Skip to content

use libidn2/2.3.7 as dependency for GnuTLS/3.7.8 and delete libidn2/2.3.2 (GCCcore/12.3.0)#20771

Merged
boegel merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
branfosj:20240607123332_new_pr_GnuTLS378
Jun 7, 2024
Merged

use libidn2/2.3.7 as dependency for GnuTLS/3.7.8 and delete libidn2/2.3.2 (GCCcore/12.3.0)#20771
boegel merged 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
branfosj:20240607123332_new_pr_GnuTLS378

Conversation

@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@branfosj branfosj commented Jun 7, 2024

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Jun 7, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=20771 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20771 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13667

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 2154657561 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@branfosj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

branfosj commented Jun 7, 2024

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03a - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/da1b7b304d57802a4fdd868bfcdcebc0 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Jun 7, 2024

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3120.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.8, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/4a81a5bff73af9ad7fcd9d361f9cb5eb for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns3 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/5193bd14678ccfdab7cc1d66923797fc for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

boegel commented Jun 7, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel boegel merged commit c8d9111 into easybuilders:develop Jun 7, 2024
@branfosj branfosj deleted the 20240607123332_new_pr_GnuTLS378 branch June 7, 2024 11:56
@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=20771 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20771 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 4315

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 2154685567 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/a8c5b6d6610e027c2b9a69d513c96ca0 for a full test report.

@boegel boegel added the change label Jun 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants