Skip to content

Comments

TagHelperCollection Part 4: Rewrite Tag Helper Discovery(!)#12507

Merged
DustinCampbell merged 5 commits intodotnet:mainfrom
DustinCampbell:taghelpercollection-part4-rewrite-tag-helper-discovery
Nov 24, 2025
Merged

TagHelperCollection Part 4: Rewrite Tag Helper Discovery(!)#12507
DustinCampbell merged 5 commits intodotnet:mainfrom
DustinCampbell:taghelpercollection-part4-rewrite-tag-helper-discovery

Conversation

@DustinCampbell
Copy link
Member

@DustinCampbell DustinCampbell commented Nov 18, 2025

| Prelude | Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 |

Warning

This pull request contains breaking changes for the RazorSdk. Once this is merged and flows to the VMR, dotnet/dotnet@dc17a09 will need to be cherry-picked to resolve build breaks in src/sdk/src/RazorSdk.

Previously, tag helpers were discovered by ITagHelperDescriptorProvider. Each provider was responsible for walking a compilation's assemblies and producing TagHelperDescriptors from the types within. This change inverts the tag helper discovery process by introducing ITagHelperDiscoveryService and moving the tag helper construction logic into a set of TagHelperProducers. The ITagHelperDiscoveryService performs a single walk of the compilation or assembly and calls the producers as needed.

Importantly, the new process allows a more expansive cache to be maintained. There is now a per-assembly cache that holds onto TagHelperCollection instances. The old cache that was owned by providers via TagHelperCollector has been removed.

To complete this change, ITagHelperDescriptorProvider and related types have been deleted.


CI Build: https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/internal/_build/results?buildId=2842196&view=results
Toolset Run: https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/internal/_build/results?buildId=2842249&view=results

Copy link
Member

@davidwengier davidwengier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I hope that second last commit was mechanical, because I completely glossed over it. Last one wasn't much better :P

watch.Stop();

timingsSpan[0] = (provider.GetType().Name, watch.Elapsed);
timingsSpan = timingsSpan[1..];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Definitely no problem with this, but it still feels like if we had something like a FixedSizeArrayBuilder, this would flow a bit more natural for me.

Copy link
Member Author

@DustinCampbell DustinCampbell Nov 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For sure! I've been thinking about bringing that type over too.


if (builder.Configuration.LanguageVersion >= RazorLanguageVersion.Version_3_0)
{
builder.Features.Add(new BindTagHelperProducer.Factory());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

builder.Features.Add(new BindTagHelperProducer.Factory());

Is DefaultTagHelperProducer.Factory special in that it's not needed in here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

DefaultTagHelperProducer.Factory is less of a "default" and more of a "producer for legacy tag helpers". I left the name as "Default" because it was previously called DefaultTagHelperDescriptorProvider. It's the thing that makes ITagHelper derived tag helper descriptors. By default, the compiler doesn't use it. It gets added by the various RazorExtensions.Register(...) calls though.

Amusingly, the source generator added two instances of DefaultTagHelperDescriptorProvider. It added one specifically (which I removed below) and a second was added because it unconditionally calls RazorExtensions.Register(...).

These are the ITagHelperDescriptorProvider instances the Razor source generator uses for tag helper discovery on main. Note that there's two "DefaultTagHelperProviderDescriptor" instances in there.

Image


internal abstract class TagHelperProducer
{
public abstract class FactoryBase : RazorEngineFeatureBase, IRazorEngineFeature, ITagHelperProducerFactory
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FactoryBase

Would it make sense for this to be genericized to the specific TagHelperProducer type it returns?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I spent some time exploring that, but it didn't add value because everything ultimately calls through ITagHelperProducerFactory.

{
// First, let producers add any static tag helpers they might have.
// Also, capture any producers that need to analyze types.
using var _ = ArrayPool<TagHelperProducer>.Shared.GetPooledArraySpan(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ArrayPool

Is there an advantage to using this over a MemoryBuilder?

Copy link
Member Author

@DustinCampbell DustinCampbell Nov 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not really. I just don't think to reach for MemoryBuilder when I don't need a builder that grows. When I need a fixed-sized buffer, I tend to just go right to ArrayPool<>.

@ToddGrun
Copy link
Contributor

This looks great. I think I find this easier to understand now.

DustinCampbell added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2025
| Prelude | [Part 1](#12504) | [Part
2](#12505) | [Part
3](#12506) | [Part
4](#12507) | [Part
5](#12509) |

This is a set of support utilities and helpers added as part of the
`TagHelperCollection` changes:

- Added `InterlockedOperations.Initialize(...)` overloads for lock free
initialization with a factory method.
(f3686aa)
- Added two `LazyValue` structs that use the new
`InterlockedOperations.Initialize(...)` overloads. These are useful for
lazily initializing a value without extra allocations or locks.
(81795f5)
- Added `OverloadResolutionPriorityAttribute` polyfill type.
(27ab174)
- Refactored `TagHelperCache` to extract `CleanableWeakCache<TKey,
TValue>`. This caches items as weak references. When the number of items
added reaches a configurable threshold, the cache is cleaned up, and any
dead weak references are removed.
(673a9b5)

----
CI Build:
https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/internal/_build/results?buildId=2842136&view=results
Toolset Run:
https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/internal/_build/results?buildId=2842197&view=results
@DustinCampbell
Copy link
Member Author

This looks great. I think I find this easier to understand now.

I'm glad you think so! I agree!

