Repository navigation
Sat May 16 - #3287
Closed
briansrls wants to merge 10 commits into
Closed
Sat May 16#3287briansrls wants to merge 10 commits into
briansrls wants to merge 10 commits into
Conversation
…🟡 plan-binding BLOCKING codex review (#3244, sha 15242ef + inline :257): #3244 made 🟡 plan-binding universal (every 🟡 binds a named primitive + owning substrate PR + dissolve-on-arrival follow-up), but Practice 4's scaffold exception still let the DECISIONS.md ledger defer wholesale and treated `feature:<sunset-milestone>` itself as the gate. A milestone-only gate leaves the dissolution path non-checkable, and a wholly-deferred ledger has nowhere to record the plan-binding. Fix: the scaffold exception now defers only the verbose patterns-tried analysis — NOT the 🟡's bound dissolution plan, which is the minimum that makes a 🟡 valid and is recorded even for a scaffold. The gate names the concrete missing primitive; a bare sunset-milestone is not a valid gate (the milestone records when revisited, not what is awaited). Audit also surfaced a minor gap: the Calibration section's general NON-BLOCKING tier did not cross-reference that dissolution findings are an always-BLOCKING class — added that line so a dissolution finding cannot be read as a NON-BLOCKING cleanup. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…2-scaffold-exception-reconcile
…2-scaffold-exception-reconcile
…2-scaffold-exception-reconcile
…2-scaffold-exception-reconcile
…2-scaffold-exception-reconcile
…2-scaffold-exception-reconcile
…2-scaffold-exception-reconcile
…2-scaffold-exception-reconcile
…2-scaffold-exception-reconcile
Contributor
Author
|
Closing as redundant. This draft was auto-opened on branch session/still-hawk-102-scaffold-exception-reconcile, whose substantive commit (ac53a5b, modeling-discipline scaffold-exception reconcile) already merged to main via #3260 on 2026-05-18. The branch has no effective diff vs main (0 files; only churn merge-commits since). Nothing to implement or flip to ready here. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Auto-opened by session-dashboard for session
still-hawk-102.Pushing to
session/still-hawk-102-scaffold-exception-reconcileadvances this PR.Worker attestation
Before flipping this PR to ready for review, confirm each item:
npm test,cargo test) and the result.Closes #Ndirective.Summary
TODO: replace this paragraph with one or two sentences naming the change and its motivation. Reviewers read this first.
Test plan