Repository navigation
docs(evaluator): audit PR-A.1 runtime Value dependency - #1228
Conversation
|
This is the right PR-A.1 blocker-tracking artifact. It stays docs-only, names the exact flat-name collision ( The resume-gate section is also aligned with the substrate disposition from jolly-ram-908: option 1, behavior-marker rename/split, is the intended small path; module-qualified identity is larger; PB-Runtime/PR-A.0 carrier rename is not recommended. No substantive feedback from me. CI is still pending as I write this; merge should wait for it to go green. |
|
Review metadata
Verdict: APPROVE — this is a documentation-only dependency audit, and it correctly blocks the runtime |
|
Review metadata
Verdict: APPROVE This looks clean. The new audit is bounded, documents the blocker, names concrete resume gates, and avoids introducing a parallel |
briansrls
left a comment
briansrls
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review metadata
- Provider / model:
codex/unknown - Commit:
b3000704· Trigger:schedule - Thinking:
181s wall
Non-blocking — Strengths
docs/briefs/r2-pr-a1-runtime-value-dependency-audit.mdDesign/docs PR; the audit correctly grounds the PR-A.1 blocker in the existing flat Value marker and avoids introducing RuntimeValue as a parallel authority.
✅ No blocking concerns found.
|
Review metadata
1. Story of the diffThis PR does not land the runtime 2. Invariant categories
Compliant — this is substrate-adjacent documentation, not a substrate mutation:
Compliant — single authority / boundary discipline is handled correctly:
N/A — diff is docs-only; no Rust code, helpers, APIs, error shapes, method placement, or dependency signatures changed.
N/A — diff is a blocker audit and intentionally adds no executable behavior. The audit’s implementation resume conditions explicitly name future test/update surfaces, including marker cache, lower validation, and
Compliant — the PR preserves the locked PB-Runtime/PR-A.0 naming instead of silently diverging:
Compliant — this is tracked blocker debt with bounds and a dissolution trigger. Documentation: the new audit is linked from the manager at 3. VerdictAPPROVE. The PR correctly refuses to introduce a parallel runtime value carrier and instead records the substrate dependency, affected surfaces, and concrete resume gates. I do not see a diff-line-backed invariant violation. |
|
Review metadata
Findings None. The diff only updates evaluator briefs and adds Verdict APPROVE — Narrow, accurate dependency audit; manager brief links are proportionate. No rubric violations in this diff. |
|
Review metadata
1. Story of the diffThis PR turns PR-A.1 from an attempted implementation slice into an explicit dependency audit. The new brief states that the runtime evaluator’s observable 2. Invariant categories
Compliant — this is substrate-facing documentation, not a substrate mutation: it explicitly says “This is not a carrier declaration PR” (
Compliant — Boundary Discipline / single authority is handled correctly: the brief rejects
N/A — diff is documentation-only; no Rust functions, helpers, methods, error shapes, or module layout are changed.
N/A — this PR does not change executable behavior or add a carrier; it records a blocker and resume gate. No test is required until one of the named implementation paths lands.
Compliant — the brief explicitly treats PB-Runtime section 3.2 and PR-A.0 as parent authorities (
Compliant — the blocker is tracked with documentation, bounds, and dissolution triggers: the collision surface is enumerated ( 3. VerdictAPPROVE. This PR does not introduce the risky carrier; it documents why the carrier must wait, preserves the locked |
Align Grounding lane rows, Evaluator PR-A/E cadence signals, and Substrate Lens-Primitive last signal with merges on main and r2-grounding-manager brief receipts. Rows stay in-flight until structural gates fire; #1240 records brief-authoring program closure, not lane green. Made-with: Cursor
* WIP: loyal-ram-816 * docs(r2): closure-ledger drift refresh (Director #1228–#1241 batch) Align Grounding lane rows, Evaluator PR-A/E cadence signals, and Substrate Lens-Primitive last signal with merges on main and r2-grounding-manager brief receipts. Rows stay in-flight until structural gates fire; #1240 records brief-authoring program closure, not lane green. Made-with: Cursor
