading cost is real but manageable" with quantified breakdown — ~15 signature changes + 14 ignore-parameter patterns + 1 consumer + cementing- test revalidation. Helps future Director ratification at N=2 trigger event. All 3 amendments are docs-only refinements; ε ratification at gunbc#2181 c#4401584012 unchanged. Strengthens canvas as durable substrate-shape decision record. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): canvases — collapse stale ratification-ask sections post-ratification codex BLOCKING at #2181 (sha be9a9c9): both canvases had stale "Director ratification ask" sections after status headers were updated to RATIFIED/DEFERRED. Per INVARIANTS P1 "Documentation Describes Live State" — canvas internally presented both settled and unsettled authority. Fixes: 1. Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 69-76: "Director ratification ask" section collapsed to "Director ratification (RECEIVED 2026-05-07)" with ε ratified, β-extended deferred, "both sequenced" rejected. Three options recorded as historical with ratification cite. Eliminates the rejected "both, sequenced" line that conflicted with status-header "canonical-not- transitional" framing. 2. Q-Lens-Target-Context line 131-136: "Director ratification ask" section collapsed to "Director disposition (DEFERRED 2026-05-07; reopens on N=2 trigger event)". Original ratification asks recorded as FROZEN; revisit at N=2 trigger event with then-current substrate-state grep. Eliminates live-now-ratify framing that conflicted with status-header DEFERRED. Both canvases now single live authority — RATIFIED/DEFERRED dispositions, no internal ratification-ask drift. Future re-ratification (Q-Lens-Target- Context at N=2 trigger) refreshes options matrix at that point per substrate-state-honesty discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context — separate live N=1 from reopen-only future N=2 openai-pro APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS at #2181 (sha be9a9c9): canvas line 127 mixed live N=1 authority with speculative N=2 candidate in one current-state cost count. Per P1 Documentation Describes Live State + P2 single-authority metadata: the live count at HEAD is `cost × 3 targets = 3 per-target instances` (× 4 authoring-multiplier per Option (ii) Con = 12 fns). The `emission_provenance × 3` figure is a reopen-only future scenario that materializes only if emission_provenance becomes the second real target-context lens at producer- wiring landing time. Updated to separate the two clearly: live count + reopen-only future scenario marked separately. Aligns with the grep-verified N=1 finding established earlier in canvas §3. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): T-CostLens worker brief — ε supersession header (γ retained as context) PR #2181 merged at eff426d ratifies ε path canonical-not-transitional for cost composition. Brief was authored under γ scope (.dag-side Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition). Add binding ε supersession header at top; retain γ section as historical context per single-authority discipline. cost.dag stays PROXY under ε; composition is Rust-side (abstract SymbolicCost shape × per-primitive realization values). Authority: Director ratification at #2181 #issuecomment-4401584012. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Complexity-Composition-Layering canvas — DRAFT (factoring tested, ε precedent does NOT apply) Director authorized canvas authoring at #828 c#4402669133 as parallel structure to Q-Cost-Composition-Layering (ε RATIFIED). Substrate- grep on src/v3/lenses/complexity.dag at HEAD shows the factoring claim DIFFERS from cost-lens: - Cost-lens needed (target-agnostic shape × target-specific values) factoring → Rust-side composition (ε) - Complexity-lens has NO target-specific axis; output is structural property of DAG topology + algebra-instance composition; substrate- native fully-on-.dag-side completion Mgr provisional reading: ε precedent does NOT apply; complexity-lens BEHAVIORAL COMPLETION is direct slice-tier substrate authoring (carrier introduction follows SymbolicCost precedent + T-E-P P1 carrier consumption). Director ratification ask: Q1 (factoring finding correct), Q2 (slice-tier directly bypassing canvas), Q3 (fresh worker pin). Cross-Mgr: Verification Mgr (#2075) pinged on v2-oracle snapshot capture status (cross-cutting prerequisite for #1950/#1951 cementing dispatch). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LBP complexity-lens substrate-completion worker brief (Q1/Q2/Q3 RATIFIED) Pre-authored brief for complexity-lens BEHAVIORAL COMPLETION substrate work per Director Q1/Q2/Q3 ratification at #828 c#4402714255. Three deliverables: carrier introduction (ComplexityCost / WorkSpan / AsymptoticClass following SymbolicCost precedent) + lens widening (complexity.dag PROXY → COMPLETE) + T-E-P P1 carrier consumption (DescentEvidence / CallPattern / SubValueRelation for asymptotic classification of recursive-call behavior). Indirect-variant dependency surfaced as worker-grep concern at slice- authoring time (T-E-P P1 Slice 5+ pending; eager-bat-178 stream). Cementing test (#1950) is separate downstream brief; v2-oracle snapshot ownership pending Q4 cross-Mgr ratification. Worker pin: fresh-pool pick at dispatch time (NOT eager-bat-178 per Director Q3 framing; NOT fierce-ram-21 busy with cost-lens ε). Same-window-dispatch discipline applies post-canvas-merge (PR #2197). Pre-authored vs pre-known discipline applied per feedback_pre_known_vs_pre_authored_briefs.md memorialized 2026-05-08. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): rewrite complexity-lens brief consuming live design authority (codex BLOCKING fix) Codex BLOCKING (3 findings) at #2199 sha 7a8bb6d: 1. Brief authored against missing canvas instead of reconciling with docs/design-complexity-lens-behavioral-completeness.md (which exists at HEAD with comprehensive substrate spec) 2. Producer coverage treated as optional corpus scope; should be hard T-E-P-Producer-Broadening prerequisite 3. Stale/non-in-repo planning authority cited; should be r3-structure.md row 146 (T-LBP slice 1) All three BLOCKING findings VALID — substrate-grep-before-authoring discipline failure on my part (feedback_substrate_grep_before_authoring already memorialized; violated own discipline). Rewrite delegates carrier shape, dimension wiring, and consumer rewrite to live design doc §§1.1-1.6 verbatim: - §1.1 SymbolicCost — already at algebra.dag; no change - §1.2 SizeVariable — display_name enrichment - §1.3 work_dimension + span_dimension — two AnalysisDimension instances - §1.4 AsymptoticClass + BoundedLattice instance - §1.5 Certainty (cost-aware composition; no lattice) - §1.6 cost_bound_to_symbolic projection - §1.7 ComplexitySummary record + lens widening T-E-P P1 hard prerequisite per design's authority discipline + r3- structure.md row 146; STOP-and-PING if T-E-P P1 not COMPLETE at slice authoring time. Authority cites updated to live r3-structure.md row 146. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-PerfWithinBaseline canvas — DRAFT (canvas-tier P1 procedure per Q6 RATIFIED) Director Q6 RATIFIED canvas-tier-required at #828 c#4403163639 for PerfWithinBaseline TestPredicate variant authoring. Three substantive substrate-shape questions resolved: Q1 baseline shape: (a) literal-Int rejected as strict-mirror-of-CostBounded defeats semantic load; (b) DeclarationRef-to-stored-data composes LensOutputEquals + data X: SymbolicCost precedent at HEAD; (c) runtime- fixture-injection over-authors. Mgr lean (b). Q2 ComparisonOp composition: (i) reuse existing ComparisonOp via test- runner-side resolution matches LensOutputEquals path; (ii) new relative- op-set introduces parallel-representation debt. Mgr lean (i). Q3 baseline-storage scope: (α) in-scope slice authors example data; (β) out-of-scope variant-only slice + PB consumer authors baseline data matches existing layering. Mgr lean (β). Combined Mgr lean: Q1(b) + Q2(i) + Q3(β) — variant authored as compositional extension; baseline-storage is PB consumer-tier work. Cross-Mgr: PB Mgr #2138 worker (crisp-swift-433) holds dispatch on #2204 land; T-Tier3-Dissolution #2085 R-4 prereq encoded. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-PerfWithinBaseline canvas REVISED (supersedes wrong-shape original) Director disposition at #828 c#4403265220 authorized supersession after BLOCKING at PR #2209 c#4403246233 verified VALID: original canvas conflated symbolic SymbolicCost (cost-lens substrate) with wall-clock measured median/p99 baseline (T-Tier3 perf gate substrate per docs/r3-structure.md:225 + :461 Director-locked 2026-04-28). Revised canvas frames as two-path ratification: - P1 author full perf-budget substrate in-R3 (multi-slice; pattern-5 genuinely-novel substrate-fact-introduction) - P2 explicitly post-R3 per Director-locked recommendation (zero in-R3 effort; structural close per r3-structure.md:461 'R3 deliverable is structural close; perf is downstream') Mgr lean: P2 — Director-locked recommendation explicit; trigger- condition ('someone authors perf-budget claim with concrete numbers and tooling') not met; R3 horizon constraint argues against multi- slice perf-budget substrate adding to 5-orthogonal-dependency picture. Original canvas at q-perf-within-baseline-canvas.md retained with SUPERSEDED-BY header per durable-decision-record discipline. 5th discipline-failure of 2026-05-08 cycle: substrate-grep verified substrate-precedent but missed consumer-side requirement at canonical authority doc; Director self-flagged symmetric two-axis verification gap; canvas-finding-taxonomy needs precondition 'consumer-side requirement grep-verified at canonical authority doc'. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-PerfWithinBaseline canvas-revised — correct trigger-condition framing per Director c#4403297623 Director caught second-axis grep failure on revised canvas: my P2 reasoning #1 ("path-trigger condition for P1 is not met") was structurally wrong. Existing tooling at HEAD substantially meets the Director-locked 2026-04-28 trigger-condition ("someone authors the perf-budget claim with concrete numbers and tooling"): - docs/briefs/r3-pb-tier3-perf-budget-worker.md - docs/audit/c1-tier3-perf-budget-readiness-matrix.md - src/v3/compiler/benches/tier3_mirror_perf.rs - docs/audit/c1-tier3-baseline-capture-procedure.md - docs/audit/c1-r3-canonical-bench-host-decision-matrix.md Plus thresholds (≤2× median, ≤5× p99) + capture discipline (N=3 min, N=5 preferred) + canonical bench host option matrix. P1 is bridging existing tooling to substrate (compositional-extension), NOT multi-slice greenfield genuinely-novel pattern-5 as originally framed. Smaller scope than canvas-finding-taxonomy pattern 5 implies. Path-call genuinely depends on PB Mgr's R-3 (canonical CI bench host) + R-7 (tier3_baseline.json baseline-capture path) decisions per their audit response at c#4403059897. Path-call DEFERRED to cross-Mgr coordination outcome with PB Mgr (#2074); Substrate Mgr surfaces with corrected framing this turn. Sixth discipline-failure of cycle (mine, second-axis grep gap on existing-tooling state); same-class as Director's first-axis grep gap on consumer-side requirement at the prior turn. Memorialized as two-axis verification discipline anchor. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-ValueBody-Drift-Resolution canvas — DRAFT (codegen-generation lean) D1 substrate-shape question per Q-ValueBody-Isomorphism RATIFIED at #828 c#4403972737. Variant-inventory readiness input from PR #2218 (merged 2026-05-08) confirms drift: Rust 5 variants vs substrate 3 constructors; asymmetry on Scalar+List Rust-only + Map payload-parity-with-semantic-gap. Two-axis verification at HEAD: - Substrate-precedent: codegen tooling exists (regen_bootstrap_emit; 5 _generated.rs files; regen_bootstrap binary). Pattern-3 strict- mirror codegen extension applies; no pattern-5 P1 procedure. - Consumer-side requirement: V1 worker brief explicitly names mirror- parity-vs-codegen-generation as D1 path-pair. Mgr lean: (b) codegen-generation. Path (a) mirror-parity perpetuates parallel-representation debt; (b) dissolves the dual-taxonomy class by construction (substrate canonical, Rust codegens). Map dup-key gap handled via (ii) Rust-side post-codegen wrapping (substrate stays minimal). Director ratification ask: D1 (b) + D1-followup (ii). Carrier slice path post-ratification: extend regen_bootstrap_emit; add Scalar+List constructors to substrate; regen + remove hand-Rust enum; handle Map dup-key per ratified followup. Worker pin fresh-pool per same-window-dispatch. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…cite (#2226) * docs(briefs): Substrate bridge SourceSpan.file participation retirement worker brief Authored for gunbc#1958 Substrate-owned bridge slice. Targets audit-row #2 (kernel Bool patch BOOL_TYPES_FILE) + row #6 (pipeline authority PIPELINE_AUTHORITY_FILE) per r3-program-plan.md §5 line 353 scope-narrowing. Sibling #1959 closed as already-retired by PR #1272. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 Variant-aware projection carrier canvas (#1947) Surfaces 3 carrier-shape options (α RestResponseProjection variant-tag / β Declaration variant_projection_metadata / γ free-standing CoproductProjection) for Director ratification before worker brief authoring. Mgr-tier recommendation = γ (DeclarationRef-keyed, avoids tag-string-as-identity bridge). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — same-slice prerequisite + section anchor Director calibration (gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-...): 1. Promote ratchet-test cross-Mgr handoff from conditional Acceptance #4 to upfront same-slice BLOCKING prerequisite gate (per feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline). 2. Replace `r3-program-plan.md:353` line-cite with `§5 Y4 scope-clarification` section anchor (per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers). Code-line anchors in bootstrap.rs left as-is (anchor sites worker navigates to). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — umbrella stays Open per P2 ledger discipline Address BLOCKING inline review at line 46: bridge_source_span_file_participation_retired is an Open umbrella whose green predicate is "no production code path consults SourceSpan.file" per r3-structure.md:115. Partial retirement was explicitly rejected 2026-04-29 (Director acceptance #1130 / dispatch #1139). Changes: - Add Ledger-discipline preamble: umbrella row stays Open; receipt updates audit-packet enumeration, NOT bridge_ledger.dag. - Acceptance #3 reframed: do NOT mutate bridge_ledger.dag; mark rows #2 + #6 retired in the audit packet only. - Authority anchor updated: status=Open (not Proposed); add r3-structure.md:115 + bridge_ledger.dag:125-129 line refs. - Cross-Mgr section reframed: umbrella ratchet cannot flip on this PR alone; Verification's ledger-zero audit progress field is post-merge tracking, not a same-slice pre-merge blocker. Reconciles with BLOCKING finding (Director calibration #1 assumed umbrella ratchet could flip on partial retirement, which r3-structure.md:115 forbids). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 CoproductProjection worker brief — γ ratified (#1947) Director ratification of option γ at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394369848. Free-standing CoproductProjection carrier in src/v3/std/, DeclarationRef-keyed, typed WireTagValue leaf, 4 same-slice acceptance gates. Surfaces 3 substrate observations for STOP-and-PING (DeclarationRef String alias; FieldRef does-not-exist-at-HEAD; tag_field String asymmetry) — worker must escalate, not silently work around. PB Mgr cross-Mgr ping at carrier landing (heads-up, not blocker). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — resolve Acceptance #4 / Cross-Mgr contradiction openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at PR #2079 #issuecomment-... flagged Acceptance #4 ("ratchet test passes ... confirmed-present at HEAD before merge") contradicting the reframed Cross-Mgr section ("No same-slice ratchet-test gate applies; post-merge tracking only"). Both said different things about whether the umbrella ratchet is a pre-merge blocker. Resolution: Acceptance #4 reframed to explicitly state "No umbrella-ratchet pre-merge gate" — worker does NOT wait for Verification ratchet authoring; acceptance for this slice is the audit-packet receipt update in #3. Cross-Mgr handoff also updated to remove "ratchet authoring" from Verification's same-slice duties. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): S5 brief — absorb Director pre-ratifications for 3 STOP-and-PING items Director pre-ratified dispositions at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394416049: 1. DeclarationRef alias: accept (b) + debt note (re-escalate only on same-slice break) 2. FieldRef: grep-decide between InputFieldRef-as-specialization vs rename 3. tag_field String asymmetry: typed introduction + debt note for migration Worker proceeds without re-pinging unless evidence forces escalation. STOP-criteria section narrowed accordingly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification Gate A receipt — Option A (Dag-as-carrier) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394427814 + proposal merge at PR #2096 (commit fec8692): src/v3/std/substrate.dag::Dag IS the reflected program; no new substrate carrier required. ReflectedProgram<T> rejected. Gate A patches: 1. r3-program-plan.md §10.3: new Q-Reification row marked RATIFIED with PR #2096 merge link + Gate A receipt scope (this PR + #1960 closed-as-non-addition). 2. r3-v-pattern-a-tc1-v1-worker.md: 3 sites — status header (Q-Reification CLEARED, Branch B η non-vacuity remains), worker-pin gate, E6-G1.a/E3 producer dependency. Replaces ReflectedProgram<T> with consumer-wiring nuance: lens fold consumes Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator. 3. r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md: 2 sites — same nuance: deferred work is consumer-wiring, NOT a separate carrier. 4. r3-pr-e8-w1-producer-contract-test-plan-worker.md: 1 site — fold-over-Dag reframe. Receipt of pass-by-construction: this PR adds NO new .dag declaration to src/v3/std/. The ratification is structurally a non-addition (Option A correctness proof per same-slice dissolution discipline). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — delete superseded canvas + name dissolution trigger for tag_field asymmetry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings (P2 single-authority + P5 dissolution trigger). Fixes: 1. Delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-s5-variant-aware-projection-carrier-canvas.md (superseded by the γ-ratified worker brief in same PR; would otherwise leave two current-looking S5 status authorities post-merge — one saying ratification pending, one saying γ ratified). 2. Substrate observation #3 (tag_field String/FieldRef asymmetry) now carries a binding named dissolution trigger: when FieldRef exists as top-level carrier AND InputFieldRef is classified, migrate InternallyTaggedObject.tag_field via follow-on Substrate hygiene PR. Worker MUST add debt-paydown row to authoritative debt ledger before merging carrier-introduction PR. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification row — fix invariant cite (C-1 → P2) cursor review at gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-... flagged C-1 as mis-keyed: INVARIANTS.md C-1 is "missing args fail closed; no LitNull sentinels" (P3 fail-closed family), not parallel-representation/duplicate-authority. The correct cite for rejecting a parallel ReflectedProgram<T> alongside Dag is P2 single authority (INVARIANTS.md line 148: cost of change is proportional to how many files encode the same fact). Cite updated to "INVARIANTS.md P2 single authority" with inline gloss. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — name dissolution trigger for DeclarationRef alias debt openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: substrate observation #1 had desired endpoint ("future structural promotion of DeclarationRef") but no checkable dissolution trigger — same P5 gap that #3 (tag_field asymmetry) had been fixed for in commit 2601d7d. Trigger now binding: promote DeclarationRef when EITHER (a) audit-row #14 (declaration_name_preference_rank / declaration_by_name rank-table) closes — dsl/std ↔ src/v3/std module convergence makes name-keyed identity unambiguous and structural module identity available, OR (b) any DeclarationRef-typed consumer surfaces a string-identity bridge per feedback_opaque_strings_attract_heuristics (heuristic patching, naming- convention dispatch, suffix/prefix matching). Worker MUST add debt-paydown row before merging carrier-introduction PR (same pattern as the tag_field debt requirement). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: complete Q-Reification stale-cite sweep — e6-g1a brief :169 + Q-PAFS row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md:169 still said TC1/V1 "waits for Q-Reification and the carrier landing", contradicting the same brief's lines 15-19 + 148-153 saying Dag IS the carrier and no separate carrier lands. Fixed: 1. e6-g1a brief line 167-170 paragraph: clarified V1 waits for consumer-wiring work (lens fold consuming Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator), NOT for a carrier-introduction. 2. r3-program-plan.md:954 Q-PAFS row text was the same shape: "Resume after Q-Reification + ReflectedProgram<T>" — contradicted my new Q-Reification row in the same diff. Updated: Q-Reification STOP CLEARED 2026-05-07 (Option A); remaining hold = Branch B η non-vacuity only. Out-of-scope-for-this-PR: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-feasibility-probe.md contains 4 stale cites but is not modified in this PR; stale-on-main can be swept in a follow-up if needed (single source of truth is the e6-g1a-static-lens worker brief, not the feasibility probe per Q-PAFS Path A acceptance). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix InputFieldRef mis-read; reframe observations #2 + #3 codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079 line 22: my brief mis-read services.dag:28-36. The text actually says "No separate InputFieldRef carrier is introduced here, since ParamToken.name already carries the same shape and adding a wrapper would duplicate without strengthening the structural invariant" — i.e., InputFieldRef does NOT exist; the comment REJECTS the wrapper. Fixes: 1. Substrate observation #2 reframed: no FieldRef-shaped carrier exists at HEAD; services.dag:28-36 precedent argues against wrapper unless it strengthens structural invariant. New (a)/(b) STOP-and-PING: (a) follow services.dag precedent — wire_tag_field: String + key invariant on wire_tag_values + fixture-load fail-closed check; (b) introduce typed FieldRef — must justify per "duplicate without strengthening" test. 2. Carrier shape (line 19): wire_tag_field: FieldRef → {String|FieldRef} pending observation #2 resolution. 3. Substrate observation #3 reframed: InternallyTaggedObject asymmetry is conditional on path (b); under path (a) no asymmetry exists. Trigger correspondingly conditional. Removed stale "InputFieldRef classified" trigger clause. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — consolidate split per-variant maps into single keyed entry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: CoproductProjection shape split per-variant data across two parallel maps (variant_field_projections + wire_tag_values), admitting illegal states where keysets drift (P2 boundary discipline / illegal-states-unrepresentable). Fix: introduce CoproductVariantProjection { field_projection, wire_tag_value } as the per-variant keyed value; CoproductProjection.variant_projections becomes Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection>. Single keyed authority per variant. Director's binding constraint #2 enumerated the two fields separately but said "refine in implementation as ergonomics demand" — consolidation preserves the substantive constraints (typed WireTagValue leaf, structural per-variant projection) while enforcing keyset alignment by carrier shape. Empty-payload variants encoded via FieldProjection::Empty constructor (or analog), not via map-absence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix stale split-map vocab in path (a) + scope STOP-and-PING umbrella openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings. 1. Path (a) at line 43 still referenced "Map<VariantId, WireTagValue> key invariant on wire_tag_values" — that's the superseded split-map vocab; the consolidated shape is Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection> on variant_projections. Path (a) now references the consolidated map; per-variant WireTagValue lives inside CoproductVariantProjection. 2. Pre-ratification umbrella at line 36 said "all 3 dispositions pre-ratified, proceed without re-pinging" — but observation #2 was re-opened after the codex InputFieldRef finding and explicitly says STOP-and-PING. Contradictory. Umbrella now scoped: observations #1 + #3 are pre-ratified; #2 is re-opened STOP-and-PING — worker MUST escalate before choosing path (a) vs (b). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof canvas — 4-residual coproduct-dissolution audit Director ratified split disposition at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394696074: descent_execution_proof STANDS ALONE (consumer-side termination-contract substrate function with fail-closed residual enumeration; folding into T-E-P-Producer-Broadening explicitly rejected — different concern axis). Canvas surfaces 3 carrier-shape options for the residual enumeration per Director's coproduct-dissolution audit suggestion: α: 4-variant coproduct verbatim from §10.3 row 966 (Missing | Unknown | Incomplete | NonStrict) β: 3-axis dimensional product (presence × completeness × strictness) γ (recommended): reuse DescentEvidence at termination.dag:14-17 for "absent/unknown" via EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) payload-variant + separate EvidenceIncomplete — ratchets variant count 4 → 2 via dimensional folding while honoring services.dag "no parallel wrapper" precedent. Mgr recommendation γ; β rejected unless 3 axes provably compose orthogonally. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan brief Row #6 — derive from bootstrap_authority map, no new enum variant codex BLOCKING (post-merge of #2079, on commit 85ceb85 — same brief is now on main): my Row #6 disposition told the worker to introduce a new BootstrapAuthority::Pipeline variant ("extend the enum if needed"). That violates P2 single-authority — src/v3/std/bootstrap_authority.dag:90 already has "src/v3/compiler/pipeline.dag": CompilerAuthority, classifying pipeline.dag under the existing CompilerAuthority variant. The :14-17 comment is explicit: "the path itself is the BootstrapAuthoritySet map key; variants carry no duplicate path payload" — single authority, not extension-by-variant. Fix: Row #6 now instructs worker to derive the typed key from the existing bootstrap_authority-map witness (BootstrapAuthorityKey threading the existing CompilerAuthority classifier), refining the constructor surface if needed — NOT introducing a new enum variant. STOP-and-PING criteria updated to forbid new-variant resolution under any path. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof worker brief — γ ratified (2-variant residual) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395060514: - DescentResidual = EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) | EvidenceIncomplete (4 → 2 dissolution: Missing+Unknown fold via DescentUnknown injection; NonStrict folds via NonIncreasing wrap; Incomplete retained — different concern axis from evidence-lattice) - DescentEvidence 3-variant lattice at termination.dag:14-17 confirmed as authoritative composition target - Type signature from §10.3 row 966 confirmed verbatim-binding Director-asked canvas-shape verification absorbed: worker STOPs if EvidenceIncomplete decomposes into payload-variants (timeout / depth-bound / evaluator-error-during-proof-construction); proceeds as 2-variant otherwise. 7 same-slice acceptance gates incl Evaluator E2 #1971 consumer wiring in same PR + §10.3 row 966 row-text refresh to cite γ-disposition. Worker pin: quick-koi-190 (pre-authorized per §10.3 row 966). Auto-spawn HOLD per L-sized threshold; surgical-recreate path ratified case-by-case if critical path blocked. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — narrow EvidenceUnknown payload via NonStrictEvidence subset; delete superseded canvas openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2105: 2 findings. 1. BLOCKING (LAYER MODEL / illegal states unrepresentable): worker brief shape `EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence)` admitted EvidenceUnknown(Strict) even though the canvas itself acknowledged Strict-isn't-a-residual as illegal. P2 requires API-level enforcement, not prose convention. Fix: introduce typed subset `NonStrictEvidence = NonIncreasing | DescentUnknown`; residual now `EvidenceUnknown(NonStrictEvidence)` — illegal-states-unrepresentable by construction. NonStrictEvidence lands in same file as DescentResidual; composes with existing 3-variant DescentEvidence via inhabitation, not re-definition. 2. NON-BLOCKING (live-state drift): canvas + worker brief both visible with "ratification needed" vs "ratified" status — same P2 single-authority shape as the S5 canvas/worker-brief co-existence at #2079. Fix: delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-descent-execution-proof-canvas.md (worker brief frontmatter already names it as superseded; with canvas gone the live authority is unambiguous). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — section-anchor cite for §10.3 row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2105 line 47: my brief cited "§10.3 row 966" but the actual line is now 986 (after my Q-Reification row insert in PR #2079 shifted §10.3 by 20 lines). Reviewer's "no such section" claim is wrong on substance (file + section + row all exist) but the line drift IS real. Fix per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers (Director calibration in gunbc#2079): replaced all "§10.3 row 966" with "§10.3 Q-EVAL-Descent- Termination-Contract row" — name-anchor instead of line-anchor, drift-immune. 5 occurrences cleaned (closure predicate, acceptance gate #3, gate #5, STOP criterion, worker pin justification). Stylistic "row row-text" repetition collapsed to "row text". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition canvas — Lens<SymbolicCost> composition shape (#1957) Pre-staged per Director endorsement of T-CostLens-Composition canvas-shape authoring. Surfaces 3 composition options for the Lens<SymbolicCost> instance: α: two separate lenses, externally joined — REJECTED (violates §1.8 gate #39 no_coercion_cost_dimension by construction) β: single Lens<SymbolicCost> with composed witness in read — strong but requires Lens<C> carrier-shape refactor (target-context threading) γ (recommended): Lens<SymbolicCost> reads structural cost via algebra-fold + target-realization composed via existing Lookup<SymbolicCost> substrate at lookup.dag:48-60 — preserves generic Lens<C> carrier; satisfies all 4 §1.8 gates (#37-40) by construction; aligns with feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first Adjacent substrate verified at HEAD: lens.dag:70-77 (Lens<C>), algebra.dag:12+ (SymbolicCost 7-variant + Semiring), lookup.dag:48-60 (Lookup<SymbolicCost> + MissingCost lens-boundary). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-Workflow-As-Data canvas — audit-receipt-honoring scope-narrowing Pre-staged per Director endorsement. Q-Workflow-As-Data-Carriers (§10.3 row 983) named 5 carriers; grep-verified at HEAD that 4 of 5 ALREADY EXIST in dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (218 lines). Only WorkflowSecret<Name> is wholly net-new substrate. Surfaces 3 options: α: maximalist 5-carrier introduction in dsl/std/workflow.dag — REJECTED (admits parallel-representation debt vs audit-receipt #1771 reuse-first directive) β (recommended): minimalist — only WorkflowSecret<Name> + Cron<Schedule> refinement net-new; lens consumes extdeps.github.actions directly. Honors feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first. γ: like β + WorkflowObservationAnchor for typed lens-consumption-shape; natural ratchet from β if evidence accumulates. Sequencing: dispatch-ready post-T-LBP COMPLETE per §S4 design-schedule:95; brief authoring lands in advance per pre-staging discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition worker brief — γ ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775: - γ option ratified (Lens<SymbolicCost> + Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition) - Lens<C> generic at lens.dag:70-77 confirmed authoritative (no refactor in scope) - symbolic_cost_dimension: AnalysisDimension<SymbolicCost> defers to separate Dimensions sub-lane Critical reframing absorbed: src/v3/lenses/cost.dag ALREADY EXISTS (status: STRUCTURALLY TERMINAL; BEHAVIORALLY PROXY). T-CostLens-Composition is behavioral-completion + target-realization-wiring, NOT P1 carrier introduction. Worker reads existing lens; advances PROXY → BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE via Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition. 8 same-slice acceptance gates incl §1.8 #37-40 + #70 demonstration + lens status header refresh + §10.3 row text refresh. Out-of-scope (deferred per Director): symbolic_cost_dimension; Lens<C> generic refactor (STOP-and-PING if implementation reveals need). Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (same precedent as S5 + descent_execution_proof canvas deletions). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Delete superseded T-CostLens canvas (worker brief is single live authority) * docs(briefs): T-WAD Slice 1 worker brief — β ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395945465: 4 asks confirmed: 1. β ratified (minimalist reuse-first) 2. #1771 audit-receipt binding precedent confirmed 3. WorkflowSecret<Name> folds into dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (provider- specific scope; NOT new dsl/std/ file unless cross-provider evidence) 4. §1.8 gates #54 + #55 split into separate slices (slice 2 = timing-and-pattern; slice 3 = ci_workflow_modeled_as_dag) Slice 1 net-new substrate (only): - WorkflowSecret<Name> + SecretScope carriers - CronExpression + CronField (typed refinement of existing WorkflowTrigger::Schedule { cron: String } at actions.dag:43) Other 4 carriers from §10.3 row 983 reused as-is from extdeps.github.actions per audit-receipt #1771 directive. 6 same-slice acceptance gates incl no-parallel-representation grep + gate #53/#62/#63 advancement + bootstrap regen + clippy. Cross-provider STOP-and-PING per Director ask #3 caveat: worker greps adjacent provider work for WorkflowSecret-shape evidence; surfaces if found before finalizing fold-into-extdeps. Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (S5 + descent_execution_proof + T-CostLens precedent). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demo (#1952) complexity-contract compile-error worker brief Pre-staged execution brief per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker brief path (no canvas — design-lock at docs/design-lens-application- surface.md specifies fixture shape verbatim at line 292). 7 same-slice acceptance gates: fixture program (O(n²) body + Enforce O(log n) budget) + TestClaim assertion + diagnostic structural validation + no regression on T-LBP cementing + bootstrap regen + clippy + §1.8 #92 advancement. Hard prerequisites STOP-and-PING: T-LAS Slice A landed (gates #88-#91) AND T-LBP complexity-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE (gate #79). Worker does not author against partial substrate. Sibling demos #1953 (CRDT cost) + #1954 (memory-peak cost) share the same hard-prerequisite + TestClaim shape pattern — could dispatch as 3 sequential PRs or single multi-demo PR (worker's call at dispatch). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demos #1953 + #1954 — cost-basis sibling worker brief Pre-staged sibling brief covering both cost-basis demos (CRDT cost basis + memory-peak cost basis) per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker-brief path. Single brief for two demos because they share: - Hard-prerequisite pattern (T-LAS Slice A + T-LBP cost-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE) - TestClaim + Diagnostic structural validation shape - apply_lens(cost, ...) Enforce mode Sibling of #1952 brief (complexity-contract compile-error). Worker's call at dispatch on multi-demo PR vs sequential PRs (Mgr ratification needed if going multi-demo). #1953 (CRDT) substrate per design §4.2 + cost-basis-declaration audit at docs/audit/t-user-authored-cost-basis-discipline-worked-examples.md. #1954 (memory-peak) substrate per design §4.3; STOP-and-PING if Dimension<SymbolicCost> substrate (deferred to Dimensions sub-lane per Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775) not yet landed. 6 same-slice acceptance gates per demo + same STOP-and-PING discipline as #1952. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens — update Sub-issue from #1957 to #2141 (post-surgical-recreate) PM executed Director's surgical-recreate ratification (gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4397693699) at 17:54:43Z: closed #1957, created fresh #2141 to trigger pollAutoSpawn fresh-creation path. Worker fierce-ram-21 (#2153) spawned on #2141. 1-line brief update per Director's queued-action commitment: brief now references #2141 + cites surgical-recreate authority. #1957 closed-as-superseded. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas (β-extended substrate-shape question) Director α-revised supersession at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4400920572 elevated β-extended path (introduce first-precedent .dag-side fold-over-realization-rows + name active-target authority shape) from slice-tier to canvas-tier. Authored per Q-PAFS template: - Substrate-state at HEAD grep-verified (Lens<C>.read no target-context; zero .dag-side fold-over-realizations precedent; 15+ lens instances using generic Lens<C>) - Binary question: should .dag-side lenses receive target-context for target-keyed reading? - Options matrix: (i) LanguageSpec param to fold; (ii) per-target lens instances [parallel-representation debt]; (iii) global accessor [REJECTED global-state anti-pattern] - Mgr provisional preference: (i) - Cross-cutting: cost.dag load-bearing; emission_provenance.dag secondary; other 13+ lenses target-agnostic Framework discipline anchors per Director corrections: - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline - feedback_parallel_representation_debt - feedback_abstraction_layering (sibling canvas) Sibling canvas (ε path): q-cost-composition-layering-canvas.md authoring follows. Both canvases together address deeper cross-cutting axis: does target-context belong .dag-side (β-extended) or emit-side (ε)? Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Cost-Composition-Layering canvas (ε substrate-shape question) Sibling canvas to q-lens-target-context-canvas.md. Director α-revised supersession at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4400920572 elevated ε path (Rust-side cost-composition wiring; preserves cost.dag PROXY) from slice-tier to canvas-tier. Authored per Q-PAFS template: - Factoring claim: cost = (target-agnostic-shape SymbolicCost algebra) × (target-specific-values per-primitive realization-cost data loaded Rust-side) - Test against feedback_abstraction_layering (Director-named anchor at gunbc#828 c#4400921658): pure objective concepts × language-agnostic LanguageSpec × emit-side composition. Compliance test for each layer. - Pro factoring (ε structurally honest): SymbolicCost algebra is target- agnostic at HEAD; Rust-side composition is natural home; #38/#39 substrate- already-aligned per Slice 1 finding. - Con factoring (ε is parallel-representation debt): N parallel Rust-side compositions if multiple lenses need target-context; lens-framework abstraction stops at substrate boundary; future lenses hit same dilemma. Mgr provisional reading: factoring honest for COST specifically; NOT generalizable. ε right framing IF cost is the singular need + factoring holds. If N>1 target-context-needing lenses surface, β-extended (option (i) from sibling canvas) becomes the right path. Director ratification ask: 3-way choice (ε) Cost-specific Rust-side composition; preserves cost.dag PROXY (β-extended option (i)) Lens<C> refactor for LanguageSpec parameter (both sequenced) ε now for cost; β-extended later if N>1 Framework discipline anchors: - feedback_abstraction_layering (Director-named for this canvas) - feedback_parallel_representation_debt - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline Canvas-pair complete; sibling canvas + this canvas address the deeper cross-cutting axis: target-context belongs .dag-side (β-extended) or emit-side (ε)? Director ratification across both informs T-CostLens follow-on slice + downstream lens architecture. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs: ε ratified canonical for cost; β-extended deferred to N=2 — gate updates Director ratification at #2181 #issuecomment-... : - (ε) RATIFIED standalone for cost composition (canonical-not-transitional) - (β-extended option (i)) DEFERRED to N=2 trigger event (second lens with target-context need beyond cost) - ("both sequenced") REJECTED as bridge-with-named-dissolution anti-pattern Same-slice acceptance gates landed: 1. Q-Cost-Composition-Layering canvas: status updated from "ratification needed" → "Director-RATIFIED 2026-05-07 (ε standalone; canonical-not- transitional); PROPOSAL maturation pending" 2. Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas: status updated from "ratification needed" → "DRAFT/DEFERRED 2026-05-07; reopens on N=2 trigger event" (second lens with substantive target-context need; emission_provenance most likely candidate per cross-cutting analysis §3) 3. r3-program-plan.md gate-table rows #37 + #40 + #70: ε path ratified; close via Rust-side composition reading abstract SymbolicCost × per- primitive realization-cost in T-CostLens follow-on slice 4. r3-program-plan.md §10.3 T-CostLens-Composition row: ε ratified for #37/#40/#70; β-extended deferred per N=2 trigger 5. v3-lens-capability-register.md cost.dag row: ε disposition cited; #2175 continues as cross-cutting umbrella tracker Closed-system disposition per Director: if N=2 condition never fires, β-extended never fires — structurally correct under closed-system design. Framework discipline anchors honored: - feedback_abstraction_layering: ε respects layering (objective concepts pure; target-specific values flow at emit time per Layer-3 honesty test) - feedback_parallel_representation_debt: bounded to N=1; reopens at N=2 - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline: ε ratified canonical, not transitional - feedback_construction_over_ratchets: substrate-shape question answered structurally - feedback_substrate_principle_audit: substrate-fact authored at canvas- tier; ratification follows P1 procedure Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): canvas inventory grounded in live src/v3/lenses/ registry codex BLOCKING at #2181 (sha 00551a8): Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas inventory was "copied from expected lens set instead of live src/v3/lenses/ registry"; emission_provenance trigger references not grounded in live file content. Same shape of error as 3 prior BLOCKING reversals (Q-Reification, S5 DeclarationRef, T-CostLens merge-content). Substrate-state-grep is being treated as retrospective-correction rather than prerequisite. Tightening: this is the 4th occurrence; should be hard-prerequisite-discipline going forward. Fixes: 1. Q-Lens-Target-Context inventory section: replaced approximate "15+ lens instances" framing with exact `ls`-grep registry (15 .dag files listed by name), notes infer_helpers + lower_helpers are helper modules authoring shared structural fns rather than top-level lens instances. 2. emission_provenance.dag analysis grounded in HEAD file status header: STATUS = STRUCTURALLY TERMINAL; LENS-INSTANCE FIXTURE-BOUND; BEHAVIORALLY DEFERRED. `read` body is fail-closed Empty stub. Lens does NOT currently read target-context inside fold; producer-side instrumentation records target-specific entries consumed via standard framework. Reframed as "ungrounded at HEAD" rather than "POSSIBLY target-context need" — re-evaluates at producer-wiring landing. 3. Net finding: N=1 confirmed at HEAD (cost.dag only); N=2 is empirically open pending lens-completion cycles, NOT pre-claimable. Plus non-blocking improvement: Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 9 stale `#issuecomment-...` placeholder replaced with concrete ratification comment id `#issuecomment-4401584012`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): fix Director-ratification-ask typo + #37 gate-id clarification footnote cursor APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS at #2181 (sha 4209eb7) flagged 2 NON-BLOCKING items + 1 exploratory: 1. (NON-BLOCKING) Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 69: `## Directorratification ask` → `## Director ratification ask` (whitespace typo) 2. (NON-BLOCKING) Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 9 placeholder `#issuecomment-...`: ALREADY ADDRESSED in commit `db88b1004` (replaced with `#issuecomment-4401584012`) 3. (Exploratory) Gate #37 id `cost_lens_reads_target_realization` framing implies .dag lens body performs realization read; per ε ratification it's Rust-side composition consumer. Added clarifying footnote noting gate-id retention + Rust-side closure path; rename candidate post-follow-on-slice landing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context — absorb PM canvas-review concerns 1-3 Director relayed PM canvas review at #2068 c#4401627536: Concern 1 (RESOLVED via grep-verify): empirical N=1 confirmation. PM ran `grep -lc 'TypeRealization|CallableRealization|MethodTemplateContract| target_realization|realization_cost|LanguageSpec' src/v3/lenses/*.dag`; only cost.dag has 3 hits, all 14 others have 0 refs (including emission_provenance.dag which I'd previously framed speculatively). Net-finding §3 updated with grep result inline + "N=1 empirically grounded" framing replacing speculative "secondary candidate" language. Empirical basis for DEFERRED β-extended disposition strengthened. Concern 2 (Option (ii) multiplier framing): per-target lens instances replicate the entire Lens<C> authoring surface — N×M × 4 (carrier + monoid sequential + branch + iterate) authoring overhead. Updated Con bullet to reflect the multiplier explicitly: 3 targets × 1 cost lens × 4 = 12 authored fns; grows to 36 if 3 lenses need target-context. Cites feedback_parallel_representation_debt as the P2 framing. Concern 3 (Option (i) threading cost quantification): replaced narrative "threading cost is real but manageable" with quantified breakdown — ~15 signature changes + 14 ignore-parameter patterns + 1 consumer + cementing- test revalidation. Helps future Director ratification at N=2 trigger event. All 3 amendments are docs-only refinements; ε ratification at gunbc#2181 c#4401584012 unchanged. Strengthens canvas as durable substrate-shape decision record. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): canvases — collapse stale ratification-ask sections post-ratification codex BLOCKING at #2181 (sha be9a9c9): both canvases had stale "Director ratification ask" sections after status headers were updated to RATIFIED/DEFERRED. Per INVARIANTS P1 "Documentation Describes Live State" — canvas internally presented both settled and unsettled authority. Fixes: 1. Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 69-76: "Director ratification ask" section collapsed to "Director ratification (RECEIVED 2026-05-07)" with ε ratified, β-extended deferred, "both sequenced" rejected. Three options recorded as historical with ratification cite. Eliminates the rejected "both, sequenced" line that conflicted with status-header "canonical-not- transitional" framing. 2. Q-Lens-Target-Context line 131-136: "Director ratification ask" section collapsed to "Director disposition (DEFERRED 2026-05-07; reopens on N=2 trigger event)". Original ratification asks recorded as FROZEN; revisit at N=2 trigger event with then-current substrate-state grep. Eliminates live-now-ratify framing that conflicted with status-header DEFERRED. Both canvases now single live authority — RATIFIED/DEFERRED dispositions, no internal ratification-ask drift. Future re-ratification (Q-Lens-Target- Context at N=2 trigger) refreshes options matrix at that point per substrate-state-honesty discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context — separate live N=1 from reopen-only future N=2 openai-pro APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS at #2181 (sha be9a9c9): canvas line 127 mixed live N=1 authority with speculative N=2 candidate in one current-state cost count. Per P1 Documentation Describes Live State + P2 single-authority metadata: the live count at HEAD is `cost × 3 targets = 3 per-target instances` (× 4 authoring-multiplier per Option (ii) Con = 12 fns). The `emission_provenance × 3` figure is a reopen-only future scenario that materializes only if emission_provenance becomes the second real target-context lens at producer- wiring landing time. Updated to separate the two clearly: live count + reopen-only future scenario marked separately. Aligns with the grep-verified N=1 finding established earlier in canvas §3. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): T-CostLens worker brief — ε supersession header (γ retained as context) PR #2181 merged at eff426d ratifies ε path canonical-not-transitional for cost composition. Brief was authored under γ scope (.dag-side Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition). Add binding ε supersession header at top; retain γ section as historical context per single-authority discipline. cost.dag stays PROXY under ε; composition is Rust-side (abstract SymbolicCost shape × per-primitive realization values). Authority: Director ratification at #2181 #issuecomment-4401584012. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Complexity-Composition-Layering canvas — DRAFT (factoring tested, ε precedent does NOT apply) Director authorized canvas authoring at #828 c#4402669133 as parallel structure to Q-Cost-Composition-Layering (ε RATIFIED). Substrate- grep on src/v3/lenses/complexity.dag at HEAD shows the factoring claim DIFFERS from cost-lens: - Cost-lens needed (target-agnostic shape × target-specific values) factoring → Rust-side composition (ε) - Complexity-lens has NO target-specific axis; output is structural property of DAG topology + algebra-instance composition; substrate- native fully-on-.dag-side completion Mgr provisional reading: ε precedent does NOT apply; complexity-lens BEHAVIORAL COMPLETION is direct slice-tier substrate authoring (carrier introduction follows SymbolicCost precedent + T-E-P P1 carrier consumption). Director ratification ask: Q1 (factoring finding correct), Q2 (slice-tier directly bypassing canvas), Q3 (fresh worker pin). Cross-Mgr: Verification Mgr (#2075) pinged on v2-oracle snapshot capture status (cross-cutting prerequisite for #1950/#1951 cementing dispatch). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LBP complexity-lens substrate-completion worker brief (Q1/Q2/Q3 RATIFIED) Pre-authored brief for complexity-lens BEHAVIORAL COMPLETION substrate work per Director Q1/Q2/Q3 ratification at #828 c#4402714255. Three deliverables: carrier introduction (ComplexityCost / WorkSpan / AsymptoticClass following SymbolicCost precedent) + lens widening (complexity.dag PROXY → COMPLETE) + T-E-P P1 carrier consumption (DescentEvidence / CallPattern / SubValueRelation for asymptotic classification of recursive-call behavior). Indirect-variant dependency surfaced as worker-grep concern at slice- authoring time (T-E-P P1 Slice 5+ pending; eager-bat-178 stream). Cementing test (#1950) is separate downstream brief; v2-oracle snapshot ownership pending Q4 cross-Mgr ratification. Worker pin: fresh-pool pick at dispatch time (NOT eager-bat-178 per Director Q3 framing; NOT fierce-ram-21 busy with cost-lens ε). Same-window-dispatch discipline applies post-canvas-merge (PR #2197). Pre-authored vs pre-known discipline applied per feedback_pre_known_vs_pre_authored_briefs.md memorialized 2026-05-08. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): rewrite complexity-lens brief consuming live design authority (codex BLOCKING fix) Codex BLOCKING (3 findings) at #2199 sha 7a8bb6d: 1. Brief authored against missing canvas instead of reconciling with docs/design-complexity-lens-behavioral-completeness.md (which exists at HEAD with comprehensive substrate spec) 2. Producer coverage treated as optional corpus scope; should be hard T-E-P-Producer-Broadening prerequisite 3. Stale/non-in-repo planning authority cited; should be r3-structure.md row 146 (T-LBP slice 1) All three BLOCKING findings VALID — substrate-grep-before-authoring discipline failure on my part (feedback_substrate_grep_before_authoring already memorialized; violated own discipline). Rewrite delegates carrier shape, dimension wiring, and consumer rewrite to live design doc §§1.1-1.6 verbatim: - §1.1 SymbolicCost — already at algebra.dag; no change - §1.2 SizeVariable — display_name enrichment - §1.3 work_dimension + span_dimension — two AnalysisDimension instances - §1.4 AsymptoticClass + BoundedLattice instance - §1.5 Certainty (cost-aware composition; no lattice) - §1.6 cost_bound_to_symbolic projection - §1.7 ComplexitySummary record + lens widening T-E-P P1 hard prerequisite per design's authority discipline + r3- structure.md row 146; STOP-and-PING if T-E-P P1 not COMPLETE at slice authoring time. Authority cites updated to live r3-structure.md row 146. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-PerfWithinBaseline canvas — DRAFT (canvas-tier P1 procedure per Q6 RATIFIED) Director Q6 RATIFIED canvas-tier-required at #828 c#4403163639 for PerfWithinBaseline TestPredicate variant authoring. Three substantive substrate-shape questions resolved: Q1 baseline shape: (a) literal-Int rejected as strict-mirror-of-CostBounded defeats semantic load; (b) DeclarationRef-to-stored-data composes LensOutputEquals + data X: SymbolicCost precedent at HEAD; (c) runtime- fixture-injection over-authors. Mgr lean (b). Q2 ComparisonOp composition: (i) reuse existing ComparisonOp via test- runner-side resolution matches LensOutputEquals path; (ii) new relative- op-set introduces parallel-representation debt. Mgr lean (i). Q3 baseline-storage scope: (α) in-scope slice authors example data; (β) out-of-scope variant-only slice + PB consumer authors baseline data matches existing layering. Mgr lean (β). Combined Mgr lean: Q1(b) + Q2(i) + Q3(β) — variant authored as compositional extension; baseline-storage is PB consumer-tier work. Cross-Mgr: PB Mgr #2138 worker (crisp-swift-433) holds dispatch on #2204 land; T-Tier3-Dissolution #2085 R-4 prereq encoded. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-PerfWithinBaseline canvas REVISED (supersedes wrong-shape original) Director disposition at #828 c#4403265220 authorized supersession after BLOCKING at PR #2209 c#4403246233 verified VALID: original canvas conflated symbolic SymbolicCost (cost-lens substrate) with wall-clock measured median/p99 baseline (T-Tier3 perf gate substrate per docs/r3-structure.md:225 + :461 Director-locked 2026-04-28). Revised canvas frames as two-path ratification: - P1 author full perf-budget substrate in-R3 (multi-slice; pattern-5 genuinely-novel substrate-fact-introduction) - P2 explicitly post-R3 per Director-locked recommendation (zero in-R3 effort; structural close per r3-structure.md:461 'R3 deliverable is structural close; perf is downstream') Mgr lean: P2 — Director-locked recommendation explicit; trigger- condition ('someone authors perf-budget claim with concrete numbers and tooling') not met; R3 horizon constraint argues against multi- slice perf-budget substrate adding to 5-orthogonal-dependency picture. Original canvas at q-perf-within-baseline-canvas.md retained with SUPERSEDED-BY header per durable-decision-record discipline. 5th discipline-failure of 2026-05-08 cycle: substrate-grep verified substrate-precedent but missed consumer-side requirement at canonical authority doc; Director self-flagged symmetric two-axis verification gap; canvas-finding-taxonomy needs precondition 'consumer-side requirement grep-verified at canonical authority doc'. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-PerfWithinBaseline canvas-revised — correct trigger-condition framing per Director c#4403297623 Director caught second-axis grep failure on revised canvas: my P2 reasoning #1 ("path-trigger condition for P1 is not met") was structurally wrong. Existing tooling at HEAD substantially meets the Director-locked 2026-04-28 trigger-condition ("someone authors the perf-budget claim with concrete numbers and tooling"): - docs/briefs/r3-pb-tier3-perf-budget-worker.md - docs/audit/c1-tier3-perf-budget-readiness-matrix.md - src/v3/compiler/benches/tier3_mirror_perf.rs - docs/audit/c1-tier3-baseline-capture-procedure.md - docs/audit/c1-r3-canonical-bench-host-decision-matrix.md Plus thresholds (≤2× median, ≤5× p99) + capture discipline (N=3 min, N=5 preferred) + canonical bench host option matrix. P1 is bridging existing tooling to substrate (compositional-extension), NOT multi-slice greenfield genuinely-novel pattern-5 as originally framed. Smaller scope than canvas-finding-taxonomy pattern 5 implies. Path-call genuinely depends on PB Mgr's R-3 (canonical CI bench host) + R-7 (tier3_baseline.json baseline-capture path) decisions per their audit response at c#4403059897. Path-call DEFERRED to cross-Mgr coordination outcome with PB Mgr (#2074); Substrate Mgr surfaces with corrected framing this turn. Sixth discipline-failure of cycle (mine, second-axis grep gap on existing-tooling state); same-class as Director's first-axis grep gap on consumer-side requirement at the prior turn. Memorialized as two-axis verification discipline anchor. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-ValueBody-Drift-Resolution canvas — DRAFT (codegen-generation lean) D1 substrate-shape question per Q-ValueBody-Isomorphism RATIFIED at #828 c#4403972737. Variant-inventory readiness input from PR #2218 (merged 2026-05-08) confirms drift: Rust 5 variants vs substrate 3 constructors; asymmetry on Scalar+List Rust-only + Map payload-parity-with-semantic-gap. Two-axis verification at HEAD: - Substrate-precedent: codegen tooling exists (regen_bootstrap_emit; 5 _generated.rs files; regen_bootstrap binary). Pattern-3 strict- mirror codegen extension applies; no pattern-5 P1 procedure. - Consumer-side requirement: V1 worker brief explicitly names mirror- parity-vs-codegen-generation as D1 path-pair. Mgr lean: (b) codegen-generation. Path (a) mirror-parity perpetuates parallel-representation debt; (b) dissolves the dual-taxonomy class by construction (substrate canonical, Rust codegens). Map dup-key gap handled via (ii) Rust-side post-codegen wrapping (substrate stays minimal). Director ratification ask: D1 (b) + D1-followup (ii). Carrier slice path post-ratification: extend regen_bootstrap_emit; add Scalar+List constructors to substrate; regen + remove hand-Rust enum; handle Map dup-key per ratified followup. Worker pin fresh-pool per same-window-dispatch. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-ValueBody-Drift-Resolution canvas amend authority cite (codex BLOCKING fix) Director ratified (α) amendment-PR at #828 c#4404398425 post-codex-BLOCKING at PR #2222 c#4404360699. Canvas originally cited regen_bootstrap_emit.rs as codegen authority for ValueBody runtime mirror; corrected to scripts/regen_runtime_mirrors.py which is the substrate→Rust runtime-mirror generator (reads substrate.dag, emits dag_scalar_generated.rs etc.). regen_bootstrap_emit.rs is a separate codegen system that generates bootstrap_generated.rs (bootstrap parser/lower compile snapshot). D1 (b) codegen-generation ratification UNCHANGED; only authority-path cites corrected. Carrier slice path at canvas §6-step plan now references correct runtime-mirror generator. Canvas inline notes mark amendment location for future-reader audit trail. 8th cycle-tier framing-failure (Mgr-tier; same fine-granularity gap parallel to Director-tier failure at c#4404256128). Two-axis verification discipline applied at insufficient granularity (verified codegen-tooling- exists but didn't disambiguate against bootstrap-vs-runtime-mirror systems). Discipline anchor refinement: when canvas cites a codegen system / tooling / authority path, identify the SPECIFIC generator/handler for the target-file-class. Don't accept 'tooling exists' at coarse granularity. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…B scope (codex BLOCKING round 1) codex top-level BLOCKING on PR #2363 sha c3a4b11: 4 findings, 3 of which were new (Finding 2 already addressed at e54d880). Major C2 + C3 corrections: **Finding 1 — C2 audit relied on grep names instead of locked design authority**: Prior framing claimed 4c (caller-side effect-set pinning carrier) is NEW substrate-fact-introduction. Verified against locked design at docs/design-effect-enumeration-resource-threading.md §3.2 + §6.2: "The pinning substrate carrier ALREADY EXISTS at src/v3/std/services.dag::Operation. No new top-level carrier is required." §6.2: "Operation already exists. No new substrate type." Carve doc's "4c is NEW substrate intro required" claim is stale relative to the more recent locked design. C2 is substrate-ready (atomic migration shape per §6.2), not substrate-cliff. Fix: §2 major rewrite — replaced grep-based assessment with design-doc authority cite. C2 reclassified substrate-ready (same shape as C1). The earlier "(a) full carve-promotion vs (γ) stub" disposition is MOOT — there's no 4c canvas to author since the carrier already exists. **Finding 3 — C3 readiness treated design sketch as landed substrate**: Prior framing said "lens_application.dag exists" → "substrate-ready conditional on C1." Codex correct: Slice A landed (#88-#90 PR #2145) but Slice B (#91 per-lens LensEnforcement projection + violation routing) is pending per design §10 step 2. Fix: §3 corrects scope. C3 cascade-gates on (a) T-LAS Slice B landing + (b) C1 parallelism lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE. Both prerequisites named explicitly. **Finding 4 — C3 scoped to opt-in parallelism worked example instead of shared lens-application surface lane**: Prior framing treated #95 as separate carve. Per r3-structure.md:164: #95 is the "fourth worked example (design §4.4)" — a demonstration gate UNDER the T-Lens-Application-Surface lane. It's a worked-example demo, not a separate substrate carve. Fix: §3 corrects scope alignment with r3-structure.md + design-lens-application-surface.md. #95 promotes as worked-example demo gate; substrate prerequisites (Slice B + C1) tracked in their respective lanes. **Net audit revision**: all 3 carves substrate-ready (was: 2 ready + 1 cliff). No substrate-cliff in any carve. §0 + §4 + §5 + §6 updated to reflect. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…odex BLOCKING round 2) codex review on PR #2363 sha 32afcd3: 2 BLOCKING findings. **BLOCKING #1 — non-live parent authorities** Parent docs section listed `r3-pb0-velocity-walk-2026-05-09.md` as authority but it's not on main (concurrent PR #2358). Codex's broader "first two parent authority links absent" framing is a tree-visibility false positive on r4-carve-out-routing.md + r3-program-plan.md (both exist on main per `git ls-tree origin/main`), but the underlying finding about authority-chain live-state grounding is valid. Fix: split parent docs into "Parent docs (live state on main)" vs "In-flight authorities" sections. On-main set: r4-carve-out-routing.md + r3-program-plan.md + r3-structure.md + design-effect-enumeration- resource-threading.md + design-lens-application-surface.md (each verified via git ls-tree on origin/main). In-flight: velocity-walk (PR #2358) cited inline only for routing context — substrate state of effects.dag + workflow_parallelism.rs is independently verifiable on main without needing the velocity-walk authority. **BLOCKING #2 — C3 imports PR/status claims instead of live state** Prior §3.1 misidentified gate-number → carrier mapping: - Cited "Slice A landed (#88-#90)" + "Slice B (#91 per-lens LensEnforcement projection + violation routing) NOT yet landed" - Live ledger on main says #90 = lens_enforcement_carrier_landed (CONSUMER_LANDED Slice A; parametric carrier landed; per-lens data instances pending Slice B per #90 Pass condition); #91 = enforce_violation_routing_landed (DECLARED; substrate routing surface landed PR #2145; CONSUMER_LANDED requires fold-pass consumer per design §10 step 2 — deferred to Slice B) Fix: replaced grep-based gate-status framing with live-ledger reading table citing exact §1.8 row content from r3-program-plan.md on main. What's actually pending for Slice B (per #90 + #91 Pass conditions on main): per-lens data instances of LensEnforcement co-located with each lens (parallelism specifically for #95) + fold-pass consumer for #91 violation routing. §3.2 Cascade-gating chain rewritten as 4-step ordering with substrate prerequisite (carrier landing before #95) made explicit per codex BLOCKING ratification. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…dex BLOCKING round 3) codex review on PR #2363 sha 54e4baf: BLOCKING — "Audit still imports non-live PR/status claims as live authorities → replace the missing parent docs with live repo authorities and rebase C3 on the current T-LAS design/readiness docs with carrier landing as a prerequisite." §3.1 live-ledger table (added at sha 54e4baf) correctly mapped gates #88/#89/#90/#91 to live blob in src/v3/std/lens_application.dag, but §0 summary table row C3 + §0 prerequisites bullet still used the prior PR-status framing that misidentified #91 as "per-lens LensEnforcement projection + violation routing" — that's actually #90's Pass condition Slice B requirement (parametric carrier landed Slice A; per-lens instances pending Slice B). Fix: cascade §3.1's live-state mapping into §0: - §0 row C3: cite live blob (`src/v3/std/lens_application.dag`, blob `968aa84a` per git ls-tree origin/main) + correct gate-to-Slice mapping + Slice B prereqs split (a) per-lens instance per #90 Pass condition; (b) fold-pass consumer for #91 violation routing per locked design §10 step 2 - §0 prerequisites bullet: same 3-prong split (a)+(b)+(c) parallelism BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE; cross-ref to §3.1 table for live-state authority Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…or-greenlit (α) carve-promotion-IN-R3) (#2363) * docs(audit): R3 R4-carve substrate-readiness audit (C1/C2/C3) — Director-greenlit per (α) ratification Per Director ratification at gunbc#846 #issuecomment-4412330468 (2026-05-09): RATIFIED PM (α) carve-promotion-IN-R3 recommendation per operator's 2026-05-09 framing "R3 close = 0 hand-Rust including tests AND stage0; bootstrap is data + self-generated." Substrate-readiness audit findings: **C1 #81 parallelism lens**: substrate-ready. effects.dag provides EffectShape/OperationEffect/CompositionVerdict; workflow_parallelism.rs imports map cleanly; port-and-rewire bounded (M-sized lane). RECOMMENDATION: full carve-promotion to R3. **C2 #82 effect_enumeration lens**: MIXED. 4a/4b/4d bounded (consumer migration + cleanup); 4c (caller-side effect-set pinning carrier) is NEW P1 substrate-fact-introduction not landed at HEAD. RECOMMENDATION: Director disposition between (a) full carve-promotion with 4c canvas authoring in R3 (PM-recommended per strict-zero framing) OR (b) γ .dag-stub-form interim with 4c R4-carved. **C3 #95 opt-in iteration parallelism via lens application**: substrate-ready conditional on C1. lens_application.dag exists; cascade-gated on C1 BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE. RECOMMENDATION: full carve-promotion to R3 (cascade post-C1). Cluster F sequencing folder: #81 + #82 + #95 fold into existing T-LP-Retirement (lens-producer-retirement structural framing). Sub-phase α (#81 port) + β (#82 per disposition) + γ (#95 demo cascade post-α). Velocity-to-zero update: original 4-6 bulk events → 5-9 bulk events post-carve-promotion. Bounded substrate/cluster work per "staffing not concern." Out-of-scope follow-ups: UNACCOUNTED entries in non-test census (Director's separate ask) — handled in Task 13 follow-up audit, not this artifact. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(audit): §0 + §2.3 — P1 modeling-vs-process layers + decision-state scope clarification (openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES) openai-pro review on PR #2363 sha c3a4b11: 2 valid findings. **Finding 1 — P1 substrate-fact-introduction procedure misrepresented**: §2.3 line 87 cited "INVARIANTS.md P1 procedure" but listed 4 dispatch/process gates (confirmed bridge consumer / carrier shape ratification / worker brief authoring / substrate-introduction PR). The actual P1 procedure (INVARIANTS.md:94-129) is 3 modeling checks: DAG-ancestor / coproduct-vs-coordinate / primitive-vs-lens-extensible. Folding both into one "P1" label authorizes carve-promotion without proving the new carrier is the right substrate fact. Fix: §2.3 now explicitly separates two layers — Layer 1 is the actual P1 modeling checks (cited with line references INVARIANTS.md:100-128); Layer 2 is dispatch/process gates. Layer 1 must surface in canvas authoring before carrier shape ratification; Layer 2 is the dispatch sequence. Both required. **Finding 2 — Decision-state ambiguity (α ratified vs C2 disposition open)**: Doc said audit is per Director (α) ratification but kept C2 as "Director disposition needed" — read as competing decision states. Cluster F dispatch couldn't tell whether (a) is ratified or γ-stub remains alternative. Fix: §0 adds explicit scope clarification — (α) thesis (carves dissolve; #81/#82/#95 R3-load-bearing) is RATIFIED at thesis level; C2 #82 sub-disposition (a vs γ-stub) is finer-grain decision *within* (α) framework. Both paths satisfy operator strict-zero framing; they differ on R3 (path (a)) vs R4 (path (γ)) timing of #82's behavioral completion. Two scopes, no contradiction. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(audit): C2/C3 substrate-readiness — design-doc authority + Slice B scope (codex BLOCKING round 1) codex top-level BLOCKING on PR #2363 sha c3a4b11: 4 findings, 3 of which were new (Finding 2 already addressed at e54d880). Major C2 + C3 corrections: **Finding 1 — C2 audit relied on grep names instead of locked design authority**: Prior framing claimed 4c (caller-side effect-set pinning carrier) is NEW substrate-fact-introduction. Verified against locked design at docs/design-effect-enumeration-resource-threading.md §3.2 + §6.2: "The pinning substrate carrier ALREADY EXISTS at src/v3/std/services.dag::Operation. No new top-level carrier is required." §6.2: "Operation already exists. No new substrate type." Carve doc's "4c is NEW substrate intro required" claim is stale relative to the more recent locked design. C2 is substrate-ready (atomic migration shape per §6.2), not substrate-cliff. Fix: §2 major rewrite — replaced grep-based assessment with design-doc authority cite. C2 reclassified substrate-ready (same shape as C1). The earlier "(a) full carve-promotion vs (γ) stub" disposition is MOOT — there's no 4c canvas to author since the carrier already exists. **Finding 3 — C3 readiness treated design sketch as landed substrate**: Prior framing said "lens_application.dag exists" → "substrate-ready conditional on C1." Codex correct: Slice A landed (#88-#90 PR #2145) but Slice B (#91 per-lens LensEnforcement projection + violation routing) is pending per design §10 step 2. Fix: §3 corrects scope. C3 cascade-gates on (a) T-LAS Slice B landing + (b) C1 parallelism lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE. Both prerequisites named explicitly. **Finding 4 — C3 scoped to opt-in parallelism worked example instead of shared lens-application surface lane**: Prior framing treated #95 as separate carve. Per r3-structure.md:164: #95 is the "fourth worked example (design §4.4)" — a demonstration gate UNDER the T-Lens-Application-Surface lane. It's a worked-example demo, not a separate substrate carve. Fix: §3 corrects scope alignment with r3-structure.md + design-lens-application-surface.md. #95 promotes as worked-example demo gate; substrate prerequisites (Slice B + C1) tracked in their respective lanes. **Net audit revision**: all 3 carves substrate-ready (was: 2 ready + 1 cliff). No substrate-cliff in any carve. §0 + §4 + §5 + §6 updated to reflect. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(audit): §3.1 C3 cascade — distinguish gate-level vs lane-level dependencies (codex BLOCKING) codex inline BLOCKING @ docs/audit/r3-r4-carve-substrate-readiness-2026-05-09.md:112: prior cascade chain "C3 cascade-gates on parallelism lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE" understated the lane-level dependency. Per r3-structure.md:61: T-Lens-Application-Surface lane depends on T-Lens-Behavioral-Parity COMPLETE (all 4 in-R3 lenses: complexity #79 + cost #80 + parallelism #81 + effect_enum #82), not only C1. Fix: §3.1 distinguishes: - Lane-level (T-LAS Slice B substrate authoring complete): gates on full T-LBP COMPLETE. - Gate-level (#95 specific demo): gates on parallelism-lens projection within Slice B + parallelism BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE (C1). Both dependencies named explicitly. The simplified "cascade-gates on Slice B + C1" framing was correct for #95-specific firing but understated the lane-level closure dependency. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(audit): C3 §3.1 live-ledger reading + parent-doc on-main scope (codex BLOCKING round 2) codex review on PR #2363 sha 32afcd3: 2 BLOCKING findings. **BLOCKING #1 — non-live parent authorities** Parent docs section listed `r3-pb0-velocity-walk-2026-05-09.md` as authority but it's not on main (concurrent PR #2358). Codex's broader "first two parent authority links absent" framing is a tree-visibility false positive on r4-carve-out-routing.md + r3-program-plan.md (both exist on main per `git ls-tree origin/main`), but the underlying finding about authority-chain live-state grounding is valid. Fix: split parent docs into "Parent docs (live state on main)" vs "In-flight authorities" sections. On-main set: r4-carve-out-routing.md + r3-program-plan.md + r3-structure.md + design-effect-enumeration- resource-threading.md + design-lens-application-surface.md (each verified via git ls-tree on origin/main). In-flight: velocity-walk (PR #2358) cited inline only for routing context — substrate state of effects.dag + workflow_parallelism.rs is independently verifiable on main without needing the velocity-walk authority. **BLOCKING #2 — C3 imports PR/status claims instead of live state** Prior §3.1 misidentified gate-number → carrier mapping: - Cited "Slice A landed (#88-#90)" + "Slice B (#91 per-lens LensEnforcement projection + violation routing) NOT yet landed" - Live ledger on main says #90 = lens_enforcement_carrier_landed (CONSUMER_LANDED Slice A; parametric carrier landed; per-lens data instances pending Slice B per #90 Pass condition); #91 = enforce_violation_routing_landed (DECLARED; substrate routing surface landed PR #2145; CONSUMER_LANDED requires fold-pass consumer per design §10 step 2 — deferred to Slice B) Fix: replaced grep-based gate-status framing with live-ledger reading table citing exact §1.8 row content from r3-program-plan.md on main. What's actually pending for Slice B (per #90 + #91 Pass conditions on main): per-lens data instances of LensEnforcement co-located with each lens (parallelism specifically for #95) + fold-pass consumer for #91 violation routing. §3.2 Cascade-gating chain rewritten as 4-step ordering with substrate prerequisite (carrier landing before #95) made explicit per codex BLOCKING ratification. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(audit): §0 C3 + §0 prerequisites — live-state mapping cascade (codex BLOCKING round 3) codex review on PR #2363 sha 54e4baf: BLOCKING — "Audit still imports non-live PR/status claims as live authorities → replace the missing parent docs with live repo authorities and rebase C3 on the current T-LAS design/readiness docs with carrier landing as a prerequisite." §3.1 live-ledger table (added at sha 54e4baf) correctly mapped gates #88/#89/#90/#91 to live blob in src/v3/std/lens_application.dag, but §0 summary table row C3 + §0 prerequisites bullet still used the prior PR-status framing that misidentified #91 as "per-lens LensEnforcement projection + violation routing" — that's actually #90's Pass condition Slice B requirement (parametric carrier landed Slice A; per-lens instances pending Slice B). Fix: cascade §3.1's live-state mapping into §0: - §0 row C3: cite live blob (`src/v3/std/lens_application.dag`, blob `968aa84a` per git ls-tree origin/main) + correct gate-to-Slice mapping + Slice B prereqs split (a) per-lens instance per #90 Pass condition; (b) fold-pass consumer for #91 violation routing per locked design §10 step 2 - §0 prerequisites bullet: same 3-prong split (a)+(b)+(c) parallelism BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE; cross-ref to §3.1 table for live-state authority Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…population drift (#2333) * docs(briefs): Substrate bridge SourceSpan.file participation retirement worker brief Authored for gunbc#1958 Substrate-owned bridge slice. Targets audit-row #2 (kernel Bool patch BOOL_TYPES_FILE) + row #6 (pipeline authority PIPELINE_AUTHORITY_FILE) per r3-program-plan.md §5 line 353 scope-narrowing. Sibling #1959 closed as already-retired by PR #1272. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 Variant-aware projection carrier canvas (#1947) Surfaces 3 carrier-shape options (α RestResponseProjection variant-tag / β Declaration variant_projection_metadata / γ free-standing CoproductProjection) for Director ratification before worker brief authoring. Mgr-tier recommendation = γ (DeclarationRef-keyed, avoids tag-string-as-identity bridge). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — same-slice prerequisite + section anchor Director calibration (gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-...): 1. Promote ratchet-test cross-Mgr handoff from conditional Acceptance #4 to upfront same-slice BLOCKING prerequisite gate (per feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline). 2. Replace `r3-program-plan.md:353` line-cite with `§5 Y4 scope-clarification` section anchor (per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers). Code-line anchors in bootstrap.rs left as-is (anchor sites worker navigates to). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — umbrella stays Open per P2 ledger discipline Address BLOCKING inline review at line 46: bridge_source_span_file_participation_retired is an Open umbrella whose green predicate is "no production code path consults SourceSpan.file" per r3-structure.md:115. Partial retirement was explicitly rejected 2026-04-29 (Director acceptance #1130 / dispatch #1139). Changes: - Add Ledger-discipline preamble: umbrella row stays Open; receipt updates audit-packet enumeration, NOT bridge_ledger.dag. - Acceptance #3 reframed: do NOT mutate bridge_ledger.dag; mark rows #2 + #6 retired in the audit packet only. - Authority anchor updated: status=Open (not Proposed); add r3-structure.md:115 + bridge_ledger.dag:125-129 line refs. - Cross-Mgr section reframed: umbrella ratchet cannot flip on this PR alone; Verification's ledger-zero audit progress field is post-merge tracking, not a same-slice pre-merge blocker. Reconciles with BLOCKING finding (Director calibration #1 assumed umbrella ratchet could flip on partial retirement, which r3-structure.md:115 forbids). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 CoproductProjection worker brief — γ ratified (#1947) Director ratification of option γ at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394369848. Free-standing CoproductProjection carrier in src/v3/std/, DeclarationRef-keyed, typed WireTagValue leaf, 4 same-slice acceptance gates. Surfaces 3 substrate observations for STOP-and-PING (DeclarationRef String alias; FieldRef does-not-exist-at-HEAD; tag_field String asymmetry) — worker must escalate, not silently work around. PB Mgr cross-Mgr ping at carrier landing (heads-up, not blocker). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan.file brief — resolve Acceptance #4 / Cross-Mgr contradiction openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at PR #2079 #issuecomment-... flagged Acceptance #4 ("ratchet test passes ... confirmed-present at HEAD before merge") contradicting the reframed Cross-Mgr section ("No same-slice ratchet-test gate applies; post-merge tracking only"). Both said different things about whether the umbrella ratchet is a pre-merge blocker. Resolution: Acceptance #4 reframed to explicitly state "No umbrella-ratchet pre-merge gate" — worker does NOT wait for Verification ratchet authoring; acceptance for this slice is the audit-packet receipt update in #3. Cross-Mgr handoff also updated to remove "ratchet authoring" from Verification's same-slice duties. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): S5 brief — absorb Director pre-ratifications for 3 STOP-and-PING items Director pre-ratified dispositions at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394416049: 1. DeclarationRef alias: accept (b) + debt note (re-escalate only on same-slice break) 2. FieldRef: grep-decide between InputFieldRef-as-specialization vs rename 3. tag_field String asymmetry: typed introduction + debt note for migration Worker proceeds without re-pinging unless evidence forces escalation. STOP-criteria section narrowed accordingly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification Gate A receipt — Option A (Dag-as-carrier) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394427814 + proposal merge at PR #2096 (commit fec869202): src/v3/std/substrate.dag::Dag IS the reflected program; no new substrate carrier required. ReflectedProgram<T> rejected. Gate A patches: 1. r3-program-plan.md §10.3: new Q-Reification row marked RATIFIED with PR #2096 merge link + Gate A receipt scope (this PR + #1960 closed-as-non-addition). 2. r3-v-pattern-a-tc1-v1-worker.md: 3 sites — status header (Q-Reification CLEARED, Branch B η non-vacuity remains), worker-pin gate, E6-G1.a/E3 producer dependency. Replaces ReflectedProgram<T> with consumer-wiring nuance: lens fold consumes Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator. 3. r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md: 2 sites — same nuance: deferred work is consumer-wiring, NOT a separate carrier. 4. r3-pr-e8-w1-producer-contract-test-plan-worker.md: 1 site — fold-over-Dag reframe. Receipt of pass-by-construction: this PR adds NO new .dag declaration to src/v3/std/. The ratification is structurally a non-addition (Option A correctness proof per same-slice dissolution discipline). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — delete superseded canvas + name dissolution trigger for tag_field asymmetry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings (P2 single-authority + P5 dissolution trigger). Fixes: 1. Delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-s5-variant-aware-projection-carrier-canvas.md (superseded by the γ-ratified worker brief in same PR; would otherwise leave two current-looking S5 status authorities post-merge — one saying ratification pending, one saying γ ratified). 2. Substrate observation #3 (tag_field String/FieldRef asymmetry) now carries a binding named dissolution trigger: when FieldRef exists as top-level carrier AND InputFieldRef is classified, migrate InternallyTaggedObject.tag_field via follow-on Substrate hygiene PR. Worker MUST add debt-paydown row to authoritative debt ledger before merging carrier-introduction PR. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Q-Reification row — fix invariant cite (C-1 → P2) cursor review at gunbc#2079 #issuecomment-... flagged C-1 as mis-keyed: INVARIANTS.md C-1 is "missing args fail closed; no LitNull sentinels" (P3 fail-closed family), not parallel-representation/duplicate-authority. The correct cite for rejecting a parallel ReflectedProgram<T> alongside Dag is P2 single authority (INVARIANTS.md line 148: cost of change is proportional to how many files encode the same fact). Cite updated to "INVARIANTS.md P2 single authority" with inline gloss. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — name dissolution trigger for DeclarationRef alias debt openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: substrate observation #1 had desired endpoint ("future structural promotion of DeclarationRef") but no checkable dissolution trigger — same P5 gap that #3 (tag_field asymmetry) had been fixed for in commit 2601d7d26. Trigger now binding: promote DeclarationRef when EITHER (a) audit-row #14 (declaration_name_preference_rank / declaration_by_name rank-table) closes — dsl/std ↔ src/v3/std module convergence makes name-keyed identity unambiguous and structural module identity available, OR (b) any DeclarationRef-typed consumer surfaces a string-identity bridge per feedback_opaque_strings_attract_heuristics (heuristic patching, naming- convention dispatch, suffix/prefix matching). Worker MUST add debt-paydown row before merging carrier-introduction PR (same pattern as the tag_field debt requirement). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: complete Q-Reification stale-cite sweep — e6-g1a brief :169 + Q-PAFS row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-static-lens-worker.md:169 still said TC1/V1 "waits for Q-Reification and the carrier landing", contradicting the same brief's lines 15-19 + 148-153 saying Dag IS the carrier and no separate carrier lands. Fixed: 1. e6-g1a brief line 167-170 paragraph: clarified V1 waits for consumer-wiring work (lens fold consuming Dag via .dag body authority through Evaluator), NOT for a carrier-introduction. 2. r3-program-plan.md:954 Q-PAFS row text was the same shape: "Resume after Q-Reification + ReflectedProgram<T>" — contradicted my new Q-Reification row in the same diff. Updated: Q-Reification STOP CLEARED 2026-05-07 (Option A); remaining hold = Branch B η non-vacuity only. Out-of-scope-for-this-PR: docs/briefs/r3-pr-e6-g1a-option3-feasibility-probe.md contains 4 stale cites but is not modified in this PR; stale-on-main can be swept in a follow-up if needed (single source of truth is the e6-g1a-static-lens worker brief, not the feasibility probe per Q-PAFS Path A acceptance). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix InputFieldRef mis-read; reframe observations #2 + #3 codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2079 line 22: my brief mis-read services.dag:28-36. The text actually says "No separate InputFieldRef carrier is introduced here, since ParamToken.name already carries the same shape and adding a wrapper would duplicate without strengthening the structural invariant" — i.e., InputFieldRef does NOT exist; the comment REJECTS the wrapper. Fixes: 1. Substrate observation #2 reframed: no FieldRef-shaped carrier exists at HEAD; services.dag:28-36 precedent argues against wrapper unless it strengthens structural invariant. New (a)/(b) STOP-and-PING: (a) follow services.dag precedent — wire_tag_field: String + key invariant on wire_tag_values + fixture-load fail-closed check; (b) introduce typed FieldRef — must justify per "duplicate without strengthening" test. 2. Carrier shape (line 19): wire_tag_field: FieldRef → {String|FieldRef} pending observation #2 resolution. 3. Substrate observation #3 reframed: InternallyTaggedObject asymmetry is conditional on path (b); under path (a) no asymmetry exists. Trigger correspondingly conditional. Removed stale "InputFieldRef classified" trigger clause. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — consolidate split per-variant maps into single keyed entry openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: CoproductProjection shape split per-variant data across two parallel maps (variant_field_projections + wire_tag_values), admitting illegal states where keysets drift (P2 boundary discipline / illegal-states-unrepresentable). Fix: introduce CoproductVariantProjection { field_projection, wire_tag_value } as the per-variant keyed value; CoproductProjection.variant_projections becomes Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection>. Single keyed authority per variant. Director's binding constraint #2 enumerated the two fields separately but said "refine in implementation as ergonomics demand" — consolidation preserves the substantive constraints (typed WireTagValue leaf, structural per-variant projection) while enforcing keyset alignment by carrier shape. Empty-payload variants encoded via FieldProjection::Empty constructor (or analog), not via map-absence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S5 — fix stale split-map vocab in path (a) + scope STOP-and-PING umbrella openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2079: 2 BLOCKING findings. 1. Path (a) at line 43 still referenced "Map<VariantId, WireTagValue> key invariant on wire_tag_values" — that's the superseded split-map vocab; the consolidated shape is Map<VariantId, CoproductVariantProjection> on variant_projections. Path (a) now references the consolidated map; per-variant WireTagValue lives inside CoproductVariantProjection. 2. Pre-ratification umbrella at line 36 said "all 3 dispositions pre-ratified, proceed without re-pinging" — but observation #2 was re-opened after the codex InputFieldRef finding and explicitly says STOP-and-PING. Contradictory. Umbrella now scoped: observations #1 + #3 are pre-ratified; #2 is re-opened STOP-and-PING — worker MUST escalate before choosing path (a) vs (b). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof canvas — 4-residual coproduct-dissolution audit Director ratified split disposition at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4394696074: descent_execution_proof STANDS ALONE (consumer-side termination-contract substrate function with fail-closed residual enumeration; folding into T-E-P-Producer-Broadening explicitly rejected — different concern axis). Canvas surfaces 3 carrier-shape options for the residual enumeration per Director's coproduct-dissolution audit suggestion: α: 4-variant coproduct verbatim from §10.3 row 966 (Missing | Unknown | Incomplete | NonStrict) β: 3-axis dimensional product (presence × completeness × strictness) γ (recommended): reuse DescentEvidence at termination.dag:14-17 for "absent/unknown" via EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) payload-variant + separate EvidenceIncomplete — ratchets variant count 4 → 2 via dimensional folding while honoring services.dag "no parallel wrapper" precedent. Mgr recommendation γ; β rejected unless 3 axes provably compose orthogonally. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): SourceSpan brief Row #6 — derive from bootstrap_authority map, no new enum variant codex BLOCKING (post-merge of #2079, on commit 85ceb85a — same brief is now on main): my Row #6 disposition told the worker to introduce a new BootstrapAuthority::Pipeline variant ("extend the enum if needed"). That violates P2 single-authority — src/v3/std/bootstrap_authority.dag:90 already has "src/v3/compiler/pipeline.dag": CompilerAuthority, classifying pipeline.dag under the existing CompilerAuthority variant. The :14-17 comment is explicit: "the path itself is the BootstrapAuthoritySet map key; variants carry no duplicate path payload" — single authority, not extension-by-variant. Fix: Row #6 now instructs worker to derive the typed key from the existing bootstrap_authority-map witness (BootstrapAuthorityKey threading the existing CompilerAuthority classifier), refining the constructor surface if needed — NOT introducing a new enum variant. STOP-and-PING criteria updated to forbid new-variant resolution under any path. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof worker brief — γ ratified (2-variant residual) Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395060514: - DescentResidual = EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence) | EvidenceIncomplete (4 → 2 dissolution: Missing+Unknown fold via DescentUnknown injection; NonStrict folds via NonIncreasing wrap; Incomplete retained — different concern axis from evidence-lattice) - DescentEvidence 3-variant lattice at termination.dag:14-17 confirmed as authoritative composition target - Type signature from §10.3 row 966 confirmed verbatim-binding Director-asked canvas-shape verification absorbed: worker STOPs if EvidenceIncomplete decomposes into payload-variants (timeout / depth-bound / evaluator-error-during-proof-construction); proceeds as 2-variant otherwise. 7 same-slice acceptance gates incl Evaluator E2 #1971 consumer wiring in same PR + §10.3 row 966 row-text refresh to cite γ-disposition. Worker pin: quick-koi-190 (pre-authorized per §10.3 row 966). Auto-spawn HOLD per L-sized threshold; surgical-recreate path ratified case-by-case if critical path blocked. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — narrow EvidenceUnknown payload via NonStrictEvidence subset; delete superseded canvas openai-pro REQUEST_CHANGES at gunbc#2105: 2 findings. 1. BLOCKING (LAYER MODEL / illegal states unrepresentable): worker brief shape `EvidenceUnknown(DescentEvidence)` admitted EvidenceUnknown(Strict) even though the canvas itself acknowledged Strict-isn't-a-residual as illegal. P2 requires API-level enforcement, not prose convention. Fix: introduce typed subset `NonStrictEvidence = NonIncreasing | DescentUnknown`; residual now `EvidenceUnknown(NonStrictEvidence)` — illegal-states-unrepresentable by construction. NonStrictEvidence lands in same file as DescentResidual; composes with existing 3-variant DescentEvidence via inhabitation, not re-definition. 2. NON-BLOCKING (live-state drift): canvas + worker brief both visible with "ratification needed" vs "ratified" status — same P2 single-authority shape as the S5 canvas/worker-brief co-existence at #2079. Fix: delete docs/briefs/r3-substrate-descent-execution-proof-canvas.md (worker brief frontmatter already names it as superseded; with canvas gone the live authority is unambiguous). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): descent_execution_proof — section-anchor cite for §10.3 row codex BLOCKING at gunbc#2105 line 47: my brief cited "§10.3 row 966" but the actual line is now 986 (after my Q-Reification row insert in PR #2079 shifted §10.3 by 20 lines). Reviewer's "no such section" claim is wrong on substance (file + section + row all exist) but the line drift IS real. Fix per feedback_section_anchors_over_line_numbers (Director calibration in gunbc#2079): replaced all "§10.3 row 966" with "§10.3 Q-EVAL-Descent- Termination-Contract row" — name-anchor instead of line-anchor, drift-immune. 5 occurrences cleaned (closure predicate, acceptance gate #3, gate #5, STOP criterion, worker pin justification). Stylistic "row row-text" repetition collapsed to "row text". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition canvas — Lens<SymbolicCost> composition shape (#1957) Pre-staged per Director endorsement of T-CostLens-Composition canvas-shape authoring. Surfaces 3 composition options for the Lens<SymbolicCost> instance: α: two separate lenses, externally joined — REJECTED (violates §1.8 gate #39 no_coercion_cost_dimension by construction) β: single Lens<SymbolicCost> with composed witness in read — strong but requires Lens<C> carrier-shape refactor (target-context threading) γ (recommended): Lens<SymbolicCost> reads structural cost via algebra-fold + target-realization composed via existing Lookup<SymbolicCost> substrate at lookup.dag:48-60 — preserves generic Lens<C> carrier; satisfies all 4 §1.8 gates (#37-40) by construction; aligns with feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first Adjacent substrate verified at HEAD: lens.dag:70-77 (Lens<C>), algebra.dag:12+ (SymbolicCost 7-variant + Semiring), lookup.dag:48-60 (Lookup<SymbolicCost> + MissingCost lens-boundary). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-Workflow-As-Data canvas — audit-receipt-honoring scope-narrowing Pre-staged per Director endorsement. Q-Workflow-As-Data-Carriers (§10.3 row 983) named 5 carriers; grep-verified at HEAD that 4 of 5 ALREADY EXIST in dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (218 lines). Only WorkflowSecret<Name> is wholly net-new substrate. Surfaces 3 options: α: maximalist 5-carrier introduction in dsl/std/workflow.dag — REJECTED (admits parallel-representation debt vs audit-receipt #1771 reuse-first directive) β (recommended): minimalist — only WorkflowSecret<Name> + Cron<Schedule> refinement net-new; lens consumes extdeps.github.actions directly. Honors feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first. γ: like β + WorkflowObservationAnchor for typed lens-consumption-shape; natural ratchet from β if evidence accumulates. Sequencing: dispatch-ready post-T-LBP COMPLETE per §S4 design-schedule:95; brief authoring lands in advance per pre-staging discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens-Composition worker brief — γ ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775: - γ option ratified (Lens<SymbolicCost> + Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition) - Lens<C> generic at lens.dag:70-77 confirmed authoritative (no refactor in scope) - symbolic_cost_dimension: AnalysisDimension<SymbolicCost> defers to separate Dimensions sub-lane Critical reframing absorbed: src/v3/lenses/cost.dag ALREADY EXISTS (status: STRUCTURALLY TERMINAL; BEHAVIORALLY PROXY). T-CostLens-Composition is behavioral-completion + target-realization-wiring, NOT P1 carrier introduction. Worker reads existing lens; advances PROXY → BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE via Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition. 8 same-slice acceptance gates incl §1.8 #37-40 + #70 demonstration + lens status header refresh + §10.3 row text refresh. Out-of-scope (deferred per Director): symbolic_cost_dimension; Lens<C> generic refactor (STOP-and-PING if implementation reveals need). Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (same precedent as S5 + descent_execution_proof canvas deletions). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Delete superseded T-CostLens canvas (worker brief is single live authority) * docs(briefs): T-WAD Slice 1 worker brief — β ratified; delete canvas Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395945465: 4 asks confirmed: 1. β ratified (minimalist reuse-first) 2. #1771 audit-receipt binding precedent confirmed 3. WorkflowSecret<Name> folds into dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (provider- specific scope; NOT new dsl/std/ file unless cross-provider evidence) 4. §1.8 gates #54 + #55 split into separate slices (slice 2 = timing-and-pattern; slice 3 = ci_workflow_modeled_as_dag) Slice 1 net-new substrate (only): - WorkflowSecret<Name> + SecretScope carriers - CronExpression + CronField (typed refinement of existing WorkflowTrigger::Schedule { cron: String } at actions.dag:43) Other 4 carriers from §10.3 row 983 reused as-is from extdeps.github.actions per audit-receipt #1771 directive. 6 same-slice acceptance gates incl no-parallel-representation grep + gate #53/#62/#63 advancement + bootstrap regen + clippy. Cross-provider STOP-and-PING per Director ask #3 caveat: worker greps adjacent provider work for WorkflowSecret-shape evidence; surfaces if found before finalizing fold-into-extdeps. Canvas deleted per single-authority discipline (S5 + descent_execution_proof + T-CostLens precedent). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demo (#1952) complexity-contract compile-error worker brief Pre-staged execution brief per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker brief path (no canvas — design-lock at docs/design-lens-application- surface.md specifies fixture shape verbatim at line 292). 7 same-slice acceptance gates: fixture program (O(n²) body + Enforce O(log n) budget) + TestClaim assertion + diagnostic structural validation + no regression on T-LBP cementing + bootstrap regen + clippy + §1.8 #92 advancement. Hard prerequisites STOP-and-PING: T-LAS Slice A landed (gates #88-#91) AND T-LBP complexity-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE (gate #79). Worker does not author against partial substrate. Sibling demos #1953 (CRDT cost) + #1954 (memory-peak cost) share the same hard-prerequisite + TestClaim shape pattern — could dispatch as 3 sequential PRs or single multi-demo PR (worker's call at dispatch). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LAS Demos #1953 + #1954 — cost-basis sibling worker brief Pre-staged sibling brief covering both cost-basis demos (CRDT cost basis + memory-peak cost basis) per Director endorsement of T-LAS demos via direct worker-brief path. Single brief for two demos because they share: - Hard-prerequisite pattern (T-LAS Slice A + T-LBP cost-lens BEHAVIORALLY COMPLETE) - TestClaim + Diagnostic structural validation shape - apply_lens(cost, ...) Enforce mode Sibling of #1952 brief (complexity-contract compile-error). Worker's call at dispatch on multi-demo PR vs sequential PRs (Mgr ratification needed if going multi-demo). #1953 (CRDT) substrate per design §4.2 + cost-basis-declaration audit at docs/audit/t-user-authored-cost-basis-discipline-worked-examples.md. #1954 (memory-peak) substrate per design §4.3; STOP-and-PING if Dimension<SymbolicCost> substrate (deferred to Dimensions sub-lane per Director ratification at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4395691775) not yet landed. 6 same-slice acceptance gates per demo + same STOP-and-PING discipline as #1952. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-CostLens — update Sub-issue from #1957 to #2141 (post-surgical-recreate) PM executed Director's surgical-recreate ratification (gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4397693699) at 17:54:43Z: closed #1957, created fresh #2141 to trigger pollAutoSpawn fresh-creation path. Worker fierce-ram-21 (#2153) spawned on #2141. 1-line brief update per Director's queued-action commitment: brief now references #2141 + cites surgical-recreate authority. #1957 closed-as-superseded. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas (β-extended substrate-shape question) Director α-revised supersession at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4400920572 elevated β-extended path (introduce first-precedent .dag-side fold-over-realization-rows + name active-target authority shape) from slice-tier to canvas-tier. Authored per Q-PAFS template: - Substrate-state at HEAD grep-verified (Lens<C>.read no target-context; zero .dag-side fold-over-realizations precedent; 15+ lens instances using generic Lens<C>) - Binary question: should .dag-side lenses receive target-context for target-keyed reading? - Options matrix: (i) LanguageSpec param to fold; (ii) per-target lens instances [parallel-representation debt]; (iii) global accessor [REJECTED global-state anti-pattern] - Mgr provisional preference: (i) - Cross-cutting: cost.dag load-bearing; emission_provenance.dag secondary; other 13+ lenses target-agnostic Framework discipline anchors per Director corrections: - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline - feedback_parallel_representation_debt - feedback_abstraction_layering (sibling canvas) Sibling canvas (ε path): q-cost-composition-layering-canvas.md authoring follows. Both canvases together address deeper cross-cutting axis: does target-context belong .dag-side (β-extended) or emit-side (ε)? Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Cost-Composition-Layering canvas (ε substrate-shape question) Sibling canvas to q-lens-target-context-canvas.md. Director α-revised supersession at gunbc#828 #issuecomment-4400920572 elevated ε path (Rust-side cost-composition wiring; preserves cost.dag PROXY) from slice-tier to canvas-tier. Authored per Q-PAFS template: - Factoring claim: cost = (target-agnostic-shape SymbolicCost algebra) × (target-specific-values per-primitive realization-cost data loaded Rust-side) - Test against feedback_abstraction_layering (Director-named anchor at gunbc#828 c#4400921658): pure objective concepts × language-agnostic LanguageSpec × emit-side composition. Compliance test for each layer. - Pro factoring (ε structurally honest): SymbolicCost algebra is target- agnostic at HEAD; Rust-side composition is natural home; #38/#39 substrate- already-aligned per Slice 1 finding. - Con factoring (ε is parallel-representation debt): N parallel Rust-side compositions if multiple lenses need target-context; lens-framework abstraction stops at substrate boundary; future lenses hit same dilemma. Mgr provisional reading: factoring honest for COST specifically; NOT generalizable. ε right framing IF cost is the singular need + factoring holds. If N>1 target-context-needing lenses surface, β-extended (option (i) from sibling canvas) becomes the right path. Director ratification ask: 3-way choice (ε) Cost-specific Rust-side composition; preserves cost.dag PROXY (β-extended option (i)) Lens<C> refactor for LanguageSpec parameter (both sequenced) ε now for cost; β-extended later if N>1 Framework discipline anchors: - feedback_abstraction_layering (Director-named for this canvas) - feedback_parallel_representation_debt - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline Canvas-pair complete; sibling canvas + this canvas address the deeper cross-cutting axis: target-context belongs .dag-side (β-extended) or emit-side (ε)? Director ratification across both informs T-CostLens follow-on slice + downstream lens architecture. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs: ε ratified canonical for cost; β-extended deferred to N=2 — gate updates Director ratification at gunb-ai/gunbc#2181 #issuecomment-... : - (ε) RATIFIED standalone for cost composition (canonical-not-transitional) - (β-extended option (i)) DEFERRED to N=2 trigger event (second lens with target-context need beyond cost) - ("both sequenced") REJECTED as bridge-with-named-dissolution anti-pattern Same-slice acceptance gates landed: 1. Q-Cost-Composition-Layering canvas: status updated from "ratification needed" → "Director-RATIFIED 2026-05-07 (ε standalone; canonical-not- transitional); PROPOSAL maturation pending" 2. Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas: status updated from "ratification needed" → "DRAFT/DEFERRED 2026-05-07; reopens on N=2 trigger event" (second lens with substantive target-context need; emission_provenance most likely candidate per cross-cutting analysis §3) 3. r3-program-plan.md gate-table rows #37 + #40 + #70: ε path ratified; close via Rust-side composition reading abstract SymbolicCost × per- primitive realization-cost in T-CostLens follow-on slice 4. r3-program-plan.md §10.3 T-CostLens-Composition row: ε ratified for #37/#40/#70; β-extended deferred per N=2 trigger 5. v3-lens-capability-register.md cost.dag row: ε disposition cited; #2175 continues as cross-cutting umbrella tracker Closed-system disposition per Director: if N=2 condition never fires, β-extended never fires — structurally correct under closed-system design. Framework discipline anchors honored: - feedback_abstraction_layering: ε respects layering (objective concepts pure; target-specific values flow at emit time per Layer-3 honesty test) - feedback_parallel_representation_debt: bounded to N=1; reopens at N=2 - feedback_same_slice_dissolution_discipline: ε ratified canonical, not transitional - feedback_construction_over_ratchets: substrate-shape question answered structurally - feedback_substrate_principle_audit: substrate-fact authored at canvas- tier; ratification follows P1 procedure Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): canvas inventory grounded in live src/v3/lenses/ registry codex BLOCKING at gunb-ai/gunbc#2181 (sha 00551a80): Q-Lens-Target-Context canvas inventory was "copied from expected lens set instead of live src/v3/lenses/ registry"; emission_provenance trigger references not grounded in live file content. Same shape of error as 3 prior BLOCKING reversals (Q-Reification, S5 DeclarationRef, T-CostLens merge-content). Substrate-state-grep is being treated as retrospective-correction rather than prerequisite. Tightening: this is the 4th occurrence; should be hard-prerequisite-discipline going forward. Fixes: 1. Q-Lens-Target-Context inventory section: replaced approximate "15+ lens instances" framing with exact `ls`-grep registry (15 .dag files listed by name), notes infer_helpers + lower_helpers are helper modules authoring shared structural fns rather than top-level lens instances. 