Fix suite_runner with logger.

[winterfroststrom]

In #606, suite_runner was not changed and had not tests and I didn't notice it, so this fixes that

---

This change is 

[xpconanfan]

Reviewable status: 0 of 2 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @winterfroststrom and @xpconanfan)

---

tests/mobly/suite_runner_test.py, line 90 at r1 (raw file):

        tmp_file_path = os.path.join(self.tmp_dir, 'config.yml')
        with io.open(tmp_file_path, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f:
            f.write(u'TestBeds:\n')

can we not write one big string instead of separate write statements?

[winterfroststrom]

Reviewable status: 0 of 2 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @winterfroststrom and @xpconanfan)

---

tests/mobly/suite_runner_test.py, line 90 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, xpconanfan (Ang Li) wrote…

can we not write one big string instead of separate write statements?

Done.

[xpconanfan]

Reviewable status: 0 of 2 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @winterfroststrom)

---

tests/mobly/suite_runner_test.py, line 90 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, winterfroststrom wrote…

Done.

If you want to inline them, you can do
("blah:"
" secondary blah:"
" more indent blah")

[winterfroststrom]

Reviewable status: 0 of 2 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @winterfroststrom and @xpconanfan)

---

tests/mobly/suite_runner_test.py, line 90 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, xpconanfan (Ang Li) wrote…

If you want to inline them, you can do
("blah:"
" secondary blah:"
" more indent blah")

I mean I could also do that with a heredoc, is there a preference here?

[xpconanfan]

Reviewable status: 0 of 2 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @winterfroststrom)

---

tests/mobly/suite_runner_test.py, line 90 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, winterfroststrom wrote…

I mean I could also do that with a heredoc, is there a preference here?

slight preference for not having macros that can't be indented...

[winterfroststrom]

Reviewable status: 0 of 2 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @winterfroststrom and @xpconanfan)

---

tests/mobly/suite_runner_test.py, line 90 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, xpconanfan (Ang Li) wrote…

slight preference for not having macros that can't be indented...

I'm not sure what you mean by indented?

[xpconanfan]

Reviewable status: 0 of 3 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @winterfroststrom)

---

tests/mobly/suite_runner_test.py, line 90 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, winterfroststrom wrote…

I'm not sure what you mean by indented?

Like you can't indent the actual string in code, and this looks weird:

        f.write(u"""

TestBeds:
# A test bed where adb will find Android devices.
- Name: SampleTestBed
Controllers:
MagicDevice: '*'
""")

[winterfroststrom]

Reviewable status: 0 of 3 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @winterfroststrom and @xpconanfan)

---

tests/mobly/suite_runner_test.py, line 90 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, xpconanfan (Ang Li) wrote…

Like you can't indent the actual string in code, and this looks weird:

        f.write(u"""

TestBeds:
# A test bed where adb will find Android devices.
- Name: SampleTestBed
Controllers:
MagicDevice: '*'
""")

I'm not sure why you want this to be indented since that seems less readable than just a macro string to me, but okay

[xpconanfan]

Reviewable status: 0 of 3 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @winterfroststrom and @xpconanfan)