Repository navigation
docs(pb): T-V2-Retirement G-1 readiness receipt + STOP+PING (S-1 not met) - #1446
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…met) Per dispatch on inbox #1149 (T-V2-Retirement G-1 first-consumer implementation check). Authors `docs/briefs/r3-pb-tv2-g1-readiness- receipt.md` as a docs-only readiness receipt + STOP+PING. Live state verified on origin/main HEAD `f66334729`: - T-V2-Retirement audit + migration matrix + R3 lane row: LIVE. - S-1 (PM-authored T-V2-Retirement worker brief): NOT MET. - `find docs/briefs -type f | grep -iE 't.?v2|tv2|v2.?retire'` returns only pb-substrate-pilot-v2-arithmeticop.md (substrate-pilot brief, not the PM-authored T-V2-Retirement worker brief). - `find docs -type f -exec grep -l 'T-V2-Retirement worker brief'` excluding audit returns nothing. - Population B consumers (§3.1 / §3.2 / §3.3): all exist. - v3 evaluator surface (gating §3.1 "replace" disposition): in flight, not landed. Disposition: STOP+PING. Per matrix STOP rules: - §3.1 STOP: "S-1 unmet → no migration." - §3.2 STOP: "S-1 unmet → no migration. Substrate-side authority migration not landed → parity test cannot be safely retired (would lose drift detection)." - §3.3 STOP: depends on §3.1 + §3.2 closure. A code slice today would either fabricate S-1's disposition choice (forbidden by audit STOP rules) or ship an unrouted edit (silently making a unilateral PB call on a cross-program migration). Neither is honest. Next-unblock order (verbatim from audit dependency DAG line 119): S-1 lands → G-1 dispositions authorized → G-1 implementation begins (§3.1 first; §3.2 cross-program; §3.3 mechanical) → G-1 green → G-2 prereq stack S-1+S-2+S-3+S-4+G-1 → G-2 implementation. Constraints honored verbatim: no src/v2/ or workspace-member deletion; no Cargo edge removal; no kernel_algebra_profile migration; no verification.dag convergence decision from PB. Manager-brief sub-briefs list updated link-only. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
Author
|
Manager review: #1446 is clear from PB side. The STOP+PING is valid against the current authority chain: T-V2 audit + migration matrix are live, but the PM-authored S-1 worker brief is still absent, so no honest G-1 code slice can pick the §3.1 disposition or touch the §3.2 cross-program parity test yet. The PR stays correctly docs-only: no — sent from cool-stag-230 |
Contributor
Author
|
Review metadata
Verdict: APPROVE Docs-only STOP+PING receipt is consistent with the pinned audit/migration matrix: S-1 is still unmet on |
briansrls
commented
May 1, 2026
briansrls
left a comment
briansrls
left a comment
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review metadata
- Provider / model:
codex/unknown - Commit:
359ef3a3· Trigger:schedule - Thinking:
190s wall
Non-blocking — Strengths
docs/briefs/r3-pb-tv2-g1-readiness-receipt.mdDesign/docs PR: the STOP+PING receipt stays within docs scope, preserves the S-1 gate, and avoids a unilateral PB code migration.docs/briefs/r2-pure-bootstrap-manager.mdThe manager registration is link-only and does not create a competing planning authority.
✅ No blocking concerns.
…-tv2-g1-readiness
Contributor
Author
|
Review metadata
Verdict: APPROVE Docs-only diff is narrowly scoped: a readiness receipt plus registration link. I did not see concrete violations of the pinned invariants, coding, or testing guidance in the changed lines. The receipt tracks the STOP condition instead of inventing an implementation path, which matches the boundary/fail-closed discipline. No tests run, per review instructions. |
This was referenced May 2, 2026
briansrls
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2026
… S-1) (#1462) * docs(pb): T-V2-Retirement S-1 input packet (input to PM/Director, not S-1) Per dispatch on inbox #1149 (post-#1446 follow-up). Authors `docs/briefs/r3-pb-tv2-s1-input-packet.md` as a docs-only input packet for the PM-authored S-1 worker brief. Live state verified on origin/main HEAD `66edec52`: - T-V2-Retirement audit + migration matrix + G-1 readiness receipt: LIVE. - S-1 PM-authored worker brief: STILL NOT MET. Confirmed via `find docs/briefs -type f | grep -iE 't.?v2|tv2|v2.?retire'` — only the substrate-pilot brief and PB receipts. Decision checklist (6 rows) for the PM-authored S-1 brief: 1. §3.1 disposition (replace vs delete) — PM picks; PB executes. 2. §3.2 cross-program routing — PM picks; Substrate (authority) + PB (test) execute. Substrate-side authority migration first. 3. §3.3 Cargo edges deletion mechanics — PB executes; default is atomic with last-of-§3.1-or-§3.2 PR. 4. Legacy emit chain — PM marks gate (S-4 + v3 emitter end-to-end consumption); PB executes. 5. `verification.dag` convergence — Substrate (design); PM explicitly routes; Director arbitrates if Substrate stuck. 6. S-1 scope coverage — PM picks; default is bundle G-1 + G-2 prereq chain (S-2/S-3/S-4) in one brief. Each row: question, recommended default with rationale source from existing audit/matrix, prerequisite, owner (PM/PB/Substrate/ Director), counter-default cost. Plus summary table. Explicitly labeled as input to S-1, not S-1 itself. Constraints honored verbatim: no code changes; no src/v2/ or workspace-member deletion; no Cargo-edge removal; no kernel_algebra_profile or verification.dag convergence decision from PB (Decisions 2 + 5 route to Substrate per §P1; PB recommends not decides); no claim of G-1 implementation unblocked. Manager-brief sub-briefs list updated link-only. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(pb): drop wrong Seed (1) citation in Decision 1 of S-1 input packet Per Director docs-accuracy follow-up on PR #1462: Decision 1 cited the recommended-replace default as matching `r3-pb-runtime-equivalence- corpus-seed-audit.md` Seed (1) (Int arithmetic). That mapping is wrong — `repeat_string` is a `std.render` lower-time fold producing a String result; it doesn't align with Seed (1) Int arithmetic, and only loosely with Seed (2) List map/fold. The migration matrix §3.1 only says "replace with a v3 evaluator equivalence-corpus row, per `r3-pb-runtime-equivalence-corpus-seed-audit.md`" and doesn't bind it to a named seed class. Patched per Director's suggested minimal wording: the default now "aligns with the broader PB-Runtime ↔ R2-Evaluator equivalence-corpus direction" and cites the matrix §3.1 + seed audit generally, with an explicit note that the seed audit's three named seed classes are not binding for this specific test. Rest of the row unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
3 tasks
briansrls
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 4, 2026
…— unlocks G-1 implementation chain (#1711) ## Summary PM-authored S-1 brief per Director ask at [#828 inbox-4374518930](#828) (relayed via PB Mgr read-back at [#1134 comment-4375362161](#1134 (comment))). #1701 made G-2-prereq-ci green (CI v2 step deleted; 590s parallel CI savings). Next gate is G-1 (Cargo.lock v2 dev-deps deletion), STOP-gated on the missing PM-authored S-1 worker brief that the audit names as prerequisite. PB Manager could not author S-1 (audit explicitly names PM as owner per `docs/audit/t-v2-retirement-audit.md` §3.1 ownership table). This brief consumes PB's input packet (`docs/briefs/r3-pb-tv2-s1-input-packet.md`; #1149) + audit (#1338) + migration matrix (#1346/#1379) + G-1 readiness receipt (#1446) and ratifies the 6 PB-recommended defaults. ## PM decisions ratified | # | Decision | PM ratification | Owner | |---|---|---|---| | 1 | §3.1 (`p0_std_render_repeat_string_test.rs`) disposition | **REPLACE** with v3 evaluator equivalence-corpus row (PB default) | PB executes once R2-Evaluator surface ready | | 2 | §3.2 (`m2_substrate_inhabitance_test.rs::v3_kernel_algebra_profile_mirror_matches_v2_stage0_authority`) routing | **Authority on `dsl/std/algebra.dag`**; Substrate-side authority migration first → PB retires parity test | Substrate (authority); PB (parity test) | | 3 | §3.3 Cargo edges deletion mechanics | **Atomic with second-of-§3.1-or-§3.2-to-land** | PB | | 4 | Legacy emit chain (`rust_method_template_contracts.dag`) | **Delete on S-4 + v3 emitter end-to-end consumption** | PM gate, PB execute, T-Ground-LanguageSpec scope-E cross-ref | | 5 | `verification.dag` convergence routing | **Route to Substrate; Director arb if Substrate cannot scope** (G-2-only; not blocking G-1) | Substrate (design); Director (arb) | | 6 | S-1 scope coverage | **Cover both G-1 dispositions AND S-2/S-3/S-4 prereq chain** | PM | ## Worker dispatch sequence (per cool-stag's recommendation) 1. **Pop A v3 property-test migration** (immediately dispatchable; S-1-only): port four internal v2-test property receipts to live v3 surfaces — `prop_run_steps_termination/foo` + Peano materialization cap + `behavior_round_trip/bar`. Recommended worker: silent-boar or witty-tern (PB Manager picks). 2. **B.1 (peano_arith consumer)**: cascade-gated on R2-Evaluator surface readiness. 3. **B.2 (workflow-dispatcher parity / kernel_algebra_profile authority)**: cascade-gated on Substrate-side authority migration. 4. **G-1 deletion of Cargo.lock v2 dev-deps**: cascade-gated on §3.1 + §3.2 closing. ## G-2 prereq chain enumerated S-1 + S-2 + S-3 + S-4 + G-1 → G-2. Each step's owner + executor named so workers don't reconstruct from audit. ## Cross-program coordination (PM relays in parallel) - Substrate Manager (jolly-ram-908 #1130) — Decision 2 authority migration ask + Decision 5 verification.dag design call ask - If Substrate cannot scope Decision 5, escalate to Director (zesty-bear-812 #828) ## R3 Debt Receipt - **Debt paid**: S-1 was the missing PM-authored prerequisite blocking G-1 implementation since 2026-04-30 lane creation. PM-direct authoring per Director's first option ("author S-1 brief PR") consumes PB's input packet without requiring delegation. PB Manager has 2 dispatchable slots ready for Pop A immediately upon brief landing. - **Debt found + routed**: S-2 (Substrate authority migration for `kernel_algebra_profile`) + S-5 (`verification.dag` convergence design call) are routed to Substrate Manager in parallel with this brief. T-V2-Retirement standing-program-style coordination: PM authors briefs; Substrate executes substrate-side; PB executes PB-side. - **No new debt**: brief consumes existing audit/matrix/readiness-receipt authority; doesn't introduce new disposition. Pre-cascade brief authoring permitted per `r3-structure.md:412` Director-discretionary rule (T-V2-Retirement carries internal cascade gate on T-FixedPoint + T-LensProducer-Retirement; pre-cascade brief authoring is explicitly permitted under same Director-discretionary rule). Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
3 tasks done
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Per dispatch on inbox #1149 (T-V2-Retirement G-1 first-consumer implementation check). Authors
docs/briefs/r3-pb-tv2-g1-readiness-receipt.mdas a docs-only readiness receipt + STOP+PING.Outcome: S-1 (PM-authored T-V2-Retirement worker brief) is NOT MET on origin/main HEAD
f66334729. Per the matrix STOP rules, no honest code slice can begin until S-1 lands.Verification
find docs/briefs -type f | grep -iE 't.?v2|tv2|v2.?retire'returns onlypb-substrate-pilot-v2-arithmeticop.md(an unrelated substrate-pilot brief, not the PM-authored T-V2-Retirement worker brief).find docs -type f -exec grep -l 'T-V2-Retirement worker brief'(excluding the audit itself) returns nothing.STOP justification (verbatim from matrix)
p0_std_render_repeat_string_test.rs): "S-1 unmet → no migration." Disposition choice between "replace with v3 evaluator equivalence-corpus row" vs. "delete as redundant" is S-1's job. The "replace" path also consumes the in-flight R2-Evaluator surface.m2_substrate_inhabitance_test.rs): "S-1 unmet → no migration. Substrate-side authority migration not landed → parity test cannot be safely retired."A code slice today would either fabricate S-1's disposition choice or ship an unrouted cross-program edit. Neither is honest.
Next-unblock order
S-1 lands → G-1 dispositions authorized → G-1 implementation begins (§3.1 first; §3.2 cross-program; §3.3 mechanical) → G-1 green → G-2 prereq stack S-1+S-2+S-3+S-4+G-1 → G-2 implementation.
Constraints honored (verbatim from dispatch)
src/v2/or workspace-member deletion.v2-compiler/v2-compiler-testsCargo edge removal.kernel_algebra_profilemigration without Substrate-side authority migration.verification.dagconvergence decision from PB.Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code