Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Load aws credentials from env vars or instance profile #7

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2012
Merged

Load aws credentials from env vars or instance profile #7

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2012

Conversation

petergillardmoss
Copy link
Contributor

AWS supports loading credentials via env variables[1] and the IAM Instance Profile[2]. To achieve this you simply don't give aws any credentials.

To enable this feature I had to make the credentials non-mandatory. As they work as a pair I don't provide either unless they are both present.

Support for IAM Instance Role security is supported from aws-sdk 1.5.3 [3], I've upgraded to 1.7.1 which is currently the latest.

[1] http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AWSRubySDK/latest/AWS/Core/CredentialProviders/ENVProvider.html
[2] http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AWSRubySDK/latest/frames.html
[3] http://aws.amazon.com/releasenotes/0304005114813505

…tance Profile by making the credentials non-mandatory
kzk added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2012
Load aws credentials from env vars or instance profile
@kzk kzk merged commit eecb5d1 into fluent:master Nov 19, 2012
@kzk
Copy link
Member

kzk commented Nov 19, 2012

Thanks for the pull request! Will update the plugin within my environment and use several days (1.1 to 1.7 is huge jump). If everything is fine, I'll release the new version.

:secret_access_key => @aws_sec_key
}
if @aws_key_id && @aws_sec_key
options[:access_key_id] = @aws_key_id
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where is the 'options' variable?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Damm, could you fix it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, my fault, merge error. Should be after the super

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the fix is already committed by @repeatedly 👍

repeatedly added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2012
@kzk
Copy link
Member

kzk commented Nov 19, 2012

cool, thx @repeatedly

chillaxd pushed a commit to chillaxd/fluent-plugin-s3 that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2016
# This is the 1st commit message:

# This is a combination of 3 commits.
# This is the 1st commit message:
# This is a combination of 3 commits.
# This is the 1st commit message:
Out S3 change

so that user can use minimal policy at AWS, to work with fluentd
like S3:PutObject

# This is the commit message fluent#2:

Spacing handled in out-S3 plugin

# This is the commit message fluent#3:

Identation modified

# This is the commit message fluent#4:

Introduce check_bucket paramater
To skip the using of auto_create_bucket for bucket existence checking

# This is the commit message fluent#5:

Fixes:

Test cases added.
README has been modified with check_bucket's usage and sample AWS policy.

# This is the commit message fluent#6:

Fixes:

Issues for extra spoaces. Modified

# This is the commit message fluent#7:

Spacing issues

# This is the commit message fluent#8:

Update test_out_s3.rb

# This is the commit message fluent#9:

time slicer modified for utc also

# This is the commit message fluent#10:

removing test cases

# This is the commit message fluent#1:

renaming time_slicer variable

# This is the commit message fluent#2:

Test casees added

Test cases for out_s3 plugin has been added. This feature will work with hardened
S3 policy like with only PutObject permission. As it will not check bucket existence
not even object existence, as for each object creation it will name it with timestamp.
So anyhow it will be unique everytime.

Only thing it willl assume that bucket is created already.

# This is the commit message fluent#3:

Some variable renamed

# This is the commit message fluent#2:

Clean up dependencies

# This is the commit message fluent#3:

Update README for placeholders

# This is the commit message fluent#2:

v0.8.0.rc1
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants