[9.0](backport #7072) Enhancement/5039 remove x crypto fips#7422
Merged
Conversation
* enhancement(5039): replace x/crypto/pbkdf2 with stdlib pbkdf2 * enhancement(5039): added nolint comment (cherry picked from commit 33df025)
Contributor
|
Pinging @elastic/elastic-agent-control-plane (Team:Elastic-Agent-Control-Plane) |
|
Contributor
💛 Build succeeded, but was flaky
Failed CI Stepscc @kaanyalti |
Contributor
Author
|
This pull request has not been merged yet. Could you please review and merge it @kaanyalti? 🙏 |
kaanyalti
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.




What does this PR do?
Removes x/crypto usage
Why is it important?
We need to move away from using x/crypto for fips compliance
Checklist
[ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas[ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation[ ] I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files[ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works./changelog/fragmentsusing the changelog tool[ ] I have added an integration test or an E2E testDisruptive User Impact
None
How to test this PR locally
Ci tests should be enough
Related issues
This is an automatic backport of pull request #7072 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).