-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
enable eth and usdc.eth on mainnet #2013
Conversation
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
@itswisdomagain and I will be a bit busy with #1986, #2036, and #2025 for the next several days, so if anyone wants to push this branch to their remote and work on it, that's fine with me. |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Just pushed 5140620 to resolve #1733 (comment) (thank you @norwnd) |
Just pushed 6aed724 to address observations from final review of #1733 (review) |
Also need to review and probably further pad the |
Last commit 0abeb4e is in regard to #1733 (comment) and the new reality of the |
c87d4ba
to
6ae961e
Compare
Dropped the commit for block poll interval fiddling with routable hosts (likely public provider). Leaving the compiler settable interval commit. |
cad2f42
to
dd09bc5
Compare
9c95fbf
to
c29fe5f
Compare
Rebased and re-tested an ETH swap with DCR. Again the current ETHSwap contract is https://etherscan.io/address/0x8c17e4968b6903e1601be82ca989c5b5e2c7b400 |
Also re-tested with USDC mainnet. Contract is still https://etherscan.io/address/0x1bbd020ddd6dc01f974aa74d2d727b2a6782f32d#code%5C |
e3d4c73
to
3d51c27
Compare
I started a fresh dex, looked at the simnet exchange in view-only mode, had not yet tried to post any bonds, and I start seeing this log: |
There's some hangover from view-only. That looks like another thing. Will look into that on the bond-reserves branch. |
I don't quite get that error though if you didn't try to post any bonds (presumably didn't touch bond options either), I wonder why the view-only dex conn had |
d8ce193
to
82e78fa
Compare
I understand mainnet testing is a burden, so if there are troubles on that front we can chat on matrix and I can provide guidance. |
5331d29
to
e278924
Compare
One second is blazing fast for an RPC provider unless it's a local node.
Post-Merge, reorgs are very difficult: > even single-block reorgs are extremely difficult, because an > attacker controlling only a few validators has no way to beat the > honest majority of thousands of attesters. from https://www.paradigm.xyz/2021/07/ethereum-reorgs-after-the-merge#post-merge-ethereum-with-proof-of-stake
Ran another USDC swap today. Bad timing with gas (9am central is peak it seems), but otherwise it was fine. @martonp Thanks for testing. You reported on matrix that it worked smoothly, correct? @JoeGruffins has verified the contract source code via etherscan matches the contract in this PR. If one more person can also verify that, we can merge this. https://etherscan.io/address/0x8c17e4968b6903e1601be82ca989c5b5e2c7b400#code#L1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tested and it looks good to me!
Rebased on #2111Resolves #2010
ETHSwap: https://etherscan.io/address/0x8c17e4968b6903e1601be82ca989c5b5e2c7b400#code
ERC20Swap: https://etherscan.io/address/0x1bbd020ddd6dc01f974aa74d2d727b2a6782f32d#code
All code verified by etherscan