Typo Update OpProposerDescriptionShort.md

[0xbryer]

Issue:

The original sentence uses the preposition "into" where "of" is more appropriate:

"...and creates the view into the L2 state from the L1's perspective."

Fix:

The corrected version replaces "into" with "of":

"...and creates the view of the L2 state from the L1's perspective."

Why this fix is important:

1. Grammatical accuracy: The preposition "into" implies movement or direction, which is not appropriate in this context. The correct preposition, "of," properly conveys the idea of a "view of the state."
2. Semantic clarity: Using "of" ensures that the meaning is clear and accurately describes the relationship between the L1 and L2 states.
3. Professional documentation: Correct grammar and precise language improve the quality and readability of technical documentation, fostering trust and professionalism.

Changes made:

• Updated the preposition in the sentence to improve grammatical and semantic accuracy.

Thank you for reviewing this improvement!

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	fb49489
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/6739bb5de0593a0008c0b47c
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1122--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve a minor textual modification to the description of the op-proposer service within the documentation. Specifically, the phrase "creates the view into the L2 state" has been revised to "creates the view of the L2 state." This change is intended to enhance clarity without impacting the functionality or logic of the content. Additionally, there were no alterations made to the declarations of exported or public entities in this update.

Possibly related PRs

• Docs improvements #776: The changes in this PR involve minor adjustments in wording for clarity, similar to the textual modification in the main PR regarding the op-proposer service description.
• Fix docs #797: This PR includes minor semantic adjustments in wording, reflecting a focus on clarity, akin to the changes made in the main PR.
• Op deployer updates #1020: The updates in this PR enhance clarity in the op-deployer documentation, paralleling the aim of the main PR to refine wording for better understanding.
• Typo Update content-reuse.md #1115: This PR corrects a typo in a section heading, which aligns with the main PR's focus on improving clarity through textual modifications.

Suggested reviewers

• krofax

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1a27d54 and fb49489.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• content/OpProposerDescriptionShort.md (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• content/OpProposerDescriptionShort.md

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.