Fix bug with not handling cold email follow up properly#322
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe changes refactor the cold email handling and logging processes across three modules. In the webhook process, the import for previous email checks is removed and logging is consolidated using a Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client as Email Source
participant HistoryProc as processHistoryItem
participant ColdAction as checkColdEmail
participant ColdChecker as isColdEmail
participant Helper as isKnownColdEmailSender
participant DB as Database
participant Logger as Logger
%% ProcessHistory flow with logging
Client->>HistoryProc: Trigger email processing
HistoryProc->>Logger: Log event using loggerOptions
%% Cold email detection flow
Client->>ColdAction: New email event with data (date, threadId)
ColdAction->>ColdChecker: Call isColdEmail(email, user, gmail)
alt Check known cold sender
ColdChecker->>Helper: Query known cold email sender using email details
Helper->>DB: Fetch sender record
DB-->>Helper: Return sender status
Helper-->>ColdChecker: Status result
end
ColdChecker-->>ColdAction: Return cold email classification
ColdAction->>HistoryProc: Invoke runColdEmailBlocker with updated email data
Poem
Tip 🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/utils/cold-email/is-cold-email.ts (2)
44-53: Consider renaming for clarity.
The variable nameisColdEmailercould more precisely reflect the fact that it checks for a known cold email sender (e.g.,isKnownColdEmailSender). This small rename might make the intent clearer for future maintainers.
82-94: Optional caching to reduce database queries.
This newisKnownColdEmailSenderfunction is straightforward. For higher volumes of requests, consider a short-lived cache to reduce repetitive lookups for the same sender.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
apps/web/app/api/google/webhook/process-history.ts(9 hunks)apps/web/utils/actions/cold-email.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/utils/cold-email/is-cold-email.ts(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
apps/web/utils/cold-email/is-cold-email.ts (3)
12-12: Confirm correct import usage.
The newly added import forhasPreviousEmailsFromSenderOrDomainis consistent with the logic below. Ensure the function is properly exported from the referenced module and that error handling is in place if the function fails.
26-37: Extended function parameters look good.
Addinggmailto the function signature and expanding thedateandthreadIdparameters is a clear approach for capturing additional context. The type definitions are consistent, and these changes help unify the logic associated with cold email detection.
55-65: Verify fallback behavior.
Here,hasPreviousEmailis set tofalsewhenemail.dateoremail.threadIdis absent. Confirm that skipping the check in these cases is intentional. There may be scenarios where only athreadIdis necessary, or you may still want partial matching (e.g., domain-based checks without a specific date).apps/web/utils/actions/cold-email.ts (1)
125-130: New fields and parameter passing approved.
AddingdateandthreadIdin thecheckColdEmailflow, along with explicitly passinggmail, aligns with the refactoredisColdEmailfunction signature. The defaulting ofthreadIdtoundefinedis a reasonable safeguard.apps/web/app/api/google/webhook/process-history.ts (3)
9-9: Confirm dropped imports are intentional.
It appearshasPreviousEmailsFromSenderOrDomainwas removed from the imports. Verify this is consistent with the new approach for managing previous email checks elsewhere.
322-327: Logger options object is a good refactoring.
ExtractingloggerOptionsinto a single object helps with readability and avoids parameter duplication in multiple logger calls. This pattern makes it simpler to adjust or expand log metadata later.
331-331: Consistent use ofloggerOptionsacross log statements.
Replacing discrete arguments with the unifiedloggerOptionsobject keeps logs coherent and maintainable. This improves debugging efficiency by ensuring consistent fields in each log entry.Also applies to: 335-335, 350-350, 362-362, 377-377, 398-398, 411-411, 429-429, 449-449, 464-464
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit