Add operational observability problem document - #38
Merged
Conversation
Review Summary by QodoAdd operational observability problem document for autonomous factory
WalkthroughsDescription• Introduces comprehensive operational observability problem document • Addresses challenges of running autonomous software factory at scale • Covers debuggability, system health monitoring, cost tracking, and continuous improvement • Explores community operating model and tooling approaches Diagramflowchart LR
A["Operational Challenges"] --> B["System Health Monitoring"]
A --> C["Debuggability & Debugging"]
A --> D["Cost Tracking"]
A --> E["Continuous Improvement"]
B --> F["Observability Tooling"]
C --> F
D --> F
E --> F
F --> G["Community Operation Model"]
File Changes1. README.md
|
Code Review by Qodo🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0) 📐 Spec deviations (0)
Great, no issues found!Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require reviewⓘ The new review experience is currently in Beta. Learn more |
rh-hemartin
reviewed
Mar 23, 2026
maruiz93
reviewed
Mar 24, 2026
Explore the operational challenges of running a fully autonomous software factory: debuggability, system health monitoring, cost tracking, continuous improvement, and the community operating model. Distinct from individual agent tracing (narrower scope) — this document focuses on what the humans and teams operating the factory need to understand, the questions they need to answer, and the tooling approaches that make the system debuggable and improvable at organizational scale. Inspired by the agent-agent-observability-langfuse branch, which surfaced the need for a broader treatment of operational debuggability beyond agent execution tracing and specific tool choices. Assisted-by: OpenCode claude-opus-4-6@default
Incorporate review feedback from @rh-hemartin: PR diffs, codebase state, and issue descriptions are already stored in GitHub and git. Traces should reference these by pointer (SHA, URL) and focus on capturing the novel data — LLM interactions — that existing systems don't store. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…back - Remove konflux-ci-specific references per the org-agnostic repositioning (PR #42, now merged) - Incorporate Marta's review insight: non-determinism is a frontier that can be pushed back as recurring agent judgments get codified into deterministic tools (linters, scanners, policies) - Add cross-reference to self-improvement-flywheel.md where this dynamic is explored in depth Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ralphbean
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2026
…ction - Remove Konflux-specific references per the org-agnostic repositioning (PR #42, now merged) - Add "Deterministic tool extraction" subsection incorporating Marta's review insight from PR #38: agents discover which checks should exist, those get codified into linters/scanners/policies, and the non-deterministic scope shrinks over time — reducing AI coupling - Add cross-references between flywheel and operational observability docs - Add deterministic tool proposals to the self-proposal list Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ralphbean
force-pushed
the
agent-operational-observability-problem-doc
branch
from
March 24, 2026 18:56
86bb97b to
70a2a25
Compare
rh-hemartin
approved these changes
Mar 25, 2026
This was referenced Jul 12, 2026
Open
5 tasks
This was referenced Jul 22, 2026
4 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Explore the operational challenges of running a fully autonomous software factory: debuggability, system health monitoring, cost tracking, continuous improvement, and the community operating model. Distinct from individual agent tracing (narrower scope) — this document focuses on what the humans and teams operating the factory need to understand, the questions they need to answer, and the tooling approaches that make the system debuggable and improvable at organizational scale.
Inspired by the agent-agent-observability-langfuse branch, which surfaced the need for a broader treatment of operational debuggability beyond agent execution tracing and specific tool choices.
Assisted-by: OpenCode claude-opus-4-6@default