Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delete .github/workflows/snyk.yml #2587

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2025
Merged

Delete .github/workflows/snyk.yml #2587

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2025

Conversation

rtyley
Copy link
Member

@rtyley rtyley commented Feb 14, 2025

This reports itself as deprecated:

This sbt-node-snyk workflow is deprecated. Please delete this workflow

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Feb 14, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: befbfac

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@rtyley rtyley requested a review from akash1810 February 14, 2025 11:44
This reports itself as deprecated:

```
This sbt-node-snyk workflow is deprecated. Please delete this workflow
```

https://github.com/guardian/cdk/actions/runs/13328404735/job/37226700025
@rtyley rtyley marked this pull request as ready for review February 14, 2025 12:01
@rtyley rtyley enabled auto-merge February 14, 2025 12:01
@rtyley rtyley merged commit f8d1a00 into main Feb 14, 2025
4 checks passed
@rtyley rtyley deleted the delete-snyk branch February 14, 2025 12:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants