-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 246
refactor: omit unnecessary reassignment #2584
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: deepdring <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @deepdring, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request refactors existing Go test code by eliminating unnecessary variable reassignments within for loops. This change aligns the codebase with recent Go language optimizations, where explicit reassignments of loop variables (e.g., tt := tt) are no longer required to ensure correct behavior with closures. The refactoring improves code readability and maintains functionality without altering the logic of the tests.
Highlights
- Code Refactoring: The pull request refactors Go test files by removing redundant variable reassignments within
forloops. This change leverages optimizations in newer Go versions where such reassignments are no longer necessary to prevent issues with loop variable capture in closures.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request refactors Go tests to remove the tt := tt variable shadowing, which is a good cleanup for projects using Go 1.22 or newer. The change correctly identifies an outdated pattern. However, this refactoring introduces a critical dependency on Go 1.22+. Without an accompanying update to the go.mod file to enforce this Go version, the parallel tests will be subject to race conditions and will likely fail or produce incorrect results when run with older Go versions. My review includes a critical comment to address this potential issue by ensuring the Go version is updated.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| for _, tt := range tests { | ||
| tt := tt |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removing the tt := tt shadowing is only safe if the project's Go version is 1.22 or higher. This change relies on the new loop variable semantics introduced in Go 1.22. If the project is compiled with an older Go version, this will introduce a race condition in these parallel tests, causing them to behave incorrectly and fail unpredictably.
Recommendation:
To prevent this critical issue, the go.mod file must be updated to go 1.22 or newer as part of this pull request. If updating the Go version is not possible, this change should be reverted.
<!-- Please read and fill out this form before submitting your PR. Please make sure you have reviewed our contributors guide before submitting your first PR. NOTE: PR titles should follow semantic commits: https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/ --> ## Overview <!-- Please provide an explanation of the PR, including the appropriate context, background, goal, and rationale. If there is an issue with this information, please provide a tl;dr and link the issue. Ex: Closes #<issue number> --> Inspired by #2584 and replace all case. The new version of Go has been optimized, and variables do not need to be reassigned. For more info: https://tip.golang.org/wiki/LoopvarExperiment#does-this-mean-i-dont-have-to-write-x--x-in-my-loops-anymore Signed-off-by: rifeplight <[email protected]>
Overview
The new version of Go has been optimized, and variables do not need to be reassigned.
Inspired by helm/helm#31134