Skip to content

Conversation

@ariskotsomitopoulos
Copy link
Contributor

Fixing issue #4602

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 1, 2021

Unit Test Results

  66 files  ±0    66 suites  ±0   54s ⏱️ +6s
135 tests ±0  135 ✔️ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
418 runs  ±0  418 ✔️ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit 578a012. ± Comparison against base commit 2e52f42.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.


override fun onCleared() {
currentJob?.cancel()
super.onCleared()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can do more cleanup by removing the fun (at both places)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 for removing the field as well

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the field is still useful I think

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, override fun onCleared can be deleted. The field is used in another line

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah I see this directory viewmodel is also using it to dedupe the requests

if (currentJob == null) {
 // load more
}

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bmarty bmarty merged commit fa256cc into develop Dec 1, 2021
@bmarty bmarty deleted the feature/aris/remove_not_needed_job_cancel_4602 branch December 1, 2021 17:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants