[Draft] Adding distinction between Placement Filters that use Request Context… #9480
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… and those that don't This would be to allow usage of the Request Context if required but also allow for filters without accessing it. Those filters that don't access RequestContext can potentially cache results between membership updates (though that does assume that they wouldn't return any different results if the membership stayed the same).
Contributor
Author
|
Closing in favor of #9482 |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
… and those that don't
This would be to allow usage of the Request Context if required but also allow for filters without accessing it. Those filters that don't access RequestContext can potentially cache results between membership updates (though that does assume that they wouldn't return any different results if the membership stayed the same).
Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow