ECIP1087 [Draft]: A way to resolve the ECIP1061/ECIP1078/ECIP1086/EIP2200 testnet fiasco (rollback Mordor, leave Kotti)#295
Conversation
…tion Signed-off-by: meows <b5c6@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: meows <b5c6@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: meows <b5c6@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: meows <b5c6@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: meows <b5c6@protonmail.com>
… etc mainnet Signed-off-by: meows <b5c6@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: meows <b5c6@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: meows <b5c6@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: meows <b5c6@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: meows <b5c6@protonmail.com>
|
I agree with the rationale. Applying 1086 to Kotti makes a lot of sense. To simplify the testnet reset on Mordor, I would propose to move both Aztlan and Phoenix to block |
|
I actually don't think we would need an ECIP for that. See #296 directly applying your suggestion. |
|
Should this be closed now? |
|
@YazzyYaz How about I'll edit to |
Signed-off-by: meows <b5c6@protonmail.com>
|
i approved "withdrawn" status pls second approval and move to merge |
|
@ethereumclassic/ecip-editors please review for editorial righteousness for the doc-only merge |
|
@meowsbits License is clarified at the header, but I think if you add these details at the bottom, it's fine editorially: ImplementationN/A Copyright/LicensingThis work is licensed under Apache License, Version |
per ethereumclassic#295 (comment) Signed-off-by: meows <b5c6@protonmail.com>
|
Is this obsoleted by Phoenix, @meowsbits? |
|
Yea it'll probably be practically obsoleted, but I think it should be merged because
|
bobsummerwill
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For the historical record ...
|
@bobsummerwill @meowsbits ...yes, I think it went thru a cycle and has to be merged as it was proposed, draft, and withdrawn...actually it should not go thru these cycles as a PR! ;) |
|
@ethereumclassic/ecip-editors beep boop Now we've established at least 3 times that this is for documentation only... please review for the format for the merge for the the PR-inbox sanity. |
Abstract
Don't touch Kotti; allow ECIP1061, ECIP1078, and ECIP1086 (EIP2200, EIP2200Disable) to continue as specified and implemented there.
Set Mordor ECIP1078 activation to 778507 (equivalent to ECIP1061), and rollback to 750000.
Rationale
Kotti is a PoA network, so it doesn't simulate (ie test) ETC mainnet in the first place (at least not well) since it uses different consensus rules. If it is a public simulation and test of ETC mainnet, it isn't a good one. So we can follow the logic of A: Testnets-as-service.
Mordor is a PoW network, so is is a pretty good simulator of ETC mainnet. We can follow the logic of B: Testnets-as-test, and not only resolve the issue of EIP2200 correction, but improve the network's simulation of mainnet activation for ECIP1061 and ECIP1078.
Rendered: https://github.com/meowsbits/ECIPs/blob/feat/ecip1087/_specs/ecip-1087.md