Move ECIP-1078 ("fix") to Last Call. Move ECIP-1079 ("redo") to Withdrawn.#285
Conversation
Move ECIP-1079 ("redo") to Withdrawn.
Aztlán has activated on the Mordor testnet, so can no longer be withdrawn.
Proceeding with "fix" appears to be our best option.
bobsummerwill
requested review from
BelfordZ,
YazzyYaz,
meowsbits,
realcodywburns and
soc1c
soc1c
left a comment
soc1c
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
proposed block numbers for the testnets in 4 and 5 weeks. please add a review period end.
Set block times for Mordor and Kotti as suggested by soc1c. Block for ETC mainnet activation is still TBD, but estimated as April/May/June. This means that Azltan+Phoenix is DELAYED from the earlier estimated 25th March 2020 target. The reason for the delay is a mixture of the unpredictability of block mining (estimate was made back in October) and the need for more time given the misspecification which let to the need for the Phoenix HF.
Updated estimates for Kotti and ETC mainnet activation for Aztlan.
…ck for Phoenix as for Aztlan, even though that is still in May/June. We certainly would not want to activate any LATER if we can avoid it. And as per soc1c, we should avoid activation of Phoenix earlier than Azltan (too many edge-cases). So, for good or bad, I guess we are locked into block 10_500_839, even though it is much later than originally planned (March 25th). Given the "fly in the ointment" of the mis-specification, perhaps that is a blessing in disguise. This does NOT stop us starting work towards features and fixes which would likely land in the HF after Atzlan/Phoenix. We can do those in parallel on other testnets (like Astor).
realcodywburns
left a comment
realcodywburns
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm- these should be individual pr's in the future to facilitate rejecting or accepting changes to each on their own
|
Thanks, @realcodywburns. I lumped these together, because they are these ECIPs are inter-related "options". ECIP-1079 is being withdrawn because ECIP-1078 is moving to Last Call. It would not make sense to progress one and not the other. Also tied into ECIP-1061 timelines. |
soc1c
left a comment
soc1c
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
bob please stop editing all EIPs in a single PR
it's not important on which day exactly aztlan activated on what testnet
|
I would propose to remove the calendar dates entirely. |
…ate estimation. Meowbits suggested we remove the dates entirely, but I do not think that is a good idea. Humans do not think in blocks. However inaccurate these dates might be, humans like to make plans and that requires dates.
|
dont forget to lable this issue (I am not able), so the Project-Section of https://github.com/ethereumclassic can be followed correctly ). Thx |
|
@TheEnthusiasticAs What labelling would it need? |
|
@TheEnthusiasticAs So you are talking about https://github.com/orgs/ethereumclassic/projects/3? @realcodywburns How is this working? There are some issues and some PRs. Both PRs showing on that Aztlan dashboard are actually already closed, but the metadata getting them onto that view are obviously wrong. How does this tagging work? |
|
yes @bobsummerwill, that one. thx. I would lable in both cases, PRs & issues, to be to follow the done works. |
6 participants
Move ECIP-1078 ("fix") to Last Call.
Move ECIP-1079 ("redo") to Withdrawn.
Aztlán has activated on the Mordor testnet, so can no longer be withdrawn.
Proceeding with "fix" appears to be our best option.