… 3 expansion + §4 sub-item 5 (Mgr dispatch) + r3-program-plan thesis-state drift reframe Director-tier R2-Evaluator audit (PR #3013 Gap 3 precondition deliverable from msg_cd2d8d7d) surfaced 3 structural findings: (a) R2 closed-with-residuals 2026-04-29 16:34Z (#1275; ROADMAP.md:512) with 5 sub-lanes carried as r3-continuation: runtime_value_model_structural (in-flight #1197/#1228/#1231), body_evaluator_structural (not-started), lens_application_complete_reflection (in-flight #1191), witness_construction_structural (not-started), cross_target_equivalence_harness_structural (not-started). Closure-ledger row stale @ #1191-#1231 era (HEAD is #3013+). (b) R3 Evaluator Mgr merry-gull-128 (#1743) ABSENT from current subtree at HEAD. Authority dispersed across 3 R3 Mgrs without single owner — r2-structure.md:73 anti-pattern reincarnation under R3-tier-slice procedural wrapper. (c) Brief surface comprehensive (r2-evaluator-manager.md + 4 sub-briefs + 10+ PR-A-E + R3-tier per-slice briefs); not the gap. (d) Director recommends re-spawn evaluator Mgr as 4th R3 Mgr lane. PM execution (bundled per feedback_bundle_workstreams_per_pr): 1. r3-actual-close-plan.md Gap 3 expansion: cite all 5 sub-lanes explicitly; reframe R2-Evaluator HEAD evidence from "landed" to "closed-with-residuals with 5 sub-lane debt"; note merry-gull-128 absence; close-criterion now requires (i) 5 sub-lanes ratchet-to-PASSING OR per-sub-lane R4-carve carrier with named retirement plan (substrate-shape symmetry with Gap 9 DeferredCorrection discipline), AND (ii) §4 sub-item 5 Mgr-dispatch disposition ratified. 2. r3-actual-close-plan.md §4 sub-item 5 (subtree-shape decision): R3 Evaluator Mgr dispatch with 3 operator sub-options — (a) re-spawn 4th lane PM+Director recommended, (b) fold into existing R3 Mgrs with named risk, (c) Director-direct ad-hoc PM-does-not-recommend per r2-structure.md:73 retraction. §6 checklist updated to track. 3. r3-program-plan.md lines 429/435 reframe: strike "R2-Evaluator (interpreter-as-data; LANDED)" / "R2-Evaluator landed" → "R2-Evaluator closed-with-residuals 2026-04-29 16:34Z per ROADMAP.md:512 — sub-lane completion partial via R3-tier slices, see Gap 3 in r3-actual-close-plan.md". Catches feedback_thesis_gate_state_drift class. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ncing (DRAFT) (#3013) * docs(r3): R3 actual-close plan — 10 adversarial gaps with disposition + dispatch sequencing (DRAFT pending Director + operator ratification) Operator directive 2026-05-13 verbatim: "can we start on the planning docs to get to ACTUAL r3 close? like all of our adversarial questions answered positively? i feel like the planning for this stuff has been continuously dropped". PM-authored planning doc replacing "viz-as-SoT closed_at + DECLARED-strings-are-drift" framing with explicit per-gap disposition for the 10 substantive counterfactuals surfaced by today's adversarial audit: 1. PB-0 zero hand-Rust (177+ entries in EXPECTED_HAND_AUTHORED_NON_TEST; gate #8 DECLARED) 2. L5 cross-target consistency (gate #15 DECLARED; no Python/Go executable emission on main) 3. Self-host fixed point R3-strong (gate #16 R1-horizon only; 4 joint preconditions deferred) 4. Lens behavioral parity (3 of 4 lenses NOT behaviorally complete; gates #79/#81/#82/#83) 5. Tests-as-data completeness (gate #84 Cluster M Phase 3 bulk-port pending; load-bearing-blocking) 6. v2 retirement terminal (gate #97 coherence-only; src/v2/ exists at HEAD) 7. T-WAD FULL R3 (gates #98-#103 all DECLARED; ci.yml still hand-edited) 8. Bootstrap-seed Rust survivors (folded into Gap 1) 9. Show-the-correct-code (no §1.8 gate exists for THESIS:103-105) 10. Close-audit doc absent (interrogation §8 self-check has no execution log on main) For each gap: promise verbatim + HEAD evidence + what's missing + plan to cash (owner, sub-program, effort estimate) + close criterion predicate. §2 dispatch sequencing: 6 phases A-F mapped to Substrate Mgr / Verification Mgr / Debt-Paydown Mgr / Director-tier coordination / PM-direct. §3 total time-to-actual-close: 8-12 weeks optimistic; 12-20 realistic; 6+ months if PB-0 retirement is the longest tail and can't parallelize aggressively. §4 operator decision points: 4 binary IN-R3 / R4-defer choices that determine actual R3 scope (PB-0, L5 cross-target, self-host R3-strong, show-correct-code). §5 process discipline (preventing future drop): single authoritative plan doc, weekly PM closure-cadence message, per-gap closure-PR template, Gap 10 (close-audit doc) authored FIRST as receipt mechanism. Authority: - Operator directive 2026-05-13 (planning request) - Today's adversarial audit findings (counterfactual evidence against viz-as-SoT closure claim) - THESIS.md promise enumeration + r3-close-interrogation.md §-by-§ adversarial structure - §1.8 closure-authority ledger gate state at HEAD Status: DRAFT pending Director ratification + operator scope-decision approval before dispatch. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): Gap 4 — cite closed PR #2860 as content-source for parallelism cementing-receipt re-launch (Director msg_b3324a05 flag) Director (msg_b3324a05) flagged PR #2860 (G87-C parallelism cementing receipt + ratchet repair, closed 2026-05-13T16:45:44Z under operator cleanup directive) as load-bearing for counterfactual #4 / Gap 4 parallelism behavioral parity. The PR content is retrievable via `gh pr view 2860 --json body` so the Gap 4 cementing-receipt re-launch doesn't author from scratch. Adds PR #2860 reference to Gap 4 sub-program as step 2 (between F-α and F-β.1), with concrete artifact paths + dissolution-trigger naming + relationship-to-F-α clarification (cementing-receipt is gate-#87 ratchet-discipline level, distinct from F-α Stage 2e walker port which is substrate work). Both are required for full Gap 4 closure. Cementing-receipt re-launch is cheaper (PR #2860 substance ready); F-α walker port is the larger substrate scope. Authority: - Director msg_b3324a05 flag (2026-05-13) - PR #2860 substance per gh API retrieval - §1.8 row #87 lens_cementing_test_discipline_complete (CONSUMER_LANDED + PASSING; ratchet fires on inventory mismatch) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): integrate Director msg_cd2d8d7d 8 substantive feedback items into close plan Director (zesty-bear-812) ratified PR #3013 structure + dispatch sequencing + §5 process discipline. 8 substantive items applied: 1. **§4 R4-carve framing collision** — Per `project_no_r4_carves_directive` (Brian 2026-05-08), R4-carve is NOT freely available as default. §4 reframed: 4 decisions default to IN-R3; explicit override required with stated structural-unblockable reason. §5 process-discipline note added. 2. **Gap 3 R2-Evaluator audit** — Director-tier deliverable picked up by zesty-bear-812 (this week per msg_cd2d8d7d). §6 deliverables list tracks. 3. **Gap 4 sequential cadence as Mgr-bandwidth lever** — Effort estimate split: single-Mgr sequential 4-8wk vs parallelized-via-2nd-Substrate-Mgr ~2-4wk. Surfaced as tightening lever, not foreclosed. 4. **Gap 5 close-criterion header-marker filter** — Predicate amended to `xargs grep -L "// AUTO-GENERATED FROM .dag" | wc -l == 0` so generated-from-.dag tests are filterable. Substrate prereq: code-gen emits header line; if not present at HEAD, lands in Gap 5 Phase 3 ratchet. 5. **Gap 6 transitive-dependency depth** — Explicit 5+ deep chain call-out: Gap 6 ← Gap 3 ← {Gap 1, R2-Evaluator, R2-Grounding, Row-B}. Gap 6 framed as close-ceremony terminal gate (last 2 weeks of R3 close). 6. **Gap 9 threshold = operator decision** — ≥80% pragmatic relaxation is operator-decision-shaped, not Director-decision. §4 now surfaces (a) IN-R3 vs not-R3-promised choice + (b) if IN-R3, threshold = 100% (THESIS-correct) or ≥X% pragmatic with named-residual list. Per `project_no_r4_carves_directive`, the not-R3-promised reframe is structurally an R4-carve requiring operator override. 7. **Gap 10 timeline calibrated** — Skeleton 1-2 days (PM-direct, unblocked, immediate); execution 1-2 weeks (Verification Mgr serial) or 3-5 days (ctrl-build parallel). Overall ~1-2 weeks for full landing. 8. **Phase F bookkeeping downstream of close-audit-doc verdict** — §2 Phase F reworded: §1.8 manifest strings sync to close-audit-doc predicate-execution outcome (View-4-authoritative per `feedback_r3_close_three_views_drift`), NOT to procedural `closed_at` markers. Sequencing: close-audit-doc lands first; bookkeeping PR consumes that doc as authority. Avoids procedural-closure trap. §6 pending-decisions list updated: - Director ratification: checked ✓ - Operator §4 confirmations: 4 sub-items per gap - Director-tier deliverables in-flight per msg_cd2d8d7d (4 items) - Operator Phase A authorization Authority: - Director ratification msg_cd2d8d7d (2026-05-13) — substance verdict + 8 feedback items - `project_no_r4_carves_directive` (Brian 2026-05-08, 5d-old memory but still presumptively in force; surfaced for operator confirmation) - `feedback_r3_close_three_views_drift` View 4 authoritative (Director memory update post-msg_b3324a05) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): claude review 11247 exploratory observations integrated (PM recs explicit per gap + Gap 9 canvas-promotion note + §3 velocity-citation discipline) 3 non-blocking exploratory observations from claude APPROVE review on PR #3013 sha a4d1608 at 2026-05-13T18:03:26Z: 1. **§4 PM-recommendation explicitness across all 4 gaps** — previously only Gap 1 stated "do not defer." Added explicit PM-recommended IN-R3 + reasoning for Gaps 2/3/9 with each R4-carve's specific dilution impact (omni-emission falsifier loss, self-host thesis dilution, THESIS:103-105 absolute promise drop). §4 preamble now states cross-gap PM view + per-gap recommendation. 2. **Gap 9 substrate-shape canvas-promotion** — `correction: Option<Witness>` field commitment is buried in planning-doc prose; promoted to Substrate-Mgr-canvas-before-worker-dispatch step. Canvas authoring + Director ratification gates worker dispatch. 3. **§3 velocity-citation discipline** — most estimates were unsourced beyond Gap 1's `feedback_pre_authored_brief_queue` reference. Added explicit caveat: Gaps 2/3/5/6/7/9 are PM-prior-cycle-experience-based; final ratified version cites per-gap velocity reference + first weekly closure-cadence message calibrates against actual landing-date data. Authority: - claude APPROVE review 11247 on PR #3013 sha a4d1608 at 2026-05-13T18:03:26Z - All 3 observations non-blocking; addressing pre-operator-review for cleaner ratification Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3-close): retract Gap 5 boundary carve-out + Gap 9 pragmatic-relaxation per codex BLOCKING PR #3013 Two substantive close-criteria fixes per codex BLOCKING 2026-05-13T18:19:56Z: **Finding 1 — Gap 5 boundary carve-out violates 0-residual** (TESTING.md L212-217 + docs/design-pure-bootstrap-zero.md:41,138): - Removed `-not -path "*/boundary/*"` from gate #84 close predicate - Added authority citation: TESTING.md "🔄 RETRACTED 2026-04-25" + 0-floor target - Boundary tests ARE counted; migrate to ExecuteCommand-based .dag TestClaim per cascade **Finding 2 — Gap 9 pragmatic-relaxation dilutes THESIS absolute** (THESIS.md "show the correct code" reads as absolute promise): - Removed "Pragmatic relaxation (≥X%)" alternative from Gap 9 close criterion - Removed §4 operator sub-decision (b) threshold negotiation - Close criterion is 100% absolute; non-100% requires R4-carve override of project_no_r4_carves_directive (NOT within-R3 threshold negotiation) **Additional: Phase F adversarial re-pass discipline** (operator directive 2026-05-13 — final closeout will be adversarial analysis): - Phase F now explicitly includes operator+PM adversarial re-pass against interrogation doc + close plan + §1.8 row statuses - Bookkeeping PR sequencing updated: depends on adversarial-re-pass verdict, not just predicate execution outcome - Symmetric to 2026-05-13 adversarial sweep that surfaced 10 counterfactuals; applied at close ceremony to confirm none survived Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3-close): retract fabricated Tier-2 R4-deferral authority per briansrls BLOCKING PR #3013 briansrls BLOCKING 2026-05-13T18:22:57Z at docs/r3-actual-close-plan.md:48: > "The PB-0 alternative disposition cites design-pure-bootstrap-zero.md as > allowing Tier-2 R4 deferral for grounding submodules, but that authority > sets a 0 hand-authored in-tree Rust floor, so this creates an unauthorized > escape hatch against the Pure Bootstrap target." **Verified**: grep -nE "tier[- ]2|grounding|R4|defer|carve" against docs/design-pure-bootstrap-zero.md returns ONLY one hit (L131: historical TESTING.md carve-out which the doc explicitly retracts under 0-floor target). Zero references to "Tier-2", "grounding submodules deferred", or any R4-deferral carve-out mechanism. The "Tier-2 R4-deferred per design-pure-bootstrap-zero.md" citation in Gap 1 alternative-disposition was fabricated authority — an unauthorized escape hatch against the absolute 0-floor target. **Fix**: - Removed the fabricated citation - Explicit statement: PB-0 design doc admits no internal escape hatch - R4-carve of PB-0 subsets requires explicit operator override of project_no_r4_carves_directive (2026-05-08), naming specific subset + structural-unblockable reason — not citation of an unauthorized escape - PM-recommendation preserved (do NOT R4-defer; standing directive applies) Symmetric to the Gap 9 pragmatic-relaxation fix at commit 870f6ce — both findings reflect the same anti-pattern of converting absolute thesis claims into negotiable thresholds via fabricated/imputed authority. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3-close): replace textual AUTO-GENERATED marker with structural EXPECTED_HAND_AUTHORED_TEST list-emptied predicate per briansrls BLOCKING PR #3013 briansrls BLOCKING 2026-05-13T18:22:57Z at docs/r3-actual-close-plan.md:183: > "The gate #84 close predicate uses the `// AUTO-GENERATED FROM .dag` > comment as the authority for generated tests, which can pass with > hand-authored Rust carrying the marker and does not prove the THESIS > tests-as-data claim." **Verified**: this is exactly the feedback_no_textual_enforcement_bridges anti-pattern — "never propose grep/regex as interim enforcement; text-gating 'be structural' defeats itself." A textual comment is gameable; a developer could add `// AUTO-GENERATED FROM .dag` to a hand-authored file to bypass the ratchet. The THESIS claim ("every Rust test ports to .dag or is generated") is structural and requires a structural predicate. **Fix**: replaced the textual-marker predicate with the structural EXPECTED_HAND_AUTHORED_TEST list-emptied authority — the same ratchet Gap 1 uses for EXPECTED_HAND_AUTHORED_NON_TEST. Every hand-authored test entry must be named on the list (PR-template enforcement); migrations remove entries; close fires when list empties. The list discriminates structurally, not textually. Preserved the no-boundary-carve-out authority citations (separate codex BLOCKING) — boundary entries are named on EXPECTED_HAND_AUTHORED_TEST and dissolve through migration like any other entry, no separate carve-out. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3-close): retract Option<Witness> shape per briansrls BLOCKING PR #3013 — Practice-2 carrier refinement briansrls BLOCKING 2026-05-13T18:22:57Z at docs/r3-actual-close-plan.md:277: > "The proposed correction: Option<Witness> shape leaves 'diagnostic > without correction' representable even though the THESIS-correct path > requires diagnostics to point to the structurally correct program." **Verified** against three converging memory authorities: - feedback_state_space_vs_behavioral_invariants — "check if the type admits illegal state combinations; type enforcement > API enforcement" - feedback_optional_models_recovery_as_exception — "T? where absence is the norm conceals plurality" - feedback_practice_2_vs_4_same_variant_vs_cross_variant — Practice-2 carrier refinement when the redundant/illegal state crosses variant boundaries Option<Witness> admits None which structurally represents "diagnostic without correction" — exactly the state THESIS.md "show the correct code" forbids absolutely. The type itself admits the illegal state; behavioral checks ("did this fired diagnostic produce a correction?") are API-tier enforcement that the carrier-tier should subsume. **Fix**: substrate-shape constraint added to Gap 9 sub-program step 4: canvas authors MUST commit `correction: Witness` (non-optional) — Practice-2 carrier refinement makes diagnostic-without-correction unrepresentable by construction. Anti-pattern symmetric to Gap 9 pragmatic-relaxation fix at 870f6ce (both findings convert absolute THESIS claim into expressible-but-forbidden state). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3-close): address 3 codex BLOCKING + 1 non-blocking on PR #3013 codex BLOCKING 2026-05-13T18:22:57Z (sha f05359f) — 3 root-causes + 1 improvement: **B1 — Tier-2 feature-deferral example removed entirely** (Gap 1 alternative-disposition): Prior fix at a973064 retained the fabricated example in retraction-framing. Codex stronger ask: "remove the example OR require operator-approved amendment to PB-zero authority". Reframed: no Tier-2 example survives this section; any R4-carve requires BOTH (1) override of project_no_r4_carves_directive AND (2) amendment to docs/design-pure-bootstrap-zero.md authority text adding a per-subset deferral carrier. Neither alone is sufficient. **B2 — Generator-manifest positive structural authority** (Gap 5 close criterion): Prior fix at 29684a0 gave negative authority (list-emptied) but codex asks positive form. Added dual predicate: (a) EXPECTED_HAND_AUTHORED_TEST = empty [negative] + (b) generator-manifest maps each surviving test → its .dag source + regeneration-byte-equality fail-close on drift [positive]. Catches orphan generated files that negative form alone misses. Substrate prereq: manifest carrier authored as Cluster M Phase 3 expansion. **B3 — Deferral carrier with named reason** (Gap 9 substrate-shape): Prior fix at 5872dae had correction: Witness covering only the 100% path. Codex asks separation of absolute-thesis vs pragmatic-residual into named carrier variants. Reshaped to sum Correction = LiveCorrection { witness } | DeferredCorrection { reason, retirement_plan }. Diagnostic.correction is mandatory Correction (not Option). Residual is structurally named with retirement-plan accountability; gate #84/#106 close requires every DeferredCorrection ratchetable to zero per its own retirement plan. **NB1 — Ledger-derived row-count** (Gap 10 close criterion): Hard-coded "ALL 105 rows" rotted as soon as Gap 9 proposed row #106. Per feedback_no_snapshot_integers_in_briefs: derive count from §1.8 ledger at execution time via grep enumeration; Gap 9 row #106 + subsequent additions automatically included. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3-close): close §6/§4 INVARIANTS P2 violation + footer drift per cursor APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS PR #3013 cursor/composer-2 APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS 2026-05-13T18:35:17Z: **Finding 1 — INVARIANTS P2 violation (§6 vs §4 duplicate Gap 9 authority)**: §6 operator checklist still offered "ratify threshold = 100% (THESIS-correct) OR ≥X% (pragmatic, X TBD); (b) override with not-R3-promised reframe" — exactly the within-R3 threshold negotiation that §4 retracted in the prior fix at 870f6ce. Two "authoritative" asks for the same Gap 9 decision = INVARIANTS P2 single-place- for-the-fact violation. **Fix**: rewrote §6 Gap 9 bullet to match §4 — single binary decision (IN-R3 at 100% absolute OR R4-carve via explicit operator override of project_no_r4_carves_directive). No threshold negotiation; no sub-decision (b) since §4 removed it. §4 is now the single authority for the Gap 9 disposition. **Finding 2 (exploratory) — §6 vs footer drift**: §6 line 453 marks "Director ratifies this plan structure — APPROVED 2026-05-13" ✓ but footer at line 471 still said "DRAFT pending Director ratification + operator scope approval". Director already ratified structure per msg_cd2d8d7d; only operator scope approval is pending. **Fix**: tightened footer to "Director structure-ratified 2026-05-13; DRAFT pending operator scope approval (§4 IN-R3 confirmations + Phase A dispatch authorization)" — preserves the actual gating state without contradicting §6 checklist. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3-close): align Gap 9 close criterion to sum-variant Correction carrier per codex BLOCKING #11273 PR #3013 Prior fix at 9d763dd ratified `sum Correction { LiveCorrection | DeferredCorrection }` substrate-shape canvas (Practice-2 carrier refinement: nullable `Option<Witness>` admits illegal "diagnostic without correction" state). But the close criterion still read `correction: Witness` + `Some(_)` — the retracted Option shape it was meant to replace. P2 single-authority violation: two incompatible carrier shapes for the same Diagnostic.correction field in adjacent text. Rewrote close criterion as: - Structural (compiler-enforced): every Diagnostic carries mandatory `correction: Correction` field (sum-variant, no Option-wrapping) - Variant-tally (zero-DeferredCorrection): every fired Diagnostic in test corpus is LiveCorrection variant; count of DeferredCorrection = 0 - Substrate ratchet: every DeferredCorrection entry ratchetable to zero per its own retirement_plan field Preserved both retraction citations (codex BLOCKING #11254 pragmatic-relaxation + briansrls Option<Witness>) as audit trail. Close criterion now matches the canvas substrate-shape commitment by construction. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3-close): absorb Director R2-Evaluator audit msg_82b9c4bb — Gap 3 expansion + §4 sub-item 5 (Mgr dispatch) + r3-program-plan thesis-state drift reframe Director-tier R2-Evaluator audit (PR #3013 Gap 3 precondition deliverable from msg_cd2d8d7d) surfaced 3 structural findings: (a) R2 closed-with-residuals 2026-04-29 16:34Z (#1275; ROADMAP.md:512) with 5 sub-lanes carried as r3-continuation: runtime_value_model_structural (in-flight #1197/#1228/#1231), body_evaluator_structural (not-started), lens_application_complete_reflection (in-flight #1191), witness_construction_structural (not-started), cross_target_equivalence_harness_structural (not-started). Closure-ledger row stale @ #1191-#1231 era (HEAD is #3013+). (b) R3 Evaluator Mgr merry-gull-128 (#1743) ABSENT from current subtree at HEAD. Authority dispersed across 3 R3 Mgrs without single owner — r2-structure.md:73 anti-pattern reincarnation under R3-tier-slice procedural wrapper. (c) Brief surface comprehensive (r2-evaluator-manager.md + 4 sub-briefs + 10+ PR-A-E + R3-tier per-slice briefs); not the gap. (d) Director recommends re-spawn evaluator Mgr as 4th R3 Mgr lane. PM execution (bundled per feedback_bundle_workstreams_per_pr): 1. r3-actual-close-plan.md Gap 3 expansion: cite all 5 sub-lanes explicitly; reframe R2-Evaluator HEAD evidence from "landed" to "closed-with-residuals with 5 sub-lane debt"; note merry-gull-128 absence; close-criterion now requires (i) 5 sub-lanes ratchet-to-PASSING OR per-sub-lane R4-carve carrier with named retirement plan (substrate-shape symmetry with Gap 9 DeferredCorrection discipline), AND (ii) §4 sub-item 5 Mgr-dispatch disposition ratified. 2. r3-actual-close-plan.md §4 sub-item 5 (subtree-shape decision): R3 Evaluator Mgr dispatch with 3 operator sub-options — (a) re-spawn 4th lane PM+Director recommended, (b) fold into existing R3 Mgrs with named risk, (c) Director-direct ad-hoc PM-does-not-recommend per r2-structure.md:73 retraction. §6 checklist updated to track. 3. r3-program-plan.md lines 429/435 reframe: strike "R2-Evaluator (interpreter-as-data; LANDED)" / "R2-Evaluator landed" → "R2-Evaluator closed-with-residuals 2026-04-29 16:34Z per ROADMAP.md:512 — sub-lane completion partial via R3-tier slices, see Gap 3 in r3-actual-close-plan.md". Catches feedback_thesis_gate_state_drift class. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3-close): split Gap 3 close criterion from dispatch staffing prereq + use r2-closure-ledger authority for sub-lanes per Director notes msg_f0a54769 PR #3013 Director note msg_f0a54769 surfaced 3 substantive shape issues on the 85c230b Director-audit absorption: Note 1 (sub-lane name authority): the 5 R2-Evaluator sub-lane names (runtime_value_model_structural / body_evaluator_structural / lens_application_complete_reflection / witness_construction_structural / cross_target_equivalence_harness_structural) live in `docs/r2-closure-ledger.md:250-263`, NOT as §1.8 row IDs in `docs/r3-program-plan.md`. Prior draft conflated authorities ("PASSING in §1.8" mismatches the actual artifact). PM-selected path (α): use sub-lane names as predicate authority per `feedback_parallel_representation_debt` — don't introduce 5 new §1.8 rows for already-named ledger content. Predicate is cell-level check of `docs/r2-closure-ledger.md` (each sub-lane row status=green at HEAD); closure-ledger row stale @ #1191-#1231 era requires refresh first. Note 2 (staffing-as-criterion vs precondition): staffing/dispatch shape is a PRECONDITION for execution, not a close criterion for the substrate-debt itself. If a Mgr exists but doesn't close the 5 sub-lanes, Gap 3 isn't closed; if alternative dispatch (fold/ad-hoc) closes them, Gap 3 IS closed. Moved "(ii) R3 Evaluator Mgr lane owner identified" from close criterion to new "Dispatch staffing prereq" section. Close criterion now purely substrate-debt-shaped. Note 3 (sequencing): re-spawn AFTER operator §4 sub-item 5 ratification, NOT before. Sequence explicit in Dispatch staffing prereq section per `feedback_construction_over_ratchets` adjacent class — don't author the Mgr until the operator-decision substrate cashes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3-close): operator-ratification recorded — all 4 IN-R3 + §4 sub-item 5 re-spawn (a) + Phase A authorized PR #3013 Operator (briansrls) ratification 2026-05-13 via direct PM dispatch: - Items 1-4 (R3 scope decisions): ALL IN-R3 confirmed per project_no_r4_carves_directive default. No R4-carves. - Gap 1 (PB-0): full 177-entry retirement - Gap 2 (L5 cross-target): full 3-target Python+Go - Gap 3 (self-host R3-strong): 4-joint-precondition cascade - Gap 9 (show-correct-code): 100% absolute (zero DeferredCorrection per sum-variant carrier) - Item 5 (R3 Evaluator Mgr dispatch subtree-shape decision): (a) re-spawn as 4th R3 Mgr lane confirmed. Director (zesty-bear-812) executes per pre-authorization at msg_d456b60d. - Phase A immediate dispatch authorized (implicit in ratification). Close-audit doc skeleton + §1.8 row #106 authoring proceeds PM-direct post-merge. §6 checklist updated: all operator-decision boxes checked. Director-tier deliverable R2-Evaluator audit also marked complete (msg_82b9c4bb 2026-05-13; absorbed at 85c230b + 97cfb9d). Footer status updated from "DRAFT pending operator scope approval" to "operator fully ratified 2026-05-13; READY FOR DISPATCH post-merge". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3-close): absorb codex BLOCKING #11284 + reframe alternative-disposition class per operator §4 ratification PR #3013 Codex BLOCKING #11284 (2 findings on 97cfb9d): F1 — `docs/r3-actual-close-plan.md:11` closure target generically allowed any adversarial gap to be "explicitly R4-deferred", semantically reintroducing a carve-out path the design-pure-bootstrap-zero.md + r3-program-plan.md authorities explicitly forbid. PM-intent dilution. F2 — `docs/r3-actual-close-plan.md:89` Gap 2 alternative-disposition authored Rust-only-Shape-A scope-narrow as an explicit fallback, semantically weakening the §3.1 3-target promise without prior authority reconciliation. Both findings are an instance of a broader class: alternative-disposition language across §0 + Gaps 1/2/3/9 was authored pre-ratification when operator hadn't yet foreclosed those paths. Post-operator-§4 ratification 2026-05-13 (ALL IN-R3, no R4-carves), they are stale-against-ratification. Consistent reframe applied to all 4 alternative-disposition instances: - Line 11 (§0 closure target): R4-defer / THESIS-reframe paths STRUCTURALLY FORECLOSED per operator §4 IN-R3 ratification; legacy alt-disposition sections retained as audit-trail not as available paths. - Line 48 (Gap 1 alt disposition): operator §4 Item 1 IN-R3 ratification supersedes; dual-amendment authority chain preserved as closure-rule discipline for any future re-opening. - Line 89 (Gap 2 alt disposition): operator §4 Item 2 IN-R3 ratification forecloses Rust-only-narrow. - Line 133 (Gap 3 alt disposition): operator §4 Item 3 IN-R3 ratification forecloses R1-horizon-narrow + 5-sub-lane R4-carve. - Line 342 (Gap 9 alt disposition): operator §4 Item 4 IN-R3 ratification forecloses THESIS-aspirational-not-R3-promised reframe. Also propagated ratification state into §4 header (request-for-ratification → RATIFIED 2026-05-13) + line 3 Status line (DRAFT → FULLY RATIFIED). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
1 participant
Summary
docs/briefs/r2-pr-a1-runtime-value-dependency-audit.mdValueand the existing L1 behavior markertype Value {}insrc/v3/spec/v3_l1.dagScope
Docs-only dependency audit. This PR does not declare runtime
Value, does not introduceRuntimeValue, does not addClosureValue, and does not touch PR-A.2EvalFrame/EvalStateStackcarrier work owned by Worker C.Local verification
cargo fmt --all --checkLC_ALL=C rg -n "[^[:ascii:]]" docs/briefs/r2-pr-a1-runtime-value-dependency-audit.md || trueResume gate
PR-A.1 carrier implementation resumes after Substrate/Director resolves the flat-name collision by renaming/splitting the L1 behavior marker, adding module-qualified declaration identity, or explicitly amending the PB-Runtime/PR-A.0 value-name lock.