Extensions: improve diagnostics for operators #80928

jcouv · 2025-10-28T00:47:39Z

Addresses parts of #78830

Report what operator methods conflict

Relates to test plan #76130

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-29T14:50:38Z

src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/CSharpResources.resx

    <value>The extension resolution is ambiguous between the following members: '{0}' and '{1}'</value>
  </data>
+  <data name="ERR_SingleInapplicableBinaryOperator" xml:space="preserve">
+    <value>Operator cannot be applied on operands of type '{0}' and '{1}'. The closest inapplicable candidate is '{2}'</value>


on

"to"? #Closed

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-29T14:51:04Z

src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/CSharpResources.resx

+    <value>Operator cannot be applied on operands of type '{0}' and '{1}'. The closest inapplicable candidate is '{2}'</value>
+  </data>
+  <data name="ERR_SingleInapplicableUnaryOperator" xml:space="preserve">
+    <value>Operator cannot be applied on operand of type '{0}'. The closest inapplicable candidate is '{1}'</value>


on

"to"? #Closed

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-29T15:03:36Z

            ref OperatorResolutionForReporting operatorResolutionForReporting)

Consider declaring this parameter before all out parameters #Closed

Refers to: src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Operators.cs:587 in 7f4d084. [](commit_id = 7f4d084, deletion_comment = False)

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-29T15:16:56Z

src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder.OperatorResolutionForReporting.cs

+    /// </summary>
+    private struct OperatorResolutionForReporting
+    {
+        private object? _nonExtensionResult;


_nonExtensionResult

It would be good to document what types can be stored in these fields #Closed

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-29T15:17:55Z

src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder.OperatorResolutionForReporting.cs

+        /// <summary>
+        /// Follows a very simplified version of OverloadResolutionResult.ReportDiagnostics which can be expanded in the future if needed.
+        /// </summary>
+        internal bool TryReportDiagnostics(SyntaxNode node, BindingDiagnosticBag diagnostics, Binder binder, object leftDisplay, object? rightDisplay)


, BindingDiagnosticBag diagnostics

I think we usually place diagnostics parameter at the end. #Closed

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-29T15:21:40Z

src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder.OperatorResolutionForReporting.cs

+                        {
+                            if (res.Signature.Method is null)
+                            {
+                                // Skip build-in operators


build-in

"built-in"? #Closed

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-29T15:21:50Z

src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder.OperatorResolutionForReporting.cs

+                        {
+                            if (res.Signature.Method is null)
+                            {
+                                // Skip build-in operators


build-in

"built-in"? #Closed

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-29T15:24:26Z

src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder.OperatorResolutionForReporting.cs

+                return false;
+            }
+
+            static void populateResults(ArrayBuilder<(MethodSymbol?, OperatorAnalysisResultKind)> results, object? extensionResult)


extensionResult

Is this necessarily an extension result? #Closed

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-29T15:26:02Z

src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder.OperatorResolutionForReporting.cs

+            {
+                return kind switch
+                {
+                    MemberResolutionKind.ApplicableInExpandedForm => OperatorAnalysisResultKind.Applicable,


MemberResolutionKind.ApplicableInExpandedForm => OperatorAnalysisResultKind.Applicable,

Is this code path reachable? #Closed

Is this code path reachable?

I guess this shouldn't be a concern for this component.

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-29T16:49:27Z

src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder.OperatorResolutionForReporting.cs

+                };
+            }
+
+            static void assertNone(ArrayBuilder<(MethodSymbol? member, OperatorAnalysisResultKind resultKind)> results, OperatorAnalysisResultKind kind)


assertNone

Consider adding a conditional DEBUG attribute #Closed

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-29T16:52:37Z

src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder.OperatorResolutionForReporting.cs

+
+                if (results.Any(m => m.resultKind == OperatorAnalysisResultKind.Applicable))
+                {
+                    return false;


return false;

Is this code path reachable? #Closed

Yes, for instance ReportDiagnostics_Binary_03 where we get here with only built-in operators being applicable. tryGetTwoBest discards built-in operators since we don't have a member to report them.

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-29T16:55:18Z

src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder.OperatorResolutionForReporting.cs

+                }
+
+                assertNone(results, OperatorAnalysisResultKind.Applicable);
+                assertNone(results, OperatorAnalysisResultKind.Worse);


assertNone(results, OperatorAnalysisResultKind.Worse);

It is not obvious to me why we can make this assumption #Closed

I went back and forth on this. I'll put fallback handling here instead, even though I don't think it's currently reachable due to how we produce operator results. It'll be more robust

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-29T21:09:19Z

            if (!operatorResolutionForReporting.SaveResult(overloadResolutionResult, isExtension))

It feels counterintuitive to do that when inPlaceResult is set. When it is set, we either succeeded or reported errors and will not attempt to report more diagnostics. #Closed

Refers to: src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Operators.cs:556 in 6a9164b. [](commit_id = 6a9164b, deletion_comment = False)

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-29T21:40:55Z

                    if (operatorResolutionForReporting.SaveResult(result, isExtension: true))

It feels counterintuitive to do that when result of BinaryOperatorAnalyzeOverloadResolutionResult HasValue #Closed

Refers to: src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Operators.cs:632 in 6a9164b. [](commit_id = 6a9164b, deletion_comment = False)

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-29T22:04:30Z

                    operatorResolutionForReporting.Free();

This looks suspicious and unintuitive. It doesn't look like we tried to report anything from the object. Also it looks like the caller will try to Free it as well. Perhaps it is safe to do, but still looks very strange. #Closed

Refers to: src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Operators.cs:1241 in 6a9164b. [](commit_id = 6a9164b, deletion_comment = False)

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-29T22:14:58Z

                if (operatorResolutionForReporting.SaveResult(result, isExtension: true))

Similar comment for a situation when result of BinaryOperatorAnalyzeOverloadResolutionResult HasValue #Closed

Refers to: src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Operators.cs:2157 in 6a9164b. [](commit_id = 6a9164b, deletion_comment = False)

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-29T22:16:39Z

        if (!operatorResolutionForReporting.SaveResult(result, isExtension: false))

Similar comment for a situation when result of BinaryOperatorAnalyzeOverloadResolutionResult HasValue #Closed

Refers to: src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Operators.cs:2199 in 6a9164b. [](commit_id = 6a9164b, deletion_comment = False)

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-29T22:55:04Z

Done with review pass (commit 2)

jcouv · 2025-10-30T00:26:10Z

            if (!operatorResolutionForReporting.SaveResult(overloadResolutionResult, isExtension))

We collect information for reporting systematically. The information we collect may or may not end up being needed to report more diagnostics.

In reply to: 3464049874

Refers to: src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Operators.cs:556 in 6a9164b. [](commit_id = 6a9164b, deletion_comment = False)

jcouv · 2025-10-30T01:29:34Z

                    operatorResolutionForReporting.Free();

Thanks, that was wrong

In reply to: 3464343239

Refers to: src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Operators.cs:1241 in 6a9164b. [](commit_id = 6a9164b, deletion_comment = False)

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-30T13:33:55Z

Done with review pass (commit 3)

jcouv · 2025-10-30T21:51:33Z

                if (operatorResolutionForReporting.SaveResult(result, isExtension: true))

Same response provided elsewhere applies to remaining comments similar to this one

In reply to: 3464425102

Refers to: src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Operators.cs:2157 in 6a9164b. [](commit_id = 6a9164b, deletion_comment = False)

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-31T14:09:51Z

        BoundExpression bindIncrementOperator(ExpressionSyntax node, ExpressionSyntax operandSyntax, SyntaxToken operatorToken, BindingDiagnosticBag diagnostics, ref OperatorResolutionForReporting operatorResolutionForReporting)

We usually keep this parameter last #Resolved

Refers to: src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Operators.cs:3279 in 99a248c. [](commit_id = 99a248c, deletion_comment = False)

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-31T14:10:56Z

        ref OperatorResolutionForReporting operatorResolutionForReporting)

Consider placing this parameter before out parameters #Resolved

Refers to: src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Operators.cs:2440 in 99a248c. [](commit_id = 99a248c, deletion_comment = False)

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-31T14:11:08Z

        ref OperatorResolutionForReporting operatorResolutionForReporting)

Consider placing this parameter before out parameters #Resolved

Refers to: src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Operators.cs:2333 in 99a248c. [](commit_id = 99a248c, deletion_comment = False)

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-31T14:11:19Z

        ref OperatorResolutionForReporting operatorResolutionForReporting)

Consider placing this parameter before out parameters #Resolved

Refers to: src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Operators.cs:2291 in 99a248c. [](commit_id = 99a248c, deletion_comment = False)

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-31T14:11:31Z

        ref OperatorResolutionForReporting operatorResolutionForReporting)

Consider placing this parameter before out parameters #Resolved

Refers to: src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Operators.cs:2189 in 99a248c. [](commit_id = 99a248c, deletion_comment = False)

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-31T14:11:46Z

        ref OperatorResolutionForReporting operatorResolutionForReporting)

Consider placing this parameter before out parameters #Resolved

Refers to: src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Operators.cs:2129 in 99a248c. [](commit_id = 99a248c, deletion_comment = False)

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-31T14:12:03Z

        ref OperatorResolutionForReporting operatorResolutionForReporting)

Consider placing this parameter before out parameters #Resolved

Refers to: src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Operators.cs:2088 in 99a248c. [](commit_id = 99a248c, deletion_comment = False)

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-31T14:12:14Z

        ref OperatorResolutionForReporting operatorResolutionForReporting)

Consider placing this parameter before out parameters #Resolved

Refers to: src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Operators.cs:2070 in 99a248c. [](commit_id = 99a248c, deletion_comment = False)

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-31T14:13:59Z

        BoundExpression bindConditionalLogicalOperator(BinaryExpressionSyntax node, BoundExpression left, BoundExpression right, BindingDiagnosticBag diagnostics, ref OperatorResolutionForReporting operatorResolutionForReporting)

Diagnostics usually the last parameter, that is when there are no out parameters #Resolved

Refers to: src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Operators.cs:1439 in 99a248c. [](commit_id = 99a248c, deletion_comment = False)

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-31T14:14:25Z

        out BinaryOperatorSignature resultSignature, out BinaryOperatorAnalysisResult best, ref OperatorResolutionForReporting operatorResolutionForReporting)

Consider placing this parameter before out parameters #Resolved

Refers to: src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Operators.cs:1140 in 99a248c. [](commit_id = 99a248c, deletion_comment = False)

AlekseyTs · 2025-10-31T14:15:04Z

        BoundExpression bindCompoundAssignment(AssignmentExpressionSyntax node, BindingDiagnosticBag diagnostics, ref OperatorResolutionForReporting operatorResolutionForReporting)

Diagnostics usually the last parameter #Resolved

Refers to: src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder_Operators.cs:31 in 99a248c. [](commit_id = 99a248c, deletion_comment = False)

AlekseyTs

LGTM (commit 5), assuming CI is passing

jcouv · 2025-11-02T07:14:02Z

@jjonescz @dotnet/roslyn-compiler for second review. Thanks

jjonescz · 2025-11-03T09:35:04Z

src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder.OperatorResolutionForReporting.cs

+        private object? _extensionResult;
+
+        [Conditional("DEBUG")]
+        private void AssertInvariant()


Suggested change

private void AssertInvariant()

private readonly void AssertInvariant()

``` #Resolved

jjonescz · 2025-11-03T09:38:15Z

src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder.OperatorResolutionForReporting.cs

+        /// <summary>
+        /// Follows a very simplified version of OverloadResolutionResult.ReportDiagnostics which can be expanded in the future if needed.
+        /// </summary>
+        internal bool TryReportDiagnostics(SyntaxNode node, Binder binder, object leftDisplay, object? rightDisplay, BindingDiagnosticBag diagnostics)


Suggested change

internal bool TryReportDiagnostics(SyntaxNode node, Binder binder, object leftDisplay, object? rightDisplay, BindingDiagnosticBag diagnostics)

internal readonly bool TryReportDiagnostics(SyntaxNode node, Binder binder, object leftDisplay, object? rightDisplay, BindingDiagnosticBag diagnostics)

``` #Resolved

jjonescz · 2025-11-03T09:54:01Z

src/Compilers/CSharp/Portable/Binder/Binder.OperatorResolutionForReporting.cs

+                Debug.Assert(results.All(r => r.resultKind == OperatorAnalysisResultKind.Inapplicable));
+
+                // There is much room to improve diagnostics on inapplicable candidates, but for now we just report the candidate if there is a single one.
+                if (results.Count == 1 && results[0].member is { } inapplicableMember)


