-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Delete suspicious code in RuntimeType #52535
Closed
MichalStrehovsky
wants to merge
2
commits into
dotnet:main
from
MichalStrehovsky:MichalStrehovsky-patch-2
Closed
Delete suspicious code in RuntimeType #52535
MichalStrehovsky
wants to merge
2
commits into
dotnet:main
from
MichalStrehovsky:MichalStrehovsky-patch-2
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This code indicates that we can somehow get to fields on interfaces by reflecting on fields of a type implementing the interface. If that's the case, we have work to do in IL Linker. But I have not been able to find a way to do that, mostly because static fields don't get inherited the same as instance fields and we don't allow instance fields on interfaces. Deleting the code to see if we have any failing tests.
/azp run runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run runtime-coreclr outerloop |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
using System;
using System.Reflection;
interface IFace
{
public static int x = 0;
}
class Program : IFace
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
foreach (var f in typeof(Program).GetFields(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Static | BindingFlags.FlattenHierarchy)) Console.WriteLine(f);
}
} |
Heh, thanks! Looks like we have no test coverage for it. Good thing it's consistent with how we do methods (not). @vitek-karas looks like we'll have a linker issue after all. It looks like a pretty annoying one. We might want to just consider won't fixing it (and leave some traces on that decision) |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This code indicates that we can somehow get to fields on interfaces by reflecting on fields of a type implementing the interface. If that's the case, we have work to do in IL Linker. But I have not been able to find a way to do that, mostly because static fields don't get inherited the same as instance fields and we don't allow instance fields on interfaces.
Deleting the code to see if we have any failing tests.