Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. """ WalkthroughA rule versioning system is introduced by adding a Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ActionHandler
participant RuleService
participant RuleHistoryService
participant Database
User->>ActionHandler: Create or Update Rule
ActionHandler->>RuleService: safeCreateRule / safeUpdateRule (with triggerType)
RuleService->>Database: Create/Update Rule
RuleService->>RuleHistoryService: createRuleHistory(rule, triggerType)
RuleHistoryService->>Database: Insert RuleHistory entry
RuleService->>ActionHandler: Return Rule
ActionHandler->>User: Return Result
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/utils/rule/rule-history.ts (1)
32-49: Ensure serialization captures all relevant fields.The current serialization manually selects specific fields from actions and categoryFilters. Consider whether this approach will scale well if new fields are added to these models in the future.
Consider documenting which fields are intentionally excluded or adding a comment about maintaining this serialization when the schema evolves.
apps/web/utils/rule/rule.ts (1)
231-247: Consider adding history tracking to rule action updates.The
updateRuleActionsfunction modifies rule behavior but doesn't track history. Consider whether action-only updates should also be tracked for a complete audit trail.If you want to track action updates, you could add the triggerType parameter and history tracking:
export async function updateRuleActions({ ruleId, actions, + triggerType = "manual_update", }: { ruleId: string; actions: CreateOrUpdateRuleSchemaWithCategories["actions"]; + triggerType?: "ai_update" | "manual_update" | "system_update"; }) { - return prisma.rule.update({ + const rule = await prisma.rule.update({ where: { id: ruleId }, data: { actions: { deleteMany: {}, createMany: { data: mapActionFields(actions) }, }, }, + include: { actions: true, categoryFilters: true, group: true }, }); + + await createRuleHistory({ rule, triggerType }); + return rule; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
apps/web/prisma/schema.prisma(2 hunks)apps/web/utils/actions/rule.ts(3 hunks)apps/web/utils/reply-tracker/enable.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/utils/rule/rule-history.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/utils/rule/rule.ts(9 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (3)
apps/web/utils/actions/rule.ts (1)
apps/web/utils/rule/rule-history.ts (1)
createRuleHistory(15-73)
apps/web/utils/rule/rule-history.ts (1)
apps/web/utils/ai/rule/create-prompt-from-rule.ts (1)
RuleWithRelations(9-23)
apps/web/utils/rule/rule.ts (2)
apps/web/utils/ai/rule/create-rule-schema.ts (1)
CreateOrUpdateRuleSchemaWithCategories(126-129)apps/web/utils/rule/rule-history.ts (1)
createRuleHistory(15-73)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Static Code Analysis Js
- GitHub Check: Jit Security
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
apps/web/utils/reply-tracker/enable.ts (1)
116-116: LGTM! Clean integration with rule history system.The addition of
triggerType: "system_creation"correctly categorizes this as a system-generated rule creation, which aligns with the new rule history tracking functionality.apps/web/utils/actions/rule.ts (3)
46-46: LGTM! Proper import for rule history functionality.
114-117: Excellent use ofafter()for non-blocking history tracking.The rule creation history is properly tracked without blocking the main response. The "manual_creation" trigger type correctly categorizes user-initiated rule creation.
246-252: Consistent pattern for rule update history tracking.Good implementation following the same pattern as rule creation, using "manual_update" trigger type to properly categorize user-initiated updates.
apps/web/utils/rule/rule-history.ts (2)
4-10: Well-defined trigger type enum with clear semantics.The
RuleHistoryTriggerunion type comprehensively covers all rule change scenarios with descriptive names and helpful comments.
51-73: Comprehensive rule state capture with proper field mapping.The function correctly maps all rule fields to the history record, maintaining a complete snapshot of the rule state at the time of change.
apps/web/prisma/schema.prisma (2)
253-255: Good additions to Rule model for history tracking.The
promptTextfield provides useful context, and thehistoryrelation is properly configured for one-to-many relationship with cascade behavior.
279-306: Well-designed RuleHistory model with comprehensive state capture.The model effectively captures complete rule snapshots with appropriate:
- Versioning strategy with unique constraint on
[ruleId, version]- Efficient indexing on
[ruleId, createdAt]for chronological queries- JSON fields for complex relations (actions, categoryFilters)
- Cascade delete to maintain referential integrity
The use of String for
triggerType(vs enum) provides flexibility while the TypeScript union type maintains type safety at the application level.apps/web/utils/rule/rule.ts (6)
14-14: LGTM: Clean import addition for history tracking.The import is correctly placed and follows the existing import organization pattern.
37-37: Well-designed parameter addition with sensible defaults.The optional
triggerTypeparameter with a default value of"ai_creation"maintains backwards compatibility while providing semantic clarity about the rule creation origin.Also applies to: 43-43
87-87: Consistent parameter design for update operations.The parameter follows the same pattern as the creation functions, with appropriate default value
"ai_update"for update operations.Also applies to: 93-93
111-111: Appropriate fallback behavior in duplicate name scenario.Setting
triggerType: "ai_creation"when falling back to creating a new rule (instead of updating) is semantically correct since a new rule is being created.
177-181: Proper history tracking implementation for rule creation.The history tracking is correctly placed after the successful rule creation and properly awaited. The rule object includes all necessary relations for complete history tracking.
222-228: Well-implemented history tracking for rule updates.The update operation correctly includes related entities and the history tracking is properly executed after the successful database update.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/prisma/migrations/20250609204102_rule_history/migration.sql (2)
10-10: ConstraintriggerTypevalues
triggerTypeis free-text, which risks invalid entries. Define a PostgresENUMor add aCHECKconstraint listing allowed types (manual_creation,manual_update,system_creation, etc.).
24-25: Provide defaults for JSONB columns
To avoid null checks in application code, defaultactionsandcategoryFiltersto an empty array ([]) or object ({}):- "actions" JSONB NOT NULL, - "categoryFilters" JSONB, + "actions" JSONB NOT NULL DEFAULT '[]', + "categoryFilters" JSONB NOT NULL DEFAULT '[]',
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/web/prisma/migrations/20250609204102_rule_history/migration.sql(1 hunks)apps/web/utils/rule/rule-history.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/web/utils/rule/rule-history.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/web/prisma/migrations/20250609204102_rule_history/migration.sql (3)
2-2: Ensure backward compatibility forpromptTextaddition
AddingpromptTextas a nullable column is correct, but you may need to backfill existingRulerows or provide a client-side default to avoid unexpectedNULLvalues in reads.
31-34: Indexes align with query patterns and uniqueness requirements
The index on(ruleId, createdAt)optimizes history lookups, and the unique index on(ruleId, version)enforces version integrity.
37-37: Foreign key cascade rules are appropriate
Cascading deletes/updates onRuleHistory.ruleIdensure referential integrity when parent rules change or are removed.
1 participant
Part of the move over to a different rule model
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Enhancements