Improved style inheritance#31317
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR fixes a style inheritance issue where derived styles were not properly inheriting from their base styles when properties were overridden. The fix ensures that when a style is applied, the base style is first unapplied and then reapplied, allowing proper inheritance behavior.
- Corrects style inheritance by unapplying base styles before reapplying them in Style.ApplyCore
- Adds comprehensive unit tests to verify style inheritance works correctly across multiple levels
- Validates that overridden properties in derived styles are properly applied while maintaining base style properties
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| src/Controls/src/Core/Style.cs | Core fix adding base style unapplication before reapplication in ApplyCore method |
| src/Controls/tests/Xaml.UnitTests/Issues/Issue31280.xaml | Test XAML defining hierarchical styles with property overrides to validate inheritance |
| src/Controls/tests/Xaml.UnitTests/Issues/Issue31280.xaml.cs | Unit test class verifying that style inheritance works correctly for both compiled and non-compiled XAML |
|
Hey there @@kubaflo! Thank you so much for your PR! Someone from the team will get assigned to your PR shortly and we'll get it reviewed. |
|
🚀 Dogfood this PR with:
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dotnet/maui/main/eng/scripts/get-maui-pr.sh | bash -s -- 31317Or
iex "& { $(irm https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dotnet/maui/main/eng/scripts/get-maui-pr.ps1) } 31317" |
StephaneDelcroix
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this looks good, but Style changes have a tendency to create regressions, I'd recommend targeting net11.0
also, xaml unittests no longer use nunit but xunit
Cherry-pick of PR #31317 (commit 1d7b946) targeting net11.0. Fixed test to use xUnit patterns (XamlInflator, [Theory], Assert.Equal) instead of NUnit patterns ([TestFixture], [TestCase], Assert.AreEqual). Renamed test files from Issue31280 to Maui31280 per naming conventions. Fixes #31280 Co-authored-by: Jakub Florkowski <kubaflo123@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
StephaneDelcroix
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Multi-Model Consensus Review (5 models: claude-opus-4.6 ×2, claude-sonnet-4.6, gemini-3-pro-preview, gpt-5.3-codex)
CI Status: ✅ All checks passing
Consensus Findings
No consensus bugs found (5/5 models clean).
One model raised a potential re-entrancy concern via RemoveDynamicResource → OnBasedOnResourceChanged but this was not confirmed by any other model and does not reach consensus threshold.
Test Coverage
✅ Includes XAML test (Issue31280.xaml) and unit test (Issue31280.xaml.cs) exercising multi-level style inheritance with property overrides.
Verdict: ✅ Approve
Minimal, correct fix with proper safety guard. No regressions identified.
StephaneDelcroix
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
rename "Issue31280" to "Maui31280". IssueXXXXX used to track issues in the Xamarin.Forms repository, MauiXXXXX on maui
|
/azp run maui-pr |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
🤖 AI Summary📊 Expand Full Review —
|
| # | Source | Approach | Test Result | Files Changed | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PR | PR #31317 | Unapply base style before reapplying it during Style.ApplyCore, plus add a regression XAML unit test covering multi-level style inheritance with AppThemeBinding. |
⏳ PENDING (Gate) | src/Controls/src/Core/Style.cs, src/Controls/tests/Xaml.UnitTests/Issues/Maui31280.xaml, src/Controls/tests/Xaml.UnitTests/Issues/Maui31280.xaml.cs |
Original PR |
🚦 Gate — Test Verification
Gate Result: ❌ FAILED
Platform: android (host context); verification executed with platform-agnostic XAML unit tests because this PR adds no HostApp/UI test coverage.
Mode: Exact PR Validation
Test Project: src/Controls/tests/Xaml.UnitTests/Controls.Xaml.UnitTests.csproj
Test Filter: StyleInheritanceShouldWork
- Tests FAIL without fix: ✅
- Tests PASS with fix: ❌
Evidence
- The underlying regression is real: when the
Style.ApplyCorechange is removed, the regression reproduces and the deepest style resolvesTextColorto green instead of red. - However, the PR as submitted does not currently pass the new test project build because
src/Controls/tests/Xaml.UnitTests/Issues/Maui31280.xaml.csstill importsNUnit.Frameworkin an xUnit test project. - Exact PR-state validation fails with compile errors before test execution:
error CS0246: The type or namespace name 'NUnit' could not be founderror CS0246: The type or namespace name 'CollectionAttribute' could not be found
- As a result, the PR fix is not merge-ready in its current form even though the
Style.cslogic change itself appears to address the reported behavior once the test file is corrected.
🔧 Fix — Analysis & Comparison
Fix Candidates
| # | Source | Approach | Test Result | Files Changed | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | try-fix (claude-opus-4.6) | Detect style re-application in IStyle.Apply and call UnApplyCore before reapplying so stale AppThemeBinding state is cleared by the style itself. |
✅ PASS* | 2 files | Passed once the test file import was corrected to xUnit. |
| 2 | try-fix (claude-sonnet-4.6) | Replace the static OnBasedOnResourceChanged callback with a style-owned callback that captures the specific Style instance and reapplies the correct owner in ApplyCore. |
✅ PASS* | 2 files | Passed once the test file import was corrected to xUnit. |
| 3 | try-fix (gpt-5.3-codex) | Keep the callback static but route OnBasedOnResourceChanged to the matching style node in the BasedOn chain before unapply/reapply. |
✅ PASS* | 1 file | Passed once the test file import was corrected to xUnit. |
| 4 | try-fix (gemini-3-pro-preview) | Validate resource identity in OnBasedOnResourceChanged so nested style updates are ignored unless they match the root style's BaseResourceKey. |
✅ PASS* | 2 files | Passed once the test file import was corrected to xUnit. |
| 5 | try-fix (claude-opus-4.6 round 2) | Invert ApplyCore ordering so derived setters run before BasedOn, attempting to let derived values win via specificity/ordering instead of cleanup. |
❌ FAIL | 2 files | Fundamentally incompatible with persistent AppThemeBinding listeners. |
| 6 | try-fix (claude-sonnet-4.6 round 2) | Flatten the BasedOn chain into a winner map, unapply overridden base setters, and add a re-entrancy guard for the callback. |
✅ PASS* | 2 files | Works, but substantially more complex than the PR fix. |
| PR | PR #31317 | Unapply the base style before reapplying it inside Style.ApplyCore. |
❌ FAIL (Gate) | 3 files | Exact PR state fails to compile because Maui31280.xaml.cs uses NUnit.Framework in an xUnit project. |
* All passing try-fix attempts also corrected the test file import from using NUnit.Framework; to using Xunit;, which is required for the regression test project to compile.
Cross-Pollination
| Model | Round | New Ideas? | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| claude-opus-4.6 | 1 | Yes | Self-cleaning re-application in IStyle.Apply |
| claude-sonnet-4.6 | 1 | Yes | Make _basedOnResourceProperty callback style-owned instead of static/top-style-driven |
| gpt-5.3-codex | 1 | Yes | Resolve callback to matching owner within the BasedOn chain |
| gemini-3-pro-preview | 1 | Yes | Validate resource identity to filter callback cross-talk |
| claude-opus-4.6 | 2 | Yes | Invert ApplyCore order so base runs after derived at lower priority |
| claude-sonnet-4.6 | 2 | Yes | Flatten the BasedOn chain into one effective setter map |
| gpt-5.3-codex | 2 | No | NO NEW IDEAS |
| gemini-3-pro-preview | 2 | No | NO NEW IDEAS |
| claude-opus-4.6 | 3 | Yes | Add per-property style-precedence tokens to specificity/value provenance |
| claude-sonnet-4.6 | 3 | Yes | Apply AppThemeBinding through binding-engine precedence instead of value assignment |
| gpt-5.3-codex | 3 | Yes | Preserve lowered specificity inside AppThemeBinding callback updates |
| gemini-3-pro-preview | 3 | Yes | Remove stale bindings in Setter.Apply before setting plain values |
Exhausted: Partial — exploration found additional theoretical directions, but the exact PR state already fails gate due to a concrete test compile issue, so further alternative execution was not necessary to reach a recommendation.
Selected Fix: Keep the PR's Style.ApplyCore logic and also correct src/Controls/tests/Xaml.UnitTests/Issues/Maui31280.xaml.cs to use xUnit (using Xunit;). That is the simplest merge-ready path.
📋 Report — Final Recommendation
⚠️ Final Recommendation: REQUEST CHANGES
Phase Status
| Phase | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Flight | ✅ COMPLETE | Small Style fix plus new XAML regression test; issue verified on all platforms. |
| Gate | ❌ FAILED | Exact PR state does not build the new XAML test on the android-hosted review environment because Maui31280.xaml.cs imports NUnit.Framework in an xUnit project. |
| Try-Fix | ✅ COMPLETE | 6 executed attempts: 5 passing alternatives (all required the xUnit import correction), 1 failing alternative that confirmed cleanup of persistent AppThemeBinding state matters. |
| Report | ✅ COMPLETE |
Summary
The Style.ApplyCore logic change appears directionally correct: when I validated the behavior with the test file corrected to xUnit, the regression failed without the Style.cs change and passed with it. However, the PR as submitted is not merge-ready because the newly added test file still uses NUnit.Framework, so the XAML unit test project fails to compile before the regression can run.
Root Cause
There are two separate issues in the current PR state:
- Behavioral bug being fixed by the PR: multi-level
BasedOnstyle application combined withAppThemeBindingcan leave the deepest style inheriting the original base value (Green) instead of the intermediate override (Red). - New test wiring bug in the PR itself:
src/Controls/tests/Xaml.UnitTests/Issues/Maui31280.xaml.csimportsNUnit.Framework, butControls.Xaml.UnitTestsuses xUnit. That causes compile errors (CS0246forNUnit,CollectionAttribute, etc.) in exact PR-state validation.
Fix Quality
The implementation in src/Controls/src/Core/Style.cs is small and plausible, and the try-fix phase found multiple alternative passing strategies — but none were clearly better once complexity was considered. The simplest path is to keep the PR’s Style.ApplyCore logic and fix the regression test file to use xUnit (using Xunit;). Until that test import issue is corrected, I would not approve the PR.
|
/azp run maui-pr-uitests |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
…otnet#34548) <!-- Please let the below note in for people that find this PR --> > [!NOTE] > Are you waiting for the changes in this PR to be merged? > It would be very helpful if you could [test the resulting artifacts](https://github.com/dotnet/maui/wiki/Testing-PR-Builds) from this PR and let us know in a comment if this change resolves your issue. Thank you! ## Description Adds a [gh-aw (GitHub Agentic Workflows)](https://github.github.com/gh-aw/introduction/overview/) workflow that automatically evaluates test quality on PRs using the `evaluate-pr-tests` skill. ### What it does When a PR adds or modifies test files, this workflow: 1. **Checks out the PR branch** (including fork PRs) in a pre-agent step 2. **Runs the `evaluate-pr-tests` skill** via Copilot CLI in a sandboxed container 3. **Posts the evaluation report** as a PR comment using gh-aw safe-outputs ### Triggers | Trigger | When | Fork PR support | |---------|------|-----------------| | `pull_request` | Automatic on test file changes (`src/**/tests/**`) | ❌ Blocked by `pre_activation` gate | | `workflow_dispatch` | Manual — enter PR number | ✅ Works for all PRs | | `issue_comment` (`/evaluate-tests`) | Comment on PR |⚠️ Same-repo only (see Known Limitations) | ### Security model | Layer | Implementation | |-------|---------------| | **gh-aw sandbox** | Agent runs in container with scrubbed credentials, network firewall | | **Safe outputs** | Max 1 PR comment per run, content-limited | | **Checkout without execution** | `steps:` checks out PR code but never executes workspace scripts | | **Base branch restoration** | `.github/skills/`, `.github/instructions/`, `.github/copilot-instructions.md` restored from base branch after checkout | | **Fork PR activation gate** | `pull_request` events blocked for forks via `head.repo.id == repository_id` | | **Pinned actions** | SHA-pinned `actions/checkout`, `actions/github-script`, etc. | | **Minimal permissions** | Each job declares only what it needs | | **Concurrency** | One evaluation per PR, cancels in-progress | | **Threat detection** | gh-aw built-in threat detection analyzes agent output | ### Files added/modified - `.github/workflows/copilot-evaluate-tests.md` — gh-aw workflow source - `.github/workflows/copilot-evaluate-tests.lock.yml` — Compiled workflow (auto-generated by `gh aw compile`) - `.github/skills/evaluate-pr-tests/scripts/Gather-TestContext.ps1` — Test context gathering script (binary-safe file download, path traversal protection) - `.github/instructions/gh-aw-workflows.instructions.md` — Copilot instructions for gh-aw development ### Known Limitations **Fork PR evaluation via `/evaluate-tests` comment is not supported in v1.** The gh-aw platform inserts a `checkout_pr_branch.cjs` step after all user steps, which may overwrite base-branch skill files restored for fork PRs. This is a known gh-aw platform limitation — user steps always run before platform-generated steps, with no way to insert steps after. **Workaround:** Use `workflow_dispatch` (Actions UI → "Run workflow" → enter PR number) to evaluate fork PRs. This trigger bypasses the platform checkout step entirely and works correctly. **Related upstream issues:** - [github/gh-aw#18481](github/gh-aw#18481) — "Using gh-aw in forks of repositories" - [github/gh-aw#18518](github/gh-aw#18518) — Fork detection and warning in `gh aw init` - [github/gh-aw#18520](github/gh-aw#18520) — Fork context hint in failure messages - [github/gh-aw#18521](github/gh-aw#18521) — Fork support documentation ### Fixes - Fixes dotnet#34602 --------- Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jakub Florkowski <kubaflo123@gmail.com>
## Summary Enables the copilot-evaluate-tests gh-aw workflow to run on fork PRs by adding `forks: ["*"]` to the `pull_request` trigger and removing the fork guard from `Checkout-GhAwPr.ps1`. ## Changes 1. **copilot-evaluate-tests.md**: Added `forks: ["*"]` to opt out of gh-aw auto-injected fork activation guard. Scoped `Checkout-GhAwPr.ps1` step to `workflow_dispatch` only (redundant for other triggers since platform handles checkout). 2. **copilot-evaluate-tests.lock.yml**: Recompiled via `gh aw compile` — fork guard removed from activation `if:` conditions. 3. **Checkout-GhAwPr.ps1**: Removed the `isCrossRepository` fork guard. Updated header docs and restore comments to accurately describe behavior for all trigger×fork combinations (including corrected step ordering). 4. **gh-aw-workflows.instructions.md**: Updated all stale references to the removed fork guard. Documented `forks: ["*"]` opt-in, clarified residual risk model for fork PRs, and updated troubleshooting table. ## Security Model Fork PRs are safe because: - Agent runs in **sandboxed container** with all credentials scrubbed - Output limited to **1 comment** via `safe-outputs: add-comment: max: 1` - Agent **prompt comes from base branch** (`runtime-import`) — forks cannot alter instructions - Pre-flight check catches missing `SKILL.md` if fork isn't rebased on `main` - No workspace code is executed with `GITHUB_TOKEN` (checkout without execution) ## Testing - ✅ `workflow_dispatch` tested against fork PR dotnet#34621 - ✅ Lock.yml statically verified — fork guard removed from `if:` conditions - ⏳ `pull_request` trigger on fork PRs can only be verified post-merge (GitHub Actions reads lock.yml from default branch) --------- Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
…taType is compiled (dotnet#34717) ## Description Adds regression tests for dotnet#34713 verifying the XAML source generator correctly handles bindings with `Converter={StaticResource ...}` inside `x:DataType` scopes. Closes dotnet#34713 ## Investigation After thorough investigation of the source generator pipeline (`KnownMarkups.cs`, `CompiledBindingMarkup.cs`, `NodeSGExtensions.cs`): ### When converter IS in page resources (compile-time resolution ✅) `GetResourceNode()` walks the XAML tree, finds the converter resource, and `ProvideValueForStaticResourceExtension` returns the variable directly — **no runtime `ProvideValue` call**. The converter is referenced at compile time. ### When converter is NOT in page resources (runtime resolution ✅) `GetResourceNode()` returns null → falls through to `IsValueProvider` → generates `StaticResourceExtension.ProvideValue(serviceProvider)`. The `SimpleValueTargetProvider` provides the full parent chain, and `TryGetApplicationLevelResource` checks `Application.Current.Resources`. The binding IS still compiled into a `TypedBinding` — only the converter resolution is deferred. ### Verified on both `main` and `net11.0` All tests pass on both branches. ## Tests added | Test | What it verifies | |------|-----------------| | `SourceGenResolvesConverterAtCompileTime_ImplicitResources` | Converter in implicit `<Resources>` → compile-time resolution, no `ProvideValue` | | `SourceGenResolvesConverterAtCompileTime_ExplicitResourceDictionary` | Converter in explicit `<ResourceDictionary>` → compile-time resolution, no `ProvideValue` | | `SourceGenCompilesBindingWithConverterToTypedBinding` | Converter NOT in page resources → still compiled to `TypedBinding`, no raw `Binding` fallback | | `BindingWithConverterFromAppResourcesWorksCorrectly` × 3 | Runtime behavior correct for all inflators (Runtime, XamlC, SourceGen) | Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
) <!-- Please let the below note in for people that find this PR --> > [!NOTE] > Are you waiting for the changes in this PR to be merged? > It would be very helpful if you could [test the resulting artifacts](https://github.com/dotnet/maui/wiki/Testing-PR-Builds) from this PR and let us know in a comment if this change resolves your issue. Thank you! ### Description of Change Cherry-pick of #31317 targeting `net11.0`. Corrects style inheritance in `Style.ApplyCore` by unapplying the base style before reapplying it. Test updated from NUnit to xUnit patterns (`XamlInflator`, `[Theory]`, `Assert.Equal`) and renamed from `Issue31280` to `Maui31280` per conventions. ### Issues Fixed Fixes #31280 Co-authored-by: Jakub Florkowski <kubaflo123@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
<!-- Please let the below note in for people that find this PR --> > [!NOTE] > Are you waiting for the changes in this PR to be merged? > It would be very helpful if you could [test the resulting artifacts](https://github.com/dotnet/maui/wiki/Testing-PR-Builds) from this PR and let us know in a comment if this change resolves your issue. Thank you! ## Description Adds arcade inter-branch merge workflow and configuration to automate merging `net11.0` into the `release/11.0.1xx-preview3` branch. ### Files added | File | Purpose | |------|---------| | `github-merge-flow-release-11.jsonc` | Merge flow config — source `net11.0`, target `release/11.0.1xx-preview3` | | `.github/workflows/merge-net11-to-release.yml` | GitHub Actions workflow — triggers on push to net11.0, daily cron, manual dispatch | ### How it works Uses the shared [dotnet/arcade inter-branch merge infrastructure](https://github.com/dotnet/arcade/blob/main/.github/workflows/inter-branch-merge-base.yml): - **Event-driven**: triggers on push to `net11.0`, with daily cron safety net - **ResetToTargetPaths**: auto-resets `global.json`, `NuGet.config`, `eng/Version.Details.xml`, `eng/Versions.props`, `eng/common/*` to target branch versions - **QuietComments**: reduces GitHub notification noise - Skips PRs when only Maestro bot commits exist ### Incrementing for future releases When cutting a new release (e.g., preview4), update: 1. `github-merge-flow-release-11.jsonc` → change `MergeToBranch` value 2. `.github/workflows/merge-net11-to-release.yml` → update workflow `name` field Follows the same pattern as `merge-main-to-net11.yml` / `github-merge-flow-net11.jsonc`. Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
<!-- !!!!!!! MAIN IS THE ONLY ACTIVE BRANCH. MAKE SURE THIS PR IS TARGETING MAIN. !!!!!!! --> <!-- Enter description of the fix in this section --> ### Issues Fixed <!-- Please make sure that there is a bug logged for the issue being fixed. The bug should describe the problem and how to reproduce it. --> Fixes dotnet#33355 ### Description of Change This report has the goal to provide a detailed progress on the solution of the memory-leak The test consists doing 100 navigations between 2 pages, as the image below suggest <img width="876" height="502" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e9e80768-dd40-4445-9fc8-90469579236c" /> Running the gc-dump on the desired objects this is what I found. > BaseLine is the dump when the app starts. | | | | | | | ------------------------------------ | ------- | ------------ | -------------- | ------------------------ | | Object Type | Count | Size (Bytes) | Expected Count | Status | | **Page2** | **100** | 84,000 | 1 | ❌ **LEAKED** (99 extra) | | **PageHandler** | **103** | 9,888 | 4 | ❌ **LEAKED** (99 extra) | | **StackNavigationManager** | **102** | 16,320 | 1 | ❌ **LEAKED** (101 extra) | | **StackNavigationManager.Callbacks** | **102** | 5,712 | 1 | ❌ **LEAKED** (101 extra) | | **NavigationViewFragment** | **102** | 5,712 | ~2 | ❌ **LEAKED** (100 extra) | So the first fix was to call `Disconnect` handler, on the `previousDetail` during the `FlyoutPage.Detail_set`. The PageChanges and Navigated events will not see this, since this `set` is not considered a navigation in .Net Maui. After that we see the following data | | | | | | | ------------------------------------ | ------- | ------------ | ---------------------- | ------------ | | Object Type | Count | Size (Bytes) | vs Baseline | Status | | **Page2** | **100** | 84,000 | Same | ❌ **LEAKED** | | **PageHandler** | **103** | 9,888 | Same | ❌ **LEAKED** | | **StackNavigationManager** | **102** | 16,320 | Same | ❌ **LEAKED** | | **StackNavigationManager.Callbacks** | **1** | 56 | ✅ **FIXED!** (was 102) | ✅ **Good!** | | **NavigationViewFragment** | **102** | 5,712 | Same | ❌ **LEAKED** | So, calling the Disconnect handler will fix the leak at `StackNavigationManager.Callbacks`. Next step was to investigate the `StackNavigationManager` and see what's holding it. On `StackNavigationManager` I see lot of object that should be cleaned up in order to release other references from it. After cleaning it up the result is | | | | | | |---|---|---|---|---| |Object Type|Count|Size (Bytes)|vs Baseline|Status| |**Page2**|**1**|840|✅ **FIXED!** (was 100)|✅ **Perfect!**| |**PageHandler**|**4**|384|✅ **FIXED!** (was 103)|✅ **Perfect!**| |**StackNavigationManager**|**102**|16,320|❌ Still leaking (was 102)|❌ **Unchanged**| |**StackNavigationManager.Callbacks**|**1**|56|✅ Fixed (was 102)|✅ **Good!**| |**NavigationViewFragment**|**102**|5,712|❌ Still leaking (was 102)|❌ **Unchanged**| So something is still holding the `StackNavigationManager` and `NavigationViewFragment` so I changed the approach and found that `NavigationViewFragment` is holding everything and after fixing that, cleaning it up on `Destroy` method. here's the result | | | | | | |---|---|---|---|---| |Object Type|Count|Size (Bytes)|vs Previous|Status| |**Page2**|**1**|840|✅ Same|✅ **Perfect!**| |**PageHandler**|**4**|384|✅ Same|✅ **Perfect!**| |**StackNavigationManager**|**1**|160|🎉 **FIXED!** (was 102)|🎉 **FIXED!**| |**StackNavigationManager.Callbacks**|**1**|56|✅ Same|✅ **Perfect!**| |**NavigationViewFragment**|**102**|5,712|⚠️ Still present|⚠️ **Remaining**| With that there's still the leak of `NavigationViewFragment`, looking at the graph the something on Android side is holding it, there's no root into managed objects, as far the gcdump can tell. I tried to cleanup the `FragmentManager`, `NavController` and so on but without success (maybe I did it wrong). There's still one instance of page 2, somehow it lives longer, I don't think it's a leak object because since its value is 1. For reference the Page2 graph is ``` Page2 (1 instance) └── PageHandler └── EventHandler<FocusChangeEventArgs> └── IOnFocusChangeListenerImplementor (Native Android) └── UNDEFINED ``` Looking into www I found that android caches those Fragments, sadly in our case we don't reuse them. The good part is each object has only 56 bytes, so it shouldn't be a big deal, I believe we can take the improvements made by this PR and keep an eye on that, maybe that's fixed when moved to Navigation3 implementation.
Code Review — PR #31317Independent AssessmentWhat this changes: In Inferred motivation: When a derived style overrides a property set by a base style that uses Reconciliation with PR NarrativeAuthor claims: "Corrects style inheritance in Style.ApplyCore by unapplying the base style before reapplying it." Fixes #31280. Findings❌ Critical — Wrong
|
🟡 .NET MAUI Review - Changes SuggestedExpand Full Review -
|
Corrects style inheritance in Style.ApplyCore by unapplying the base style before reapplying it, fixing multi-level style property override. - Adds UnApply call before Apply in ApplyCore when basedOn is not null - Adds XAML unit test verifying multi-level style inheritance - Uses xUnit test patterns (XamlInflator, [Theory], Assert.Equal) Fixes dotnet#31280 Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
/azp run maui-pr-uitests maui-pr-devicetests |
|
No pipelines are associated with this pull request. |
Note
Are you waiting for the changes in this PR to be merged?
It would be very helpful if you could test the resulting artifacts from this PR and let us know in a comment if this change resolves your issue. Thank you!
Description of Change
Corrects style inheritance in Style.ApplyCore by unapplying the base style before reapplying it.
Issues Fixed
Fixes #31280