Add preinstallopts for minimap2 to fix installation on aarch64

[rungitta]

(created using eb --new-pr)

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
select-pika-c6gd-2xlarge-0001 - Linux centos linux 8.3.2011, AArch64, ARM UNKNOWN (graviton2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/3dfc69d2a499a3a81386f395249c8438 for a full test report.

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

[boegel]

lgtm

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3501.doduo.os - Linux RHEL 8.2, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/26a3cbbf130a5e404cc032a85e3324f2 for a full test report.

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3119.skitty.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/13e02bcee00b581ca749b0174ff418f9 for a full test report.

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=13080 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_13080 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 17390

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 857130667 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-c1-s-2 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/ff6a50e07eb58d9c037bf3749776600f for a full test report.

[rungitta]

@boegel Are these failed tests expected behaviour?

And why is this being tested?
XGBoost-20171120-intel-2017b-Java-1.8.0_152.eb

[boegel]

@boegel Are these failed tests expected behaviour?

And why is this being tested?
XGBoost-20171120-intel-2017b-Java-1.8.0_152.eb

That's a problem somewhere else, I'll get that fixed...

[verdurin]

Going in, thanks @rungitta!