Suggested change

if (results.Count == 1 && results[0].member is { } inapplicableMember)

if (results is [{ member: { } inapplicableMember }])

``` #Resolved

jjonescz · 2025-11-03T09:59:28Z

src/Compilers/CSharp/Test/Emit3/Semantics/ExtensionOperatorsTests.cs

            var comp = CreateCompilation(src, targetFramework: TargetFramework.Net90);
            comp.VerifyEmitDiagnostics(
-                // (32,17): error CS0035: Operator '-' is ambiguous on an operand of type 'I2'
+                // (32,17): error CS9339: Operator resolution is ambiguous between the following members:'I1.operator -(I1)' and 'I3.operator -(I3)'


Suggested change

// (32,17): error CS9339: Operator resolution is ambiguous between the following members:'I1.operator -(I1)' and 'I3.operator -(I3)'

// (32,17): error CS9339: Operator resolution is ambiguous between the following members: 'I1.operator -(I1)' and 'I3.operator -(I3)'

``` #Resolved

jjonescz · 2025-11-03T10:01:03Z

src/Compilers/CSharp/Test/Emit3/Semantics/ExtensionOperatorsTests.cs

 """;

            var comp = CreateCompilation(src, options: TestOptions.DebugExe);
+#if DEBUG


Why are the diagnostics subtly different between Debug and Release? #ByDesign

We have GetMembers() and GetMembersUnordered().
We use GetMembersUnordered() in NamedTypeSymbol.GetExtensionMembers() as we do in NamedTypeSymbol.DoGetExtensionMethods().

I explored making the diagnostics deterministic too (in #80552 ) but we ended up deciding against it.

For some reason, GetMembersUnordered() only swaps the first and last elements, instead of a more aggressive de-ordering, so our usage of GetMembersUnordered() isn't apparent is as many tests as you'd think.

jjonescz · 2025-11-03T10:01:31Z

src/Compilers/CSharp/Test/Emit3/Semantics/ExtensionOperatorsTests.cs

+#if DEBUG
            comp.VerifyEmitDiagnostics(
-                // (35,13): error CS0035: Operator '-' is ambiguous on an operand of type 'C1'
+                // (35,13): error CS9339: Operator resolution is ambiguous between the following members: 'Extensions2.extension(C1).operator -(C1)' and 'Extensions1.extension(C1).operator -(C1)'


Suggested change

// (35,13): error CS9339: Operator resolution is ambiguous between the following members: 'Extensions2.extension(C1).operator -(C1)' and 'Extensions1.extension(C1).operator -(C1)'

// (35,13): error CS9342: Operator resolution is ambiguous between the following members: 'Extensions2.extension(C1).operator -(C1)' and 'Extensions1.extension(C1).operator -(C1)'

``` #Resolved

jjonescz · 2025-11-03T10:03:22Z

src/Compilers/CSharp/Test/Emit3/Semantics/ExtensionOperatorsTests.cs

+        [Fact]
+        public void ReportDiagnostics_CompoundAssignment_01()
+        {
+            // inner scope has inapplicable operator, outter scope too


Suggested change

// inner scope has inapplicable operator, outter scope too

// inner scope has inapplicable operator, outer scope too

``` #Resolved

jcouv self-assigned this Oct 28, 2025

jcouv added Area-Compilers Feature - Extension Everything The extension everything feature labels Oct 28, 2025

jcouv mentioned this pull request Oct 28, 2025

Extensions: diagnostic quality follow-ups #78830

Open

5 tasks

jcouv force-pushed the extensions-diagnostics2 branch 2 times, most recently from ebe80f9 to 928f3b3 Compare October 28, 2025 07:50

Extensions: improve diagnostics for operators

7f4d084

jcouv force-pushed the extensions-diagnostics2 branch from 928f3b3 to 7f4d084 Compare October 28, 2025 16:59

