Basix/0.9.0-gfbf-2024a, nanobind/2.6.1-GCCcore-13.3.0.eb, robin-map/1.4.0-GCCcore-13.3.0, scikit-build-core/0.11.0-GCCcore-13.3.0#22697
Conversation
Updated software
|
|
It appears the |
|
@sassy-crick : I would like to revive this PR and bring it back to life. Are there still any steps I shall take to have it tested? Unfortunately, the easyblock cannot be automatically found, and few tests fail. How can I resolve this issue? |
|
Are there any particular reasons why we include the newer versions of |
| parallel = 8 | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is there a reason why we set this to 8?
Typically, this would be handled by users by their parallel and max-parallel config options.
There might be a reason to set it to 1, e.g. when a parallel build causes build failures. But I don't think this is the case here.
| 'download_dep_fail': True, | ||
| 'use_pip': True, | ||
| 'sanity_pip_check': True, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think those should be set by EB 5.x by default, so we don't need to specify them here anymore.
|
Based on the discussion in easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3684, trying |
This PR was pushed on 3 April whereas the older versions of |
The commit 6befba9 retracts the proposed easyconfigs for those conflicting modules to adopt the existing versions from the 2024a toolchain. |
|
Closing this PR in favor of #23838 |
This PR adds
Basixwhich is one of the dependencies ofDOLFINx.requires:
Furthermore, these new easyconfigs are either created or a newer version is proposed:
scikit-build-core/0.11.0-GCCcore-13.3.0robin-map/1.4.0-GCCcore-13.3.0nanobind/2.6.1-GCCcore-13.3.0I also have to admit that this PR is inspired by PR #22422.