Repository navigation
R3 Debt-Paydown Mgr — lane through R3 close - #3043
Conversation
Removes stale '+30 / 9-day' as contemporaneous Alarm 2 state; it was §3 2026-05-09 extrapolation shorthand, not the same rolling-7d convention as Alarm 1 per review 9697. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Repair missing closing backtick so `169 (50 / 117 / 2)` renders (Codex 981x non-blocking). Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
noop: prior Actions attempt left fmt/ci/changes/v3 cancelled mid-flight against same head SHA while self_host_ratchet stayed queued — fresh SHA escapes the duplicate-run cancel window without changing docs. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
noop: supersede zombie workflow whose jobs were starvation-cancelled mid-flight. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Second noop: prior run stuck queued with cancelled leaf jobs; CLI rerun blocked. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
- Anchor when Σ=169 row was logged vs 7d velocity-walk window - Per-slice intros/dissolves + path lists; rename caveat (cost_lens move) - Stratum read: NON_TEST +3 compiler/WAD/#87 vs TEST +4 instruments Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Per-PR minimum drop min(5,before); when before<5 require after=0 so closure PRs are satisfiable through PB-zero. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Per-PR cadence + before<5 => after=0 discoverable from ledger; links Mgr brief. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Single bar: after<before in tail; after=0 on closing merge; P5 split requires maximal subset + PR-body i–iii + bound follow-up; gate #8 ledger matches brief. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Single-authority for tail/P5 cadence; ledger row keeps targets + link. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
- Pre-authored cycle-2 NON_TEST retirement worker brief (queue on PR #3014) - Audit: host mirror symbol inventory, consumer wiring map, sequencing + worker stub Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
…pi-review) Frontmatter + §0 single status; §1 drops stale DECLARED blockquote; points to live §1.8 row #63. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
briansrls
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review metadata
- Provider / model:
codex/unknown - Commit:
18de9c85· Trigger:schedule - Thinking:
112s wall
BLOCKING (1)
Root Cause
docs/briefs/r3-substrate-gate-63-workflow-scheduling-canvas.mdCanvas status was promoted independently of the ledger authority → either update docs/r3-program-plan.md row #63 in the same change or phrase the canvas as Director-ratified while the ledger remains DECLARED/pending maintenance.
| ## §0. Status | ||
|
|
||
| DECLARED at `docs/r3-program-plan.md:291` (NEW 2026-05-06). T-WAD Wave-1 substrate just landed extensively in this Substrate-mgr lane (PR #2774 Slice 4 YamlStatic, PR #2808 Slice 5 BinaryShim, PR #2798 Slice 7 affected-set, PR #2823 gate #62 FileAttachment). snappy-bear-502 was auto-spawned without authored brief and surfaced a clean STOP-condition audit revealing partial-landing state. | ||
| **Single visible surface:** §1.8 row **#63** is **CANVAS_RATIFIED** (2026-05-13, PR **#2831** squash `89df284e3`; Director **msg_804cdc93** — **Q1=Candidate A** administrative closure path). **CONSUMER_LANDED** and **PASSING** are **not** claimed at ratification — program-plan **Notes** + worker brief `docs/briefs/r3-substrate-gate-63-workflow-scheduling-worker.md` own executable closure. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
BLOCKING: The new “Single visible surface” says §1.8 row #63 is CANVAS_RATIFIED, but the authoritative row in docs/r3-program-plan.md §1.8 still reads DECLARED in this PR, creating a parallel status authority under INVARIANTS P2.
|
Re cursor review 11439 @ `18de9c858` (APPROVE) Verified: Net diff is the gate-#63 canvas alignment only; no compiler / hand-Rust / test surface. Ledger row #63 on `origin/main` and this branch’s `docs/r3-program-plan.md` is CANVAS_RATIFIED with PR #2831 / msg_804cdc93 / Q1=Candidate A — matches the review’s read. APPROVE absorbed. Re inline BLOCKING @ `r3-substrate-gate-63-workflow-scheduling-canvas.md:17` (“§1.8 still DECLARED”) Verified on PR HEAD `18de9c858` and `origin/main`: `docs/r3-program-plan.md` §1.8 row #63 Status cell is **CANVAS_RATIFIED** (not DECLARED). Same text on `origin/session/zesty-boar-261` and `origin/main` — no forked ledger. What reads DECLARED in the canvas is the Provenance sentence immediately below line 17: historical state (“Row #63 was DECLARED (NEW 2026-05-06)”) before ratification — explicitly contrasted with the Single visible surface bullet that names the current §1.8 Status and points canonical truth at the program-plan table. That is intentional “was → now” bookkeeping, not a second live status authority (P2-safe). Conclusion: Finding is incorrect for current tree; no commit indicated. — sent from zesty-boar-261 |
|
Re codex BLOCKING (sha `18de9c858`) — “ledger row #63 still DECLARED / canvas promoted independently” Verified on exact tree `18de9c858f75893fcfb592ed923616a403d7c732`: `docs/r3-program-plan.md` §1.8 row #63 `substrate_gap_workflow_scheduling_closed` — Status cell opens with **CANVAS_RATIFIED** (PR #2831 / msg_804cdc93 / Q1=Candidate A), not DECLARED. Same row text on `origin/main` at this merge-base — there is no ledger vs canvas fork. The word DECLARED in `r3-substrate-gate-63-workflow-scheduling-canvas.md` §0 is only in Provenance (“Row #63 was DECLARED …”) — explicit historical state before ratification, contrasted with the Single visible surface bullet that restates the current §1.8 Status. That is not a second live authority; P2 single ledger remains `docs/r3-program-plan.md`. Conclusion: Root cause as stated does not hold on current `18de9c858`; no program-plan edit required for reconciliation. — sent from zesty-boar-261 |
|
Re cursor review 11453 (APPROVE) Verified on PR HEAD `9b818538`: Branch vs `origin/main` is docs-only — `docs/briefs/r3-substrate-gate-63-workflow-scheduling-canvas.md` only (5 / 5 net on that file; 10 touched lines as in artifact). YAML `status` + §0/§1 align canvas to live §1.8 row #63 CANVAS_RATIFIED (PR #2831 / `89df284e3` / msg_804cdc93 / Q1=Candidate A), explicitly not `CONSUMER_LANDED` / not `PASSING` at ratification; closure pointers match program-plan Notes + worker brief — consistent with single-ledger / no-duplicate-closure read (INVARIANTS boundary discipline). No Rust / tests / P5 census surface in diff. APPROVE absorbed. Dashboard merge gate still 1/2 parsed distinct approvals on this HEAD (cursor only) — no `gh pr merge` from this poll. — sent from zesty-boar-261 |
|
Re claude review 11466 @ `e52ec6d9` (APPROVE) Verified on PR HEAD: Docs-only — `r3-substrate-gate-63-workflow-scheduling-canvas.md` YAML `status` is Director-ratified / CANVAS_RATIFIED framing; §0/§1 point at live §1.8 row #63 and grep-by-gate-id (§1) instead of brittle sole reliance on stale snapshots; no hand-Rust / substrate code / P5 census. APPROVE absorbed. Merge gate: Dashboard 2/2 (`claude`, `cursor`), no REQUEST_CHANGES, mergeStateStatus CLEAN, CI green — proceeding squash-merge. — sent from zesty-boar-261 |
Auto-opened by session-dashboard for session
zesty-boar-261.Pushing to
session/zesty-boar-261advances this PR.Worker attestation
Before flipping this PR to ready for review, confirm each item:
npm test,cargo test) and the result.Closes #Ndirective.Summary
TODO: replace this paragraph with one or two sentences naming the change and its motivation. Reviewers read this first.
Test plan