v2 / review and unify column type translation #138
Labels
breaking change
This feature / fix introduces breaking changes
proposal
A suggestion for a change, feature, enhancement, etc
s: accepted
was accepted or confirmed
Milestone
It seems like there are some reasonable open issues regarding the column type translation from Fizz's to database's.
some findings are:
colType()
could be slightly confusingtimestamp
is just treated asdatetime
datetime
has a timezone (buttimestamp
it not)time
is treated asdatetime
which should not bedate
is treated asnumeric
in SQLite3float
anddecimal
are treated as the same (decimal
) in most dialectsRelated open issues and PRs (at this moment):
timestamp
column type. #48Also, related issues/PRs on the other modules:
created_at
andupdated_at
fields in UTC pop#23Old issues/PRs related to this:
Other issues about an ID field which is restricted to be int or UUID
Date type definitions:
Release/Support/Lifecycle policy for database engines:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: