Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move FabricBot rules to Config-As-Code #62297

Merged

Conversation

eiriktsarpalis
Copy link
Member

Following #7442 this PR transfers our FabricBot automation rules to Config-as-Code. Also adds a bit of documentation pointing to the new rule editing workflow.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 2, 2021

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-meta
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Following #7442 this PR transfers our FabricBot automation rules to Config-as-Code. Also adds a bit of documentation pointing to the new rule editing workflow.

Author: eiriktsarpalis
Assignees: eiriktsarpalis
Labels:

area-Meta

Milestone: -

docs/infra/automation.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@eiriktsarpalis
Copy link
Member Author

Since it's a Friday, I'll hold off from merging this until next week. I'll also need to update the FB configuration dump to the most recent state if needed.

@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented Dec 3, 2021

who has permission to edit the fabricbot config?

@eiriktsarpalis
Copy link
Member Author

who has permission to edit the fabricbot config?

Currently a handful of team members have permissions in the FabricBot portal, but after this is merged anybody should be able to submit a PR.

@eiriktsarpalis eiriktsarpalis merged commit f8871cb into dotnet:main Dec 6, 2021
@eiriktsarpalis eiriktsarpalis deleted the fabricbot-configuration-as-code branch December 6, 2021 12:24
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 5, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants