build: Avoid use of fastbuild when building with gcc to work around command line limit#16492
build: Avoid use of fastbuild when building with gcc to work around command line limit#16492antoniovicente wants to merge 5 commits intoenvoyproxy:mainfrom
Conversation
…ommand line limit Signed-off-by: Antonio Vicente <avd@google.com>
ci/do_ci.sh
Outdated
|
|
||
| echo "bazel release build with gcc..." | ||
| bazel_binary_build fastbuild | ||
| bazel_binary_build release |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should do dbg as well. Otherwise it is full rebuild again.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd prefer if we used -c dbg, since there are no debug builds done on the CI (...well, there is an ASan build with -c dbg, but a lot of projects turn off certain features in builds with sanitizers to avoid false-positives), and there were a few issues in the past that would have been caught by it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Makes sense. Rolled back the switch to release, I'll wait for the review of #16132 to complete.
|
/wait |
Signed-off-by: Antonio Vicente <avd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Antonio Vicente <avd@google.com>
|
gcc failures in wasm tests look odd. Failures seem consistent though, does dbg not play nice with WASM under gcc? https://dev.azure.com/cncf/4684fb3d-0389-4e0b-8251-221942316e06/_apis/build/builds/75652/logs/182 |
|
/retest |
|
Retrying Azure Pipelines: |
This is fixed in #16132. |
Signed-off-by: Antonio Vicente <avd@google.com>
Thanks for the fix and for commenting about it here. And sorry for the delayed response, been a bit distracted with other things. |
|
Blocked by #16132 /wait |
Signed-off-by: Antonio Vicente <avd@google.com>
|
/retest |
|
Retrying Azure Pipelines: |
|
@antoniovicente you need to merge |
I can try to merge again, but it seems to me that the problem is that -c dbg builds use more disk space. |
|
This PR already has the latest upstream/main merged in. The issue is higher disk usage when building with |
|
I'm going to tag this as waiting given CI failure |
|
I think we can close this one. |
Issue: #16196