Copy link
Contributor

@ToddGrun ToddGrun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

DustinCampbell added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2025
| [Prelude](#12503) | Part 1 | [Part
2](#12505) | [Part
3](#12506) | [Part
4](#12507) | [Part
5](#12509) |

This pull request represents all new code! It introduces a new immutable
collection type, `TagHelperCollection`, that is designed to contain
`TagHelperDescriptors`. It is built with the following principles:

1. Guarantee that collections never contain duplicate tag helpers.
2. Collections can be compared efficiently via checksums.
3. Multiple collections can be merged into a single collection
efficiently, with minimal array copying.
4. Determining whether a collection contains a tag helper is efficient.

> [!TIP]
> Since this is all new code, I recommend reviewing commit-by-commit.
Each commit represents a cohesive portion of new code.

----
CI Build:
https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/internal/_build/results?buildId=2842145&view=results
Toolset Run:
https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/internal/_build/results?buildId=2842216&view=results
DustinCampbell added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2025
| [Prelude](#12503) | [Part
1](#12504) | Part 2 | [Part
3](#12506) | [Part
4](#12507) | [Part
5](#12509) |

> [!WARNING]
> This pull request contains breaking changes for the RazorSdk. Once
this is merged and flows to the VMR,
dotnet/dotnet@9a7e708
will need to be cherry-picked to resolve build breaks in
`src/sdk/src/RazorSdk`.

These commits represent the (mostly) mechanical changes needed to
integrate `TagHelperCollection` across the Razor code base. Most
references to `ImmutableArrary<TagHelperDescriptor>`,
`IReadOnlyList<TagHelperDescriptor>`,
`IEnumerable<TagHelperDescriptor>`, and `TagHelperDescriptor[]` have
been replaced with `TagHelperCollection`. This is **by far** the largest
of the `TagHelperCollection` pull requests.

While most of the commits contain mechanical changes across the code
base, there are few that include more substantial work that require a
bit more scrutiny:

- **Update `RenameService` to remove
`ImmutableArray<TagHelperDescriptor>`**
(fa3ad2b)
This includes a fair amount of refactoring in `RenameService` to fix
bugs found when moving to `TagHelperCollection`.

- **Update `TagHelperFacts` to use `TagHelperCollection`**
Extra work was done in `DirectiveAttributeComplationItemProvider` to
clean up a bit following #12473.

----
CI Build:
https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/internal/_build/results?buildId=2842165&view=results
Toolset Run:
https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/internal/_build/results?buildId=2842237&view=results
DustinCampbell added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2025
…c in source generator (#12506)

| [Prelude](#12503) | [Part
1](#12504) | [Part
2](#12505) | Part 3 | [Part
4](#12507) | [Part
5](#12509) |

This is a relatively small change to remove LINQ from the Razor source
generator and use `TagHelperCollection` when checking for added/removed
tag helpers.

----
CI Build:
https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/internal/_build/results?buildId=2842169&view=results
Toolset Run:
https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/internal/_build/results?buildId=2842240&view=results
Add TagHelperDiscoveryService to the compiler that manages calling into ITagHelperDescriptorProviders. All existing code that previously used ITagHelperDecriptorProviders directly now uses TagHelperDiscoveryService.

TagHelperDiscoveryService manages a per-assembly cache using the existing AssemblySymbolData infrastructure. Currently, this is essentially a copy-paste of the per-assembly cache in TagHelperCollector.
BindTagHelperDescriptorProvider and ComponentTagHelperDescriptorProvider are a bit unique in that there's a dependency between them. When BindTagHelperDescriptorProvider runs, it walks all of the previously added tag helpers and tries to add bind tag helpers for any components.

This change breaks this dependency by introducing BindTagHelperProducer, which is used by both BindTagHelperDescriptorProvider and ComponentTagHelperDescriptorProvider. Now, ComponentTagHelperDescriptorProvider is responsible for adding bind tag helpers for the components any it adds.
- Move assembly-walking algorithm from TagHelperCollector to TagHelperDiscoveryService.
- Introduce TagHelperDiscoverer to cache details derived from a compilation while walking assemblies.
- Delete ITagHelperDescriptorProvider and all implementations
- Use a ConcurrentDIctionary<int, TagHelperCollection> as the per-assembly cache and compute the key based on both options and the selected producers.
- Add new RegisterDefaultTagHelperProducer API for RazorSdk to use rather than directly referencing DefaultTagHelperDescriptorProvider.
- Update tests
@DustinCampbell DustinCampbell changed the base branch from dev/dustinca/taghelpercollection-part3-source-generator-optimization to main November 24, 2025 19:35
@DustinCampbell DustinCampbell force-pushed the taghelpercollection-part4-rewrite-tag-helper-discovery branch from d4020af to f4a353a Compare November 24, 2025 19:36
@DustinCampbell DustinCampbell merged commit a845656 into dotnet:main Nov 24, 2025
11 checks passed
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added this to the Next milestone Nov 24, 2025
@DustinCampbell DustinCampbell deleted the taghelpercollection-part4-rewrite-tag-helper-discovery branch November 24, 2025 20:20
DustinCampbell added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2025
…xt (#12509)

| [Prelude](#12503) | [Part
1](#12504) | [Part
2](#12505) | [Part
3](#12506) | [Part
4](#12507) | Part 5 |

This change introduces a weak cache for `TagHelperDocumentContext` keyed
by the tag helper prefix string and `TagHelperCollection` checksum. This
helps avoid creating new `TagHelperBinders` for the same set of tag
helpers, since `TagHelperBinder` is expensive to create.

----
CI Build:
https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/internal/_build/results?buildId=2842228&view=results
Toolset Run:
https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/internal/_build/results?buildId=2842250&view=results
@davidwengier davidwengier modified the milestones: Next, 18.3 Jan 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants