Skip to content

op-node: Call FCU on new unsafe payload#3418

Merged
mergify[bot] merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
jg/fix_fcu_on_unsafe_payload
Sep 11, 2022
Merged

op-node: Call FCU on new unsafe payload#3418
mergify[bot] merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
jg/fix_fcu_on_unsafe_payload

Conversation

@trianglesphere
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This calls a FCU to set the unsafe head of the L2 execution client immediately after NewPayload is called on the execution client. This means that the unsafe head in the node state matches the unsafe head on the execution client.

This commit removes the FCU prior to the NewPayload call because we assert that the unsafe block that we are inserting extends the current unsafe head. As such, the L2 execution client is in a state to accept the new block.

Tests

No new tests.

This calls a FCU to set the unsafe head of the L2 execution client
immediately after NewPayload is called on the execution client. This
means that the unsafe head in the node state matches the unsafe head
on the execution client.

This commit removes the FCU prior to the NewPayload call because
we assert that the unsafe block that we are inserting extends the
current unsafe head. As such, the L2 execution client is in a state
to accept the new block.
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Sep 11, 2022

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 8896e1b

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 11, 2022

This PR changes implementation code, but doesn't include a changeset. Did you forget to add one?

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 11, 2022

This PR has been added to the merge queue, and will be merged soon.

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 5b6bd79 into develop Sep 11, 2022
@mergify mergify bot deleted the jg/fix_fcu_on_unsafe_payload branch September 11, 2022 09:42
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 11, 2022

This PR is next in line to be merged, and will be merged as soon as checks pass.

@mergify mergify bot removed the on-merge-train label Sep 11, 2022
maurelian pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2022
This calls a FCU to set the unsafe head of the L2 execution client
immediately after NewPayload is called on the execution client. This
means that the unsafe head in the node state matches the unsafe head
on the execution client.

This commit removes the FCU prior to the NewPayload call because
we assert that the unsafe block that we are inserting extends the
current unsafe head. As such, the L2 execution client is in a state
to accept the new block.
sam-goldman pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2022
This calls a FCU to set the unsafe head of the L2 execution client
immediately after NewPayload is called on the execution client. This
means that the unsafe head in the node state matches the unsafe head
on the execution client.

This commit removes the FCU prior to the NewPayload call because
we assert that the unsafe block that we are inserting extends the
current unsafe head. As such, the L2 execution client is in a state
to accept the new block.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants