update PyTorch easyblock to avoid configure warnings by disabling some options

[Flamefire]

Explicitely disable some options to avoid warnings during the configure.

[boegel]

@Flamefire Can you clarify what kind of warning pop up without these changes?

[Flamefire]

@Flamefire Can you clarify what kind of warning pop up without these changes?

Stuff like: "Not compiling with X. Turn this warning off by passing Y". E.g.: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/40a6710ad34ae4c6f4987f0e47b5c94df3fc8ec7/cmake/Dependencies.cmake#L803-L813

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

• SUCCESS PyTorch-1.10.0-foss-2021a-CUDA-11.3.1.eb
• SUCCESS PyTorch-1.11.0-foss-2021a-CUDA-11.3.1.eb
• SUCCESS PyTorch-1.12.0-foss-2022a-CUDA-11.7.0.eb
• SUCCESS PyTorch-1.12.1-foss-2021a-CUDA-11.3.1.eb
• FAIL (build issue) PyTorch-1.12.1-foss-2021b-CUDA-11.5.2.eb (partial log available at https://gist.github.com/boegel/2640b41c9f8ee1f3e827e57c95c873ae)
• SUCCESS PyTorch-1.12.1-foss-2022a-CUDA-11.7.0.eb
• SUCCESS pytest-rerunfailures-11.1-GCCcore-11.3.0.eb
• SUCCESS pytest-shard-0.1.2-GCCcore-11.3.0.eb
• FAIL (build issue) PyTorch-1.13.1-foss-2022a-CUDA-11.7.0.eb (partial log available at https://gist.github.com/boegel/4498523636b35f08ed7804ce7d9ec05a)

Build succeeded for 7 out of 9 (7 easyconfigs in total)
node3905.accelgor.os - Linux RHEL 8.8, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7413 24-Core Processor (zen3), 1 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-SXM4-80GB, 535.129.03, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/e6b728c6f7fb23b5351ccd707c143ab3 for a full test report.

[Flamefire]

@boegel

* **FAIL (build issue)** _PyTorch-1.13.1-foss-2022a-CUDA-11.7.0.eb_ (partial log available at https://gist.github.com/boegel/4498523636b35f08ed7804ce7d9ec05a)

This failed because the check logic didn't find the number of failed tests but detected that some have failed ("+ test_ops_gradients ", the plus sign is an indication for this)
We might need to adjust the regex again. Can you attach the log?
In any case this is nothing new from this PR and it seemingly only has 2 failed tests which looks fine

[Flamefire]

Ok, that detection issue is handled in #3085 which includes a larger refactoring of the parsing logic to debug it easier. Ran onto your test report yields:

Failed test names:  FailedTestNames(error=[], fail=['test_fn_grad_linalg_det_singular_cpu_complex128', 'test_forward_mode_AD_linalg_det_singular_cpu_complex128'])
Test result:  TestResult(test_cnt=122917, error_cnt=0, failure_cnt=2, failed_suites=[TestSuiteResult(name='test_ops_gradients', summary='2 failed, 3454 passed, 4032 skipped, 72 xfailed, 152 warnings, 4 rerun')])

You can test the failed EC (PyTorch-1.13.1-foss-2022a-CUDA-11.7.0.eb) with that PR which should make it pass as 2 tests are allowed to fail

[branfosj]

Test report by @branfosj

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

• SUCCESS PyTorch-2.0.1-foss-2022b.eb

Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03a - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/a581d8d414c1200d452a7bed204fe898 for a full test report.