docs(#2067): add dispatch workflow sync guidance to CLAUDE.md

[fullsend-ai-coder]

Add a new bold-titled paragraph documenting that dispatch.yml and reusable-dispatch.yml must stay in sync, following the same pattern used for the mint function sync guidance. This addresses a documentation gap that caused PR #2048 to miss syncing a jq payload change across the two files.

Note: make lint could not run in sandbox due to Go module cache permission errors. This is a documentation-only change with no Go code modified.

---

Closes #2067

Post-script verification

• Branch is not main/master (agent/2067-dispatch-sync-guidance)
• Secret scan passed (gitleaks — 46eb2347412401912817b8c5e04ebf4b6ce761b2..HEAD)
• Pre-commit hooks passed (authoritative run on runner)
• Tests ran inside sandbox

[github-actions]

Site preview

Preview: https://50e53190-site.fullsend-ai.workers.dev

Commit: 38dba6fbead045bb3860b0fc3e9983394beca553

[fullsend-ai-review]

🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 11:48 AM UTC · Completed 11:53 AM UTC
Commit: ba204cb · View workflow run →

[fullsend-ai-review]

Review

Findings

No findings.

The PR adds dispatch workflow sync guidance to CLAUDE.md, following the established pattern used for mint function and mintcore sync guidance. The referenced file paths (internal/scaffold/fullsend-repo/.github/workflows/dispatch.yml and .github/workflows/reusable-dispatch.yml) are verified to exist and do share identical routing logic. The change is correctly scoped to issue #2067 with no scope creep.

[fullsend-ai-retro]

🤖 Finished Retro · ✅ Success · Started 7:08 AM UTC · Completed 7:21 AM UTC
Commit: 4ed6da4 · View workflow run →

[fullsend-ai-retro]

Retro: PR #2068 — Add dispatch workflow sync guidance to CLAUDE.md

This was a clean, efficient end-to-end workflow. Issue #2067 (filed by the retro bot from a prior workflow) was triaged in ~3 minutes, coded in ~5 minutes (single clean edit to CLAUDE.md), review-approved in ~6 minutes, and merged after human approval the next day. No rework was needed.

What went well

• Code agent was focused and efficient: read CLAUDE.md, verified both referenced workflow files exist, made one precise 2-line edit, and committed cleanly.
• Review agent correctly verified the documentation claims by reading both workflow files and confirming they share routing logic. The approve verdict was appropriate.
• Zero rework — the code agent got it right on the first attempt.

Minor observations (already tracked)

• The review agent dispatched 3 parallel sub-agents for a 2-line docs-only change, which is disproportionate. This is already tracked in #1900 ("Review orchestrator: add fast path for trivial docs/prompt-only changes").
• make lint failed in the sandbox due to Go module cache permissions. Already tracked in #2041.

No new proposals — existing issues adequately cover the improvement opportunities identified.