2. emission_provenance.dag analysis grounded in HEAD file status header: STATUS = STRUCTURALLY TERMINAL; LENS-INSTANCE FIXTURE-BOUND; BEHAVIORALLY DEFERRED. `read` body is fail-closed Empty stub. Lens does NOT currently read target-context inside fold; producer-side instrumentation records target-specific entries consumed via standard framework. Reframed as "ungrounded at HEAD" rather than "POSSIBLY target-context need" — re-evaluates at producer-wiring landing. 3. Net finding: N=1 confirmed at HEAD (cost.dag only); N=2 is empirically open pending lens-completion cycles, NOT pre-claimable. Plus non-blocking improvement: Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 9 stale `#issuecomment-...` placeholder replaced with concrete ratification comment id `#issuecomment-4401584012`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): fix Director-ratification-ask typo + #37 gate-id clarification footnote cursor APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS at gunb-ai/gunbc#2181 (sha 4209eb7f) flagged 2 NON-BLOCKING items + 1 exploratory: 1. (NON-BLOCKING) Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 69: `## Directorratification ask` → `## Director ratification ask` (whitespace typo) 2. (NON-BLOCKING) Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 9 placeholder `#issuecomment-...`: ALREADY ADDRESSED in commit `db88b1004` (replaced with `#issuecomment-4401584012`) 3. (Exploratory) Gate #37 id `cost_lens_reads_target_realization` framing implies .dag lens body performs realization read; per ε ratification it's Rust-side composition consumer. Added clarifying footnote noting gate-id retention + Rust-side closure path; rename candidate post-follow-on-slice landing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context — absorb PM canvas-review concerns 1-3 Director relayed PM canvas review at gunb-ai/gunbc#2068 c#4401627536: Concern 1 (RESOLVED via grep-verify): empirical N=1 confirmation. PM ran `grep -lc 'TypeRealization|CallableRealization|MethodTemplateContract| target_realization|realization_cost|LanguageSpec' src/v3/lenses/*.dag`; only cost.dag has 3 hits, all 14 others have 0 refs (including emission_provenance.dag which I'd previously framed speculatively). Net-finding §3 updated with grep result inline + "N=1 empirically grounded" framing replacing speculative "secondary candidate" language. Empirical basis for DEFERRED β-extended disposition strengthened. Concern 2 (Option (ii) multiplier framing): per-target lens instances replicate the entire Lens<C> authoring surface — N×M × 4 (carrier + monoid sequential + branch + iterate) authoring overhead. Updated Con bullet to reflect the multiplier explicitly: 3 targets × 1 cost lens × 4 = 12 authored fns; grows to 36 if 3 lenses need target-context. Cites feedback_parallel_representation_debt as the P2 framing. Concern 3 (Option (i) threading cost quantification): replaced narrative "threading cost is real but manageable" with quantified breakdown — ~15 signature changes + 14 ignore-parameter patterns + 1 consumer + cementing- test revalidation. Helps future Director ratification at N=2 trigger event. All 3 amendments are docs-only refinements; ε ratification at gunbc#2181 c#4401584012 unchanged. Strengthens canvas as durable substrate-shape decision record. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): canvases — collapse stale ratification-ask sections post-ratification codex BLOCKING at gunb-ai/gunbc#2181 (sha be9a9c94): both canvases had stale "Director ratification ask" sections after status headers were updated to RATIFIED/DEFERRED. Per INVARIANTS P1 "Documentation Describes Live State" — canvas internally presented both settled and unsettled authority. Fixes: 1. Q-Cost-Composition-Layering line 69-76: "Director ratification ask" section collapsed to "Director ratification (RECEIVED 2026-05-07)" with ε ratified, β-extended deferred, "both sequenced" rejected. Three options recorded as historical with ratification cite. Eliminates the rejected "both, sequenced" line that conflicted with status-header "canonical-not- transitional" framing. 2. Q-Lens-Target-Context line 131-136: "Director ratification ask" section collapsed to "Director disposition (DEFERRED 2026-05-07; reopens on N=2 trigger event)". Original ratification asks recorded as FROZEN; revisit at N=2 trigger event with then-current substrate-state grep. Eliminates live-now-ratify framing that conflicted with status-header DEFERRED. Both canvases now single live authority — RATIFIED/DEFERRED dispositions, no internal ratification-ask drift. Future re-ratification (Q-Lens-Target- Context at N=2 trigger) refreshes options matrix at that point per substrate-state-honesty discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Lens-Target-Context — separate live N=1 from reopen-only future N=2 openai-pro APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS at gunb-ai/gunbc#2181 (sha be9a9c94): canvas line 127 mixed live N=1 authority with speculative N=2 candidate in one current-state cost count. Per P1 Documentation Describes Live State + P2 single-authority metadata: the live count at HEAD is `cost × 3 targets = 3 per-target instances` (× 4 authoring-multiplier per Option (ii) Con = 12 fns). The `emission_provenance × 3` figure is a reopen-only future scenario that materializes only if emission_provenance becomes the second real target-context lens at producer- wiring landing time. Updated to separate the two clearly: live count + reopen-only future scenario marked separately. Aligns with the grep-verified N=1 finding established earlier in canvas §3. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(briefs): T-CostLens worker brief — ε supersession header (γ retained as context) PR #2181 merged at eff426de5 ratifies ε path canonical-not-transitional for cost composition. Brief was authored under γ scope (.dag-side Lookup<SymbolicCost> composition). Add binding ε supersession header at top; retain γ section as historical context per single-authority discipline. cost.dag stays PROXY under ε; composition is Rust-side (abstract SymbolicCost shape × per-primitive realization values). Authority: Director ratification at gunb-ai/gunbc#2181 #issuecomment-4401584012. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-Complexity-Composition-Layering canvas — DRAFT (factoring tested, ε precedent does NOT apply) Director authorized canvas authoring at gunb-ai/gunbc#828 c#4402669133 as parallel structure to Q-Cost-Composition-Layering (ε RATIFIED). Substrate- grep on src/v3/lenses/complexity.dag at HEAD shows the factoring claim DIFFERS from cost-lens: - Cost-lens needed (target-agnostic shape × target-specific values) factoring → Rust-side composition (ε) - Complexity-lens has NO target-specific axis; output is structural property of DAG topology + algebra-instance composition; substrate- native fully-on-.dag-side completion Mgr provisional reading: ε precedent does NOT apply; complexity-lens BEHAVIORAL COMPLETION is direct slice-tier substrate authoring (carrier introduction follows SymbolicCost precedent + T-E-P P1 carrier consumption). Director ratification ask: Q1 (factoring finding correct), Q2 (slice-tier directly bypassing canvas), Q3 (fresh worker pin). Cross-Mgr: Verification Mgr (#2075) pinged on v2-oracle snapshot capture status (cross-cutting prerequisite for #1950/#1951 cementing dispatch). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): T-LBP complexity-lens substrate-completion worker brief (Q1/Q2/Q3 RATIFIED) Pre-authored brief for complexity-lens BEHAVIORAL COMPLETION substrate work per Director Q1/Q2/Q3 ratification at gunb-ai/gunbc#828 c#4402714255. Three deliverables: carrier introduction (ComplexityCost / WorkSpan / AsymptoticClass following SymbolicCost precedent) + lens widening (complexity.dag PROXY → COMPLETE) + T-E-P P1 carrier consumption (DescentEvidence / CallPattern / SubValueRelation for asymptotic classification of recursive-call behavior). Indirect-variant dependency surfaced as worker-grep concern at slice- authoring time (T-E-P P1 Slice 5+ pending; eager-bat-178 stream). Cementing test (#1950) is separate downstream brief; v2-oracle snapshot ownership pending Q4 cross-Mgr ratification. Worker pin: fresh-pool pick at dispatch time (NOT eager-bat-178 per Director Q3 framing; NOT fierce-ram-21 busy with cost-lens ε). Same-window-dispatch discipline applies post-canvas-merge (PR #2197). Pre-authored vs pre-known discipline applied per feedback_pre_known_vs_pre_authored_briefs.md memorialized 2026-05-08. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): rewrite complexity-lens brief consuming live design authority (codex BLOCKING fix) Codex BLOCKING (3 findings) at #2199 sha 7a8bb6dc: 1. Brief authored against missing canvas instead of reconciling with docs/design-complexity-lens-behavioral-completeness.md (which exists at HEAD with comprehensive substrate spec) 2. Producer coverage treated as optional corpus scope; should be hard T-E-P-Producer-Broadening prerequisite 3. Stale/non-in-repo planning authority cited; should be r3-structure.md row 146 (T-LBP slice 1) All three BLOCKING findings VALID — substrate-grep-before-authoring discipline failure on my part (feedback_substrate_grep_before_authoring already memorialized; violated own discipline). Rewrite delegates carrier shape, dimension wiring, and consumer rewrite to live design doc §§1.1-1.6 verbatim: - §1.1 SymbolicCost — already at algebra.dag; no change - §1.2 SizeVariable — display_name enrichment - §1.3 work_dimension + span_dimension — two AnalysisDimension instances - §1.4 AsymptoticClass + BoundedLattice instance - §1.5 Certainty (cost-aware composition; no lattice) - §1.6 cost_bound_to_symbolic projection - §1.7 ComplexitySummary record + lens widening T-E-P P1 hard prerequisite per design's authority discipline + r3- structure.md row 146; STOP-and-PING if T-E-P P1 not COMPLETE at slice authoring time. Authority cites updated to live r3-structure.md row 146. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-PerfWithinBaseline canvas — DRAFT (canvas-tier P1 procedure per Q6 RATIFIED) Director Q6 RATIFIED canvas-tier-required at gunb-ai/gunbc#828 c#4403163639 for PerfWithinBaseline TestPredicate variant authoring. Three substantive substrate-shape questions resolved: Q1 baseline shape: (a) literal-Int rejected as strict-mirror-of-CostBounded defeats semantic load; (b) DeclarationRef-to-stored-data composes LensOutputEquals + data X: SymbolicCost precedent at HEAD; (c) runtime- fixture-injection over-authors. Mgr lean (b). Q2 ComparisonOp composition: (i) reuse existing ComparisonOp via test- runner-side resolution matches LensOutputEquals path; (ii) new relative- op-set introduces parallel-representation debt. Mgr lean (i). Q3 baseline-storage scope: (α) in-scope slice authors example data; (β) out-of-scope variant-only slice + PB consumer authors baseline data matches existing layering. Mgr lean (β). Combined Mgr lean: Q1(b) + Q2(i) + Q3(β) — variant authored as compositional extension; baseline-storage is PB consumer-tier work. Cross-Mgr: PB Mgr #2138 worker (crisp-swift-433) holds dispatch on #2204 land; T-Tier3-Dissolution #2085 R-4 prereq encoded. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-PerfWithinBaseline canvas REVISED (supersedes wrong-shape original) Director disposition at gunb-ai/gunbc#828 c#4403265220 authorized supersession after BLOCKING at PR #2209 c#4403246233 verified VALID: original canvas conflated symbolic SymbolicCost (cost-lens substrate) with wall-clock measured median/p99 baseline (T-Tier3 perf gate substrate per docs/r3-structure.md:225 + :461 Director-locked 2026-04-28). Revised canvas frames as two-path ratification: - P1 author full perf-budget substrate in-R3 (multi-slice; pattern-5 genuinely-novel substrate-fact-introduction) - P2 explicitly post-R3 per Director-locked recommendation (zero in-R3 effort; structural close per r3-structure.md:461 'R3 deliverable is structural close; perf is downstream') Mgr lean: P2 — Director-locked recommendation explicit; trigger- condition ('someone authors perf-budget claim with concrete numbers and tooling') not met; R3 horizon constraint argues against multi- slice perf-budget substrate adding to 5-orthogonal-dependency picture. Original canvas at q-perf-within-baseline-canvas.md retained with SUPERSEDED-BY header per durable-decision-record discipline. 5th discipline-failure of 2026-05-08 cycle: substrate-grep verified substrate-precedent but missed consumer-side requirement at canonical authority doc; Director self-flagged symmetric two-axis verification gap; canvas-finding-taxonomy needs precondition 'consumer-side requirement grep-verified at canonical authority doc'. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-PerfWithinBaseline canvas-revised — correct trigger-condition framing per Director c#4403297623 Director caught second-axis grep failure on revised canvas: my P2 reasoning #1 ("path-trigger condition for P1 is not met") was structurally wrong. Existing tooling at HEAD substantially meets the Director-locked 2026-04-28 trigger-condition ("someone authors the perf-budget claim with concrete numbers and tooling"): - docs/briefs/r3-pb-tier3-perf-budget-worker.md - docs/audit/c1-tier3-perf-budget-readiness-matrix.md - src/v3/compiler/benches/tier3_mirror_perf.rs - docs/audit/c1-tier3-baseline-capture-procedure.md - docs/audit/c1-r3-canonical-bench-host-decision-matrix.md Plus thresholds (≤2× median, ≤5× p99) + capture discipline (N=3 min, N=5 preferred) + canonical bench host option matrix. P1 is bridging existing tooling to substrate (compositional-extension), NOT multi-slice greenfield genuinely-novel pattern-5 as originally framed. Smaller scope than canvas-finding-taxonomy pattern 5 implies. Path-call genuinely depends on PB Mgr's R-3 (canonical CI bench host) + R-7 (tier3_baseline.json baseline-capture path) decisions per their audit response at c#4403059897. Path-call DEFERRED to cross-Mgr coordination outcome with PB Mgr (#2074); Substrate Mgr surfaces with corrected framing this turn. Sixth discipline-failure of cycle (mine, second-axis grep gap on existing-tooling state); same-class as Director's first-axis grep gap on consumer-side requirement at the prior turn. Memorialized as two-axis verification discipline anchor. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-ValueBody-Drift-Resolution canvas — DRAFT (codegen-generation lean) D1 substrate-shape question per Q-ValueBody-Isomorphism RATIFIED at gunb-ai/gunbc#828 c#4403972737. Variant-inventory readiness input from PR #2218 (merged 2026-05-08) confirms drift: Rust 5 variants vs substrate 3 constructors; asymmetry on Scalar+List Rust-only + Map payload-parity-with-semantic-gap. Two-axis verification at HEAD: - Substrate-precedent: codegen tooling exists (regen_bootstrap_emit; 5 _generated.rs files; regen_bootstrap binary). Pattern-3 strict- mirror codegen extension applies; no pattern-5 P1 procedure. - Consumer-side requirement: V1 worker brief explicitly names mirror- parity-vs-codegen-generation as D1 path-pair. Mgr lean: (b) codegen-generation. Path (a) mirror-parity perpetuates parallel-representation debt; (b) dissolves the dual-taxonomy class by construction (substrate canonical, Rust codegens). Map dup-key gap handled via (ii) Rust-side post-codegen wrapping (substrate stays minimal). Director ratification ask: D1 (b) + D1-followup (ii). Carrier slice path post-ratification: extend regen_bootstrap_emit; add Scalar+List constructors to substrate; regen + remove hand-Rust enum; handle Map dup-key per ratified followup. Worker pin fresh-pool per same-window-dispatch. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(proposals): Q-ValueBody-Drift-Resolution canvas amend authority cite (codex BLOCKING fix) Director ratified (α) amendment-PR at gunb-ai/gunbc#828 c#4404398425 post-codex-BLOCKING at PR #2222 c#4404360699. Canvas originally cited regen_bootstrap_emit.rs as codegen authority for ValueBody runtime mirror; corrected to scripts/regen_runtime_mirrors.py which is the substrate→Rust runtime-mirror generator (reads substrate.dag, emits dag_scalar_generated.rs etc.). regen_bootstrap_emit.rs is a separate codegen system that generates bootstrap_generated.rs (bootstrap parser/lower compile snapshot). D1 (b) codegen-generation ratification UNCHANGED; only authority-path cites corrected. Carrier slice path at canvas §6-step plan now references correct runtime-mirror generator. Canvas inline notes mark amendment location for future-reader audit trail. 8th cycle-tier framing-failure (Mgr-tier; same fine-granularity gap parallel to Director-tier failure at c#4404256128). Two-axis verification discipline applied at insufficient granularity (verified codegen-tooling- exists but didn't disambiguate against bootstrap-vs-runtime-mirror systems). Discipline anchor refinement: when canvas cites a codegen system / tooling / authority path, identify the SPECIFIC generator/handler for the target-file-class. Don't accept 'tooling exists' at coarse granularity. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: reconcile cross_target_coverage emission_path_projections post-population drift cross_target_coverage.dag:179 + sg0_census_test.rs:355 still described emission_path_projections as `(empty data state)` / `== []`, but the data block at cross_target_coverage.dag:186 is populated with 41 Phase-1 rows (Rust 13 / Python 16 / Go 12). Update both comment sites to reflect the populated state. P1 Modeling Faithfulness — comment-drift only, no behavior change. Surfaced by gentle-newt-665 R3 Debt-Paydown ROADMAP audit at gunb-ai/gunbc#2062; absorbed into Substrate lane (#1939) per L6 emission_path_projections carrier ownership. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: pad cross_target_coverage.dag comment to preserve byte offsets Previous comment edit changed line 179 length 76→75, shifting SourceSpan byte offsets in bootstrap_generated.rs by 1 and breaking regen_bootstrap --verify in CI. Pad with one extra dash to restore original 76-char length; comment text intent unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * fix(canvas): clarify Source param doesn't carry subject identity (P2) Reviewer flagged on PR #2333 inline review: parametric form WorkflowObservationAnchor<BehaviorId, TimingMeasurement> would create redundant subject-identity authority if TimingMeasurement carries subject identity (P2 violation). Clarify Q-WAD-S2-Anchor (b) so Source parameter is observed-payload-only; subject identity is owned solely by Subject parameter. In worker's actual PR #2360 shape, TimingMeasurement is variant-typed report state (Observed { nanoseconds } | Missing | ...) and does NOT carry subject identity — concern is theoretical there but worth clarifying canvas language for clean Director ratification. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(canvas): correct fail-closed analysis for LensEnforcement.violates signature Reviewer flagged BLOCKING on PR #2333 inline review (canvas:90): LensEnforcement.violates signature is (Budget, Budget) -> Bool per src/v3/std/lens_application.dag:100 — does NOT see raw Output. Original canvas claim 'fail-closed: violates = Output != Observed' was structurally wrong. Updated: - (a) clarified: projection step (Output → Budget) must fabricate violating Budget for non-Observed variants (option (a)(i)) OR substrate-extend the violates signature (option (a)(ii)) which is canvas-tier and cascades across all lens consumers. - Added option (c) reflecting worker tidy-raven-610 PR #2360 shape: Output folded into TimingMeasurement carrier directly, Budget projection handles fabrication naturally. Status: shape ratification still pending Director per #828 c#4412018726. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(canvas): add 🟢 dissolution classification to TimingObservationOutcome variants Reviewer flagged BLOCKING on PR #2333 inline review (canvas:86): proposed sum has no 🟢/🟡/🔴 dissolution receipt per INVARIANTS P5 / modeling-discipline.md §coproduct dissolution. Worker could land unclassified coproduct. Added 🟢 GREEN (terminal) classification to both option (a) TimingObservationOutcome and option (c) folded TimingMeasurement — four variants exhaust externally-attested observation states; no richer-source-extraction path exists at the workflow-observation boundary. Worker .dag declarations MUST carry the 🟢 marker comment per modeling-discipline.md:132. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(canvas): correct Q-WAD-S2-Placement to src/v3/std/ (not dsl/std/) Reviewer flagged BLOCKING on PR #2333 inline review (canvas:108): recommending dsl/std/timing_lens.dag conflicts with src/v3/std/lens.dag:17-21 v3-only-carriers convention. Worker would land substrate in wrong layer. Earlier canvas claim 'T-LBP / T-CostLens / T-LAS lens carriers all live in dsl/std/' was factually wrong — they live in src/v3/std/ and src/v3/lenses/. Corrected to src/v3/std/timing_lens.dag throughout. Worker PR #2360 already placed at correct path; canvas now matches. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(canvas): make six gate #55 invariants concrete fields on anchor (P2) Reviewer flagged BLOCKING on PR #2333 inline review (canvas:75): the recommended <Subject, Source> parametric shape only named type params and didn't assign digest/producer/observer/prover/timestamp/run-id/ report-state to a single carrier — gate #55 facts wouldn't flow forward under P2 boundary discipline. Fixed: Q-WAD-S2-Anchor (b) now shows explicit six-invariant field schema as concrete fields (subject/artifact_digest/producer_id/ observer_id/prover_id/attached_at/workflow_run_id/observation_outcome) with Subject + Source as type parameters for variable parts only. Notes worker tidy-raven-610 PR #2360 flat shape is already gate-#55-compliant at the field level; convergence path is adding type parameters to the flat shape (minimal rework). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(canvas): correct convergence assessment — invariant 5 split-authority in worker shape Reviewer flagged BLOCKING on PR #2333 inline review (canvas:96): claiming worker's flat anchor shape gate-#55-compliant drops invariant 5 (observation_outcome / report-state) from the anchor. Worker's TimingMeasurement variants carry report-state on the payload, not on the anchor — splits P2 single-authority for invariant 5. Fixed: convergence assessment now correctly identifies 5/6 invariants on anchor + invariant 5 split. Path requires TWO edits not one: (1) add <Subject, Source> type parameters to anchor; (2) add observation_outcome: ObservationOutcome<Source> field to anchor itself. This collapses Q-WAD-S2-Output (c) folded shape back to (a)(i) separate-projection — trade-off documented (single-authority preserved at cost of one extra type). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(canvas): reject (a)(i) Budget fabrication per P3/C-8 fail-closed (canvas:118) Reviewer flagged BLOCKING on PR #2333 inline review (canvas:118): recommending projection fabricates violating Budget for non-Observed states violates INVARIANTS P3/C-8 fail-closed discipline — erases typed Missing/Ambiguous/Stale failure evidence into a plausible budget value. Consumers downstream of violates can't distinguish 'budget exceeded by observed value' from 'no observation existed'. Fixed: (a)(i) REJECTED with explicit P3/C-8 rationale. Added (a)(iii) Result-typed projection with auto_violate_on_left bit — smaller substrate change than (ii) full-signature-extension. Director-tier disposition still required for (ii) or (iii); (i) no longer a viable path. Convergence implications for worker PR #2360 + canvas (c) folded shape need re-assessment in next pass — (c) sidesteps the violates signature collision but invariant 5 split-authority (per canvas:96 fix in 960a03f98) means observation_outcome belongs on anchor not payload, which then re-introduces the violates-Output-visibility question via ObservationOutcome typing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(canvas): propagate (a)(i) rejection across all recommendation/status refs Earlier commit 594a4df9c rejected (a)(i) Budget fabrication per P3/C-8 inline review. Updated remaining 3 refs to reflect: - Q-WAD-S2-Anchor convergence trade-off line - Q-WAD-S2-Output recommendation: now (a)(ii)/(a)(iii) pending Director - Q3 (c) Status line: Director call is (a)(ii)/(a)(iii) vs (c) (a)(i) is REJECTED throughout; Director-tier LensEnforcement substrate change unavoidable for fail-closed-correct anchor-side report-state carriage. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(canvas): correct invariant-6 claim — fail-closed needs LensEnforcement substrate-extension Reviewer flagged BLOCKING on PR #2333 inline review (canvas:91): claim 'all six invariants concrete fields on anchor' was wrong — invariant 6 (fail-closed) explicitly lives at LensEnforcement.violates layer, not on the anchor. Without Q-WAD-S2-Output (a)(ii)/(a)(iii) substrate- extension landing, gate #55 cannot close on 5/6 — would let consumers attach observation facts without fail-closed evidence (P2/P3 violation). Fixed: clarified 5/6 invariants on anchor + invariant 6 dependency on Director-tier LensEnforcement substrate-extension. Gate #55 closure explicitly cross-linked to canvas:118 escalation thread. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(canvas): Output (a) variants wrap Source not TimingMeasurement (P2) Reviewer flagged BLOCKING on PR #2333 inline review (canvas:112): Output (a) Observed{value: TimingMeasurement} would wrap the report-state-bearing TimingMeasurement type, duplicating identity/attestation/report-state with the anchor's invariant 5 authority. Reopens P2 split-authority. Fixed: Observed wraps payload-only Source (e.g., TimingPayload { nanoseconds: Int }), NOT TimingMeasurement. Per Q-WAD-S2-Anchor revised convergence: subject identity / attestation / report-state on anchor; payload carries only observed-value-when-present. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(canvas): split gate #55 + canonicalize TimingPayload (parent BLOCKING b526a26f) Reviewer flagged 2 BLOCKING on PR #2333 parent review at sha b526a26f: Finding 1 (gate #55 mixes anchor-fact + fail-closed): added gate #55a/#55b split — #55a = anchor carrier landed (worker scope); #55b = LensEnforcement substrate-extension landed across all lens consumers (canvas-tier separate dispatch, owner: Substrate Mgr). Finding 2 (TimingMeasurement overload): added Naming canonicalization section to Carrier inventory. TimingPayload = observed-value-only; WorkflowObservationAnchor = observation record; ObservationOutcome = report state; TimingObservationSet = lens C (per Q1 ratification). Earlier TimingMeasurement references deprecated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(canvas): rewrite Carrier inventory to reflect Director ratification of worker shape Reviewer flagged BLOCKING on PR #2333 inline review (canvas:35): old carrier inventory still said TimingMeasurement owns subject identity + observer attestation, contradicting revised anchor authority. Same-day Director re-ratification at #828 c#4412301889 reversed the canvas (b) recommendations and ratified worker tidy-raven-610's shape as-shipped: - TimingMeasurement = Observed | Missing | Ambiguous | Stale (carrier-as-report-state; owns invariant 5 via variants) - WorkflowObservationAnchor = timing-specific concrete fields (Q-WAD-S2-Anchor (a) ratified; owns invariants 1-4) - TimingObservationSet = aggregation collection - Lens<TimingMeasurement> per-observation Fixed: rewrote Carrier inventory to reflect Director-ratified shape; explicit invariant ownership (anchor: 1-5; LensEnforcement: 6 via gate #55b separate dispatch). TimingPayload canonicalization (which contradicted Director ratification) removed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(canvas): resolve option (c) Pro/Con contradiction on signature collision Reviewer flagged BLOCKING on PR #2333 inline review (canvas:137): option (c) Pro line said 'avoids violates signature collision entirely' but lines 135/139 routed back to (a)(ii)/(a)(iii) — internal contradiction; fail-closed obligation under P3/C-8 still ambiguous. Fixed: rewrote (c) Pro/Con honestly — Pro = state-space discipline (per Director's ratification reasoning); Con = does NOT sidestep violates signature collision, still requires substrate-extension path. Status updated to reflect Director ratification at #828 c#4412301889: (c) carrier shape ratified for worker scope (#55a); LensEnforcement substrate-extension disposition (#55b) still pending between (a)(ii) and (a)(iii). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(v3): LensEnforcement.auto_violate_on_left for observation-driven lenses Per Director ratification at gunb-ai/gunbc#828 c#4412884371 + re-confirmation at c#4413159089: extend LensEnforcement<Output, Budget> with additive auto_violate_on_left: Bool field for observation-driven lens classes (T-Workflow-As-Data Slice 2 timing-lens et seq.). Substrate semantics: when Output is Result-typed (e.g., Result<Observed, ObservationFailure> for timing), runtime checks the bit before calling project; on Result-Left + bit=true, enforcement violates without fabricating a Budget value at the projection boundary. Preserves typed failure evidence (Missing/Ambiguous/Stale/ Unobserved) per INVARIANTS P3/C-8 fail-closed discipline. Backward-compatible additive: existing structural-static lenses (complexity, cost, T-LAS) set the bit to false; bit is inert when Output is not Result-typed. Updated complexity_enforcement declaration + hand-Rust LensEnforcement struct mirror. Closes §1.8 ledger #55 sub-gate b (LensEnforcement substrate-extension prerequisite for fail-closed-correct enforcement on non-Observed report states); enables T-Workflow-As-Data Slice 2 worker (tidy-raven-610 #2359) to revise PR #2360 against the ratified Result-typed Output shape. Canvas authority: docs/briefs/r3-substrate-t-wad-slice-2-timing-lens-canvas.md §"Question 3 (Q-WAD-S2-Output)" + Gate #55 closure-predicate split. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Revert "feat(v3): LensEnforcement.auto_violate_on_left for observation-driven lenses" This reverts commit 5ec59209d1c561788a4f6f686d8d1f62daf086ef. * fix(canvas): Q-WAD-S2-Anchor recommendation aligned to Director ratification of (a) Reviewer flagged BLOCKING on PR #2333 inline review (canvas:99): canvas still recommended (b) generic anchor after Director ratified (a) timing-specific. Competing WorkflowObservationAnchor authorities = P2 violation. Fixed: Q-WAD-S2-Anchor recommendation rewritten to reflect Director RATIFIED (a) per #828 c#4412301889 + c#4413322671. Mgr-tier preliminary (b) was over-engineered (chased hypothetical second-consumer parameterization). Invariant 5 split-authority concern resolved at LensEnforcement layer per (a)(ii) full-signature extension (Director c#4413284764) — violates pattern-matches Output variants directly, no observation_outcome projection wrapper needed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 …
…#88) Register the new EXPECTED_HAND_AUTHORED_TEST path in §SG-0 hand-authored integration test receipts per Dispatch-Discipline Mechanism (b). Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
…ace) (#3125) * test(T-LAS): CI ratchet for §1.8 gate #88 lens application carriers - Integration tests lock EnforcedApplication (3 typarams, 5 fields) and IntrospectApplication (1 typaram, 3 fields) on generated_full_bootstrap_dag - SG-0: register new hand-authored test module (sorted after t_las_*) - r3-program-plan: note harness on row #88; align row #90 with Projected PR checklist (census net +1): include in PR body verbatim: SG-0 hand-path delta: +1 SG-0 pairing: (c) substrate dispatch receipts docs/briefs/r3-substrate-t-las-demo-complexity-contract-compile-error-worker.md Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * ci: prepend SG-0 PR-body pairing for census +1 (#3125) PR #3125 edits sg0_census_test.rs (+1 EXPECTED_HAND_AUTHORED_TEST) but the GitHub PR description lacked required SG-0 hand-path delta + pairing, failing the CI job. ci.yml merges scripts/ci-merge/sg0-pr-body-append.<n>.txt before the discipline gate. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * docs(INVARIANTS): P5 receipt for t_lens_application_carrier_test (gate #88) Register the new EXPECTED_HAND_AUTHORED_TEST path in §SG-0 hand-authored integration test receipts per Dispatch-Discipline Mechanism (b). Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * ci: align SG-0 pairing #3125 brief with Slice A gates #88–#91 Pairing cited gate #92 demo brief; executor brief r3-v-t-lens-application-surface- execution-split-worker.md owns §1.8 gates #88–#91 incl. lens_application_carrier_landed. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
… SupplierHypothesis. The roster is executed today only by the identity-join witness; §3c requires the later consumers and their triggers beside the list. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Summary
This PR reorganizes the SDLC provider implementations (ClaimStore, OutcomeLedger, SignalStore, ArtifactStore) from inline service definitions in profile files into dedicated, separately-compiled modules. This improves modularity, testability, and maintainability of the provider layer.
Key Changes
Extracted provider modules: Created new dedicated
.dagfiles for each provider implementation:dsl/services/sdlc/providers/gcs_claim_store.dagdsl/services/sdlc/providers/gcs_outcome_ledger.dagdsl/services/sdlc/providers/pubsub_signal_store.dagdsl/services/sdlc/providers/gcs_artifact_store.dagdsl/services/sdlc/providers/file_claim_store.dagdsl/services/sdlc/providers/file_outcome_ledger.dagdsl/services/sdlc/providers/file_signal_store.dagdsl/services/sdlc/providers/inline_artifact_store.dagCleaned up profile files: Removed inline service definitions from
dsl/profiles/local.daganddsl/profiles/cloud_run.dag, replacing them with import references to the new provider modulesAdded provider configuration: Enhanced GCS providers with explicit
endpointandauthconfiguration fields for better REST transport bindingRemoved obsolete integration tests: Deleted
sdlc_integration.rs,sdlc_handlers.rs,sdlc_worker.rs, andsdlc_scenario.rstest files that were testing compilation and DryRun execution — these are now covered by the testgen infrastructureUpdated test discovery: Modified
dag_test_discovery.rsto usecallable_countinstead offunc_count, reflecting support for multiple callable item types (func, fn, pattern, pipeline)Added contract testing design: Introduced
docs/design/contract-testing.mddocumenting a three-phase approach to verify provider behavior against interface contractsFixed variable references: Corrected parameter passing in
dsl/infra/sdlc/deploy.dag(e.g.,project→project_id)Updated test fixtures: Adjusted expected node counts in workflow fixture JSON files to reflect the new module structure
Implementation Details
Each provider module now:
The refactoring maintains backward compatibility — profiles still bind interfaces to the same concrete implementations, just via module imports rather than inline definitions.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01PmLvshGhZGoEvfDdiLawFj