jcouv marked this pull request as ready for review October 28, 2025 18:22

jcouv requested a review from a team as a code owner October 28, 2025 18:22

AlekseyTs reviewed Oct 29, 2025

View reviewed changes

Address feedback

6a9164b

jcouv requested review from AlekseyTs and jjonescz October 29, 2025 20:15

Address feedback

9a868b7

Julien Couvreur added 2 commits October 30, 2025 14:41

Re-order parameter

87c9e6c

Re-order parameters

99a248c

jcouv requested a review from AlekseyTs October 30, 2025 21:52

AlekseyTs approved these changes Oct 31, 2025

View reviewed changes

jjonescz reviewed Nov 3, 2025

View reviewed changes

jjonescz approved these changes Nov 4, 2025

View reviewed changes

Address feedback

d3a09b8

jcouv enabled auto-merge (squash) November 4, 2025 09:04

jcouv merged commit ed83c92 into dotnet:main Nov 5, 2025
24 of 25 checks passed

dotnet-policy-service bot added this to the Next milestone Nov 5, 2025

This was referenced Nov 6, 2025

[main] Source code updates from dotnet/roslyn dotnet/dotnet#3147

Open

[release/10.0.2xx] Source code updates from dotnet/roslyn dotnet/dotnet#3244

Open

	private void AssertInvariant()
	private readonly void AssertInvariant()
	``` #Resolved

	internal bool TryReportDiagnostics(SyntaxNode node, Binder binder, object leftDisplay, object? rightDisplay, BindingDiagnosticBag diagnostics)
	internal readonly bool TryReportDiagnostics(SyntaxNode node, Binder binder, object leftDisplay, object? rightDisplay, BindingDiagnosticBag diagnostics)
	``` #Resolved

	if (results.Count == 1 && results[0].member is { } inapplicableMember)
	if (results is [{ member: { } inapplicableMember }])
	``` #Resolved

	// (32,17): error CS9339: Operator resolution is ambiguous between the following members:'I1.operator -(I1)' and 'I3.operator -(I3)'
	// (32,17): error CS9339: Operator resolution is ambiguous between the following members: 'I1.operator -(I1)' and 'I3.operator -(I3)'
	``` #Resolved

	// (35,13): error CS9339: Operator resolution is ambiguous between the following members: 'Extensions2.extension(C1).operator -(C1)' and 'Extensions1.extension(C1).operator -(C1)'
	// (35,13): error CS9342: Operator resolution is ambiguous between the following members: 'Extensions2.extension(C1).operator -(C1)' and 'Extensions1.extension(C1).operator -(C1)'
	``` #Resolved

	// inner scope has inapplicable operator, outter scope too
	// inner scope has inapplicable operator, outer scope too
	``` #Resolved

Extensions: improve diagnostics for operators #80928

Extensions: improve diagnostics for operators #80928

Uh oh!

Conversation

jcouv commented Oct 28, 2025

Uh oh!

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

AlekseyTs commented Oct 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

jcouv Oct 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

jcouv Oct 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

AlekseyTs commented Oct 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

AlekseyTs commented Oct 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

AlekseyTs commented Oct 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

AlekseyTs commented Oct 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

AlekseyTs commented Oct 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

AlekseyTs commented Oct 29, 2025

Uh oh!

jcouv commented Oct 30, 2025

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

AlekseyTs commented Oct 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

AlekseyTs Oct 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

AlekseyTs commented Oct 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

AlekseyTs commented Oct 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

AlekseyTs commented Oct 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

AlekseyTs commented Oct 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

AlekseyTs commented Oct 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

AlekseyTs commented Oct 31, 2025 •

edited by jcouv

Loading

AlekseyTs commented Oct 31, 2025 •

edited by jcouv

Loading

AlekseyTs commented Oct 31, 2025 •

edited by jcouv

Loading

AlekseyTs commented Oct 31, 2025 •

edited by jcouv

Loading

AlekseyTs commented Oct 31, 2025 •

edited by jcouv

Loading

AlekseyTs commented Oct 31, 2025 •

edited by jcouv

Loading

AlekseyTs commented Oct 31, 2025 •

edited by jcouv

Loading

AlekseyTs commented Oct 31, 2025 •

edited by jcouv

Loading

AlekseyTs commented Oct 31, 2025 •

edited by jcouv

Loading

AlekseyTs commented Oct 31, 2025 •

edited by jcouv

Loading

AlekseyTs commented Oct 31, 2025 •

edited by jcouv

Loading

AlekseyTs left a comment •

edited

Loading

jjonescz Nov 3, 2025 •

edited by jcouv

Loading

jjonescz Nov 3, 2025 •

edited by jcouv

Loading

jjonescz Nov 3, 2025 •

edited by jcouv

Loading

jjonescz Nov 3, 2025 •

edited by jcouv

Loading

jjonescz Nov 3, 2025 •

edited by jcouv

Loading