-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 220
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Automatic Release detection (#335) #363
feat: Automatic Release detection (#335) #363
Conversation
a972959
to
5d9e534
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If so inclined, please see the note I left on the GetDefaultRelease()
function declaration.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@AramisHM thanks for your contribution, muito obrigado! Only required change is to not introduce any new exported symbol. We can always revisit how exactly the automatic detection works later.
Attempts to guess the release info, either by getting the last git commit hash or by looking up some known environment variables that tracks release identification.
5d9e534
to
790558d
Compare
Thank you for taking the time to deal with a newbie. Wasn't sure if create a new commit, ended up force pushing the new code on top of the old one. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @AramisHM!
Attempts to guess the release info, either by getting the last git
commit hash or by looking up some know environment variables that tracks
release identification.
Had to make changes on some tests, though I am not sure if what I wrote there is appropriated.
Closes #335.