Skip to content

Conversation

@suranmiao
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

There is a new function added in the go1.21 standard library, which can make the code more concise and easy to read.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @suranmiao, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request modernizes the codebase by adopting the slices.Sort function from the Go 1.21 standard library. This refactoring simplifies the sorting logic for integer slices, enhancing code readability and conciseness without altering the functional behavior of the existing sorting operations.

Highlights

  • Refactor for improved sorting: Replaced the older sort.Slice function with the new slices.Sort function, introduced in Go 1.21, for natural ordering of integer slices. This change leverages modern Go features to make the code more concise and readable.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly refactors the sorting logic in tools/cache-analyzer/main.go by replacing sort.Slice with the more concise slices.Sort function, which was introduced in Go 1.21. This change improves code readability and conciseness, aligning with modern Go idioms. The implementation is correct and a good improvement.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt enabled auto-merge October 17, 2025 10:33
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 17, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 61.42%. Comparing base (1890a37) to head (875e8cc).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
tools/cache-analyzer/main.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2768   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.42%   61.42%           
=======================================
  Files          81       81           
  Lines        8622     8622           
=======================================
  Hits         5296     5296           
  Misses       2828     2828           
  Partials      498      498           
Flag Coverage Δ
combined 61.42% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@tac0turtle tac0turtle disabled auto-merge October 17, 2025 12:46
@tac0turtle tac0turtle merged commit bd7891f into evstack:main Oct 17, 2025
18 of 22 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Done in Evolve Oct 17, 2025
alpe added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2025
* main:
  feat(cache): cache pruning (#2761)
  refactor: replace sort.Slice with slices.Sort for natural ordering (#2768)
  chore!: cleanup header unused types (#2766)
  chore: remove unused flag (#2765)
  chore: fix some comments (#2762)
@claude claude bot mentioned this pull request Nov 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants