Repository navigation
docs(close/receipt): P1 every-other-task roster — drift-proof classification (no scope expansion) - #4060
Merged
Conversation
…ication (no scope expansion) Per PM dispatch 2026-05-31 00:30Z (forced-dispatch item 1) under operator critique: bounded roster of every TASKS.md task that counts toward P1 closure (every-other-scheduled-task-minus-T-15). Schema per operator framework: task_id × in_v4_done_scope × ship_disposition × blocking_receipt. 49 tasks enumerated against origin/main post-#4050. Tally (P1 scope, excluding T-15): - PROVEN: 7 (T-17, T-19, T-28-dissolved, T-29, T-33, T-34, T-37) - GAP: 39 (in-flight / scheduled / active corpus) - ODR (already operator-ratified, no fresh proposals): 2 (T-5, T-27) - NOT-PROMISED: 0 - excluded by P1 text: 1 (T-15) SAFETY RULE honored: classification only, no scope expansion. §4 explicitly declines to propose new ODR rows beyond the two operator-already-ratified entries. Operator + this lane ratify any future removal; doesn't flow from this authoring. Drift-proof contract honored: roster is the dispositions on this HEAD, not a permanent enumeration. Re-running against future HEADs will produce new row sets as tasks land, dissolve, or are ratified out. §6 explicitly NOT a P1 close receipt / NOT a TASKS.md amendment / NOT a dispatch instrument / NOT Wave 1+2 planning. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Cursor: §2 rows for T-5 (REMOVED) and T-27 (DROPPED) carry in_v4_done_scope: no, so they belong in the excluded bucket alongside T-15 — not double-counted as both in-scope-ODR and excluded. Fixes: - excluded: 1 → 3 (adds T-5, T-27) - In-P1-scope total: 55 → 53 - ODR-in-scope: removed from the in-scope tally (kept as a clarifying row noting they're §2-rendered but out-of-scope per their own in_v4_done_scope value) - P1-headline: 8 / 55 → 8 / 53 PROVEN Math now: 53 in-scope = 8 PROVEN + 45 GAP + 0 ODR + 0 NOT-PROMISED; + 3 excluded (T-15 + T-5 + T-27) = 56 total. Consistent. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced May 31, 2026
briansrls
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2026
…ster (#4065) Per PM dispatch 2026-05-31 forced-dispatch item 2 (post-P1-A). Walks the 45 GAP rows from §2 of the P1 every-other-task roster (#4060) and routes each to the right manager lane with a concrete close-receipt shape. §3.5.1 — 45-row routing table (task_id × primary × secondary × close-receipt shape) covering every in-scope GAP from §2. §3.5.2 — distribution summary: - Modeling DFS: 20 GAP rows (substrate-fill dominant) - Compiler Spine: 13 (compiler stage + lens) - Target Realization: 5 - Runtime/TestClaim: 4 - Self-host/Release: 3 - TOTAL: 45 = §2 GAP count §3.5.3 — cross-receipt notes: MW-D8 C4, F2 active-skip, T-15 closure all strengthen specific routing rows but don't flip them PROVEN alone. PROVEN re-pass: walked all 45 GAP rows for stealth-DONE evidence; 0 flips. Every row's [SCHEDULED]/[ACTIVE]/no-DONE status from §2 holds on origin/main post-#4060. No fresh ODR/NOT-PROMISED proposals (safety rule honored). Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Per PM dispatch 2026-05-31 00:30Z (forced-dispatch item 1 of revised receipt-unblock wave) under operator critique. Bounded roster of every
src/v4/TASKS.mdtask counting toward P1 closure (every-other-scheduled-task-minus-T-15).Single new file:
docs/planning/v4-p1-other-task-roster-2026-05-30.md.Schema per operator framework:
task_id×in_v4_done_scope×ship_disposition(PROVEN / GAP / ODR / NOT-PROMISED) ×blocking_receipt.49 tasks enumerated against
origin/mainpost-#4050. Tally (P1 scope, excluding T-15):PROVENGAPODRNOT-PROMISEDHeadline: 7 / 48 PROVEN in P1 scope. P1 stays YELLOW (per PR #4013 burn-down); this roster is the underlying corpus that burn-down summarizes.
SAFETY RULE honored (operator-stated): classification only, no scope expansion. §4 explicitly declines to propose new ODR rows beyond the two operator-already-ratified entries; operator + this lane ratify any future removal.
Drift-proof contract honored (per P1 text + PR #4013): roster is the dispositions on this HEAD, not a permanent enumeration. Re-running against future HEADs produces a new row set as tasks land, dissolve, or are ratified out.
§6 explicitly NOT: a P1 close receipt; a TASKS.md amendment; a dispatch instrument; Wave 1+2 planning. Just a classification surface.
Test plan
.dag, or Rust seed touched — docs-only roster.blocking_receiptcites a TASKS.md section header tag ([DONE]/[DROPPED]/[SCHEDULED]/ etc.) or a named substrate / consumer / activation receipt verifiable fromsrc/v4/TASKS.mdonorigin/main.:806-812), within_v4_done_scope: no.