#1215: Migrate to slnx solution file format

[kashifsoofi]

• I agree that my contribution may be licensed either under MIT or any version of LGPL license.

[badcel]

Is slnx already supported oficially by dotnet?

[kashifsoofi]

Is slnx already supported oficially by dotnet?

Yes it seems to be the case, since sdk version 9.0.200, build is successful as well

[badcel]

Hm it seem to work for dotnet 8, too.

I will need to test this with Rider and read a little bit in the Microsoft docs before merging.

[badcel]

It reads like it is not generally available. So I would wait a little more before merging this.

[UrtsiSantsi]

I was planning to to this a few moths ago, but it is not in Fedora yet (even now), so the ci will not work

[badcel]

I think we can give this a go. I can't find the docs stating that it's not fully released. Can you rebase on current main as the code is on a pretty old base.

[kashifsoofi]

Updated

[badcel]

Hm something is off: Buildalyzer seems to not support slnx: Buildalyzer/Buildalyzer#295

But the CI is green here. On my local main branch the tests are red. Currently I'm not sure if the unit tests are running correctly at all.

[badcel]

As the buildalyzer dependency got removed in #1362 and all the nugets are updated and there is dotnet 10 support I think this should work if you just rebase it on current 'main'.

[kashifsoofi]

As the buildalyzer dependency got removed in #1362 and all the nugets are updated and there is dotnet 10 support I think this should work if you just rebase it on current 'main'.

Rebased

[badcel]

Just checked it one more time in Rider and it works like expected :-).

Thanks again for your contribution and ongoing support 🚀