Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Vercel Deployment to Zola v0.15.3 #54

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Update Vercel Deployment to Zola v0.15.3 #54

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

maydayv7
Copy link

No description provided.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 22, 2022

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployment, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/ejmg/zerm/8NGTjSY9j34bKGZ4KnrehwLWuzei
✅ Preview: Failed

@maydayv7
Copy link
Author

A quick dirty fix to get #53 to work would be to just upgrade Zola to v0.14.0 instead of the latest version

@kartva
Copy link
Contributor

kartva commented Feb 22, 2022

If I'm reading the documentation right, it seems that we can't change the build image. Instead, what we can do is build Zola from source, since Vercel does give an option to install Rust.

@ejmg
Copy link
Owner

ejmg commented Feb 22, 2022

adding rust into the deploy setup feels fragile but looking at this issue's history, it has been around for some time now.

that said, i've just spent the last 20 minutes or so trying to understand what /i/ would need to do in order to get this running so that zerm can handle > v0.14 zola features and still can't tell if we are allowed to define these changes locally to package.json or if I'll need to exclusively use the build settings (from my Vercel dashboard) as are described here

@ejmg
Copy link
Owner

ejmg commented Feb 22, 2022

man, it looks like keats got zola v0.15.3 working for his website using netflify. if changing the entire deployment setup turns out to be simpler, then maybe we should consider that too.

@ejmg ejmg mentioned this pull request Feb 23, 2022
@kartva
Copy link
Contributor

kartva commented Mar 11, 2022

Any progress?

@ejmg
Copy link
Owner

ejmg commented Mar 17, 2022

unfortunately, no.

i haven't made the time to setup either a separate deployment mechanism (as i previously mentioned) or see how vercel can be made to work with a patch/work-around.

@ejmg
Copy link
Owner

ejmg commented Mar 17, 2022

i've knocked out a few PR's this past week, i will try to follow up on this one along with a few others.

@maydayv7 maydayv7 closed this by deleting the head repository Feb 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants