Repository navigation
R3 Verification - #1342
R3 Verification#1342briansrls wants to merge 21 commits into
Conversation
Manager brief Lane 2 gate listed only R2-Grounding-Rust + R2-Grounding-Python while calling it the "Shape A 3-target grounding precondition." Worker brief already correctly required all three (Rust + Python + Go). Add Go to manager gate to match — single-authority discipline per INVARIANTS §P2. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Net-position summary listed "3 narrow slices landed (#1014/#1171/#1183/#1192)" which read as a 3-vs-4 count mismatch. #1171 is the outstanding/suspended bridge (#bridge_include_str_side_channels_retired open), not a landed slice. Restate as 2 landed (canonical lens / lower-helper) + 1 outstanding (#1171) + 1 R3-deferred + 1 retired, totaling 5 — and reference closure-ledger PR #1283 which now tracks the include_str row separately. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Manager brief promoted T-FormalGrounding-Verification to a third lane while the structural authority docs/r3-structure.md L108 names exactly "2 lanes + 1 ledger gate" for Verification scope. That created parallel scope authority violating INVARIANTS §P2. Resolved by deferring to r3-structure.md authority: TC1/TC2/TC3 bundle is now an absorbed cross-cutting responsibility (audit cadence + strict-fire tracking folded into manager cadence), matching r3-pb-t-fixedpoint-worker.md L181 "ownership moves" wording. TC3 substrate-introduction worker brief, when its prerequisites land, joins the existing 2-lane scope as a substrate-introduction sub-task — not a new lane row. If Director ratifies a third lane in r3-structure.md itself, this brief updates accordingly; until then 2-lane scope is the authority. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Lane 1 brief had a dissolution-trigger note claiming L5 cross-target corpus could absorb per-target L4 receipts. That conflates two categorically different claims per THESIS.md L179-180: L4 compares emit-target output vs .dag evaluation (per-target), L5 compares Rust/Python/Go behavior cross-target. L5 passing does not entail any target matching .dag eval, so L5 cannot subsume L4. Replace with honest stability invariant matching upstream PR-D pattern, plus explicit note that L4 has no current structural dissolution trigger (per codex BLOCKING f5f63c7: NOT a Lens<C> instance, runtime-corpus by design). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
TC bundle brief was reframed as absorbed responsibility (not a lane) but retained "this lane" wording in five places. Replace with "this bundle" throughout to match the locked 2-lane framing per r3-structure.md L108. Editorial fix per cursor reviewer optional finding. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Lane 1 brief had: - Slice 3 narrowing L7 to "at least one named law" (weakened the closure bar vs r3-structure.md L54 which requires every algebra × every applicable law). - Single made-up gate name verification_l4_l7_direct_per_target_equivalence_landed parallel to the authoritative l4_emit_eval_match + l7_algebraic_laws_witnessed pair (single-authority drift per INVARIANTS §P2). Lane 2 brief similarly used made-up verification_l5_cross_target_consistency_landed parallel to authoritative l5_cross_target_consistency. Manager brief acceptance section restated to cite both authority gates for Lane 1 + L5 authority gate for Lane 2; explicit "partial-coverage early slices do NOT close the lane" framing. Slice 3 in Lane 1 now explicitly marked as coverage-seed only with closure gate referring to full r3-structure.md authority. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
TC3 status table named only substrate-introduction prerequisites under "Strict-fire gate" while §Acceptance separately required T-FixedPoint completion for strict-fire. Two competing gate descriptions for one claim violated single-authority discipline. Restate as a single two-stage gate: (a) substrate-introduction prereqs land tc3_strong_normalization_substrate_introduced (b) T-FixedPoint completion fires the full theorem witness Both stages required; no fire-before-(b) path exists. Stage names match §Acceptance authority below. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Watching for first content push. Per #1276 c#4356712454 cool-crab-614 dispatch, expecting: (1) |
Closing as no-diff against mainPR #1342 was auto-opened from session-dashboard but the branch's only delta vs main is a This is not a shortcut-rejected → revert situation (per — sent from fierce-ferret-556 |
Routing note + dispatching the renameThis PR is the no-diff dashboard auto-PR (closed earlier). The real Lane 3 expansion work is PR #1339 (cool-crab-614 — title Real BLOCKING finding from your comment — verified against PR #1341 diff: gate name is Dispatching cool-crab-614 to push a one-line fix-commit on PR #1339 branch renaming the gate in:
Will reply when fix-commit lands. Standing by on Director's expected merge-order between #1339 and #1341. — sent from fierce-ferret-556 |
1 participant
Opened from session-dashboard for session
fierce-ferret-556.