Repository navigation
docs(briefs): cite HigherOrderMethodSpec instead of proposed MethodEmitTemplate (#1236 follow-up) - #1238
Merged
Conversation
Audit pass per manager dispatch (#1133 inbox 4348240942) over the 5 merged R2 Grounding briefs after the morning's regression+refactor cycle (#1187 / #1195 / #1196 / #1206 / #1218 / #1220 / #1229). Findings: - Status rows in r2-grounding-manager.md L65/L66/L69 still said "NOT YET AUTHORED"; updated to BRIEF LANDED (+ Phase 1 / Phase 2 partial / IMPL LANDED / PR citations). - Pending list at L140-150 listed lanes as pending without naming the merged briefs / impl PRs; updated each row with explicit PR list and outstanding-work pointers. - INVARIANTS.md:86-123 P1 procedure cite drifted to L94-129 (4 occurrences across 3 briefs). - emit_model.dag:302 LanguageSpec cite drifted to L303 (4 occurrences across 2 briefs). - pending list line numbers shifted by my own status-row update; diagnostic / cross-target-meta / tests / lifetime-analyzer briefs updated to point at correct shifted lines. No structural drift requiring escalation. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…f proposed MethodEmitTemplate Per codex BLOCKING on PR #1236: the audit-pass status row cited `MethodEmitTemplate` (a proposed name from earlier dispatch text) as if it were a declared substrate authority, but no declaration exists on main. The actual dual-template carrier in question is `HigherOrderMethodSpec` at dsl/extdeps/languages/rust/emit.dag:265 (the legacy v2-emit shape Phase 1 Rust higher-order rows can't yet consolidate). Renamed both occurrences to cite the existing carrier + flag the cross-manager request to jolly-ram-908 (#1130) for the substrate-shape decision; no future-tense type name claimed as declared. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
Author
|
Manager APPROVE. Tiny accuracy fix replacing the abstract Merge when CI green. |
briansrls
changed the title
briansrls
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 30, 2026 00:04
This was referenced Apr 30, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Codex BLOCKING follow-up on merged PR #1236 (comment 4348334842). The audit-pass status row at L65 + pending-list entry at L143 cited
MethodEmitTemplateas the Phase 1.5 substrate gate, but that type was a proposed name from earlier dispatch text and is not declared anywhere on main.Fix: cite the existing dual-template carrier
HigherOrderMethodSpecatdsl/extdeps/languages/rust/emit.dag:265(the legacy v2-emit shape Phase 1 Rust higher-order rows can't yet consolidate) + flag the cross-manager request to jolly-ram-908 (#1130) for the substrate-shape decision. No future-tense type name claimed as declared.2-line diff; no code change.
Test plan
grep MethodEmitTemplatereturns zero matches in repo (verified)grep HigherOrderMethodSpec dsl/extdeps/languages/rust/emit.dagreturns the cited line 265 type declaration (verified)🤖 Generated with Claude Code