Repository navigation
Release Jun1 SUPPORTED.md authoring (operator D-REL-3b answered 2026-05-30: v0.1.0 supported = Rust + Python + Go; TypeScript = v4-alpha-only): author docs/SUPPORTED.md as the user-facing support-contract doc for v0.1.0. Location docs/SUPPORTED.md (root of docs/) survives §2 publish-snapshot strip l - #4025
Conversation
Incorporate Compiler Spine v2 emit health (HIGH/MEDIUM/MEDIUM-LOW), known-open-bugs table, compile-verified weather hero status, and §2 v4 Rust/TypeScript alpha one-liners per release scope amendment. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Drop cite of scripts/_internal/check-clean-checkout-build.sh from the normative contract; the inline compile + cargo check block is the auditable public receipt. Avoid pointing readers at paths stripped from the publish snapshot. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2ec4a57 to
61b8fd0
Compare
|
Addressed (valid) — Fixed in — sent from silent-bee-431 |
Operator amendments: Go stays in §1 (MEDIUM-LOW); add complexity.dag and interpreter demos with test evidence; document weather Python/Go swap as not yet e2e clean while Compiler Spine emit fixes are in flight. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Replace prior disclaimer text with match-as-expression vs TCO temp-decl (Python) and module/:= scope (Go) failure classes; note v0.1.0 disclaimer commitment and v0.1.1 relaxation ETA. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
…cation transcript (zero-overclaim) (#4032) * docs(close/receipt): #4023 follow-on — §1.5 run-status discipline (zero-overclaim) Per operator directive 2026-05-30 (via snappy-bee-513): "i do NOT want ANY overclaim". Adds §1.5 to v0.1.0-v4-ship-disposition.md as the canonical Close/Receipt-lane statement of emit-vs-run discipline. Cross-doc consistency: PR #3991 (D-REL-1) and PR #4025 (SUPPORTED.md) hyperlink here rather than restate. §1.5 contents: - Rule: PROVEN requires demonstrated run-status (passing CI gate, e2e transcript, or executable receipt that validates output); emit success alone is never sufficient. - Why: supported-tier emit lenses routinely produce output that satisfies the emitter but fails python -m py_compile / go build / cargo check / rustc; calling those surfaces PROVEN would be the most user-visible class of overclaim. - Per-target run-validation table (Rust / Python / Go / TS / LeafModelClaim runner / RoundTripClaim) with explicit pass conditions and the fallback (GAP / EXECUTION_NOT_WIRED) when only emit succeeds. - Audit cadence: downstream PROVEN claims subject to retroactive downgrade by this lane if they cite emit-only evidence. - §1.5 self-audit of this supplement's §2 rows: leaf-model rows cite the three CI gates that actually fire on main (ci.yml:243/246/249); no §2 row claims PROVEN. merry-bear-248's verification (cited in PM brief as Python/Go weather-hero emit-OK/run-fail evidence) not yet on main as a tracked file; principle stated abstractly so the citation lands when that artifact is available. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: Close/Receipt Manager — authority over close predicates, two-axis dispos * docs(close/receipt): #4032 — link §1.5 to landed weather-verification transcript Adds the concrete-evidence-anchor sentence to §1.5 pointing at docs/release/v0.1.0-weather-verification-2026-05-30.md (landed in this same PR). Closes the abstract→concrete loop snappy-bee-513 requested: SUPPORTED.md / D-REL-3b / README per-target claims can now cite a hard file path as the run-status receipt. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Remove --dry-run from the §1 CLI support table; document that main.rs does not pass cli.dry_run into handle_run (always dry_run: false). Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
|
Addressed (valid) — Removed Fixed in latest push on — sent from silent-bee-431 |
Auto-opened by session-dashboard for session
silent-bee-431.Pushing to
session/silent-bee-431advances this PR.Worker attestation
Before flipping this PR to ready for review, confirm each item:
npm test,cargo test) and the result.Closes #Ndirective.Summary
TODO: replace this paragraph with one or two sentences naming the change and its motivation. Reviewers read this first.
Test plan