Skip to content

[CODEOWNERS] fix the codeowners file for appex sharedux team #223433

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2025
Merged

[CODEOWNERS] fix the codeowners file for appex sharedux team #223433

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2025

Conversation

@tsullivan
Copy link
Member

@tsullivan tsullivan commented Jun 11, 2025 •
edited by kibanamachine
Loading

Summary

Resolve a typo in CODEOWNERS

@tsullivan tsullivan added release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes backport:all-open Backport to all branches that could still receive a release labels Jun 11, 2025
@mistic mistic merged commit aa7ea37 into elastic:main Jun 11, 2025
13 of 16 checks passed
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

kibanamachine commented Jun 11, 2025

Starting backport for target branches: 7.17, 8.17, 8.18, 8.19, 9.0

https://github.com/elastic/kibana/actions/runs/15590149637

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

kibanamachine commented Jun 11, 2025

💔 All backports failed

Status Branch Result
❌ 7.17 Backport failed because of merge conflicts
❌ 8.17 Backport failed because of merge conflicts
❌ 8.18 Backport failed because of merge conflicts
❌ 8.19 Backport failed because of merge conflicts

You might need to backport the following PRs to 8.19:
- [ska] update paths, kibana.jsons for test plugins (#223004)
- [Security Solution] Replace data view creation with data view picker data views in AI pages (#219988)
- [ska][x-pack] relocate security solution tests [5] (#220465)
- [ska][x-pack] relocate platform & solutions tests [6] (#220612)
- [ska][x-pack] relocate platform tests [7] (#220803)
- [ska][x-pack] relocate platform tests [4] (#219691)
- [Security Solution] Fix alerts table potentially not applying alert assignees (#219460)
- [AI4DSOC] Alert flyout code cleanup (#219810)
❌ 9.0 Backport failed because of merge conflicts

Manual backport

To create the backport manually run:

node scripts/backport --pr 223433

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the backport missing Added to PRs automatically when the are determined to be missing a backport. label Jun 12, 2025
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

kibanamachine commented Jun 12, 2025

Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet.
To create automatically backports add a backport:* label or prevent reminders by adding the backport:skip label.
You can also create backports manually by running node scripts/backport --pr 223433 locally
cc: @tsullivan

nickpeihl pushed a commit to nickpeihl/kibana that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
@tsullivan @nickpeihl
[CODEOWNERS] fix the codeowners file for appex sharedux team (elastic…
5711e5b 
…#223433)

## Summary

Resolve a typo in CODEOWNERS
@tsullivan tsullivan added the backport:skip This PR does not require backporting label Jun 13, 2025
@kibanamachine kibanamachine removed the backport missing Added to PRs automatically when the are determined to be missing a backport. label Jun 13, 2025
iblancof pushed a commit to iblancof/kibana that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2025
@tsullivan @iblancof
[CODEOWNERS] fix the codeowners file for appex sharedux team (elastic…
cc40d01 
…#223433)

## Summary

Resolve a typo in CODEOWNERS
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@mistic mistic mistic approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

backport:all-open Backport to all branches that could still receive a release backport:skip This PR does not require backporting release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes v9.1.0

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@tsullivan @kibanamachine @mistic