Update citation info on website 1

[gassmoeller]

In the past years I have not paid much attention to keeping the citation info on the website https://aspect.geodynamics.org/citing.html?ver=release&src=www updated. Thus, we have a number of new methods that are based on published papers, which are not listed. This PR fixes this for the plugins for which I know the related papers. If anyone is aware of other papers that are connected to individual methods in ASPECT feel free to let me know. I will open the corresponding PR for the website branch next.

[gassmoeller]

/rebuild

[Shangxin-Liu]

Hi Rene and Timo,

I missed this pull request yesterday. As for the CBF heat flux plugin. Actually, there is another paper published in the year 2023 that you two are coauthored, benchmarked the CBF heat flux through Nusselt number in 3D spherical shell thermal convection. Rene implemented the CBF heat flux post-processor in 2019 and this paper benchmarked the heat flux output based on ASPECT 2.2.0 which using the CBF heatflux postprocessor. Can we add this paper together with the other one for the CBF hear flux method?

Euen, G. T., Liu, S., Gassmöller, R., Heister, T., & King, S. D. (2023). A comparison of 3-D spherical shell thermal convection results at low to moderate Rayleigh number using ASPECT (version 2.2. 0) and CitcomS (version 3.3. 1). Geoscientific Model Development, 16(11), 3221-3239.

@gassmoeller @tjhei

[gassmoeller]

That is a good point, thanks @Shangxin-Liu. Sorry I had completely forgotten that that paper also included the Nusselt number/heat flux computation. I still left the other paper in, because Euen et al. doesnt describe the CBF method, while Dannberg et al. does. See #6174.

[gassmoeller]

I was similarly unsure about the dynamic topography CBF method. We could include either Shangxin and Scott's paper from 2019 (https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/217/1/650/5290318#130755184), or this one (or both):

Karen Williams, D Sarah Stamps, Jaqueline Austermann, Scott King, Emmanuel Njinju, Effects of using the consistent boundary flux method on dynamic topography estimates, Geophysical Journal International, Volume 238, Issue 2, August 2024, Pages 1137–1149, https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae203

The problem is that neither paper includes the original author (Ian Rose) and therefore I am not sure it is appropriate to list them as the correct reference to cite. Maybe I can reach @ian-r-rose, here? Ian we are looking for a proper reference to cite for the consistent boundary flux method that you implemented to compute the dynamic topography in ASPECT long ago (in #1572). Is there something official we can cite (like your thesis or a paper)? If not, are you ok with us listing one of the papers that benchmark the method as the reference to cite? At least the first one also includes you in the acknowledgments as the author of the method.

[ljhwang]

I am not finding that Euen et al., 2023 did not make it into the Publications list on aspect.geodynamics.org. I did find it on geodynamics.org so it must mean I forgot to update the file. I will add this on my next update if this is correct but I wanted to make sure I am not duplicating effort if this has been done and I missed the PR.

[Shangxin-Liu]

As for the CBF dynamic topography method, I agree with Rene @gassmoeller . Including both of the two papers is ok, but we need to somehow highlight the contribution of Ian Rose to introduce this method into ASPECT, as we acknowledged him in the last section of Liu and King, 2019. Maybe we can mention Ian's contribution in ASPECT manual or the same citation website? Let's say whether Ian is here. @ian-r-rose

Btw, as far as I know, the CBF method to calculate dynamic topography is based on this old paper.

Zhong, S., Gurnis, M., & Hulbert, G. (1993). Accurate determination of surface normal stress in viscous flow from a consistent boundary flux method. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 78(1-2), 1-8.

But this is the origin of the math formulation of the method instead of the one based on ASPECT code.

[Shangxin-Liu]

I am not finding that Euen et al., 2023 did not make it into the Publications list on aspect.geodynamics.org. I did find it on geodynamics.org so it must mean I forgot to update the file. I will add this on my next update if this is correct but I wanted to make sure I am not duplicating effort if this has been done and I missed the PR.

Thanks Lorraine! @ljhwang Yes. It seems that Euen et al., 2023 is not in the publication list on aspect.geodynamics.org. The other one Euen et al., 2022 is the original submitted version to open discussion in GMD journal. There are also two google scholar citations. Thanks to the open discussion review system of GMD journal:-) This causes confusion.

[gassmoeller]

#6174 should add the (final published) version of Euen 2023. When that PR is merged and after the website is updated the next time it should appear in the list.