Skip to content

enableRoslynAnalyzers flag. #2836

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Apr 5, 2019

Conversation

savpek
Copy link
Contributor

@savpek savpek commented Feb 3, 2019

Requires OmniSharp/omnisharp-roslyn#1076 from omnisharp-roslyn to function.

Adds flag:

"omnisharp.enableRoslynAnalyzers": true

That can enable feature without modifying omnisharp.json when used with vscode.

@dnfclas
Copy link

dnfclas commented Feb 3, 2019

CLA assistant check
All CLA requirements met.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 3, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #2836 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2836      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.87%   89.89%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          59       59              
  Lines        1581     1583       +2     
  Branches       89       89              
==========================================
+ Hits         1421     1423       +2     
  Misses        149      149              
  Partials       11       11
Flag Coverage Δ
#integration 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#unit 89.89% <100%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/omnisharp/options.ts 95.08% <100%> (+0.16%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1279c53...2672b86. Read the comment docs.

@akshita31
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks !

@savpek
Copy link
Contributor Author

savpek commented Feb 4, 2019

I will merge this once analyzers are available on omnisharp-roslyn master branch.

@akshita31
Copy link
Contributor

@savpek Any updates here ?

@savpek
Copy link
Contributor Author

savpek commented Mar 14, 2019

@akshita31 waiting for review/approval to omnisharp-roslyn side of analyzers from @rchande and @david-driscoll

@savpek
Copy link
Contributor Author

savpek commented Mar 19, 2019

@akshita31 @rchande this probably can be merged since OmniSharp/omnisharp-roslyn#1076 is available in master branch.

@akshita31
Copy link
Contributor

It would be better to merge this when we include a new version of omnisharp in the extension.

@akshita31 akshita31 merged commit c3337aa into dotnet:master Apr 5, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants