clientmanager: fix index mangling when removing balancer clients on balancer disconnect #1214
Conversation
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@dyc3 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 45 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe update introduces a more efficient way to handle client disconnections from a balancer. An intermediate array now temporarily holds clients set to leave, streamlining the removal process from the main connections array before proceeding with the disconnections. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- server/clientmanager.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
server/clientmanager.ts (1)
- 232-242: The changes to the
onBalancerDisconnectfunction introduce an intermediate arrayleavingClientsto store references to balancer clients that need to be removed. This is a good approach to prevent index mangling during the removal process. However, it's important to ensure that theleavemethod on theclientobject properly handles the disconnection and cleanup. If there are any side effects or shared resources that need to be managed, those should be addressed within theleavemethod.Verification successful
The search results confirm that there are references to a
leavemethod within theserver/clientmanager.tsfile, as well as a definition of aleavemethod within theserver/client.tsfile. This indicates that theleavemethod is indeed implemented and used within the codebase, specifically in the context of theonBalancerDisconnectfunction inclientmanager.ts.Given this information, it can be concluded that the
leavemethod exists and is being called as part of the disconnection logic for balancer clients. However, without further details on the implementation of theleavemethod, it is not possible to assess whether it properly handles disconnection and cleanup. For a complete verification, the implementation details of theleavemethod would need to be reviewed.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the leave method is properly implemented for BalancerClient instances. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'class BalancerClient { $$$ leave($_) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 105
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First, confirm the existence of the BalancerClient class. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'class BalancerClient { $$$ }' # If the BalancerClient class exists, then search for the leave method within it. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'class $_ { leave($_) { $$$ } }'Length of output: 151
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Perform a broader search for any references to the `leave` method within the codebase. rg "leave\("Length of output: 128
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1214 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 61.5318% 61.5464% +0.0145%
================================================
Files 115 115
Lines 9322 9635 +313
Branches 1141 1141
================================================
+ Hits 5736 5930 +194
- Misses 3586 3705 +119 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Passing run #804 ↗︎
Details:
Review all test suite changes for PR #1214 ↗︎ |
|||||||||||||||
…alancer disconnect
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- server/tests/unit/clientmanager.spec.ts (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
server/tests/unit/clientmanager.spec.ts (2)
10-10: The addition of
DirectClientto the import statement aligns with the PR objectives to ensure that all necessary client types are available for testing.121-150: The new test case "should disconnect only clients that were from the balancer when a balancer disconnects" is well-structured and covers the scenario where multiple balancers are connected with different clients. It correctly asserts that only clients from the disconnected balancer are removed, while others remain. This test case is crucial for validating the bug fix and ensuring that the
clientmanagerbehaves as expected when handling balancer disconnections.
…alancer disconnect (dyc3#1214) * clientmanager: fix index mangling when removing balancer clients on balancer disconnect * add a unit test
fixes #1207