-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 697
enableRoslynAnalyzers flag. #2836
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
enableRoslynAnalyzers flag. #2836
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2836 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.87% 89.89% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 59 59
Lines 1581 1583 +2
Branches 89 89
==========================================
+ Hits 1421 1423 +2
Misses 149 149
Partials 11 11
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Thanks ! |
I will merge this once analyzers are available on omnisharp-roslyn master branch. |
@savpek Any updates here ? |
@akshita31 waiting for review/approval to omnisharp-roslyn side of analyzers from @rchande and @david-driscoll |
@akshita31 @rchande this probably can be merged since OmniSharp/omnisharp-roslyn#1076 is available in master branch. |
It would be better to merge this when we include a new version of omnisharp in the extension. |
Requires OmniSharp/omnisharp-roslyn#1076 from omnisharp-roslyn to function.
Adds flag:
That can enable feature without modifying
omnisharp.json
when used with vscode.